<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Sellers Party Like Its 1999</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:14:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ejaculation Trainer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-2930816</link>
		<dc:creator>Ejaculation Trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-2930816</guid>
		<description>The amount of money people are gettings for domains is crazy! I really started too late...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of money people are gettings for domains is crazy! I really started too late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Hosley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-2890032</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Hosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-2890032</guid>
		<description>I tend to disagree with you. I had once bought a niche related aged expired domain &amp; built a site on it. But nothing was so much as easy to get good organic rankings. It was just like any other new site for me! I didn&#039;t get the benefit of age. and it had even gone to sandbox for several months.
I think this tactic works better only in some specific low-competition  niches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to disagree with you. I had once bought a niche related aged expired domain &amp; built a site on it. But nothing was so much as easy to get good organic rankings. It was just like any other new site for me! I didn&#8217;t get the benefit of age. and it had even gone to sandbox for several months.<br />
I think this tactic works better only in some specific low-competition  niches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wutzke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-2534965</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wutzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-2534965</guid>
		<description>Rather than buying domains with good names, you may try buying aged domains from aftermarket.They bring in good search results ! And If you are lucky then you may get hold of a 9-12 yrs old domain too (like I did! )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than buying domains with good names, you may try buying aged domains from aftermarket.They bring in good search results ! And If you are lucky then you may get hold of a 9-12 yrs old domain too (like I did! )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clickfire Webmaster News &#187; No Slowdown in Domain Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1494222</link>
		<dc:creator>Clickfire Webmaster News &#187; No Slowdown in Domain Sales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1494222</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch posts that domain sellers are partying like it&#8217;s 1999.  The domain after-market is nearly as old as the internet itself. From domain and typo squatting through to legitimate ownership, the market for domain names has risen and fallen in line with the overall market. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch posts that domain sellers are partying like it&#8217;s 1999.  The domain after-market is nearly as old as the internet itself. From domain and typo squatting through to legitimate ownership, the market for domain names has risen and fallen in line with the overall market. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xkexbnpuxa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1481767</link>
		<dc:creator>xkexbnpuxa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1481767</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! kklffogzebjkb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! kklffogzebjkb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1463808</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1463808</guid>
		<description>Graham (#37):

Please contact us at ImpressiveDomains.com. We would be happy to assist you in the sale of your domains. We specialize in premium domains, and have a large network of professional buyers that we deal with.

We&#039;ve been a major player in the market for a number of years, with many sales in the six figure range (wallpapers.com, aos.com, everybody.com, cairo.com, blueberry.com, and MANY more). Most of our premium domains never get listed on our site, and most of our sales are never reported. Why? Because the investors we deal with don&#039;t like the publicity - they like to do their thing without drawing attention to themselves. So if you want top notch service and guaranteed results, give us a shot. 

To the readers of this forum: Here&#039;s the deal with valuations: Traffic = Money. Professional buyers aren&#039;t concerned about the price as much as the ROI - and with an average of 22% return, you can understand why there is such a frenzy.

Ashley Saddul
President
ImpressiveDomains.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham (#37):</p>
<p>Please contact us at ImpressiveDomains.com. We would be happy to assist you in the sale of your domains. We specialize in premium domains, and have a large network of professional buyers that we deal with.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been a major player in the market for a number of years, with many sales in the six figure range (wallpapers.com, aos.com, everybody.com, cairo.com, blueberry.com, and MANY more). Most of our premium domains never get listed on our site, and most of our sales are never reported. Why? Because the investors we deal with don&#8217;t like the publicity &#8211; they like to do their thing without drawing attention to themselves. So if you want top notch service and guaranteed results, give us a shot. </p>
<p>To the readers of this forum: Here&#8217;s the deal with valuations: Traffic = Money. Professional buyers aren&#8217;t concerned about the price as much as the ROI &#8211; and with an average of 22% return, you can understand why there is such a frenzy.</p>
<p>Ashley Saddul<br />
President<br />
ImpressiveDomains.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham F French</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1463068</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham F French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1463068</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe that some people are getting this much money for domains!!

I&#039;ve got about half a dozen domains lying around that could be worth a small fortune. Any suggestions on where is the best place to either sell or lease them?

Cheers

Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe that some people are getting this much money for domains!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got about half a dozen domains lying around that could be worth a small fortune. Any suggestions on where is the best place to either sell or lease them?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thirsty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1461507</link>
		<dc:creator>Thirsty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1461507</guid>
		<description>Does anyone think companies like; Ebay / MSFT / GOOGLE / Yahoo / Amazon will ever look at companies like; DemandMedia / NameMedia / DomainSponsor to acquire?

I have been seeing more and more context about this domain industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone think companies like; Ebay / MSFT / GOOGLE / Yahoo / Amazon will ever look at companies like; DemandMedia / NameMedia / DomainSponsor to acquire?</p>
<p>I have been seeing more and more context about this domain industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1461459</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1461459</guid>
		<description>Interesting post

To get my feet on the ground ........... in the last week I have had unsolicited offers for  a common word name  (www.sternum.com)

$25
$10
$135

So I think there are few trolling purchasers out there hoping to get a bargain!

Cheers Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post</p>
<p>To get my feet on the ground &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. in the last week I have had unsolicited offers for  a common word name  (www.sternum.com)</p>
<p>$25<br />
$10<br />
$135</p>
<p>So I think there are few trolling purchasers out there hoping to get a bargain!</p>
<p>Cheers Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stinky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1461399</link>
		<dc:creator>Stinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1461399</guid>
		<description>I reluctantly am putting www.stinkyninja.com plus 9 years of internet-changing content, up for sale. I will accept bids starting at $20,000. 

Remember, StinkyNinja.com has the world&#039;s first Andy Lawrence fan site, plus one of the first 5 JTT fan sites. Serious bids only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reluctantly am putting <a href="http://www.stinkyninja.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.stinkyninja.com'>http://www.stinkyninja.com</a> plus 9 years of internet-changing content, up for sale. I will accept bids starting at $20,000. </p>
<p>Remember, StinkyNinja.com has the world&#8217;s first Andy Lawrence fan site, plus one of the first 5 JTT fan sites. Serious bids only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetRichSlowly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1461113</link>
		<dc:creator>GetRichSlowly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1461113</guid>
		<description>To those who (still) doubt the vibrancy and legitimacy of the secondary domain marketplace, I invite you to visit the sales page of DNJournal.com...carefully noting the many different weekly buyers of these reported 2k+ priced domains...keeping in mind that these reported sales represent purhaps only some 10-30% of all such domain sales taking place each and every week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who (still) doubt the vibrancy and legitimacy of the secondary domain marketplace, I invite you to visit the sales page of DNJournal.com&#8230;carefully noting the many different weekly buyers of these reported 2k+ priced domains&#8230;keeping in mind that these reported sales represent purhaps only some 10-30% of all such domain sales taking place each and every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concrete Stain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460929</link>
		<dc:creator>Concrete Stain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460929</guid>
		<description>honestly .COM is the only worth having - besides .ORG or .EDU

I bet .gov is Not bad - but I never had one :?( heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honestly .COM is the only worth having &#8211; besides .ORG or .EDU</p>
<p>I bet .gov is Not bad &#8211; but I never had one <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /> ( heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460914</guid>
		<description>Anything that can be converted into a commodity has a value, whether it&#039;s unique or not... domains have finally matured as such.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything that can be converted into a commodity has a value, whether it&#8217;s unique or not&#8230; domains have finally matured as such.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kligman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460614</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kligman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460614</guid>
		<description>Keep your eyes on .TV

Demand Media is making a huge push on it and I rescently sold more the 16k worth of .tv names in the last 6 weeks. I also have been getting a lot more offers on some of my better names like Laptops.tv &amp; Opportunity.tv, but at Qoof we have huge development plans for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep your eyes on .TV</p>
<p>Demand Media is making a huge push on it and I rescently sold more the 16k worth of .tv names in the last 6 weeks. I also have been getting a lot more offers on some of my better names like Laptops.tv &amp; Opportunity.tv, but at Qoof we have huge development plans for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460449</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460449</guid>
		<description>Having spent the majority of the last 5 years in the domain aftermarket, I have to say that one of the best kept secrets has really opened up and it&#039;s great to see the larger market start to take notice. 

One thing about the &quot;right&quot; domains (I.E. Good Generic Search Terms .com) is that the traffic that goes to those pages is highly monetizable and targeted. Why do you think Google and Yahoo provide the ads for the CPC pages that go on the majority of these domains when in fact it’s competing search traffic? The traffic converts much better than their own organic search results is why. 

This is also why even though we consider ourselves a &quot;Web 2.0 Startup&quot;, we balked at going for one of the trendy voweless domains that most others are choosing and went straight for a good two word generic that means exactly what we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spent the majority of the last 5 years in the domain aftermarket, I have to say that one of the best kept secrets has really opened up and it&#8217;s great to see the larger market start to take notice. </p>
<p>One thing about the &#8220;right&#8221; domains (I.E. Good Generic Search Terms .com) is that the traffic that goes to those pages is highly monetizable and targeted. Why do you think Google and Yahoo provide the ads for the CPC pages that go on the majority of these domains when in fact it’s competing search traffic? The traffic converts much better than their own organic search results is why. </p>
<p>This is also why even though we consider ourselves a &#8220;Web 2.0 Startup&#8221;, we balked at going for one of the trendy voweless domains that most others are choosing and went straight for a good two word generic that means exactly what we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460439</link>
		<dc:creator>HK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460439</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good piece of news! I have lanuit.com which I try to sell since 2001! No success so far.

Admit that such a domain name is worth more than the $ 20 I give away every year to the parking company, huh! 
Nice post. I feel better now Duncan.
Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good piece of news! I have lanuit.com which I try to sell since 2001! No success so far.</p>
<p>Admit that such a domain name is worth more than the $ 20 I give away every year to the parking company, huh!<br />
Nice post. I feel better now Duncan.<br />
Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rami Kayyali</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rami Kayyali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460399</guid>
		<description>I think many fresh start-ups proved that the domain name itself is irrelevant. Sure it&#039;s cool to have a &quot;meaningful&quot; domain name, but with names like quizbi, flankshr and gwalalata, I don&#039;t think anyone will find a problem getting themselves a domain.

I think single-word domain names are somehow overrated (Pets.com for example?). Domains that are, or derive from, verbs or proper nouns offer very little help in branding. In fact, they can drag a business down to being confusing and forgettable.

But anyhow, buying domains and trying to foretell if they will sell is sort of like gambling, it&#039;s simply unpredictable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many fresh start-ups proved that the domain name itself is irrelevant. Sure it&#8217;s cool to have a &#8220;meaningful&#8221; domain name, but with names like quizbi, flankshr and gwalalata, I don&#8217;t think anyone will find a problem getting themselves a domain.</p>
<p>I think single-word domain names are somehow overrated (Pets.com for example?). Domains that are, or derive from, verbs or proper nouns offer very little help in branding. In fact, they can drag a business down to being confusing and forgettable.</p>
<p>But anyhow, buying domains and trying to foretell if they will sell is sort of like gambling, it&#8217;s simply unpredictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460281</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460281</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know... If they auctioned the names in the first place, this wouldn&#039;t be an issue, then they could charge the same fee as the auction every year for the name.

The only reason domain parking is profitable is that the &quot;squatters&quot; get the names at rock bottom prices from the registrars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know&#8230; If they auctioned the names in the first place, this wouldn&#8217;t be an issue, then they could charge the same fee as the auction every year for the name.</p>
<p>The only reason domain parking is profitable is that the &#8220;squatters&#8221; get the names at rock bottom prices from the registrars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460188</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460188</guid>
		<description>To second Paul&#039;s comments, this talk about Business.com is driving me mad.  The domain has value, but it&#039;s a business for sale...not just a domain:

http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/25/businesscom-confusion-spreads-across-web/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To second Paul&#8217;s comments, this talk about Business.com is driving me mad.  The domain has value, but it&#8217;s a business for sale&#8230;not just a domain:</p>
<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/25/businesscom-confusion-spreads-across-web/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/25/businesscom-confusion-spreads-across-web/'>http://domainna...ads-across-web/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domba</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460122</link>
		<dc:creator>domba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460122</guid>
		<description>Look at swers.us ready for sale and have 1 bidder at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at swers.us ready for sale and have 1 bidder at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460107</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460107</guid>
		<description>Fullalbums.com up for sale! hit the contact page for contact info. 

--starving college student</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fullalbums.com up for sale! hit the contact page for contact info. </p>
<p>&#8211;starving college student</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1460078</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1460078</guid>
		<description>Duncan, your reporting the sale of Business.com in this context is misleading. Whoever is buying Business.com is buying an entire business -- one with an EBITDA of about $15 million. They&#039;re not merely buying a domain name.

You should correct your post to reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, your reporting the sale of Business.com in this context is misleading. Whoever is buying Business.com is buying an entire business &#8212; one with an EBITDA of about $15 million. They&#8217;re not merely buying a domain name.</p>
<p>You should correct your post to reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isedb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1459895</link>
		<dc:creator>isedb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1459895</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Domain Market Is Hot Again...&lt;/strong&gt;

Last week some $10 million changed hands at auction for domain sales, with 16 domains being sold for 6 figures. Free Credit Check.com &amp; Credit Check.com sold together for $3 million, although as the DomainTools Blog points out this was at a relatively ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Domain Market Is Hot Again&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Last week some $10 million changed hands at auction for domain sales, with 16 domains being sold for 6 figures. Free Credit Check.com &amp; Credit Check.com sold together for $3 million, although as the DomainTools Blog points out this was at a relatively &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1459767</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1459767</guid>
		<description>Good News worth reading thanks !

www.crawlingthenet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good News worth reading thanks !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crawlingthenet.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.crawlingthenet.com'>http://www.crawlingthenet.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-1459745</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/domain-sellers-party-like-its-1999/#comment-1459745</guid>
		<description>Yes, the real estate / domain name analogy is the one that fits.

I own over many domains and revenue has been trending up for years and that should continue as long as:

1) population is growing

2) the % of the population using the Internet is growing

3) the economy (and advertising) is growing

4) the % of ad $ spent on the Internet is growing.

That a perfect storm and people have been blind to it or poo-pooing it for years and many still do.  Probably the same people who sat on the stock market sidelines until March of 2000, when they leveraged the house to buy momentum stocks.  And probably the same ones who were renting all through the 1990s and early 2000s and then finally decided to buy that condo in Miami in 2005.

Not saying there won&#039;t be a speculative peak and a &quot;top tick&quot; sale to ring the bell at the peak of this cycle, there will be, but the trend should continue up over time.  Wash, rinse, repeat.  Same as always.

A big question is the domain name registrars and what they will do with prices, regulations, etc.  All it will take is some greed from the registrars and/or some sour grapes from connected people who want to take names they failed to buy when they had the chance.

Cheers,
Chrisco
http://www.buzzpal.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the real estate / domain name analogy is the one that fits.</p>
<p>I own over many domains and revenue has been trending up for years and that should continue as long as:</p>
<p>1) population is growing</p>
<p>2) the % of the population using the Internet is growing</p>
<p>3) the economy (and advertising) is growing</p>
<p>4) the % of ad $ spent on the Internet is growing.</p>
<p>That a perfect storm and people have been blind to it or poo-pooing it for years and many still do.  Probably the same people who sat on the stock market sidelines until March of 2000, when they leveraged the house to buy momentum stocks.  And probably the same ones who were renting all through the 1990s and early 2000s and then finally decided to buy that condo in Miami in 2005.</p>
<p>Not saying there won&#8217;t be a speculative peak and a &#8220;top tick&#8221; sale to ring the bell at the peak of this cycle, there will be, but the trend should continue up over time.  Wash, rinse, repeat.  Same as always.</p>
<p>A big question is the domain name registrars and what they will do with prices, regulations, etc.  All it will take is some greed from the registrars and/or some sour grapes from connected people who want to take names they failed to buy when they had the chance.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chrisco<br />
<a href="http://www.buzzpal.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.buzzpal.com'>http://www.buzzpal.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
