<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BitTorrent Users Respond to WWDC Leopard Leak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:12:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1457571</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1457571</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t know how his reporting on the illegal leak of a piece of software gives them the right wish awful, terrible things upon Nicholas’ family members, his mother especially, but that’s their prerogative.&quot;

No, it&#039;s not their prerogative : threatening or intimidating speech is not protected speech, and we all need to be less tolerant of that kind of behavior to encourage healthy debate.  

Our attitude, especially among those with influence, must be : Test the strength of my arguments if you can, test the thickness of my skin to character assault if you must, but once you threaten my safety, you are no longer welcome in any forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t know how his reporting on the illegal leak of a piece of software gives them the right wish awful, terrible things upon Nicholas’ family members, his mother especially, but that’s their prerogative.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not their prerogative : threatening or intimidating speech is not protected speech, and we all need to be less tolerant of that kind of behavior to encourage healthy debate.  </p>
<p>Our attitude, especially among those with influence, must be : Test the strength of my arguments if you can, test the thickness of my skin to character assault if you must, but once you threaten my safety, you are no longer welcome in any forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Pushkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1456006</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman Pushkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1456006</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just installed Leopard. Amazing!!! It looks great and works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just installed Leopard. Amazing!!! It looks great and works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1453198</link>
		<dc:creator>johnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1453198</guid>
		<description>Why are all the other OiNK users such flaming homophobes? (not to mention pretentious jackasses)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are all the other OiNK users such flaming homophobes? (not to mention pretentious jackasses)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452612</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452612</guid>
		<description>Anyone have an Oink invite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have an Oink invite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452597</guid>
		<description>Yawn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452576</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452576</guid>
		<description>Man you&#039;re quite the fag, Arrington. You and your fag crew cried for attention and got flamed. Boo hoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man you&#8217;re quite the fag, Arrington. You and your fag crew cried for attention and got flamed. Boo hoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452508</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452508</guid>
		<description>What I think is kind of nuts is that AADC Select members are still waiting to receieve a legal seed of this beta, and we pay apple north of $500 US a year for the privelege of receiving seeds for development purposes. 

The past couple of years Apple has restricted access to betas released at WWDC for months to only those who ponied up thousands of dollars to attend the conference. Now the only people who want the beta that don&#039;t have access to it are people who legitimatly need it. Whoever manages the development program at apple needs a reality check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is kind of nuts is that AADC Select members are still waiting to receieve a legal seed of this beta, and we pay apple north of $500 US a year for the privelege of receiving seeds for development purposes. </p>
<p>The past couple of years Apple has restricted access to betas released at WWDC for months to only those who ponied up thousands of dollars to attend the conference. Now the only people who want the beta that don&#8217;t have access to it are people who legitimatly need it. Whoever manages the development program at apple needs a reality check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452345</guid>
		<description>Sweet, I had no idea you could download a whole Mac OS :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, I had no idea you could download a whole Mac OS <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Story Whore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452176</link>
		<dc:creator>Story Whore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452176</guid>
		<description>The tech paparazzi at work. 
You must be really bored.
and yes I think the response was because Oink was singled out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tech paparazzi at work.<br />
You must be really bored.<br />
and yes I think the response was because Oink was singled out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Spahn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Spahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452130</guid>
		<description>Publicity stunt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publicity stunt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concrete Stain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452029</link>
		<dc:creator>Concrete Stain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452029</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t deserve a 2nd post on TC / 

 - Apple can&#039;t do much . - its out of the bag.

 - maybe they can trace the leak, then fire the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t deserve a 2nd post on TC / </p>
<p> &#8211; Apple can&#8217;t do much . &#8211; its out of the bag.</p>
<p> &#8211; maybe they can trace the leak, then fire the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Security Briefing: June 22nd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1452004</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Security Briefing: June 22nd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1452004</guid>
		<description>[...] BitTorrent Users Respond to WWDC Leopard Leak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BitTorrent Users Respond to WWDC Leopard Leak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: predictable</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451926</link>
		<dc:creator>predictable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451926</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s somewhat annoying that you troll for attention and act surprised when you get flamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s somewhat annoying that you troll for attention and act surprised when you get flamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451842</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451842</guid>
		<description>there was a torrent of Leopard&#039;s latest build on Pirate Bay about 24-48 hours after the keynote. You&#039;re way behind the curve on this. More to the point, who cares? Most of the downloaders just want to try it out and will then dump it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there was a torrent of Leopard&#8217;s latest build on Pirate Bay about 24-48 hours after the keynote. You&#8217;re way behind the curve on this. More to the point, who cares? Most of the downloaders just want to try it out and will then dump it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451692</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451692</guid>
		<description>A STRICTLY enforced rule of oink is that your avatar must be &quot;cute.&quot; Having a non-cute avatar is a bannable offense.

The reverence for oink comes because it is perfect. It blows the original Napster away as far as quantity, quality, and speed. I paid 5 euros for two invites a while ago and haven&#039;t been able to get my ratio up high enough to get any more invites and I probably never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A STRICTLY enforced rule of oink is that your avatar must be &#8220;cute.&#8221; Having a non-cute avatar is a bannable offense.</p>
<p>The reverence for oink comes because it is perfect. It blows the original Napster away as far as quantity, quality, and speed. I paid 5 euros for two invites a while ago and haven&#8217;t been able to get my ratio up high enough to get any more invites and I probably never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoR</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451676</link>
		<dc:creator>VoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451676</guid>
		<description>I think part of the problem is that Oink users feel their tracker is being singled out when other trackers had this before them.

Obviously that doesn&#039;t give them the right to be offensive but I can see their point if it&#039;s this that is irritating them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the problem is that Oink users feel their tracker is being singled out when other trackers had this before them.</p>
<p>Obviously that doesn&#8217;t give them the right to be offensive but I can see their point if it&#8217;s this that is irritating them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex H</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451639</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451639</guid>
		<description>John,

A question: Why should they have any respect for a CrunchGear reporter when the CrunchGear reporter has no respect for the property of others?

Bloggers seem to demand a halo around them.

I see a lot of bloggers using freedom of speech and knowledge as a way to justify their writings and such &#039;leaks&#039;. But what about the right of property that is derived from the hard working labour that is put into it?

Bloggers are so incredibly one dimensional it ain&#039;t even funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>A question: Why should they have any respect for a CrunchGear reporter when the CrunchGear reporter has no respect for the property of others?</p>
<p>Bloggers seem to demand a halo around them.</p>
<p>I see a lot of bloggers using freedom of speech and knowledge as a way to justify their writings and such &#8216;leaks&#8217;. But what about the right of property that is derived from the hard working labour that is put into it?</p>
<p>Bloggers are so incredibly one dimensional it ain&#8217;t even funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n/a</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451538</link>
		<dc:creator>n/a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451538</guid>
		<description>Yes, it was on Oink, but it was on Demonoid long beforehand (at least 4 hours). Also, Oink was not down for most of the day, or at all as far as I could tell, as I was in the forums and actively downloading content all day. Way to dig for sensationalism instead of fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it was on Oink, but it was on Demonoid long beforehand (at least 4 hours). Also, Oink was not down for most of the day, or at all as far as I could tell, as I was in the forums and actively downloading content all day. Way to dig for sensationalism instead of fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Price</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451528</guid>
		<description>Oink has this strange mythology around it... whenever I&#039;ve heard anyone talk about it, there is a strange reverence they treat it with, like it is some secret fountain of youth they want to protect. I have also heard that ANY breaks in the extremely tight Oink protocol will be punished by immediate banishment... and somehow people are supposed to be able to &quot;track you down&quot; if you break the rules and continue to ban you from the site long after your first infraction... and they ALWAYS catch RIAA stooges... sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oink has this strange mythology around it&#8230; whenever I&#8217;ve heard anyone talk about it, there is a strange reverence they treat it with, like it is some secret fountain of youth they want to protect. I have also heard that ANY breaks in the extremely tight Oink protocol will be punished by immediate banishment&#8230; and somehow people are supposed to be able to &#8220;track you down&#8221; if you break the rules and continue to ban you from the site long after your first infraction&#8230; and they ALWAYS catch RIAA stooges&#8230; sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451527</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451527</guid>
		<description>Oink users are pretty elitist. I think the pettiness comes from the considerable work groveling on forums most of them had to do to get their membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oink users are pretty elitist. I think the pettiness comes from the considerable work groveling on forums most of them had to do to get their membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incredible</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451525</link>
		<dc:creator>Incredible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451525</guid>
		<description>Is there really that little to report beyond this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really that little to report beyond this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qikki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451519</link>
		<dc:creator>qikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451519</guid>
		<description>So, let me see if I understand this; you posted a pointless &#039;story&#039; on Cruchgear that wasn&#039;t news to anyone, got a nasty response for it, and now you&#039;re posting about that as a story on techcrunch?  Seriously, is cruchgear that hurting for traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let me see if I understand this; you posted a pointless &#8217;story&#8217; on Cruchgear that wasn&#8217;t news to anyone, got a nasty response for it, and now you&#8217;re posting about that as a story on techcrunch?  Seriously, is cruchgear that hurting for traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451489</link>
		<dc:creator>TCReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451489</guid>
		<description>Seems as though OiNK is having DNS issues.

I haven&#039;t tried to login myself, but the site is up and can be reached by IP: http://85.17.40.71/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems as though OiNK is having DNS issues.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried to login myself, but the site is up and can be reached by IP: <a href="http://85.17.40.71/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://85.17.40.71/'>http://85.17.40.71/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451488</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451488</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think these are Mac users being idiots - rather immature Oink members who didn&#039;t want their precious &quot;news&quot; being spread. (Of course if they&#039;re downloading Leopard they probably are Mac users, but anyway...)

Remember the golden rule - Don&#039;t feed the trolls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think these are Mac users being idiots &#8211; rather immature Oink members who didn&#8217;t want their precious &#8220;news&#8221; being spread. (Of course if they&#8217;re downloading Leopard they probably are Mac users, but anyway&#8230;)</p>
<p>Remember the golden rule &#8211; Don&#8217;t feed the trolls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnml</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-1451487</link>
		<dc:creator>mnml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/21/bittorrent-users-respond-to-wwdc-leopard-leak/#comment-1451487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OS X Leopard leaks, sends torrent downloaders in a frenzy...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some things will never change.  
It seems that Apple&#8217;s next version of OS X, named Leopard, has been leaked onto the internet and has quickly spread to almost all popular bittorrent trackers.  Downloads of the beta OS have skyrocketed as download...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OS X Leopard leaks, sends torrent downloaders in a frenzy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some things will never change.<br />
It seems that Apple&#8217;s next version of OS X, named Leopard, has been leaked onto the internet and has quickly spread to almost all popular bittorrent trackers.  Downloads of the beta OS have skyrocketed as download&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
