<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PayPerPost Raises $7 million More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:02:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TenBestStocks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-2/#comment-2288660</link>
		<dc:creator>TenBestStocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-2288660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TenBestStocks...&lt;/strong&gt;

The best stock investing systems will be based principally on objective, measurable data.  It\&#039;s critical to \&quot;exorcise\&quot; the emotions from the investor\&#039;s buy/sell decisions....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TenBestStocks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The best stock investing systems will be based principally on objective, measurable data.  It\&#8217;s critical to \&#8221;exorcise\&#8221; the emotions from the investor\&#8217;s buy/sell decisions&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; [fr] eBuzzing lance une agence de publi-Blogs en France</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1656418</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; [fr] eBuzzing lance une agence de publi-Blogs en France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1656418</guid>
		<description>[...] billet n&#8217;est pas au goût de la marque. Le modèle cependant a intéressé le très sérieux fonds d&#8217;investissement Drapper Fisher et a donné naissance à quelques [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billet n&#8217;est pas au goût de la marque. Le modèle cependant a intéressé le très sérieux fonds d&#8217;investissement Drapper Fisher et a donné naissance à quelques [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FVB &#62;&#62;  PayPerPost Revolution Accelerates, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1433338</link>
		<dc:creator>FVB &#62;&#62;  PayPerPost Revolution Accelerates, Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1433338</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FVB &gt;&gt;  PayPerPost Revolution Accelerates, Again...&lt;/strong&gt;

The result: PPP&#039;s Consumer Generated Advertising revolution is growing faster than ever -- signups by 11am today are already 2X our largest day ever....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FVB &gt;&gt;  PayPerPost Revolution Accelerates, Again&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The result: PPP&#8217;s Consumer Generated Advertising revolution is growing faster than ever &#8212; signups by 11am today are already 2X our largest day ever&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;ve hit the 10,000 dollar mark! &#124; Tricia's Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1428631</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;ve hit the 10,000 dollar mark! &#124; Tricia's Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 05:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1428631</guid>
		<description>[...] I find kind of amusing is that in the comment section of one of the recent posts on Michael Arrington&#8217;s Blog, Techcrunch, one of the commenters stated that the majority of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I find kind of amusing is that in the comment section of one of the recent posts on Michael Arrington&#8217;s Blog, Techcrunch, one of the commenters stated that the majority of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1424321</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve's Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1424321</guid>
		<description>Dave G:
It&#039;s more than just buying text link. The advertiser get some feedback from reviewers. You don&#039;t get that with other types of traditional advertisement(TLA, Adsense or Banners).  Plus, the &quot;stay-at-home moms...&quot; get experience writing reviews that will make them more professional in time. I have also seen poor reviews from the competitions. 

P.S. I was not aware of the controversies about PPP and people seems to judge them on past issues. You adapt or die and I guest they adapted to criticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave G:<br />
It&#8217;s more than just buying text link. The advertiser get some feedback from reviewers. You don&#8217;t get that with other types of traditional advertisement(TLA, Adsense or Banners).  Plus, the &#8220;stay-at-home moms&#8230;&#8221; get experience writing reviews that will make them more professional in time. I have also seen poor reviews from the competitions. </p>
<p>P.S. I was not aware of the controversies about PPP and people seems to judge them on past issues. You adapt or die and I guest they adapted to criticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.ChrisMerriman.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1424130</link>
		<dc:creator>www.ChrisMerriman.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1424130</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PayPerPost $7 Million Injection...&lt;/strong&gt;

For those that have not come across them yet, Pay Per Post is a company that helps companies get their products and sites noticed, and improve their search engine rankings. They act as the middleman to enable companies to advertise on blogs by keeping ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PayPerPost $7 Million Injection&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>For those that have not come across them yet, Pay Per Post is a company that helps companies get their products and sites noticed, and improve their search engine rankings. They act as the middleman to enable companies to advertise on blogs by keeping &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423988</guid>
		<description>PPP is a link spamming scheme...and everyone who has money invested in that company knows it.

I personally see no issues with the &quot;ethics&quot; part of being paid to blog about something - but that is not the business PPP or its posties are in.

PPP facilitates the buying and selling of text links - that is their business.  Ted came up with a really smart way of doing it - turn a bunch of stay-at-home moms and struggling students (or whoever) into spammers @ $10 a pop and keep a portion.

Can/will they make money?...sure they will - in the short term.  

Will the major SE&#039;s work hard to kill any link coming from these spammers?...of course - I would bet money that they are working on it right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPP is a link spamming scheme&#8230;and everyone who has money invested in that company knows it.</p>
<p>I personally see no issues with the &#8220;ethics&#8221; part of being paid to blog about something &#8211; but that is not the business PPP or its posties are in.</p>
<p>PPP facilitates the buying and selling of text links &#8211; that is their business.  Ted came up with a really smart way of doing it &#8211; turn a bunch of stay-at-home moms and struggling students (or whoever) into spammers @ $10 a pop and keep a portion.</p>
<p>Can/will they make money?&#8230;sure they will &#8211; in the short term.  </p>
<p>Will the major SE&#8217;s work hard to kill any link coming from these spammers?&#8230;of course &#8211; I would bet money that they are working on it right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Josh Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423890</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Josh Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423890</guid>
		<description>Your insinuation that this is a bad sign is wrong.  I&#039;d think that as a former attorney that dealt with startup companies and venture investors and as a former entrepreneur at a venture backed startup that you would have understood this better.  
Investors oftentimes lead a Series B even if they were in the A to avoid any dilution b/c they believe things are going really really well.  I guess when Sequoia led the Series B for Youtube it wasn&#039;t a good thing either?  I&#039;m sure Youtube couldn&#039;t find anyone else to give them a Series B in all of Silicon Valley.  As an entrepreneur you also have to think about changing the Board dynamics and objectives of people in different securities by brining on a new investor/partner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your insinuation that this is a bad sign is wrong.  I&#8217;d think that as a former attorney that dealt with startup companies and venture investors and as a former entrepreneur at a venture backed startup that you would have understood this better.<br />
Investors oftentimes lead a Series B even if they were in the A to avoid any dilution b/c they believe things are going really really well.  I guess when Sequoia led the Series B for Youtube it wasn&#8217;t a good thing either?  I&#8217;m sure Youtube couldn&#8217;t find anyone else to give them a Series B in all of Silicon Valley.  As an entrepreneur you also have to think about changing the Board dynamics and objectives of people in different securities by brining on a new investor/partner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concrete Stain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423870</link>
		<dc:creator>Concrete Stain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423870</guid>
		<description>After 10 mil

 - would it be a stretch to say / The founders no longer have a majority share?

-RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 10 mil</p>
<p> &#8211; would it be a stretch to say / The founders no longer have a majority share?</p>
<p>-RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinL.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423557</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinL.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423557</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve reviewed PayPerPost, ReviewMe and CreamAid as someone who&#039;s actually used it as an advertiser. I found out some interesting things about how they do things. They all have their own charms and faults, but I think PPP is here to stay.

http://www.merchantcircle.com/corporate/blog/2007/06/payperpost-reviewme-and-creamaid-what.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve reviewed PayPerPost, ReviewMe and CreamAid as someone who&#8217;s actually used it as an advertiser. I found out some interesting things about how they do things. They all have their own charms and faults, but I think PPP is here to stay.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.merchantcircle.com/corporate/blog/2007/06/payperpost-reviewme-and-creamaid-what.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.merchantcircle.com/corporate/blog/2007/06/payperpost-reviewme-and-creamaid-what.html'>http://www.merc...amaid-what.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired: Fix Yer Darn Ads! - odd time signatures -</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423531</link>
		<dc:creator>Wired: Fix Yer Darn Ads! - odd time signatures -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423531</guid>
		<description>[...] am a Postie, but this is an unsolicited post], big congratulations are in order for Ted &amp; Co on receiving 7 million in their second round of funding. As usual, Michael Arrington is negative, but Josh Stein of DFJ corrects him straight away. Ted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am a Postie, but this is an unsolicited post], big congratulations are in order for Ted &amp; Co on receiving 7 million in their second round of funding. As usual, Michael Arrington is negative, but Josh Stein of DFJ corrects him straight away. Ted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incubaweb 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423486</link>
		<dc:creator>Incubaweb 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PayPerPost, pago por entradas en blogs...&lt;/strong&gt;

PayPerPost es un red de contactos entre empresas y bloggers, que permite que las empresas busquen escritores de blogs para promocionar sus compañías, productos o servicios y en los que los bloggers serán los encargado de escribir artículos patrocin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PayPerPost, pago por entradas en blogs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>PayPerPost es un red de contactos entre empresas y bloggers, que permite que las empresas busquen escritores de blogs para promocionar sus compañías, productos o servicios y en los que los bloggers serán los encargado de escribir artículos patrocin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drama 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423475</link>
		<dc:creator>Drama 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423475</guid>
		<description>I would love to better understand what PPP actually needs this type of money for. Even if you buy into the PPP concept and business model, based on what I can see there&#039;s no compelling rationale for the amount invested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to better understand what PPP actually needs this type of money for. Even if you buy into the PPP concept and business model, based on what I can see there&#8217;s no compelling rationale for the amount invested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bucks Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423464</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bucks Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423464</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pay Per Post Raises $7 Million....&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch&#8217;s  reported that PayPerPost recently raised an additional $7 million in capital.  This would presumably be a positive turn of events for Pay Per Post. 
However, some comments following that post seem to predict a ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pay Per Post Raises $7 Million&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Michael Arrington of Tech Crunch&#8217;s  reported that PayPerPost recently raised an additional $7 million in capital.  This would presumably be a positive turn of events for Pay Per Post.<br />
However, some comments following that post seem to predict a &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomthree</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423435</link>
		<dc:creator>tomthree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423435</guid>
		<description>TO #19 - Did your investors pay you to write that those nice things about them??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO #19 &#8211; Did your investors pay you to write that those nice things about them??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cross</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423429</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423429</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I wonder what happens when search engines starts devaluing all of these sites with Postie links and ReviewMe links?

All of the sudden PPP advertisers are not getting any link juice for their dollars spent with the posties and the blogger carnivals that are skewing PPP blogger&#039;s traffic numbers don&#039;t really generate any quality traffic for their ad dollars so why spend anymore money with PPP? 

I am not surprised PPP took an up round because Ted Murphy must have lots of ad industry connections that are willing to try PPP and I&#039;m sure they have seen some decent results thus far so client retention and revenue has been good. On the other hand, Matt Cutts has spelled out Google&#039;s intentions on the paid link front quite plainly and I think it is safe to say that the results current PPP advertisers are witnessing are at risk in the near future and this in turn places the whole PPP model at risk. 

My prediction -- Matt Cutts and Google will eat PPP&#039;s lunch and take back any ad dollars that Ted and Co., are just starting to get excited about.  In Google&#039;s mind it&#039;s a win-win.  PPP exists to game the search engines and creates spammy results AND it also takes away revenue (however miniscule that amount is compared to the whole pie). Either way it&#039;s a no-brainer for them from a quality and business perspective.

However, this is not the first time VCs have gone where angels fear to tread. Good luck to PPP in your cat and mouse game with Google. Guess who the mouse is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I wonder what happens when search engines starts devaluing all of these sites with Postie links and ReviewMe links?</p>
<p>All of the sudden PPP advertisers are not getting any link juice for their dollars spent with the posties and the blogger carnivals that are skewing PPP blogger&#8217;s traffic numbers don&#8217;t really generate any quality traffic for their ad dollars so why spend anymore money with PPP? </p>
<p>I am not surprised PPP took an up round because Ted Murphy must have lots of ad industry connections that are willing to try PPP and I&#8217;m sure they have seen some decent results thus far so client retention and revenue has been good. On the other hand, Matt Cutts has spelled out Google&#8217;s intentions on the paid link front quite plainly and I think it is safe to say that the results current PPP advertisers are witnessing are at risk in the near future and this in turn places the whole PPP model at risk. </p>
<p>My prediction &#8212; Matt Cutts and Google will eat PPP&#8217;s lunch and take back any ad dollars that Ted and Co., are just starting to get excited about.  In Google&#8217;s mind it&#8217;s a win-win.  PPP exists to game the search engines and creates spammy results AND it also takes away revenue (however miniscule that amount is compared to the whole pie). Either way it&#8217;s a no-brainer for them from a quality and business perspective.</p>
<p>However, this is not the first time VCs have gone where angels fear to tread. Good luck to PPP in your cat and mouse game with Google. Guess who the mouse is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sindy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423417</guid>
		<description>#32 Rob - If the shoe fits ...

You do realize though that titles aren&#039;t all they&#039;re cracked up to be, right?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32 Rob &#8211; If the shoe fits &#8230;</p>
<p>You do realize though that titles aren&#8217;t all they&#8217;re cracked up to be, right?  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423406</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423406</guid>
		<description>Haha, PPP is indeed a great tool but lately people are trying to do what PPP does them selves on webmaster forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, PPP is indeed a great tool but lately people are trying to do what PPP does them selves on webmaster forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sindy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423402</link>
		<dc:creator>Sindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423402</guid>
		<description>#33 It&#039;s not evil, it&#039;s incorrect.  The &quot;majority&quot; of PayPerPost posties simply cannot be mommy bloggers due to the demographic makeup.  I am not disputing that the majority of blogs in the marketplace are low traffic, what I am disputing is that the majority of those low traffic blogs are written by mommy bloggers. If you had stats of all the blogs, perhaps you could prove that the female bloggers hold a greater percentage of the low traffic blogs.  But you don&#039;t have that information so you&#039;re purely speculating and feeding a stereotype.

My blog is pretty low key and has relatively low traffic, however I still had over 5000 visits in May alone; 2100+ uniques.  That&#039;s nothing compared to Kat, but it&#039;s certainly more than 3 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33 It&#8217;s not evil, it&#8217;s incorrect.  The &#8220;majority&#8221; of PayPerPost posties simply cannot be mommy bloggers due to the demographic makeup.  I am not disputing that the majority of blogs in the marketplace are low traffic, what I am disputing is that the majority of those low traffic blogs are written by mommy bloggers. If you had stats of all the blogs, perhaps you could prove that the female bloggers hold a greater percentage of the low traffic blogs.  But you don&#8217;t have that information so you&#8217;re purely speculating and feeding a stereotype.</p>
<p>My blog is pretty low key and has relatively low traffic, however I still had over 5000 visits in May alone; 2100+ uniques.  That&#8217;s nothing compared to Kat, but it&#8217;s certainly more than 3 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423388</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423388</guid>
		<description>And finally before turning this box off for tonight.. there is one thing that PPP has... posties that will battle for them - that will certainly help PPP continue to grow. The posties scour the net for anything related to PPP and swarm like a band of killer bees. Some of the best viral marketing possible.

It&#039;s like, Mike writes yet another negative post about PPP and Ted picks up the postie phone :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And finally before turning this box off for tonight.. there is one thing that PPP has&#8230; posties that will battle for them &#8211; that will certainly help PPP continue to grow. The posties scour the net for anything related to PPP and swarm like a band of killer bees. Some of the best viral marketing possible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like, Mike writes yet another negative post about PPP and Ted picks up the postie phone <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423383</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423383</guid>
		<description>please understand there is NOTHING wrong with mommy (daddy) bloggers - I think its awesome - in fact, I wish my mother would blog (but she can&#039;t barely use AOL without breaking it!).

Imagine for one parent (or two) to stay home with the kids and still earn a living off sharing information they enjoy. It&#039;s awesome.

What I was suggesting is that (from the reports/emails) is that a large percentage of their posties have low traffic. If it came across incorrectly, i apologize. And actually both of my sentences in comment #1 are indep. of each other.

And #31 Sindy to answer your question on your blog - so far all I have dealt with and seen in coverage of PPP is the majority of mommy bloggers...the people who came over to CN when I spoke about PPP, the people here, etc. So why is it evil for me to say that what I see is mommy bloggers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please understand there is NOTHING wrong with mommy (daddy) bloggers &#8211; I think its awesome &#8211; in fact, I wish my mother would blog (but she can&#8217;t barely use AOL without breaking it!).</p>
<p>Imagine for one parent (or two) to stay home with the kids and still earn a living off sharing information they enjoy. It&#8217;s awesome.</p>
<p>What I was suggesting is that (from the reports/emails) is that a large percentage of their posties have low traffic. If it came across incorrectly, i apologize. And actually both of my sentences in comment #1 are indep. of each other.</p>
<p>And #31 Sindy to answer your question on your blog &#8211; so far all I have dealt with and seen in coverage of PPP is the majority of mommy bloggers&#8230;the people who came over to CN when I spoke about PPP, the people here, etc. So why is it evil for me to say that what I see is mommy bloggers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob La Gesse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob La Gesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423362</guid>
		<description>Hey - I am a single father, stay at home worker/parent/blogger.  Doesn&#039;t that make me an uber-daddy-blogger, or something?

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; I am a single father, stay at home worker/parent/blogger.  Doesn&#8217;t that make me an uber-daddy-blogger, or something?</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sindy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423358</link>
		<dc:creator>Sindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423358</guid>
		<description>#28 Allen - You started off so well in making your point, that mommy blogger stereotype is a killer though. 

As Kat pointed out, a mommy blogger can have a great deal of traffic.   And as Trish states, the demographic makeup of PayPerPost doesn&#039;t line up with your statement.   

Hopefully more people will get their facts straight and ditch the condescending perception of moms who are also bloggers.  If you want to make a point about low traffic blogs, call them what they are, ditch the stereotyping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28 Allen &#8211; You started off so well in making your point, that mommy blogger stereotype is a killer though. </p>
<p>As Kat pointed out, a mommy blogger can have a great deal of traffic.   And as Trish states, the demographic makeup of PayPerPost doesn&#8217;t line up with your statement.   </p>
<p>Hopefully more people will get their facts straight and ditch the condescending perception of moms who are also bloggers.  If you want to make a point about low traffic blogs, call them what they are, ditch the stereotyping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423340</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve's Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423340</guid>
		<description>Andy: You are right, negative reviews don&#039;t serve any purpose. If a blogger takes a review with a negative attitude from the start, then it&#039;s not fair to the advertiser. A review serve to promote a service/product to people and to discover constructive recommendations. It&#039;s like paying an external consultant. ;)

Allen: If I follow your logic then all PPP type sites should follow that path: advertorial only or is it just PPP? I&#039;m advertiser/blogger and would find the feedback interesting because the comments also give some free feedbacks. 

Mike: Until investors don&#039;t see a return soon and that depend on what &quot;soon&quot; means for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: You are right, negative reviews don&#8217;t serve any purpose. If a blogger takes a review with a negative attitude from the start, then it&#8217;s not fair to the advertiser. A review serve to promote a service/product to people and to discover constructive recommendations. It&#8217;s like paying an external consultant. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Allen: If I follow your logic then all PPP type sites should follow that path: advertorial only or is it just PPP? I&#8217;m advertiser/blogger and would find the feedback interesting because the comments also give some free feedbacks. </p>
<p>Mike: Until investors don&#8217;t see a return soon and that depend on what &#8220;soon&#8221; means for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob La Gesse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/comment-page-1/#comment-1423328</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob La Gesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/11/payperpost-raises-7-million-more/#comment-1423328</guid>
		<description>#27 Mike - Yes, they could get another round of funding, and another, etc.  But at every step investors balance the good/bad aspect of the investment.  If they didn&#039;t think PPP could make money, there would not have been a round two.  And if in 6 months they don&#039;t believe PPP will make money there will NOT be a round 3.

And yes, at some point SMART investors know when to get out.  But the Genius investors?  They are the one&#039;s that know to stay in &quot;just long enough&quot;.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27 Mike &#8211; Yes, they could get another round of funding, and another, etc.  But at every step investors balance the good/bad aspect of the investment.  If they didn&#8217;t think PPP could make money, there would not have been a round two.  And if in 6 months they don&#8217;t believe PPP will make money there will NOT be a round 3.</p>
<p>And yes, at some point SMART investors know when to get out.  But the Genius investors?  They are the one&#8217;s that know to stay in &#8220;just long enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
