<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xing May Be In Talks To Acquire Plaxo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:36:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: XING kooperiert mit ZoomInfo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-3047498</link>
		<dc:creator>XING kooperiert mit ZoomInfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-3047498</guid>
		<description>[...] nun is es raus. W&#228;hrend alle fleissig bei Techcrunch abgeschrieben haben und aus der Vermutung teilweise schon ein Fakt gemacht haben, hat die Open BC AG in Ruhe die eigentliche [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nun is es raus. W&#228;hrend alle fleissig bei Techcrunch abgeschrieben haben und aus der Vermutung teilweise schon ein Fakt gemacht haben, hat die Open BC AG in Ruhe die eigentliche [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genieyclo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-2572969</link>
		<dc:creator>genieyclo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-2572969</guid>
		<description>Wait, is this the same Ben Golub who made FFtogo and works at FriendFeed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, is this the same Ben Golub who made FFtogo and works at FriendFeed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was internationale Blogs &#252;ber deutsche Web-2.0-Dienste schreiben &#187; Beitrag &#187; zweinull.cc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1610383</link>
		<dc:creator>Was internationale Blogs &#252;ber deutsche Web-2.0-Dienste schreiben &#187; Beitrag &#187; zweinull.cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1610383</guid>
		<description>[...] Network mit vier Millionen Mitgliedern hauptsächlich in Deutschland und Europa. Berichte bei TechCrunch I GigaOm I Mashable I CenterNetworks 1 I CenterNetworks 2 I Profy I Webware I Venturebeat    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Network mit vier Millionen Mitgliedern hauptsächlich in Deutschland und Europa. Berichte bei TechCrunch I GigaOm I Mashable I CenterNetworks 1 I CenterNetworks 2 I Profy I Webware I Venturebeat    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1430646</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1430646</guid>
		<description>Heard Zoominfo is actually the fastest growing people database so makes sense for them to add social networking with a deep partnership with XING</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard Zoominfo is actually the fastest growing people database so makes sense for them to add social networking with a deep partnership with XING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1429969</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1429969</guid>
		<description>@bill: As I stated before, that&#039;s a rumour and has been denied by the CEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bill: As I stated before, that&#8217;s a rumour and has been denied by the CEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly S</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1429362</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1429362</guid>
		<description>bill - in the new version of plaxo.com you can search http://preview.plaxo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill &#8211; in the new version of plaxo.com you can search <a href="http://preview.plaxo.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://preview.plaxo.com'>http://preview.plaxo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1428224</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1428224</guid>
		<description>Man - I hated Plaxo to begin with, now they are going to be owned by a german company!  You cant even search your contacts in Plaxo. I migrated my Plaxo contacts to spock.com...totally cool application. much better for staying in touch with your network then plaxo..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man &#8211; I hated Plaxo to begin with, now they are going to be owned by a german company!  You cant even search your contacts in Plaxo. I migrated my Plaxo contacts to spock.com&#8230;totally cool application. much better for staying in touch with your network then plaxo..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1427797</link>
		<dc:creator>Henning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1427797</guid>
		<description>@Bill / #27: it&#039;s a german company (headquarters in Hamburg) with its own chinese subsidiary for the chinese market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill / #27: it&#8217;s a german company (headquarters in Hamburg) with its own chinese subsidiary for the chinese market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1426805</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1426805</guid>
		<description>... and just a cooperation, nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and just a cooperation, nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1426804</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1426804</guid>
		<description>Just appeared in the press: It is not Plaxo but ZoomInfo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just appeared in the press: It is not Plaxo but ZoomInfo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kampf der Business-Netzwerke :: deutsche-startups.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1425301</link>
		<dc:creator>Kampf der Business-Netzwerke :: deutsche-startups.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1425301</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesse am US-Konkurrenten &#8220;Plaxo&#8221; (15 Millionen Mitglieder) nachgesagt. &#8220;Techcrunch&#8221; kolportiert einen Kaufpreis in Hhe von 250 Millionen Dollar. Viel Geld, trotzdem fhrt fr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1425283</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1425283</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a rumour and there are no acutal plans for buying Plaxo, as Hinrich&#039;s, CEO of openBC/XING, stated two hours ago at the shareholders&#039; meeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a rumour and there are no acutal plans for buying Plaxo, as Hinrich&#8217;s, CEO of openBC/XING, stated two hours ago at the shareholders&#8217; meeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc d.,jerusalem,israel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1423181</link>
		<dc:creator>marc d.,jerusalem,israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1423181</guid>
		<description>@amy 
it&#039;s like GMAIL ,they check the subjects of my mails ,and with some keywords they send me some ads .that&#039;s diabolical.
The job of governements should makes some rules about, but in this time of war on terror ,we will wait a long time ...and Google will continue to make billions for a long time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amy<br />
it&#8217;s like GMAIL ,they check the subjects of my mails ,and with some keywords they send me some ads .that&#8217;s diabolical.<br />
The job of governements should makes some rules about, but in this time of war on terror ,we will wait a long time &#8230;and Google will continue to make billions for a long time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handelskraft</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1422340</link>
		<dc:creator>Handelskraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1422340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Xing-Plaxo: Auf gute Partnerschaft?!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ger&#252;chte &#252;ber eine m&#246;gliche &#220;bernahmen von plaxo zu xing ist derzeit im Umlauf. Xing ist in Deutschland sehr erfolgreich, aber in den USA konnte es sich bis jetzt nicht wirklich gut durchsetzen. Wenn es wirklich zur &#220;bernahme k...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Xing-Plaxo: Auf gute Partnerschaft?!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ger&#252;chte &#252;ber eine m&#246;gliche &#220;bernahmen von plaxo zu xing ist derzeit im Umlauf. Xing ist in Deutschland sehr erfolgreich, aber in den USA konnte es sich bis jetzt nicht wirklich gut durchsetzen. Wenn es wirklich zur &#220;bernahme k&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1421987</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1421987</guid>
		<description>Terry, I don&#039;t really want to beat this to death, and i&#039;m fine with Plaxo&#039;s CURRENT vociferous defense of keeping my data private, but my concern is when they figure out they have no business or some investors want to recoup $ - that database is a potential goldmine. If your contacts show that you know Michael and that I know Michael and can find one or two other contacts that we share, this spider web of networking - knowledge is worth a lot of money.

I just don&#039;t see the same issue with social networks, and don&#039;t care if some dba there reads my &quot;messages&quot; or look at my photos or even relationship status. I do not upload sensitive data like personal notes, cell numbers, home addresses etc. to facebook, myspace etc. I very much care if Plaxo one decides to sell that database. Personally I would LOVE to get MY hands on that db. Pure gold. 

@Dru- I believe this is actually being bashed around in the courts right now. They own the medium, i.e. the tools, for dispersing the data but the content that you actually type, and what you put up in your profile is yours (I&#039;ve not read every social network&#039;s terms of use but our lawyers have been following this point closely for my own company).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, I don&#8217;t really want to beat this to death, and i&#8217;m fine with Plaxo&#8217;s CURRENT vociferous defense of keeping my data private, but my concern is when they figure out they have no business or some investors want to recoup $ &#8211; that database is a potential goldmine. If your contacts show that you know Michael and that I know Michael and can find one or two other contacts that we share, this spider web of networking &#8211; knowledge is worth a lot of money.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t see the same issue with social networks, and don&#8217;t care if some dba there reads my &#8220;messages&#8221; or look at my photos or even relationship status. I do not upload sensitive data like personal notes, cell numbers, home addresses etc. to facebook, myspace etc. I very much care if Plaxo one decides to sell that database. Personally I would LOVE to get MY hands on that db. Pure gold. </p>
<p>@Dru- I believe this is actually being bashed around in the courts right now. They own the medium, i.e. the tools, for dispersing the data but the content that you actually type, and what you put up in your profile is yours (I&#8217;ve not read every social network&#8217;s terms of use but our lawyers have been following this point closely for my own company).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1421529</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1421529</guid>
		<description>Market cap 200 million Euros.

http://uk.betastreaming.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=O1BC.DE

Is Mike correct that this is a Chinese company (with German headquarters), or is it a German company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market cap 200 million Euros.</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.betastreaming.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=O1BC.DE" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://uk.betastreaming.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=O1BC.DE'>http://uk.betas...com/q?s=O1BC.DE</a></p>
<p>Is Mike correct that this is a Chinese company (with German headquarters), or is it a German company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1421346</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1421346</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;XingはPlaxoの買収に向けて動いている？...&lt;/strong&gt;

われわれは現在XingのPlaxo買収の噂をあちこちから聞いている。金額は$250M（2億5千万ドル）前後の規模という。これはうなずけないこともない。最近株式を公開したXingはドイツの企業で、....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>XingはPlaxoの買収に向けて動いている？&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>われわれは現在XingのPlaxo買収の噂をあちこちから聞いている。金額は$250M（2億5千万ドル）前後の規模という。これはうなずけないこともない。最近株式を公開したXingはドイツの企業で、&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1421223</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1421223</guid>
		<description>Plaxo is the pitts. I was getting 5-7 email messages a day from people I didn&#039;t remember asking me to update my info. I went to the Plaxo Website, gave them all of my email addresses, opting out completely. I never want to be contacted again by anyone using this service. I can&#039;t imagine this thing growing.

I was nervous about giving them all of my email addresses, but I had to take the chance. I&#039;ve not been contacted since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plaxo is the pitts. I was getting 5-7 email messages a day from people I didn&#8217;t remember asking me to update my info. I went to the Plaxo Website, gave them all of my email addresses, opting out completely. I never want to be contacted again by anyone using this service. I can&#8217;t imagine this thing growing.</p>
<p>I was nervous about giving them all of my email addresses, but I had to take the chance. I&#8217;ve not been contacted since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1420700</link>
		<dc:creator>Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1420700</guid>
		<description>@Olly @terry chay

I have to belive that Plaxo really had to change their biz strategy at some point.  I interviewed there several years ago and advanced (after 10 hours of interviews) to thier meet with their co-founders.  After mock product meetings, programming tests, logic puzzles, actually working at someones workstation to fix 3 bugs.....I&#039;m sitting in a conference room with the two founders.  They ask me silly questions, like whether I like to play video games....finally they ask if I have any questions.....I bring up the ol&#039; &quot;How will Plaxo make money?  I&#039;ve heard about this end-game, master plan, tell me more.&quot;

The next few minutes changed my entire perspective of this company that seemingly had a vaulable service.  They told me about how much it costs companies (newspapers, magazines, credit cards, insurance companies, etc, junk mailers of all kinds) to keep up with your address.  That they pay for your address upwards of $1 a lead.  They told me that with Plaxo, they know your address whenever it changes, they were the first to know and therefore could undercut other companies.

As someone who values their privacy I was shocked.  Myspace, Facebook, etc... do not ask for your address (Facebook does but I don&#039;t fill it in).  Otherwise everyone is asking for your email address and I trust my spam filter to do a pretty good job of blocking that.  But nothing is worse than 10 pieces of mail and 9 of them are junk.  The Earth doesn&#039;t need that kind of spam.

Anyhow, I believe that Plaxo has probably changed their business model after all the criticism they received, so this is all probably not a real issue anymore.  Or maybe the founders were having fun with me, because they never offered me a job and probably didn&#039;t want me to know the &quot;master plan&quot;.  But either way, kind of shady if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Olly @terry chay</p>
<p>I have to belive that Plaxo really had to change their biz strategy at some point.  I interviewed there several years ago and advanced (after 10 hours of interviews) to thier meet with their co-founders.  After mock product meetings, programming tests, logic puzzles, actually working at someones workstation to fix 3 bugs&#8230;..I&#8217;m sitting in a conference room with the two founders.  They ask me silly questions, like whether I like to play video games&#8230;.finally they ask if I have any questions&#8230;..I bring up the ol&#8217; &#8220;How will Plaxo make money?  I&#8217;ve heard about this end-game, master plan, tell me more.&#8221;</p>
<p>The next few minutes changed my entire perspective of this company that seemingly had a vaulable service.  They told me about how much it costs companies (newspapers, magazines, credit cards, insurance companies, etc, junk mailers of all kinds) to keep up with your address.  That they pay for your address upwards of $1 a lead.  They told me that with Plaxo, they know your address whenever it changes, they were the first to know and therefore could undercut other companies.</p>
<p>As someone who values their privacy I was shocked.  Myspace, Facebook, etc&#8230; do not ask for your address (Facebook does but I don&#8217;t fill it in).  Otherwise everyone is asking for your email address and I trust my spam filter to do a pretty good job of blocking that.  But nothing is worse than 10 pieces of mail and 9 of them are junk.  The Earth doesn&#8217;t need that kind of spam.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I believe that Plaxo has probably changed their business model after all the criticism they received, so this is all probably not a real issue anymore.  Or maybe the founders were having fun with me, because they never offered me a job and probably didn&#8217;t want me to know the &#8220;master plan&#8221;.  But either way, kind of shady if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedtoplaxo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1420668</link>
		<dc:creator>usedtoplaxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1420668</guid>
		<description>plaxo is a nice backend utility and thats it.  no one i know uses it actively, it sort of falls in the category of disk space backup.  it missed the social network wave and its too late.  ms, google or yahoo should suck it in for 100M while it still has enuf of a buff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>plaxo is a nice backend utility and thats it.  no one i know uses it actively, it sort of falls in the category of disk space backup.  it missed the social network wave and its too late.  ms, google or yahoo should suck it in for 100M while it still has enuf of a buff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dru Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1420229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dru Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1420229</guid>
		<description>Amy: Hi, another former employee of Plaxo here. 
The difference between other social networks and plaxo is that the social networks actually own all of those messages between you, your daughter and their friends. Rather than just getting your contacts, they want to get your contacts/friends into their service. They want to own the communication medium entirely between you and your network. You will share your photos, messages/pokes, events and even relationship status on a Myspace, Facebook, or Bebo. All of the differences feature-wise come out of that difference. This has hurt Plaxo in the past because they relied on email more so than other networks.

Anyways, this news is interesting and the first I&#039;ve heard about this Xing deal. Hopefully, we&#039;ll get more info about that here.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy: Hi, another former employee of Plaxo here.<br />
The difference between other social networks and plaxo is that the social networks actually own all of those messages between you, your daughter and their friends. Rather than just getting your contacts, they want to get your contacts/friends into their service. They want to own the communication medium entirely between you and your network. You will share your photos, messages/pokes, events and even relationship status on a Myspace, Facebook, or Bebo. All of the differences feature-wise come out of that difference. This has hurt Plaxo in the past because they relied on email more so than other networks.</p>
<p>Anyways, this news is interesting and the first I&#8217;ve heard about this Xing deal. Hopefully, we&#8217;ll get more info about that here.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Das CIO Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1420031</link>
		<dc:creator>Das CIO Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1420031</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kauft Xing womöglich Plaxo?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Im US-Blog Techcrunch wird wieder mal heftig spekuliert. Diesmal über das Business-Social-Network Xing (früher auch als OpenBC bekannt): &quot;We are hearing a LOT of chatter about a possible Xing-Plaxo merger in the $250 million range. The deal make...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kauft Xing womöglich Plaxo?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Im US-Blog Techcrunch wird wieder mal heftig spekuliert. Diesmal über das Business-Social-Network Xing (früher auch als OpenBC bekannt): &quot;We are hearing a LOT of chatter about a possible Xing-Plaxo merger in the $250 million range. The deal make&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry chay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1419916</link>
		<dc:creator>terry chay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1419916</guid>
		<description>Amy,

I more than anyone say that Plaxo isn’t social networking. I like to say, “Use LinkedIn to build your business network; use Plaxo to maintain that network.” or s/LinkedIn/Facebook/ s/business/college/ (what have you).

But I was talking about VIRALITY: This step that is most annoying about this and where the “Plaxo is evil” statements directly come from. And in that sense all these companies are the same.

Have you joined a social network recently? I do as part of my job and every social network has importers where they spam your address list. For me, because of http://preview.plaxo.com/ , the sites they import from (Yahoo, Google, AOL, MSN) ALL contain the same information as my desktop address book.

Finally, LinkedIn has a tool that seems to be just that access to &quot;just that&quot; information you are talking about http://www.linkedin.com/static?key=outlook_toolbar_download . And since their connection network is far more prevalent among business users http://blog.beaufortes.com/2007/05/networking_proj.html
and that connection network is PUBLIC (they are a social network after all) http://www.linkedin.com/in/tychay it is definitely more dangerous and less private.

The only difference here is that Plaxo legally binds themselves NOT to have access to those things you say and this binding forces them to NOT make that content public. Whereas the other social networks do not bind themselves and do make that content public.

I think there is a deeper problem here that we’re talking around. The problem is that Plaxo DOES maintain that YOU own your contact database and the problem with that ownership is it can’t be shared. What I mean is that the repal problem with Plaxo is that if I add Michael Arrington to my address book and sync that with Plaxo, Michael doesn’t have any control of that information nor is Plaxo empowered to do anything about that (because it&#039;s my information, not Michael’s, but it is information OF Michael). In a simple sense that’s no different that a rolodex. But when you network up that rolodex… This needs to be addressed and discussed. We are having this discussion today and will have more in the future as social networking becomes more prevalent.

I won’t deny that. Nor will I defend it. I don’t even work at Plaxo anymore and I was just an engineer there when I did. There is a feeling that you don’t control things (even if it isn’t true) and that feeling is REAL. It leads people to justifiably gripe about Plaxo. It was the source of the huge blowup about Newsfeed and Facebook.

But to think that social networks aren’t doing the same as Plaxo (or worse) with YOUR contact information and YOUR contact network is either naïve or placing blind trust in incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy,</p>
<p>I more than anyone say that Plaxo isn’t social networking. I like to say, “Use LinkedIn to build your business network; use Plaxo to maintain that network.” or s/LinkedIn/Facebook/ s/business/college/ (what have you).</p>
<p>But I was talking about VIRALITY: This step that is most annoying about this and where the “Plaxo is evil” statements directly come from. And in that sense all these companies are the same.</p>
<p>Have you joined a social network recently? I do as part of my job and every social network has importers where they spam your address list. For me, because of <a href="http://preview.plaxo.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://preview.plaxo.com/'>http://preview.plaxo.com/</a> , the sites they import from (Yahoo, Google, AOL, MSN) ALL contain the same information as my desktop address book.</p>
<p>Finally, LinkedIn has a tool that seems to be just that access to &#8220;just that&#8221; information you are talking about <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/static?key=outlook_toolbar_download" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.linkedin.com/static?key=outlook_toolbar_download'>http://www.link...oolbar_download</a> . And since their connection network is far more prevalent among business users <a href="http://blog.beaufortes.com/2007/05/networking_proj.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blog.beaufortes.com/2007/05/networking_proj.html'>http://blog.bea...rking_proj.html</a><br />
and that connection network is PUBLIC (they are a social network after all) <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tychay" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.linkedin.com/in/tychay'>http://www.link...n.com/in/tychay</a> it is definitely more dangerous and less private.</p>
<p>The only difference here is that Plaxo legally binds themselves NOT to have access to those things you say and this binding forces them to NOT make that content public. Whereas the other social networks do not bind themselves and do make that content public.</p>
<p>I think there is a deeper problem here that we’re talking around. The problem is that Plaxo DOES maintain that YOU own your contact database and the problem with that ownership is it can’t be shared. What I mean is that the repal problem with Plaxo is that if I add Michael Arrington to my address book and sync that with Plaxo, Michael doesn’t have any control of that information nor is Plaxo empowered to do anything about that (because it&#8217;s my information, not Michael’s, but it is information OF Michael). In a simple sense that’s no different that a rolodex. But when you network up that rolodex… This needs to be addressed and discussed. We are having this discussion today and will have more in the future as social networking becomes more prevalent.</p>
<p>I won’t deny that. Nor will I defend it. I don’t even work at Plaxo anymore and I was just an engineer there when I did. There is a feeling that you don’t control things (even if it isn’t true) and that feeling is REAL. It leads people to justifiably gripe about Plaxo. It was the source of the huge blowup about Newsfeed and Facebook.</p>
<p>But to think that social networks aren’t doing the same as Plaxo (or worse) with YOUR contact information and YOUR contact network is either naïve or placing blind trust in incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1419706</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1419706</guid>
		<description>terry - eveyone has already unsubscribed from / blocked Plaxo, that&#039;s why they&#039;ve not been annoyed by them lately. Plaxo is NOT a social network. I don&#039;t upload (or even allow access to) my cutomer&#039;s or personal contacts&#039; home and cell #&#039;s and daughter&#039;s first name and whether they prefer sushi or when to send them an anniversary gift in my CRM, so what do I care if they are viral. Plaxo is a tool, and IS viral. Not a horrible tool, but definitely a suspicious one. Your comparison of Plaxo to social networking is apples to oranges b/c of the sensitivity of the data that Plaxo extracts and by default, has access to. What do I care if LinkedIn knows who&#039;s in my &quot;connections&quot;? But I sure as heck care about Plaxo knowing who&#039;s in my email contact list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terry &#8211; eveyone has already unsubscribed from / blocked Plaxo, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;ve not been annoyed by them lately. Plaxo is NOT a social network. I don&#8217;t upload (or even allow access to) my cutomer&#8217;s or personal contacts&#8217; home and cell #&#8217;s and daughter&#8217;s first name and whether they prefer sushi or when to send them an anniversary gift in my CRM, so what do I care if they are viral. Plaxo is a tool, and IS viral. Not a horrible tool, but definitely a suspicious one. Your comparison of Plaxo to social networking is apples to oranges b/c of the sensitivity of the data that Plaxo extracts and by default, has access to. What do I care if LinkedIn knows who&#8217;s in my &#8220;connections&#8221;? But I sure as heck care about Plaxo knowing who&#8217;s in my email contact list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry chay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/comment-page-1/#comment-1419649</link>
		<dc:creator>terry chay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/08/xing-may-be-in-talks-to-acquire-plaxo/#comment-1419649</guid>
		<description>Oops! I meant:

http://terrychay.com/blog/article/plaxo-is-evil-plaxo-is-spam.shtml

Guess the birthday hangover is getting to me. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I meant:</p>
<p><a href="http://terrychay.com/blog/article/plaxo-is-evil-plaxo-is-spam.shtml" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://terrychay.com/blog/article/plaxo-is-evil-plaxo-is-spam.shtml'>http://terrycha...o-is-spam.shtml</a></p>
<p>Guess the birthday hangover is getting to me. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
