<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salesforce Is Acquisition Bait</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; “Deep Integration” Between Google Apps and Salesforce to Be Announced Next Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-2141558</link>
		<dc:creator>www.teletubis.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; “Deep Integration” Between Google Apps and Salesforce to Be Announced Next Monday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-2141558</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO Marc Benioff might be happy to sell Salesforce to Oracle for $75 a share, he might be even happier to sell it to Google. Buying Salesforce would certainly turbocharge Google&#8217;s efforts to sell into enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO Marc Benioff might be happy to sell Salesforce to Oracle for $75 a share, he might be even happier to sell it to Google. Buying Salesforce would certainly turbocharge Google&#8217;s efforts to sell into enterprise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor: Salesforce to Resell Google Apps</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-2140867</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor: Salesforce to Resell Google Apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-2140867</guid>
		<description>[...] CEO Marc Benioff might be happy to sell Salesforce to Oracle for $75 a share, he might be even happier to sell it to Google. Buying Salesforce would certainly turbocharge Google&#8217;s efforts to sell into enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CEO Marc Benioff might be happy to sell Salesforce to Oracle for $75 a share, he might be even happier to sell it to Google. Buying Salesforce would certainly turbocharge Google&#8217;s efforts to sell into enterprise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamieG Analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1516879</link>
		<dc:creator>JamieG Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1516879</guid>
		<description>[...] a post from techcrunch (Note Here, looked this up and I was confusing this with another article http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/ which is not connected to zimbra, but does describe how loosing the war on the corporate desktop is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post from techcrunch (Note Here, looked this up and I was confusing this with another article <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007.....tion-bait/</a> which is not connected to zimbra, but does describe how loosing the war on the corporate desktop is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tschentscher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1412267</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tschentscher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1412267</guid>
		<description>Well, that was about to happen. Thought I'm not that sure whether Google is really interested in the financial prospects of that deal - or rather in adding a CRM to their total suite in order to gain additional avertising data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was about to happen. Thought I&#8217;m not that sure whether Google is really interested in the financial prospects of that deal - or rather in adding a CRM to their total suite in order to gain additional avertising data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen P</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1411377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1411377</guid>
		<description>All i can say is that "well done" to the webmaster. Glad that you are not giving into Salesforce.com and their bully tactics asking for the info. This is supposed to be anonymous post after all. 

Finally a person standing up to them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All i can say is that &#8220;well done&#8221; to the webmaster. Glad that you are not giving into Salesforce.com and their bully tactics asking for the info. This is supposed to be anonymous post after all. </p>
<p>Finally a person standing up to them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1411174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1411174</guid>
		<description>I disagree Stephane, I can't get people to use google docs / spreadsheets for a number of reasons - security is not one of them. This is in a company that uses google apps for your domain, btw. Sales people can't live without their powerpoint. Finance people can't live without excel. And Word, well at least it works offline.

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree Stephane, I can&#8217;t get people to use google docs / spreadsheets for a number of reasons - security is not one of them. This is in a company that uses google apps for your domain, btw. Sales people can&#8217;t live without their powerpoint. Finance people can&#8217;t live without excel. And Word, well at least it works offline.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1410242</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1410242</guid>
		<description>A lot of BS.

The reason why Google docs and spreadsheet hasn't caught up yet is for security reasons, not for technical reasons. Why Google is not selling a corresponding intranet appliance for this is beyond me, hopefully that will happen in the not too distant future. Should it happen, there is a huge opportunity right now as Microsoft is killing their own Office customer base (the Office 2007 file formats are new and incompatible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of BS.</p>
<p>The reason why Google docs and spreadsheet hasn&#8217;t caught up yet is for security reasons, not for technical reasons. Why Google is not selling a corresponding intranet appliance for this is beyond me, hopefully that will happen in the not too distant future. Should it happen, there is a huge opportunity right now as Microsoft is killing their own Office customer base (the Office 2007 file formats are new and incompatible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409935</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409935</guid>
		<description>Great analysis Mike, Salesforce is "a perfect fit" to Google. We're gonna see lot of exciting software when they join their forces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis Mike, Salesforce is &#8220;a perfect fit&#8221; to Google. We&#8217;re gonna see lot of exciting software when they join their forces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409781</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409781</guid>
		<description>yep, it sure is. that was a bad typo. thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, it sure is. that was a bad typo. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409716</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409716</guid>
		<description>Isn't it PAUL Chamberlain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it PAUL Chamberlain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409635</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409635</guid>
		<description>Nice insight! Really enjoyed this article Mike.

SF just needs to get a better grip on the small business market, which is becoming more attractive to Google if nothing else b/c of its sheer numbers (or so my google contacts tell me, but they're all low level developers so what do they know :)). Small businesses, esp non-tech-savvy ones (and there are a LOT of those), are still often creeped out by SalesForce; so adding the thought of GoogleAds being able to reach into their [potential] client list scares many of them. The ability to reach out to wider potential customer base is attractive, but don't discount the fear of Google going intrusively that [still] exists. That's why Act!, Goldmine and Maximizer are still in the game for the millions of small businesses out there. 

I recently asked a small audio visual shop why they didn't go online for CRM and answer was more or less "it's on my computer and I can control it." Putting their client list online to be accessible &#38; managed by someone else - still a big hurdle for many small entities. 

And if Goooooogle (or anyone) wants to buy a killer desktop application that combines Act, Lyris &#38; Outlook - i know a company willing to sell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insight! Really enjoyed this article Mike.</p>
<p>SF just needs to get a better grip on the small business market, which is becoming more attractive to Google if nothing else b/c of its sheer numbers (or so my google contacts tell me, but they&#8217;re all low level developers so what do they know :)). Small businesses, esp non-tech-savvy ones (and there are a LOT of those), are still often creeped out by SalesForce; so adding the thought of GoogleAds being able to reach into their [potential] client list scares many of them. The ability to reach out to wider potential customer base is attractive, but don&#8217;t discount the fear of Google going intrusively that [still] exists. That&#8217;s why Act!, Goldmine and Maximizer are still in the game for the millions of small businesses out there. </p>
<p>I recently asked a small audio visual shop why they didn&#8217;t go online for CRM and answer was more or less &#8220;it&#8217;s on my computer and I can control it.&#8221; Putting their client list online to be accessible &amp; managed by someone else - still a big hurdle for many small entities. </p>
<p>And if Goooooogle (or anyone) wants to buy a killer desktop application that combines Act, Lyris &amp; Outlook - i know a company willing to sell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason M. Lemkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Lemkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409573</guid>
		<description>From what we see as a Salesforce partner, Salesforce is executing incredibly well.  Customers love the product in a way and for reasons that may be hard for non-power users to appreciate (customization is key).  And customers are willing to pay handsomely for it.  Salesforce is investing heavily to grow and expand the platform in unique ways (AppExchange really is unique).  They will do $1billion in revenue next year.  Selling now would seem odd timing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what we see as a Salesforce partner, Salesforce is executing incredibly well.  Customers love the product in a way and for reasons that may be hard for non-power users to appreciate (customization is key).  And customers are willing to pay handsomely for it.  Salesforce is investing heavily to grow and expand the platform in unique ways (AppExchange really is unique).  They will do $1billion in revenue next year.  Selling now would seem odd timing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409565</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409565</guid>
		<description>I strongly suspect that this will be a worse strategic partnership arrangement than the one SUN and GOOGLE announced a year or 2 ago. 

Acquisition bait - I doubt it! CRM is overpriced at $5.5bn and a 20% or so acquisition premium will make it only more expensive. And for what? GOOG has been having more success than CRM in its office apps, and it will be cheaper for GOOG to build something similar rather than buy CRM. 

SAP has also indicated that they will be focusing on the small business market very soon and Microsoft already has 4 Dynamics products - enough to confuse most corporate customers, without having one more.

The announcement is very likely to be something along the lines of Salesforce users will now have access to Google Office Apps.. Something they all did earlier.  

CRM needs extra publicity to keep the stock price up (and you see a lot of fluff press releases being generated by them) and any hype is good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly suspect that this will be a worse strategic partnership arrangement than the one SUN and GOOGLE announced a year or 2 ago. </p>
<p>Acquisition bait - I doubt it! CRM is overpriced at $5.5bn and a 20% or so acquisition premium will make it only more expensive. And for what? GOOG has been having more success than CRM in its office apps, and it will be cheaper for GOOG to build something similar rather than buy CRM. </p>
<p>SAP has also indicated that they will be focusing on the small business market very soon and Microsoft already has 4 Dynamics products - enough to confuse most corporate customers, without having one more.</p>
<p>The announcement is very likely to be something along the lines of Salesforce users will now have access to Google Office Apps.. Something they all did earlier.  </p>
<p>CRM needs extra publicity to keep the stock price up (and you see a lot of fluff press releases being generated by them) and any hype is good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409408</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409408</guid>
		<description>The day Microsoft acquires Salesforce, Oracle will take our a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal proclaiming "Microsoft CRM Applications are Powered by Oracle!".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day Microsoft acquires Salesforce, Oracle will take our a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal proclaiming &#8220;Microsoft CRM Applications are Powered by Oracle!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409381</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409381</guid>
		<description>SugarCRM seems like a better fit. Open source, more users, better app, fraction of the cost. Salesforce is not much more than a talented sales force pushing glorified contact management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SugarCRM seems like a better fit. Open source, more users, better app, fraction of the cost. Salesforce is not much more than a talented sales force pushing glorified contact management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mehus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409301</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mehus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409301</guid>
		<description>@#2: I still love Google, but their "don't be evil" credo fell by the wayside as soon as they implemented their partnership with Dell and started redirecting spelling mistakes in Web addresses and for sites that don't resolve to an ad-filled page where irrelevant ads and "popular categories" take up the entire screen above the fold - on a 20" monitor! To make matters worse, they do this by installation of a browser helper object they created for Dell called "Browser Address Error Redirector" to confuse less technically-inclined people into thinking, "it came with my PC, and it sounds innocuous and like it's needed, I better not uninstall it," to do their redirecting. We have a name for companies that install surreptitious software to intercept Web browsing with sponsored links: it's called Claria. It's called WhenU.

Do a search for "google+AFE" and you'll see.

Cheers,
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#2: I still love Google, but their &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; credo fell by the wayside as soon as they implemented their partnership with Dell and started redirecting spelling mistakes in Web addresses and for sites that don&#8217;t resolve to an ad-filled page where irrelevant ads and &#8220;popular categories&#8221; take up the entire screen above the fold - on a 20&#8243; monitor! To make matters worse, they do this by installation of a browser helper object they created for Dell called &#8220;Browser Address Error Redirector&#8221; to confuse less technically-inclined people into thinking, &#8220;it came with my PC, and it sounds innocuous and like it&#8217;s needed, I better not uninstall it,&#8221; to do their redirecting. We have a name for companies that install surreptitious software to intercept Web browsing with sponsored links: it&#8217;s called Claria. It&#8217;s called WhenU.</p>
<p>Do a search for &#8220;google+AFE&#8221; and you&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409293</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409293</guid>
		<description>This is just the beginning. There is going to be some great consolidation between companies you never thought could be under one umbrella. Don't forget IBM....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning. There is going to be some great consolidation between companies you never thought could be under one umbrella. Don&#8217;t forget IBM&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pran Kurup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409263</link>
		<dc:creator>Pran Kurup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409263</guid>
		<description>I doubt Google is going to buy Salesforce at this time. Sounds more like gossip :-) 

Interesting nevertheless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Google is going to buy Salesforce at this time. Sounds more like gossip <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Interesting nevertheless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wingthom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409257</link>
		<dc:creator>wingthom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409257</guid>
		<description>Salesforce had an offline version for years, based on .NET and  XML - a switch to GEARS would be easy! No need for MSFT  any more, good luck Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salesforce had an offline version for years, based on .NET and  XML - a switch to GEARS would be easy! No need for MSFT  any more, good luck Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T J</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409239</link>
		<dc:creator>T J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409239</guid>
		<description>Mike, this is an excellent analysis of the situation. I am somewhat knowledgeable on this (don't work for any of the companies mentioned, so I am not breaking any confidentiality here), but it is true that Marc Benioff is desperately seeking strategic choices. As has been reported by ZDNet bloggers, Salesforce growth is slowing down, and the stock has been levitating of late, particularly after the Google acquisition rumors. If he does nothing (tomorrows announcement is most certainly going to be lame!) the stock will go right back down. And he cares a lot about the stock price, as anyone who knows him can attest.

Benioff has considered acquisitions in the past, but he is in a delicate dance with his stock price, and doesn't want to be seen to be overpaying. Unlike Google, he just doesn't have much "room" - a billion wasted is nothing for Google, but Benioff just doesn't have the luxury, particularly with the P/E it already commands, and the slowing growth. So acquisitions that don't add to the E reasonably quickly will worsen his P/E, putting pressure on his stock. And Google has that aura of mystery and grandeur about it, which Benioff's sales guy cheap-shot antics have denied him, so he cannot go on "trust me" too long.

His other strategic problem is his own core business is facing price pressure  in the low end. Moving higher to escape creeping commoditization pits him against Oracle/SAP, which he knows is not going to be easy.  

So he is going to sell. From his perspective, Google would be the best company to sell to, both from a stock valuation perspective and from a going-with-glory perspective. If the stock goes down, Oracle would surely emerge as a bidder (Ellison has publicly mused about adding Salesforce to his stable). Benioff would do anything to avoid that fate, because in a sense it would represent failure. 

His problem is that Google doesn't really want to pick a fight with Oracle/SAP, at least not anytime soon. Microsoft is their enemy, and they don't want to make new enemies. So they would probably pass on Salesforce. And the cultural fit just isn't there at all for Google.

Benioff knows Google is at best lukewarm about him. That is why he is playing coy, letting the impression of Google-being-a-suitor gain ground (which only helps his stock), and hoping that someone else will make a bid, preferably on top of that already boosted stock price. Delicate high-wire act, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, this is an excellent analysis of the situation. I am somewhat knowledgeable on this (don&#8217;t work for any of the companies mentioned, so I am not breaking any confidentiality here), but it is true that Marc Benioff is desperately seeking strategic choices. As has been reported by ZDNet bloggers, Salesforce growth is slowing down, and the stock has been levitating of late, particularly after the Google acquisition rumors. If he does nothing (tomorrows announcement is most certainly going to be lame!) the stock will go right back down. And he cares a lot about the stock price, as anyone who knows him can attest.</p>
<p>Benioff has considered acquisitions in the past, but he is in a delicate dance with his stock price, and doesn&#8217;t want to be seen to be overpaying. Unlike Google, he just doesn&#8217;t have much &#8220;room&#8221; - a billion wasted is nothing for Google, but Benioff just doesn&#8217;t have the luxury, particularly with the P/E it already commands, and the slowing growth. So acquisitions that don&#8217;t add to the E reasonably quickly will worsen his P/E, putting pressure on his stock. And Google has that aura of mystery and grandeur about it, which Benioff&#8217;s sales guy cheap-shot antics have denied him, so he cannot go on &#8220;trust me&#8221; too long.</p>
<p>His other strategic problem is his own core business is facing price pressure  in the low end. Moving higher to escape creeping commoditization pits him against Oracle/SAP, which he knows is not going to be easy.  </p>
<p>So he is going to sell. From his perspective, Google would be the best company to sell to, both from a stock valuation perspective and from a going-with-glory perspective. If the stock goes down, Oracle would surely emerge as a bidder (Ellison has publicly mused about adding Salesforce to his stable). Benioff would do anything to avoid that fate, because in a sense it would represent failure. </p>
<p>His problem is that Google doesn&#8217;t really want to pick a fight with Oracle/SAP, at least not anytime soon. Microsoft is their enemy, and they don&#8217;t want to make new enemies. So they would probably pass on Salesforce. And the cultural fit just isn&#8217;t there at all for Google.</p>
<p>Benioff knows Google is at best lukewarm about him. That is why he is playing coy, letting the impression of Google-being-a-suitor gain ground (which only helps his stock), and hoping that someone else will make a bid, preferably on top of that already boosted stock price. Delicate high-wire act, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409223</guid>
		<description>Mike, its nice seeing you writing these longer reviews. (even though you don't make as much $$$ on them.)

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, its nice seeing you writing these longer reviews. (even though you don&#8217;t make as much $$$ on them.)</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyWarhol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409201</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyWarhol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409201</guid>
		<description>i love that Bass riff on Shine!! ;))

i've always loved ACT! for CRM but Salesforce is certainly more Web oriented* it makes sense for Google to scoop this one but as a coupla peeps mentioned these Valuations are outrageous*  ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love that Bass riff on Shine!! ;))</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve always loved ACT! for CRM but Salesforce is certainly more Web oriented* it makes sense for Google to scoop this one but as a coupla peeps mentioned these Valuations are outrageous*  ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ez E</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ez E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409162</guid>
		<description>"Lorilee Walton" -- the TC commenter you mentioned Salesforce was trying find -- linked to Lorilee Walton's myspace page. Guess what her profile song was? "Shine" by Collective Soul. Dude, that song SUCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lorilee Walton&#8221; &#8212; the TC commenter you mentioned Salesforce was trying find &#8212; linked to Lorilee Walton&#8217;s myspace page. Guess what her profile song was? &#8220;Shine&#8221; by Collective Soul. Dude, that song SUCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409158</link>
		<dc:creator>Regin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409158</guid>
		<description>That much for source protection "I did not supply it to them" - How about just telling that it was an internal employee that provided it to you, AND that you have the individual's email and ip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That much for source protection &#8220;I did not supply it to them&#8221; - How about just telling that it was an internal employee that provided it to you, AND that you have the individual&#8217;s email and ip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hickins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409134</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hickins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/04/salesforce-is-acquisition-bait/#comment-1409134</guid>
		<description>Michael, I asked Dave Girouard at the end of last year whether Google would buy Salesforce. After he stopped giggling, he said that Google has no interest in going after applications that aren't logical extensions of "the Google everyone knows and loves in the consumer world." Sounded like a reasonable statement. I like your division of the market, but it leaves unanswered whether Google is willing to go so far outside its comfort zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I asked Dave Girouard at the end of last year whether Google would buy Salesforce. After he stopped giggling, he said that Google has no interest in going after applications that aren&#8217;t logical extensions of &#8220;the Google everyone knows and loves in the consumer world.&#8221; Sounded like a reasonable statement. I like your division of the market, but it leaves unanswered whether Google is willing to go so far outside its comfort zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.117 seconds -->
