<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recruit.net: Job Aggregation With Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recruit.net Expanding: Growth Opportunities in Asia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1805778</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruit.net Expanding: Growth Opportunities in Asia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1805778</guid>
		<description>[...] Kong based Recruit.net, a job search engine we first wrote about in May, is expanding, and they&#8217;re still not interested in the United [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kong based Recruit.net, a job search engine we first wrote about in May, is expanding, and they&#8217;re still not interested in the United [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recruit.net &#187; Some recent press from across the blogsphere</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1527657</link>
		<dc:creator>recruit.net &#187; Some recent press from across the blogsphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1527657</guid>
		<description>[...] Duncan Reily from TechCrunch has also covered us in a recent article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Duncan Reily from TechCrunch has also covered us in a recent article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maneck Mohan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1402677</link>
		<dc:creator>Maneck Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 06:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1402677</guid>
		<description>Duncan, thank you for writing about Recruit.net

Paul - more mature in terms of the value proposition we offer to our advertisers who can target their ads to a specific niche partner, country or language in addition to just keywords.

Best,

Maneck Mohan
http://www.recruit.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, thank you for writing about Recruit.net</p>
<p>Paul - more mature in terms of the value proposition we offer to our advertisers who can target their ads to a specific niche partner, country or language in addition to just keywords.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Maneck Mohan<br />
<a href="http://www.recruit.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.recruit.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1400990</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1400990</guid>
		<description>Could someone explain why Recruit.net's syndication of sponsored job content to a network of partner sites is a 'more mature revenue model...'?  Indeed, for example, has been syndicating pay-per-click sponsored jobs - and sharing the revenue with partner sites - for more than 2 years.

Paul
CEO, Indeed
www.indeed.com - one search. all jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone explain why Recruit.net&#8217;s syndication of sponsored job content to a network of partner sites is a &#8216;more mature revenue model&#8230;&#8217;?  Indeed, for example, has been syndicating pay-per-click sponsored jobs - and sharing the revenue with partner sites - for more than 2 years.</p>
<p>Paul<br />
CEO, Indeed<br />
<a href="http://www.indeed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com</a> - one search. all jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399798</link>
		<dc:creator>shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 07:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399798</guid>
		<description>someone wants to do some mashup with the SalaryBase project (http://www.salarybase.com) - would be cool to get the stats per a job listing I reckon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone wants to do some mashup with the SalaryBase project (http://www.salarybase.com) - would be cool to get the stats per a job listing I reckon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399777</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399777</guid>
		<description>My review from a week ago (Maneck is working with me on an interview). For some reason I think I review every job board out there :)
http://www.centernetworks.com/recruit-net-is-to-the-east-what-indeed-is-to-the-u-s

There is also newchinacareer.com in the Chinese space.

Duncan, I like your "Australiasian" term... is this used a lot down-under? I would love to use that going forward if people will "get it".

Recruit.net is closest to Indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My review from a week ago (Maneck is working with me on an interview). For some reason I think I review every job board out there <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/recruit-net-is-to-the-east-what-indeed-is-to-the-u-s" rel="nofollow">http://www.centernetworks.com/.....to-the-u-s</a></p>
<p>There is also newchinacareer.com in the Chinese space.</p>
<p>Duncan, I like your &#8220;Australiasian&#8221; term&#8230; is this used a lot down-under? I would love to use that going forward if people will &#8220;get it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Recruit.net is closest to Indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399757</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 07:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399757</guid>
		<description>Michael (Camilleri), call me old fashioned but when referring to people in a formal written setting it's usually considered the norm to refer to them by both names. Whilst blogging as a medium often sits on the line when it comes to formalities this isn't my personal blog so understand that I'm not referring to anyone by their first name alone unless advised to do so from above. Also consider that whilst TechCrunch has a loyal readership who would immediately understand that a reference to Michael would mean Michael Arrington, a lot of visitors won't. Your point in terms of a personal blog is noted, but it justifies a formal approach and not an informal one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael (Camilleri), call me old fashioned but when referring to people in a formal written setting it&#8217;s usually considered the norm to refer to them by both names. Whilst blogging as a medium often sits on the line when it comes to formalities this isn&#8217;t my personal blog so understand that I&#8217;m not referring to anyone by their first name alone unless advised to do so from above. Also consider that whilst TechCrunch has a loyal readership who would immediately understand that a reference to Michael would mean Michael Arrington, a lot of visitors won&#8217;t. Your point in terms of a personal blog is noted, but it justifies a formal approach and not an informal one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Camilleri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399743</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Camilleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 06:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399743</guid>
		<description>Duncan, don't keep referring to Arrington as 'Michael Arrington'. You're in danger of either sounding like a robot or a six-year-old. You're writing for TechCrunch not some personal blog; I'm sure 'Michael' or even 'Mike' is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, don&#8217;t keep referring to Arrington as &#8216;Michael Arrington&#8217;. You&#8217;re in danger of either sounding like a robot or a six-year-old. You&#8217;re writing for TechCrunch not some personal blog; I&#8217;m sure &#8216;Michael&#8217; or even &#8216;Mike&#8217; is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399608</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/recruitnet-job-aggregation-with-revenue/#comment-1399608</guid>
		<description>I doubt the job search space is in a bubble.

For one, it is one of the few industries that spits out non-ad dollars at the end of its funnel.

Just in India, naukri.com, India's equivelent of monster.com, recently had an IPO(oversubscribed six times).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the job search space is in a bubble.</p>
<p>For one, it is one of the few industries that spits out non-ad dollars at the end of its funnel.</p>
<p>Just in India, naukri.com, India&#8217;s equivelent of monster.com, recently had an IPO(oversubscribed six times).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.046 seconds -->
