<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelliverb: Is It Intelligent Investing in Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arjun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399773</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 07:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399773</guid>
		<description>What kind of review is this?  It almost seems like you were drunk when you chose your sample queries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of review is this?  It almost seems like you were drunk when you chose your sample queries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: most3</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399751</link>
		<dc:creator>most3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 06:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399751</guid>
		<description>I don't like this search engine, there is no more exciting changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like this search engine, there is no more exciting changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: other</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399613</link>
		<dc:creator>other</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399613</guid>
		<description>this

post

has

way

too

many

images

we 

got

the

point

after

the

first

one.

(see duncan, scrolling down sucks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this</p>
<p>post</p>
<p>has</p>
<p>way</p>
<p>too</p>
<p>many</p>
<p>images</p>
<p>we </p>
<p>got</p>
<p>the</p>
<p>point</p>
<p>after</p>
<p>the</p>
<p>first</p>
<p>one.</p>
<p>(see duncan, scrolling down sucks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399582</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399582</guid>
		<description>It did get one search right:

"intelliverb sucjs"

Returns "did you mean 'Intelliverb sucks'".  Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did get one search right:</p>
<p>&#8220;intelliverb sucjs&#8221;</p>
<p>Returns &#8220;did you mean &#8216;Intelliverb sucks&#8217;&#8221;.  Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399476</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399476</guid>
		<description>Lex, regarding Google's concerns about Powerset.    Short answer is no, I don't think any of the  Google folks I know has ever expressed concerns to me though I have not brought this up specifically.  Long answer is absolutely yes.    Eric Schmidt has noted, correctly, that Google is only one great search idea away from having real competition.  Powerset also convinced one of Yahoo's excellent search guys to join them (Tim Converse).   Do I think Powerset is likely to be the next Google?  No.  Do I think Powerset has a *decent chance* of becoming a dominant player in the market?  Yes.    Will Google's dominance in onine advertising see any challenges in the coming 5 years.   Yes.   Therefore, Google is concerned - their stock price is based on the assumption they'll keep being dominant for some time.  Staying at the top of your game while supersizing the company is a challenge even for Google's brilliant leadership and staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex, regarding Google&#8217;s concerns about Powerset.    Short answer is no, I don&#8217;t think any of the  Google folks I know has ever expressed concerns to me though I have not brought this up specifically.  Long answer is absolutely yes.    Eric Schmidt has noted, correctly, that Google is only one great search idea away from having real competition.  Powerset also convinced one of Yahoo&#8217;s excellent search guys to join them (Tim Converse).   Do I think Powerset is likely to be the next Google?  No.  Do I think Powerset has a *decent chance* of becoming a dominant player in the market?  Yes.    Will Google&#8217;s dominance in onine advertising see any challenges in the coming 5 years.   Yes.   Therefore, Google is concerned - their stock price is based on the assumption they&#8217;ll keep being dominant for some time.  Staying at the top of your game while supersizing the company is a challenge even for Google&#8217;s brilliant leadership and staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaila Colbin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaila Colbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 02:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399441</guid>
		<description>Temptation to mock the site notwithstanding, I'm actually curious -- does anyone have an understanding of what they mean by 'point of operation dependency'? This is not a sarcastic question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temptation to mock the site notwithstanding, I&#8217;m actually curious &#8212; does anyone have an understanding of what they mean by &#8216;point of operation dependency&#8217;? This is not a sarcastic question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399374</link>
		<dc:creator>haha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399374</guid>
		<description>haha 

type in "google"

it doesnt even return google.com as the top result. 

who the fk would want to use this ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha </p>
<p>type in &#8220;google&#8221;</p>
<p>it doesnt even return google.com as the top result. </p>
<p>who the fk would want to use this ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399236</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 23:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399236</guid>
		<description>But Phugit its hard to please everybody because if they make it different then some people may say we want a familiar interface - at least as familiar as possible to Google in a way. I think that is the reason why they stuck to the status quo because its a safer bet and I cannot blame them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Phugit its hard to please everybody because if they make it different then some people may say we want a familiar interface - at least as familiar as possible to Google in a way. I think that is the reason why they stuck to the status quo because its a safer bet and I cannot blame them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phugit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399189</link>
		<dc:creator>phugit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 22:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399189</guid>
		<description>#10 - gotta agree with you ... I'd like to see a innovative, creative UI rather than the bland textbox with button.  I mean even live.com is lame and I was hoping the Live brand would show use something different.

I don't mind these search startups, but atleast make the search box and results something DIFFERENT than the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10 - gotta agree with you &#8230; I&#8217;d like to see a innovative, creative UI rather than the bland textbox with button.  I mean even live.com is lame and I was hoping the Live brand would show use something different.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind these search startups, but atleast make the search box and results something DIFFERENT than the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John / SocialNext</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399188</link>
		<dc:creator>John / SocialNext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399188</guid>
		<description>Pfft. ACrappySearchEngine.com is way crappier than Intelliverb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfft. ACrappySearchEngine.com is way crappier than Intelliverb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399186</guid>
		<description>maybe they should return to private beta and work on the algorithm and GUI a bit more, but none the less an interesting project to be working on. May not necesarily be a google killer, but does it really need to be? it was mentioned in on a blog post i linked to in my blog that only 1% of the search market accounts for $1bn enough for a small company if they can get it!

Good luck to em i say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they should return to private beta and work on the algorithm and GUI a bit more, but none the less an interesting project to be working on. May not necesarily be a google killer, but does it really need to be? it was mentioned in on a blog post i linked to in my blog that only 1% of the search market accounts for $1bn enough for a small company if they can get it!</p>
<p>Good luck to em i say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SutroStyle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399128</link>
		<dc:creator>SutroStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399128</guid>
		<description>@david #9
zinju.com is not so great either- you are not even co-located ;-)
CIDR:       208.109.0.0/16 
NetName:    GO-DADDY-SOFTWARE-INC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@david #9<br />
zinju.com is not so great either- you are not even co-located <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
CIDR:       208.109.0.0/16<br />
NetName:    GO-DADDY-SOFTWARE-INC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scmexpert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399085</link>
		<dc:creator>scmexpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399085</guid>
		<description>I remember when Google was a search engine start-up...

Anyone else out there Riding the RFID Roller Coaster?
http://supplychainnetwork.com/?p=68


Cheers SCMX
http://supplychainnetwork.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when Google was a search engine start-up&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyone else out there Riding the RFID Roller Coaster?<br />
<a href="http://supplychainnetwork.com/?p=68" rel="nofollow">http://supplychainnetwork.com/?p=68</a></p>
<p>Cheers SCMX<br />
<a href="http://supplychainnetwork.com/" rel="nofollow">http://supplychainnetwork.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399070</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 20:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399070</guid>
		<description>@Joe Hunkins
&#62;&#62; PowerSet has even Google (a little bit) worried 

Do you have *any* evidence of this??  Are your Googler friends telling you they're concerned?  I'm guessing not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe Hunkins<br />
&gt;&gt; PowerSet has even Google (a little bit) worried </p>
<p>Do you have *any* evidence of this??  Are your Googler friends telling you they&#8217;re concerned?  I&#8217;m guessing not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399020</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 20:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1399020</guid>
		<description>Looks like it has a ways to go. How did you find these guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it has a ways to go. How did you find these guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chanderlandarianaryformersaudersmalirianactivatedoystermolchernedorvermoldfrostegaous</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398985</link>
		<dc:creator>chanderlandarianaryformersaudersmalirianactivatedoystermolchernedorvermoldfrostegaous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 19:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398985</guid>
		<description>lol wtf is "business"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol wtf is &#8220;business&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dekut.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398918</link>
		<dc:creator>Dekut.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398918</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is It Intelligent Investing in Search?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Maryland based Intelliverb is a full content based search engine with a relevancy model driven by point of operation dependency.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is It Intelligent Investing in Search?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Maryland based Intelliverb is a full content based search engine with a relevancy model driven by point of operation dependency&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what's biggest search engine fears?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398846</link>
		<dc:creator>what's biggest search engine fears?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 17:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398846</guid>
		<description>You know what is biggest fear... Islamic fundamentalist or Muslim founded and powered AI search engine. Dubai have last digit A.I. They have lot of money. Oil power, desert power, economic power, etc.. AI search engine could bring hype over there.  They can have IPO


You guys should not attack U.S search engine startups. Give the little faith... They could help us bring better life and American dream. Come on we screw up war with iraq stuff. We have high oil price over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what is biggest fear&#8230; Islamic fundamentalist or Muslim founded and powered AI search engine. Dubai have last digit A.I. They have lot of money. Oil power, desert power, economic power, etc.. AI search engine could bring hype over there.  They can have IPO</p>
<p>You guys should not attack U.S search engine startups. Give the little faith&#8230; They could help us bring better life and American dream. Come on we screw up war with iraq stuff. We have high oil price over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ 9, @ 10</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398831</link>
		<dc:creator>@ 9, @ 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398831</guid>
		<description>Please people give them chance to succeed. Come on... Oh knows... These guys could be famous.

Remember the old google days... Stanford.google.com wasn't popular. people didn't even know these guys. Somehow they invented something cool.


Give them chance. They didn't ask for VC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please people give them chance to succeed. Come on&#8230; Oh knows&#8230; These guys could be famous.</p>
<p>Remember the old google days&#8230; Stanford.google.com wasn&#8217;t popular. people didn&#8217;t even know these guys. Somehow they invented something cool.</p>
<p>Give them chance. They didn&#8217;t ask for VC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398830</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398830</guid>
		<description>Mine is funnier:   joke hunkies  OR   foe hunk ins

They seem to also have trouble with their own name:
The search for :        intelliverb search          did not match any document in the system

But Duncan you don't answer your own question - is is good to invest in search?   PowerSet has even Google  (a little bit) worried because a killer search application will shift things within a few years or months as we've seen with the evolution of search.   

Maybe TechCrunch should consider organizing a  "search hedge fund" that would invest in dozens (hundreds?) of the most promising new search companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine is funnier:   joke hunkies  OR   foe hunk ins</p>
<p>They seem to also have trouble with their own name:<br />
The search for :        intelliverb search          did not match any document in the system</p>
<p>But Duncan you don&#8217;t answer your own question - is is good to invest in search?   PowerSet has even Google  (a little bit) worried because a killer search application will shift things within a few years or months as we&#8217;ve seen with the evolution of search.   </p>
<p>Maybe TechCrunch should consider organizing a  &#8220;search hedge fund&#8221; that would invest in dozens (hundreds?) of the most promising new search companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398827</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398827</guid>
		<description>I'm annoyed by this...not because its Yet-Another search engine in what is starting to look like a crowded market, but because this start-up is focussing on one aspect of search (the algorithm), but neglecting another key area: the user interface. Copying the status quo is like an insult to what start-ups are supposed to be; innovative and creatively free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m annoyed by this&#8230;not because its Yet-Another search engine in what is starting to look like a crowded market, but because this start-up is focussing on one aspect of search (the algorithm), but neglecting another key area: the user interface. Copying the status quo is like an insult to what start-ups are supposed to be; innovative and creatively free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398809</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398809</guid>
		<description>Duncan, why did you ever publish this write-up?  Run out of good start-ups, or did the founders get to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, why did you ever publish this write-up?  Run out of good start-ups, or did the founders get to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tradesecret search engine?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398803</link>
		<dc:creator>Tradesecret search engine?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398803</guid>
		<description>Hunt for spy programmers is hard to find. They are usually lottery people or Secret men.  You can find them around the U.S and some parts of world.

Spy programmers usually use fake name, looking put into trade secret stuff, putting new search engine source code,  no copyright infragement, no patent infragnement. He will sit down on quiet park with yellow envelope and disk. No camera... No company spies..

Spy programmers usually run away with deals and never come back...They dont' accept money either.

 It's cool to find spy programmers...Some search engine is usually made by russians, chinese, british, canadians, israeli, and americans. It could be 007, KGB, MI6, MOSSAD, CIA, all the intelligence men give away free source code gifts. They goal was compete search engine super power.


It's pretty cool to have
Google, Google maps, Yahoo Maps,  baidu, yandex, yahoo, accoona, powerset, wikia, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunt for spy programmers is hard to find. They are usually lottery people or Secret men.  You can find them around the U.S and some parts of world.</p>
<p>Spy programmers usually use fake name, looking put into trade secret stuff, putting new search engine source code,  no copyright infragement, no patent infragnement. He will sit down on quiet park with yellow envelope and disk. No camera&#8230; No company spies..</p>
<p>Spy programmers usually run away with deals and never come back&#8230;They dont&#8217; accept money either.</p>
<p> It&#8217;s cool to find spy programmers&#8230;Some search engine is usually made by russians, chinese, british, canadians, israeli, and americans. It could be 007, KGB, MI6, MOSSAD, CIA, all the intelligence men give away free source code gifts. They goal was compete search engine super power.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty cool to have<br />
Google, Google maps, Yahoo Maps,  baidu, yandex, yahoo, accoona, powerset, wikia, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398784</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398784</guid>
		<description>This doesn't look too promising, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t look too promising, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398752</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/27/intelliverb-is-it-intelligent-investing-in-search/#comment-1398752</guid>
		<description>business search: google - Do you mean    goggle  OR   go ogle...

they should reconsider entering into search engine business or return to private beta after this review.

btw i don't like their logo either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>business search: google - Do you mean    goggle  OR   go ogle&#8230;</p>
<p>they should reconsider entering into search engine business or return to private beta after this review.</p>
<p>btw i don&#8217;t like their logo either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.088 seconds -->
