<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The .CM Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:45:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama en de typmachine &#124; peteraspeslagh.be // een eigen kijk op de wereld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-2449918</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama en de typmachine &#124; peteraspeslagh.be // een eigen kijk op de wereld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-2449918</guid>
		<description>[...] domeinnamen wordt grof geld verdiend. Zo wist iemand de Kameroenese overheid ervan te overtuigen om de rechten op de .cm-extensie aan hem te verkopen. Alle niet geregistreerde .cm-domeinen zouden op die manier naar een reclamesite leiden, waarvan de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] domeinnamen wordt grof geld verdiend. Zo wist iemand de Kameroenese overheid ervan te overtuigen om de rechten op de .cm-extensie aan hem te verkopen. Alle niet geregistreerde .cm-domeinen zouden op die manier naar een reclamesite leiden, waarvan de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Use The Trademark Office - Turkmenistan is a Click Away! &#171; PhilSpace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-2407673</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Use The Trademark Office - Turkmenistan is a Click Away! &#171; PhilSpace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-2407673</guid>
		<description>[...] yes I wasn&#8217;t quick enough to get in the the Micronesia (FM), Tuvalu (TV), or Cameroon (CM) scams concepts.  Or at least too ethical (which sounds so much better).  I&#8217;m sure the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yes I wasn&#8217;t quick enough to get in the the Micronesia (FM), Tuvalu (TV), or Cameroon (CM) scams concepts.  Or at least too ethical (which sounds so much better).  I&#8217;m sure the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Media Supermarket</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1396082</link>
		<dc:creator>The Media Supermarket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1396082</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Owners of the Internet...&lt;/strong&gt;

Kevin Ham, the man behind many of these evil (and seriously cool) tactics, has also managed to remain anonymous in this undercover field of business

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Owners of the Internet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Kevin Ham, the man behind many of these evil (and seriously cool) tactics, has also managed to remain anonymous in this undercover field of business</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Itch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1393106</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Itch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 05:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1393106</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lost treasures of Cameroon...&lt;/strong&gt;

Agoga.com would have been absolutely unremarkable website, if not for two minor details, it has about one million US visitors and it belongs to domain mogul Kevin Ham (The man who owns the Internet). How comes that boring website got attention of milli...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lost treasures of Cameroon&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Agoga.com would have been absolutely unremarkable website, if not for two minor details, it has about one million US visitors and it belongs to domain mogul Kevin Ham (The man who owns the Internet). How comes that boring website got attention of milli&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392408</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392408</guid>
		<description>Kamel, Thanks for confirming more &quot;scams occurring in the extremely dirty domain name business&quot;, as Michael originally stated. Anyone else want to add anything. Organized crime? Wow, that is a new one, but now that I think about it, why wouldn&#039;t they have their fingers in ripping off brands like TM domain names. It&#039;s easier and cheaper than making a counterfeit Gucci bag, and you make more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kamel, Thanks for confirming more &#8220;scams occurring in the extremely dirty domain name business&#8221;, as Michael originally stated. Anyone else want to add anything. Organized crime? Wow, that is a new one, but now that I think about it, why wouldn&#8217;t they have their fingers in ripping off brands like TM domain names. It&#8217;s easier and cheaper than making a counterfeit Gucci bag, and you make more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392396</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392396</guid>
		<description>Since we&#039;re on the subject, am wondering why no one is making a big deal about Demand Media auctioning off trademark names followed by .TV (ie: NFL.TV) for high amounts?

That&#039;s a scam.  Making a deal with a country to monetize their assets isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we&#8217;re on the subject, am wondering why no one is making a big deal about Demand Media auctioning off trademark names followed by .TV (ie: NFL.TV) for high amounts?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a scam.  Making a deal with a country to monetize their assets isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392378</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392378</guid>
		<description>Michael,

As a regular reader of TechCrunch, am surprised with your tone in this article and comments.  Your readers are entitled to opinions, and since you&#039;ve enabled comments, to air them.

To respond to them in a personally aggressive manner only dilutes TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>As a regular reader of TechCrunch, am surprised with your tone in this article and comments.  Your readers are entitled to opinions, and since you&#8217;ve enabled comments, to air them.</p>
<p>To respond to them in a personally aggressive manner only dilutes TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392370</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392370</guid>
		<description>Adam, pass the popcorn please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, pass the popcorn please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392299</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392299</guid>
		<description>The more I look into the domain industry, the more I think Michael is just telling it like it is.  This my be what the future Domain Conferences look like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KghzMaaJPRE&amp;mode=related&amp;search=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I look into the domain industry, the more I think Michael is just telling it like it is.  This my be what the future Domain Conferences look like:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KghzMaaJPRE&amp;mode=related&amp;search=" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KghzMaaJPRE&amp;mode=related&amp;search='>http://www.yout...ted&amp;search=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High End Web Names Blog &#187; Domain Extension Typos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392271</link>
		<dc:creator>High End Web Names Blog &#187; Domain Extension Typos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392271</guid>
		<description>[...] and bloggers. For example, Michael Arrington has a post on his Techcrunch.com blog titled &#8220;The .CM Scam&#8220;: Business 2.0&#8217;s Paul Sloan has been digging into the .CM domain name scam. (&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and bloggers. For example, Michael Arrington has a post on his Techcrunch.com blog titled &#8220;The .CM Scam&#8220;: Business 2.0&#8217;s Paul Sloan has been digging into the .CM domain name scam. (&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Жульничество с доменами из зоны .CM &#171; Web 2.0 - Что нового? Новости интернет проектов</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392251</link>
		<dc:creator>Жульничество с доменами из зоны .CM &#171; Web 2.0 - Что нового? Новости интернет проектов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392251</guid>
		<description>[...] Источник: Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Источник: Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue_Chi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392064</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue_Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392064</guid>
		<description>A proposal was made by an undisclosed company to the Telecommunication Regulation Authority in Oman to have all unresolved traffic under the .om domain be redirected to a website created by that company called Search.om. The TRA made a public consultation announcement and has been collecting feedback. We do not know if they are going to go with the deal or not yet.

I&#039;ve written about it last month here
http://blue-chi.blogspot.com/2007/04/searchom-proposal-to-tra.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A proposal was made by an undisclosed company to the Telecommunication Regulation Authority in Oman to have all unresolved traffic under the .om domain be redirected to a website created by that company called Search.om. The TRA made a public consultation announcement and has been collecting feedback. We do not know if they are going to go with the deal or not yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written about it last month here<br />
<a href="http://blue-chi.blogspot.com/2007/04/searchom-proposal-to-tra.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blue-chi.blogspot.com/2007/04/searchom-proposal-to-tra.html'>http://blue-chi...sal-to-tra.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392060</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392060</guid>
		<description>No blog duel from me Adam..  I am predisposed to like Mike,  but I just don&#039;t understand the vitriol and unfair malignment of an entire space ..  the hate coming from his ivory tower. If we&#039;re dirty for trying to run white hat businesses in this space then so&#039;s he can be no better..  that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No blog duel from me Adam..  I am predisposed to like Mike,  but I just don&#8217;t understand the vitriol and unfair malignment of an entire space ..  the hate coming from his ivory tower. If we&#8217;re dirty for trying to run white hat businesses in this space then so&#8217;s he can be no better..  that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1392001</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1392001</guid>
		<description>Everybody grab your popcorn . It&#039;s a blog duel.

Frank maybe Mike left pool because he had a guilty conscience about all the tm typo names pool was selling off (and monetizing before releasing I might add). 

I&#039;m pretty sure while you were with Pool during its rise that they were one of the top companies involved in &quot;clever scams in the dirty domain business&quot;. 
How many registrar accreditations do they have now anyway?  How many registrar accreds does 1 company need ?   You worked around the barriers just like any business person would . . . and now you point the finger and call the &quot;industry&quot; dirty ?  CLASSIC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody grab your popcorn . It&#8217;s a blog duel.</p>
<p>Frank maybe Mike left pool because he had a guilty conscience about all the tm typo names pool was selling off (and monetizing before releasing I might add). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure while you were with Pool during its rise that they were one of the top companies involved in &#8220;clever scams in the dirty domain business&#8221;.<br />
How many registrar accreditations do they have now anyway?  How many registrar accreds does 1 company need ?   You worked around the barriers just like any business person would . . . and now you point the finger and call the &#8220;industry&#8221; dirty ?  CLASSIC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; The .COM Scam&#160;by&#160;Nate Ritter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391881</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; The .COM Scam&#160;by&#160;Nate Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391881</guid>
		<description>[...] with what Michael Arrington of Techcrunch says, other than his overly-sensational post titles, but Arrington&#8217;s stance on the &#8220;.cm scam&#8221; issue is so far out there it makes me laugh and cry at the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with what Michael Arrington of Techcrunch says, other than his overly-sensational post titles, but Arrington&#8217;s stance on the &#8220;.cm scam&#8221; issue is so far out there it makes me laugh and cry at the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391860</guid>
		<description>Open DNS... try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open DNS&#8230; try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391776</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391776</guid>
		<description>this is old new: aug 2006

http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/09/cameroon-takes-o-out-of-com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is old new: aug 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/09/cameroon-takes-o-out-of-com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/09/cameroon-takes-o-out-of-com/'>http://blog.ope...s-o-out-of-com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391740</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391740</guid>
		<description>What?  Advertising is booming, the monetization of anything and everything is in.  The names aren&#039;t registered, but wildcarded.  

As mentioned above, OpenDNS is an alternative.  But that doesn&#039;t make it new.  It&#039;s old news.  Tell the public about relevant &quot;domainer&quot; topics such as Registerfly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  Advertising is booming, the monetization of anything and everything is in.  The names aren&#8217;t registered, but wildcarded.  </p>
<p>As mentioned above, OpenDNS is an alternative.  But that doesn&#8217;t make it new.  It&#8217;s old news.  Tell the public about relevant &#8220;domainer&#8221; topics such as Registerfly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391724</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391724</guid>
		<description>I do see a problem here. The notion that all .cm traffic is wildcarded (treated equally) does not bear out.

Try:
disney.cm (goes to a domain sponsor page)
verizon.cm (goes to a hit farm page)
google.cm (goes to an end user advertiser page)
microsoft.cm  (goes to an altered agoga page)

If the traffic was wildcarded as suggested shouldn&#039;t all domains in .cm resolves similarly? Since they do not one could opine that the differential treatment of the domain traffic is indicative of the targeting of famous brands and tms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do see a problem here. The notion that all .cm traffic is wildcarded (treated equally) does not bear out.</p>
<p>Try:<br />
disney.cm (goes to a domain sponsor page)<br />
verizon.cm (goes to a hit farm page)<br />
google.cm (goes to an end user advertiser page)<br />
microsoft.cm  (goes to an altered agoga page)</p>
<p>If the traffic was wildcarded as suggested shouldn&#8217;t all domains in .cm resolves similarly? Since they do not one could opine that the differential treatment of the domain traffic is indicative of the targeting of famous brands and tms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-2/#comment-1391661</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391661</guid>
		<description>While this .cm business is seedy, it pales in comparison (IMO) to when a certain company &quot;broke&quot; DNS on the Internet - such that all normally-invalid DNS lookups would then resolve to something: A site with ads.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitefinder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this .cm business is seedy, it pales in comparison (IMO) to when a certain company &#8220;broke&#8221; DNS on the Internet &#8211; such that all normally-invalid DNS lookups would then resolve to something: A site with ads.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitefinder" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitefinder'>http://en.wikip...wiki/Sitefinder</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dach</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-1391626</link>
		<dc:creator>Dach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391626</guid>
		<description>Mike, if you want to buy .cm domain, please let me know, I will help you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, if you want to buy .cm domain, please let me know, I will help you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pallet jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-1391464</link>
		<dc:creator>pallet jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391464</guid>
		<description>yeah sounds like a good move to me; not a scame - just not completly ; legit :)

 - its  the american way -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah sounds like a good move to me; not a scame &#8211; just not completly ; legit <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> &#8211; its  the american way -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-1391396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391396</guid>
		<description>Were can you buy a &quot;.cm&quot; domain from? I cants seem to find any &quot;for real&quot; comapny that lets you buy them..!!

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were can you buy a &#8220;.cm&#8221; domain from? I cants seem to find any &#8220;for real&#8221; comapny that lets you buy them..!!</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-1391357</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391357</guid>
		<description>BTW, the scam is pretty smart in theory but rather poorly done : while techcrunch.cm does redirect to the placeholder ads, techcrunch.cm/someurl only shows a 404 :)
Nice thinking, then no brain in doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, the scam is pretty smart in theory but rather poorly done : while techcrunch.cm does redirect to the placeholder ads, techcrunch.cm/someurl only shows a 404 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Nice thinking, then no brain in doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anty.at &#187; Kamerun verdient Geld mit Type-in-Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-1391144</link>
		<dc:creator>anty.at &#187; Kamerun verdient Geld mit Type-in-Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/the-cm-scam/#comment-1391144</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch, Business 2.0, CNN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch, Business 2.0, CNN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
