May 21, 2007

Zooomr Mark III: New Features, Better Look

Duncan Riley

70 comments »

zooomr.pngZooomr has launched its latest version, Zooomr Mark III today with over 250 additional features, enhancements and upgrades.

The photo sharing company headed by the just turned 19 Kristopher Tate provides a range of appealing features including unlimited storage. Previous TechCrunch coverage here.

9 months in the making, we can’t possibly list all the changes, but we can focus on the big ones.

Zooomr Zipline

The new Zooomr sees the photo sharing site embrace social media. New feature Zooomr Zipline can only be described as a multimedia version of Twitter, complete with SMS and Widget support. More than TXT, Zipline naturally supports photo sharing as well.
zooomr1.png
It’s surprising to see a photo sharing site looking to compete with Twitter. The combination of photos and IM don’t immediately seem like a natural combination, but then again many people never thought services like Twitter would take off either.

Zooomr Groups

Zooomr Groups will allow users to play games and share photos. Groups can be password protected to restrict access and can be user defined to allow access to non-registered users.

Upgrades/ Changes

The new version of Zooomr will support what Zooomr calls “Infowidgets” that allows users to interact with tags in a visual way. An example is the marketplace slider in the screenshot below, instead of typing a price and saving it, users can slide their price from $1 to $1000.

Zooomr also adds its own login/ account functionality for the first time. Whilst running to date on OpenID, user feedback indicated that a significant number of people would prefer a site specific login. The new login does not come in place OpenID, both types of logins will be supported.

People Tags have been upgraded and now allow people who are not Zooomr account holders to be tagged. Tags will be tied to email addresses and are fully searchable. Non-users are emailed by Zooomr informing them of their inclusion in photo(s) on the site.

Zooomr API support will now be available to the public.

Aesthetics have also been improved with a new cleaner interface

Coming Soon: Zooomr Marketplace

Zooomr Marketplace will allow users to make money from the photos they shoot. Prices can be set to between $1 to $1000 and will be indexed in the marketplace for others to purchase.
zooomr2.jpg

Photos will be offered for sale royalty-free and can not depict a copyrighted image, slogan or face. Revenue from sales will be split 90/10 in favor of the publisher. Zooomr Marketplace will be launched later in the year; however as at Mark III users are able to price their photos in readiness for Zooomr Marketplace’s later launch. The entire Marketplace system is being developed in-house by Zooomr and is not being outsourced or provided by a 3rd party.

No Flickr Migration

The one feature still lacking in Mark III is the ability to transfer images from Flickr to Zooomr. Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote in June 2006 that Flickr may be afraid of Zooomr, and it would appear that they still are. Despite Yahoo providing export support for a range of external sites as part of the migration away from Yahoo Photos, Zooomr remains blocked from gaining access to the Flickr API to provide such as tool for its users, according to founder Kristopher Tate.

Zooomr Mark III Launch Demo! from Kristopher on Vimeo

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. TechCrunch Japanese
  2. Jeqq.com
  3. Phasor Burn » Blog Archive » Zooomr Mark III - if all else fails, try try again.
  4. Bloggers, CEOs And Everyone Else Camping Out for the iPhone
  5. Bloggers, CEOs And Everyone Else Camping Out for the iPhone | moraaz.org - feed all tech!
  6. Ajax Girl » Blog Archive » Bloggers, CEOs And Everyone Else Camping Out for the iPhone
  7. Zoli’s Blog » Blog Archive » Zooomr Powered by Zoho - Launch!

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Thomas Hawk

    Thanks Duncan,

    If people want to watch the launch live on UStream with us they can do that here:

    http://ustream.tv/channel/zooomr-mark-iii-launch

  2. Jim Turner

    I am also watching Kris and Thomas live at Ustream during the launch.
    http://ustream.tv/channel/zooomr-mark-iii-launch

  3. Not a fan

    “Zooomr remains blocked from gaining access to the Flickr API to provide such as tool for it’s users, according to founder Kristopher Tate.”

    Oh, come on. Flickr has always said that as soon as Zooomr has a free, open API like Flickr, they’ll give Zooomr an API key. Zooomr does not (yet) have an API, and therefore no Flickr API key.

  4. Duncan Riley

    Actually not a fan, if you read the post, Zooomr has an open, public API as part of its new feature set.

  5. David Agnew

    Hummm, not sure about launched, all I see are some videos, is that their new site? ;)

    People tagging seems like a horrible privacy invasion. There was a big thread about this on Flickr when a different company said they’d developed facial recognition and virtually everyone was against it. This doesn’t sound so different other than the person getting ‘people tagged’ gets spammed by zooomr too.

    I can’t see the API yet, but Thomas has said that Flickr was waiting for them to have an API first. Guess it’s more to do with that than still being “afraid”, guess we’ll see though. Would be good to have the option to export.

    Otherwise, the Vimeo video of it looks great. Can’t wait to see the long over due update.

  6. David Agnew

    Duncan, can you see an open API? I can’t.

  7. Not a fan

    Duncan, this is the second time they’ve tried to launch “Mark III” with this alleged open API. As far as I am concerned (and apparently Flickr as well), until the actual API is up and running, the API isn’t actually up and running.

    Surely you can see the difference?

  8. Thomas Hawk

    [I’m CEO of Zooomr]

    Flickr has said that they will give direct competitors a commercial API key when they release their API with documentation. We plan to do this coinciding with the launch of Mark III and will re-request a key in order to build a Flickr to Zooomr importer. I have no doubt that Flickr will keep good on their word with this.

  9. Not a fan

    See?

  10. Don MacAskill

    I like Thomas Hawk, Zooomr’s CEO, and I’m sure Mark III will be very cool. I wish Zooomr the best of luck.

    But is TechCrunch really in the habit of “launching” new releases before they’re actually released? They tried to launch it a month ago and were down for the greater part of a week, without a release.

    This attempt, if it goes smoothly, will be online in 12-24 hours. Shouldn’t TechCrunch actually wait for that to occur before posting something like this?

  11. Adam

    “with over 250 additional features”….whatever happened to the ‘less is more’ theme spreading throughout the web 2.0 world? Does anyone out there really want a photo site with 250 ‘additional’, let alone existing, features?

  12. James Swift

    Oh, hold on then Duncan, when you say…

    “Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote in June 2006 that Flickr may be afraid of Zooomr, and it would appear that they still are”

    That “appear” appears to be artistic license then, devoid of any facts?

    Watching the ustream video and IRC chat now, which is cool. But people keep asking about the one investor withdrawing their money and TH never answers and Kris wrote on the Zooomr blog that the site would have “a period of hiatus for Zooomr”. Is it safe for new users to depend on Zooomr sticking around? No answer so far.

  13. Matthew Rothenberg

    Hi Duncan, just a factual correction:
    “Zooomr remains blocked from gaining access to the Flickr API to provide such as tool for it’s users, according to founder Kristopher Tate.”

    As the person at Flickr directly responsible for all commercial API integrations, I can say this is inaccurate. Kristopher applied for a commercial API key back in February via our normal application process, but has yet to respond to my follow-up request for the documentation we would need to evaluate the request.

  14. Jeff O'Hara

    Can’t wait to see it.

  15. Duncan Riley

    Lot’s of comments on the API, so I won’t respond to all of them. The position is per the post “according to founder Kristopher Tate”, the historical perspective is in terms of what has been previously written on TechCrunch, and I’d note Flickr promised to give Zooomr access last year according to commentary at the time, it would appear that for what ever reasons it didn’t happen. (For the record though this isn’t a Flickr-bashing exercise, I’m a Flickr Pro account holder and I’ve always loved Flickr).

    As for what’s up at Zooomr, I wrote this post a week ago, so I promise that we’ve held it until close to or actual launch date. My understanding is that if everything isn’t live yet it shortly will be, perhaps Thomas or Kris can jump in and clarify this. Marketplace is the only feature that is to be launched later this year.

  16. Non Fan

    Kris Tate just asked people to head over hear to leave comments on this article in his ustream video feed. I wonder what kind of comments will follow?

  17. Basicity

    They need to put out and get the zoomr.com domain because they are driving lots of free traffic to zoomr.com!

  18. Not a non fan

    The position is per the post “according to founder Kristopher Tate”

    So you’re calling Kris Tate a liar?

  19. Mikko Kuhna

    Well done Kris. Can’t wait for Mark III. The only thing I would’ve hoped is more multi-editing/tagging/copyrighting or whatever. Well, anyways great job. I’m going to stay with zooomr for a long time and not even think about flickr.

  20. Dunstan

    [I happen to work at Flickr.]

    Thomas and Mathew seem to have cleared up the confusion on the API issue, so that’s nice, but Flickr and Zoomr aside, why would TechCrunch publish an article, the main focus of which (in this case a site’s supposed launch) isn’t yet true, and the most contentious point of which (Flickr migration) is poorly researched?

    I know there’s nothing positive in this comment, and I aplogise for that, but really, it’s a bit of a crappy state of affairs for a site such as TechCrunch, no?

  21. Dunstan

    Now I feel bad for writing that… but I’m a little tired of crummy articles on tech sites:

    http://flickr.com/photos/dunstan/491853235/

    :o/

  22. TwisterMc

    I can’t wait till Mark III is live. I’ve been very happy with Zooomr and the new features will make it even better!!

  23. soxiam

    I will reserve my opinions on the new release until i get to immerse myself in it and feel my way through the new features but I want to point out that a MAJOR feature release of this type does seem to dovetail well with Zooomr’s core audience. I think this is their niche. Zooomr fans early adopters looking for fresh features and I don’t think anyone will accuse Zooomr of being stricken with featuritis. The real trick of course is the level of engagement and the rate of traction. I just hope the developers didn’t forget to keep the new features simple and fun to use.

  24. joker

    Zooomr is becoming more and more clearly a joke. TechCrunch always propagandas for it at all cost of its own credibility. Hopefully I will be proved wrong - many of my pictures in Zooomr became “not available” for quite a while and all the so-called “launchching” did (again) is just stopping the service.

  25. Wes

    I actually thought that Mark III had been launched but all the same 250 additional features, enhancements and upgrades means to me its worth waiting for. With so many additions, one can understand why there could be delays in the launch but when it is finally launched I will make sure I jump on to the site.

  26. Robert Dewey

    It’s funny how people love to hate this service… I see so many new people come out of the woodwork and comment just for Zooomr.

  27. Griffon

    Crazy question but how do a I pull a random picture from a user stream. Say I wanted to have a blog post where the imagine changed with each page load from zooomr. Seems to only be static links now but a simple API call should be able to handle this… oh wait documentation dam….

  28. Andy

    One thing that was not mentioned was that zooomr will now offer “Unlimited storage, archival and uploading for all users — no limits on photo size, either!” Very nice, if you ask me.

    I’ve been using zooomr for a while now, and have found it to be a nice alternative to Flickr. I’ve got my fingers crossed that the release, which Thomas and Kris say will be out in “12-24 hours” will go smoothly, and nothing bad will happen like the last time they tried to release Mark III a few months ago.

  29. Jono

    Wow, can Zoomr be any more of a piece of shit? Seriously. We have a big ugly kid who is ego obsessed. We’re not interested in seeing your ugly mug, why the hell is there a live webcam stream on the landing page?

    Zoomr is just mashing together random features. Geo tagging photographs? Are you serious? Nobody does this because its pointless. Twitter like features? Groups where you play games? Why do people want this exactly? Who are you trying to target exactly? And now your getting into folksonomy and people tagging? Since when was Zoomr about people and relationships? Zoomr started as a photography hub for photographic images, NOT to socially network and tag people with. People aren’t going to start mixing in their personal party photos with their candid photography work.

    I’m all for young entrepreneurs, but give me something I can respect, please.

  30. Hari

    Hm.. I have not heard of Zooomr before. Its looks good, maybe i’ll try it.

  31. Robert Dewey

    Jono;

    You lost credibility after your first paragraph. You’re claims of an ego-obsessed founder, even if true, aren’t as ridiculous as your post… which is obviously an expression of your own personality (or lack of).

  32. Michael Arrington

    “Wow, can Zoomr be any more of a piece of shit?”

    I love our insightful readers.

  33. joker

    Honestly I wish Zooomr well. It is a free service and provides (at least promised providing) so much. There is no reason to complain - I’m serious. I don’t like Flickr because I have only a free account, only 200 pictures. I just don’t have that much FAITH others have.

  34. Robert Dewey

    I think we have a new term coming up; it’s the “anti-userbase”

    This would be the people that scan every blog on the internet for a service, just for the sole purpose of leaving “insightful” comments. Zooomr seems to be one of the first victims. Out of all of these commenters, I would say I regularly see two or three of them here on TC…

  35. Jono

    Don’t discriminate or exclude my opinion because of my language. It may be unprofessional in this context, but what good are these words to the english language if we can’t use them? Why do we have words we can’t use, doesn’t that defeat the purpose of communication?

    I don’t need credibility to prove my point. Look at Zooomr yourself, the feature roll-out they’re producing. It upsets me something that HAD potential is becoming a zoo of a product. What exactly IS this site now? Why the need for groups, locking pages, and for the love of god, MAPS on a photo sharing site? This upsets me because this isn’t innovation. This is monkeys throwing darts at a wall of post it notes, each with a different feature on it.

    I value originality, creativity, competitiveness. I don’t value sucking up to a product that sucks, like TC and many of its readers are doing.

  36. patricia

    @ robert dewey, i comment here a lot…

    i have no opinion about this service, but I think it’s very interesting how all of the sudden there are a lot of start ups and new ideas based on twitter’s concept. I think twitter is a good first look at what convergence is going to be like. this only makes drives it further.

  37. patricia

    ^oops. remove makes out of the last sentence (long day)

  38. joker

    I could not say for other “anti-users”. I am just a regular user, maybe too picky only because I really wish the perfect service promised by Zooomr will come true in a couple of days. As I see it, Zooomr will be great as long as all the talks become real. At this moment, the whole thing just doesn’t work. I have no problem with Kris’s attitude or ego. He is obviously a very VERY smart kid.

    I admit I didn’t enter my real email because I still want to be a Zooomr’s customer in case it works out this time. Let’s cross the fingers as somebody said. I’m a regular reader of techcrunch and never posted on any other blogs before.

  39. Scott McDonald

    Jono - you don’t like maps on a photo site, that’s fine. It’s the reason I went to Zooomr in the first place. I take a lot of photographs of my wandering around, I like to know where they were taken and like to see on the map where others have taken their photos. I geotag all of my photos now and Zooomr picks up the geotags in the exif data automatically.

    Obviously Flickr thought this was a great idea as well, as they added that feature a short time ago. It’d be nice if Flickr also used the geotags inside the photo automatically, but it doesn’t seem to - I still have to drag and drop onto their map interface (which is very nice) manually.

    If you don’t like Zooomr, that’s fine, but I don’t understand the need to criticize just to fuel your own ego.

  40. Jono

    Scott: I wish I had an ego. Jono isn’t even my real name, this isn’t my real email. I don’t care to be identified, but I’m discussing and replying because I’m not an annonymous internet shit disturber. I’m an entrepreneur as well, Kristopher’s age.

    Do I hate Zooomr, or have something against Kris? Yeah, and as an entrepreneur, I’ll tell you why. Zooomr originally started out as an alternative to flickr. A direct clone if you will. Even the name was copied in nature. Kris, with his ego, sought to get as much coverage on his baby as he could. Why do I think he has an annoying ego. Well, why did he have a launch party? Who declares a launch countdown and then delays the site from becoming live for like a week? Who honestly wants their face to be on the main page of their site, on a LIVE webcam feed and a flash tutorial of them talking for 5 mins? And then the acquisition rumours?

    Is Kris a businessman or a hobbyist? Is Zooomr a business or his pet project? Do you honestly see anything innovative coming out of his Mark 3 rollout? I don’t. It doesn’t impress me. And if you think I’m jealous of his success….what success?

    So why is TC covering a launch that hasn’t even happend yet? Is TC objectively reporting, or is there a payola scheme going down (sarcasm, but the way TC covers kris’ pretty ass, I wonder…)

  41. RevDanCatt

    [I work for Flickr]

    Scott: Flickr does use the EXIF geo data from a photo and always has done. You need to opt in though from your account page. It’s under the Privacy Settings “Import EXIF location data”. It’s opt in because I believe in a couple of years there will be far more devices with GPS built in as standard and writing the EXIF data automatically, not everyone will be fully aware that each photos is broadcasting where it was taken. If the default it ‘On’ that’ll be a privacy problem at some point (like people ever opt out).

    Anyway, this is about Zooomr and not Flickr, and I kinda like that Kris is on live video. It’s brave.

    I’d *never* want a camera pointing at me when I’m trying to hit a deadline! Imagine being on camera at the time ticks towards Midnight as those last minute things that always crop up, well crop up. Yikes!

  42. Trey Ratcliff

    I’m considering bringing my photos over from Flickr where I suppose I have some kinda following ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/s.....77/detail/ ) but I can’t even think about it until I get that Flickr transfer tool. I spent a long time uploading and tagging everything.

    I love Zoomr’s features. I don’t know why such a small hungry team can add so many features while Flickr doesn’t really add much… I guess they are lazy? Hard to believe… but maybe Yahoo made them lazy.

  43. Jana

    “I’m an entrepreneur as well, Kristopher’s age.”

    Jono, if you’re Kris’s age then you ain’t anywhere near as mature! You need to grow some hair on those big balls of yours!

  44. Coleman Hines

    “It’s funny how people love to hate this service… I see so many new people come out of the woodwork and comment just for Zooomr.”

    Its about Thomas Hawk’s questionable (and bordering on the unethical) business practices. Taking advantage of any hot topic / issue within Flickr, (which with 5m users+ is always bound to happen) to put the knife into Flickr and then say “hey I’ve got a photo website too.”

    Competition is fine, but using your competitor’s website & forums to actively drum up business, well that’s pretty shady.

  45. Thomas

    @coleman

    Maybe that’s shady. But that doesn’t care for me. What I want is the best service for my needs. And I want high-resolution geotagging, a nice interface and big storage for free. 1 year ago was this “pro-account for blogging about zooomr” campaign. That was pretty cool promotion I think. So it was zooomr I started with - and not flickr.

  46. TravisP

    Coleman,

    I am a Zooomr user.

    I understand what you are saying about Thomas, but I think you are wrong. I have been following Thomas’ work since long before Zooomr came into the picture ;-). He has been a passionate photographer for a long time and passionate about Flickr also. Your comment about drumming up business for himself is not quite accurate either. Every time I have seen a comment from Thomas that appears to have any bias (and I don’t consider criticism of policies etc bias), he clearly identifies that he is the CEO of Zooomr. That is not shady. It allows the reader to decide if they feel that his comments are biased, because he is CEO of Zooomr. If he did not state his interests then yes I agree it would be ‘pretty shady’.

    If you take the time to read through some of the discussions that he has been involved in, where it appears that he is criticizing Flickr, you will likely also see a reasonable amount of early members of Flickr with similar views.

    @Jono: I don’t see what is wrong with marketing yourself by any means to increase traffic and exposure. Does an entrepreneur not ‘have’ to try and ‘hype’ their product to its maximum to get that exposure?

  47. Trey Ratcliff

    Thomas isn’t shady. He’s a sharp guy that is a cool photographer and has excellent ideas about how to build a photo-sharing website. He understands that the community (the ant-colony) should control what is popular with their digital scent-trails.

    Flickr recently did what old-school publishers did and censored a photo… Hawk merely pointed out that Zoomr was more like DIGG (ala the CD-KEY scent-trail revolt), and Zoomr would not arbitrarily do things like what Flickr did. It’s a great point and I’m glad he utilized the community of Flickr to make it.

  48. Sean McGee

    Hear hear, TravisP. I agree with everything you just said.

    Thomas Hawk is not shady. He’s made a lot of enemies by standing up for photographer’s rights. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if Coleman Hines was someone who didn’t like Thomas taking a picture of their building. Or maybe Coleman Hines is in the pay of Flickr. Wouldn’t be surprised.

    FYI: I am a Zooomr user. I had a Zooomr account before I had a Flickr account. The only reason I use Flickr, is because of all the cool things you can do with the API. Once Zooomr’s API is released, I don’t see a single reason why I should stay with Flickr.

  49. Duncan Riley

    Interesting that some people don’t like Zooomr. I’m not a Zooomr user so I’m not writing this from some sort of biased perspective, but I honestly believe there is a lot to like about the service, it could easily be a Flickr killer, although like the Twitter/ Jaiku relationship better doesn’t always result in numbers. It must be awfully hard for Zooomr to compete with a service like Flickr given Flickr’s penetration and acceptance in the Web 2.0 community but good on them for trying, we need competitors such as Zooomr to keep everyone honest. Imagine a world where Flickr had no competition, I would be able to smell the rotting stench of 2005 from a mile away :-)

  50. not a fan either

    “Zooomr remains blocked from gaining access to the Flickr API to provide such as tool for it’s users, according to founder Kristopher Tate.”

    Does Zoomr provide a way for their users to export photos to flickr?
    http://www.zoto.com does. They’ve redesigned and relaunched their site, too. But I guess because their developers are actually old enough to get into a bar they won’t ever get a mention on techcrunch.

  51. Jono

    Jana: I’m mature enough not need to show my balls on my webcam, unlike Kris. Or have my balls plastered to every screenshot and landing page. Nuff said.

    TravisP: How do you figure he’s marketing himself? Where in God’s planet have you ever seen a GUY (who looks like Kris btw) utilized to market a website effectively? Its not like he has the clout of Bill Gates, where anyone will watch and listen anyway, if thats what your trying to say. Name me one other succesful startup where the owners needed to show their faces so consistently and constantly.

    And what, a day later, the zooomr page is still showing a landing page. We can’t access anything, we can’t see any of the new features. These are the things that bother me with Zooomr + Kris.

    I don’t mean to be a total jerk, but the truth hurts. Thomas, get your project straightened out. I like the marketplace feature, where you can sell stock photos. This is innovative. But the rest is junk. Stick to your core features and advantages.

  52. OffBeatMammal

    Zooomr rocks.I’ve been using it for a while (”Pro for Life”) and prefer it to Flickr (esp not it’s Yahoo) but I wish the API existed and that someone would write a plug-in for Windows Live Writer so I don’t have to do everything manually

  53. Fabydreams

    Zooomr… the sky is the limit!

  54. Kurazaybo

    I don’t get it, why write a post about a service being launched “today” if it is still offline?

    Anyway I was a Flickr fan but my free account was very limited. Zooomr is more permissive, completely free and gave one of those “Pro4life” accounts just because. They have some catch up to do, specially in the API support department, but I can’t complain.

  55. joker

    For most people, “Launch” means starting some new service or new version of service or software. For Zooomr and its fans, it means stopping the existing service and putting some movie, which I have no interest in watching, on the home page.

    It happened several times in its short history. So many still have strong faith in it. I wish they’re right.

    Doesn’t this have nothing to do innovation or advantage, etc? It is just not real (yet). I hope this whole thing is not some kind of “behavior art”, or I’m caught on candid camera for being too serious.

  56. Anon

    I wonder how many days will pass from this article going live until it begins to be accurate. We’re already more than 24 hours in and the main point of the story “Zooomr has launched its latest version, Zooomr Mark III today…” is still entirely incorrect.

    This is a pretty shoddy journalistic justification for such a state of affairs:
    “As for what’s up at Zooomr, I wrote this post a week ago, so I promise that we’ve held it until close to or actual launch date. My understanding is that if everything isn’t live yet it shortly will be…”

    All I can say is thank heavens this kind of thing doesn’t happen very often with these wonderfully professional tech sites:
    http://daringfireball.net/2007/05/enjackass

  57. joker

    TechCrunch has a blind faith in Zooomr. Or for some unknown reason just doing Zooomr favors.

    For one thing I still respect you - not delete the criticizing comments.

  58. Automatt

    Hmm, the site is still down. Maybe they should focus on fewer features and instead show some discipline in their release process. In any case, they should definitely tie the product “launch” to actually having the thing working.

    I have a Flickr and a Zoomr account, and periodically check back with Zoomr to see if it is still as slow as mollasses and if the experience of using it still brings my browser to a crawl.

    Loading a map with every photo might make for an interesting demo, but in practice I’ve found it to be the worst thing about the site. Maybe removing that is one of the 250 features?

  59. phasorburn

    “How do you figure he’s marketing himself? Where in God’s planet have you ever seen a GUY (who looks like Kris btw) utilized to market a website effectively?”

    Sure, right over here at the super secret Zooomr MIII test site

  60. Anon

    Tick-tock tick-tock 3 days later and this article is still not true tick-tock how long can this go on tickety-tockety bong…

  61. Anon

    STILL NOT TRUE!!

  62. Peter

    every time i see another TC post pimping Zooomrrrrr, i get a bit nervous for just-turned-19 Chris Tate.

    TC seems to think that Zooooooooomr is not enough on its own - it is something developed by _some really young dude_ and therefore is worth going to check out.

    i don’t know - i’m a flickr guy, just want someplace to stick my photos, whatever - but if someone said anything about me or the stuff i produced and threw in a “he’s only X years old” disclaimer every time they mentioned my work, i’d start to wonder if what I produced was worth anything at all.

  63. Yam

    Just couldn’t believe that it is such a long time already.
    20 full days since this post that announced that Zoomr III ‘has launched today’ (!!!) and that great site is still not functioning normally.
    Let’s face reality. This is perhaps the beginning of the end of Zoomr, sadly so. (Or the end has already come?)
    A fantastic idea that cannot be delivered is only a fantasy. Now, Zoomr has exposed its real nature as the hobby of a teenager, and cheered up a small group of fans. It’s not meant to compete with flickr or anything on that level.
    I am sad, but this is reality.