<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Salesforce Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:51:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google-Salesforce Deal Looks Increasingly Improbable &#124; MeltedCube</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2039818</link>
		<dc:creator>Google-Salesforce Deal Looks Increasingly Improbable &#124; MeltedCube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-2039818</guid>
		<description>[...] Valley gossips keep rehashing rumors that Salesforce.com is on the block. We&#8217;ve seen all sorts of variations on the story, including one rumor that surfaced last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valley gossips keep rehashing rumors that Salesforce.com is on the block. We&#8217;ve seen all sorts of variations on the story, including one rumor that surfaced last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google-Salesforce Deal Looks Increasingly Improbable &#124; MeltedCube</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-2039817</link>
		<dc:creator>Google-Salesforce Deal Looks Increasingly Improbable &#124; MeltedCube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-2039817</guid>
		<description>[...] Valley gossips keep rehashing rumors that Salesforce.com is on the block. We&#8217;ve seen all sorts of variations on the story, including one rumor that surfaced last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valley gossips keep rehashing rumors that Salesforce.com is on the block. We&#8217;ve seen all sorts of variations on the story, including one rumor that surfaced last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qkjosilhtt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1443980</link>
		<dc:creator>qkjosilhtt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1443980</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! cymzmzczoeb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! cymzmzczoeb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sriram</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1408962</link>
		<dc:creator>Sriram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1408962</guid>
		<description>Replies 19 and 20: Salesforce or Google employee replies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replies 19 and 20: Salesforce or Google employee replies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salesforce Is Acquisition Bait</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1408876</link>
		<dc:creator>Salesforce Is Acquisition Bait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1408876</guid>
		<description>[...] smart money is betting that the partner is Google, and that the announcement itself won&#8217;t be much to write home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] smart money is betting that the partner is Google, and that the announcement itself won&#8217;t be much to write home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques V</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1404493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1404493</guid>
		<description>Yes, this walton character thinks they know something. What did we hear a story in our smoke room and now you want to pass this bull to the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this walton character thinks they know something. What did we hear a story in our smoke room and now you want to pass this bull to the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1404474</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1404474</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of junk, they are not doing any such deal. It is just a scam to get the stock prices to shoot up

As you all did see they did and a there is a lot of rich stockbrokers now.

People need to not listen to lies especially from this walton character</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of junk, they are not doing any such deal. It is just a scam to get the stock prices to shoot up</p>
<p>As you all did see they did and a there is a lot of rich stockbrokers now.</p>
<p>People need to not listen to lies especially from this walton character</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorilee Walton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1394695</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorilee Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1394695</guid>
		<description>They are not integrating all they are doing is getting Google Adwords at a cheaper deal for Salesforce.com customers. They are also giving team edition customers access to use the Google Adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not integrating all they are doing is getting Google Adwords at a cheaper deal for Salesforce.com customers. They are also giving team edition customers access to use the Google Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1393788</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1393788</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad these things are done. Many should do the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad these things are done. Many should do the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1392959</link>
		<dc:creator>DGary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 04:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1392959</guid>
		<description>Not happening.  Just a partnership that should have happened a long time ago...  http://www.salesforce.com/landing/coral_launch.jsp?d=70130000000CerP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not happening.  Just a partnership that should have happened a long time ago&#8230;  <a href="http://www.salesforce.com/landing/coral_launch.jsp?d=70130000000CerP" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.salesforce.com/landing/coral_launch.jsp?d=70130000000CerP'>http://www.sale...70130000000CerP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edbong</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1391569</link>
		<dc:creator>edbong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1391569</guid>
		<description>Salesforce.com has much more then a technology... it has a sale force to sell to the enterprise market. No doubt to me... Google will sooner or later buy salesforce.com...... ask yourself... as a shareholder of both companies... would you agree? I would.  
Appexchange with Google Apps makes absolute sense from the user perspective as well. We just did something similar but open source... http://www.applicationexchange.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salesforce.com has much more then a technology&#8230; it has a sale force to sell to the enterprise market. No doubt to me&#8230; Google will sooner or later buy salesforce.com&#8230;&#8230; ask yourself&#8230; as a shareholder of both companies&#8230; would you agree? I would.<br />
Appexchange with Google Apps makes absolute sense from the user perspective as well. We just did something similar but open source&#8230; <a href="http://www.applicationexchange.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.applicationexchange.com'>http://www.appl...ionexchange.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeri Van Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1391534</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeri Van Holder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1391534</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t surprise me if they did, would be good competition for MS...

I created a bet on it http://www.gottabet.com/bet/2176-google-acquire-salesforce ;-)

Go Google Go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if they did, would be good competition for MS&#8230;</p>
<p>I created a bet on it <a href="http://www.gottabet.com/bet/2176-google-acquire-salesforce" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.gottabet.com/bet/2176-google-acquire-salesforce'>http://www.gott...uire-salesforce</a> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Go Google Go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Cormon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1391297</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Cormon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1391297</guid>
		<description>Google could better buy Highrise of 37Signals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google could better buy Highrise of 37Signals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahya Cheema</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387884</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahya Cheema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387884</guid>
		<description>Its very true! Today when downloading attachments in gmail I was being redirected to a salesforce.com server.

I think its definitely a move by Google to increase adoption of Google Apps-its MS Office rival offering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its very true! Today when downloading attachments in gmail I was being redirected to a salesforce.com server.</p>
<p>I think its definitely a move by Google to increase adoption of Google Apps-its MS Office rival offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hornswaggled</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387365</link>
		<dc:creator>Hornswaggled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387365</guid>
		<description>I would like to see an acquisition. I am not interested in a partnership with any premium being put on the services available through G. I too read about this a few months ago though cant remember where. This in all reality would be a huge acquisition for G and the amount of services they could offer. It would also raise more flags about the amount of information that they have access to and can control. 

I&#039;m all for it though, their takeover of Urchin/Picassa/etc was great for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see an acquisition. I am not interested in a partnership with any premium being put on the services available through G. I too read about this a few months ago though cant remember where. This in all reality would be a huge acquisition for G and the amount of services they could offer. It would also raise more flags about the amount of information that they have access to and can control. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for it though, their takeover of Urchin/Picassa/etc was great for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387309</link>
		<dc:creator>CSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387309</guid>
		<description>I have known about these discussions for months, very surprised that this is news. I work for neither company, just have very good connections at one.  The lawyers have been hashing out the partnership for 3 months +, essentially they are working an APEX play for Google-Office and potentially SDFC integration with GOffice externally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have known about these discussions for months, very surprised that this is news. I work for neither company, just have very good connections at one.  The lawyers have been hashing out the partnership for 3 months +, essentially they are working an APEX play for Google-Office and potentially SDFC integration with GOffice externally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387286</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387286</guid>
		<description>Since we rolled out a gadgetized CRM for Google Apps and iGoogle at Etelos, I have been bugging my contacts at Google about this rumor.  From what I hear, its not a new rumor.  Been around a while... seems to come up every now and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we rolled out a gadgetized CRM for Google Apps and iGoogle at Etelos, I have been bugging my contacts at Google about this rumor.  From what I hear, its not a new rumor.  Been around a while&#8230; seems to come up every now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387251</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387251</guid>
		<description>Why is this a snoozer? SalesForce is used by a tremendous amount of companies.  I might hint that Google is interested in expanding it&#039;s business services beyond mail and docs, and actually start offering in-depth products.   At least, that would seem more logical than SalesForce wanting to integrate Google mail and docs into a proprietary platform like AppExchange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this a snoozer? SalesForce is used by a tremendous amount of companies.  I might hint that Google is interested in expanding it&#8217;s business services beyond mail and docs, and actually start offering in-depth products.   At least, that would seem more logical than SalesForce wanting to integrate Google mail and docs into a proprietary platform like AppExchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine WEB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387219</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387219</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;BREAKING:&lt;/b&gt; Snoozer or not , as of today - shares rose for   Salesforce by 5 percent after the announcement   - 

also  today,  Salesforce announced an  on demand SOA (service oriented architecture)

www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-21-2007/0004592433&amp;EDATE=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>BREAKING:</b> Snoozer or not , as of today &#8211; shares rose for   Salesforce by 5 percent after the announcement   &#8211; </p>
<p>also  today,  Salesforce announced an  on demand SOA (service oriented architecture)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-21-2007/0004592433&amp;EDATE=" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/05-21-2007/0004592433&amp;EDATE='>http://www.prne...2433&amp;EDATE=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Zaf</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387183</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Zaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387183</guid>
		<description>Will, G has the money...This will be a good addition to google if they offer the service along with their other line of web applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, G has the money&#8230;This will be a good addition to google if they offer the service along with their other line of web applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastien</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387142</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387142</guid>
		<description>Michael,
 i am not related to bebo, but i think no one should be allowed to speak of an entrepreneur like Birch in the futile manner employed by the last poster. why don&#039;t you delete this horrendous post, we don&#039;t want to read that kin of crap on techcrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
 i am not related to bebo, but i think no one should be allowed to speak of an entrepreneur like Birch in the futile manner employed by the last poster. why don&#8217;t you delete this horrendous post, we don&#8217;t want to read that kin of crap on techcrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne lambright</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1387091</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne lambright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1387091</guid>
		<description>Wow, That would be cool.  If google acquires saleforce then offers it as one-of-there applications, it could really start to win me over to the do no evil company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, That would be cool.  If google acquires saleforce then offers it as one-of-there applications, it could really start to win me over to the do no evil company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1386997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1386997</guid>
		<description>Why write about a snoozer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why write about a snoozer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1386843</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1386843</guid>
		<description>I think this is probably right on the money, I posted on my blog about this around a month ago saying this would be the right move for them (&lt;a href=&quot;http://danielgardner.wordpress.com/2007/04/10/salesforcecom-should-partner-with-google/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Salesforce.com should partner with Google&lt;/a&gt;), looks like they may finally be acting on it.

Acquisition was out of the question, Salesforce is a B2B focussed app, even Google Docs is not focussed in that direction despite it&#039;s ability to go very well if it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is probably right on the money, I posted on my blog about this around a month ago saying this would be the right move for them (<a href="http://danielgardner.wordpress.com/2007/04/10/salesforcecom-should-partner-with-google/" rel="nofollow">Salesforce.com should partner with Google</a>), looks like they may finally be acting on it.</p>
<p>Acquisition was out of the question, Salesforce is a B2B focussed app, even Google Docs is not focussed in that direction despite it&#8217;s ability to go very well if it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Ramowski</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-1386833</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Ramowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 09:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/21/google-salesrorce-rumors/#comment-1386833</guid>
		<description>From a CRM perspective it&#039;s possibly the only missing application from Google&#039;s aresenal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a CRM perspective it&#8217;s possibly the only missing application from Google&#8217;s aresenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
