<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AppleGate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Marketing &#124; Branded 3</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2526837</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Marketing &#124; Branded 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2526837</guid>
		<description>[...] rumour came from a trusted source but was confirmed to be totally incorrect just 20 minutes later. Unfortunately by then the story had already reached the stock market, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rumour came from a trusted source but was confirmed to be totally incorrect just 20 minutes later. Unfortunately by then the story had already reached the stock market, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE IMPACT OF BLOGS ON MASS MEDIA&#160;at&#160;SpunkyGidget</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2476018</link>
		<dc:creator>THE IMPACT OF BLOGS ON MASS MEDIA&#160;at&#160;SpunkyGidget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 06:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2476018</guid>
		<description>[...] M. (2007, May 17) AppleGate techcrunch.com http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M. (2007, May 17) AppleGate techcrunch.com <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $1.11 per liter Gasoline and other opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2419871</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $1.11 per liter Gasoline and other opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2419871</guid>
		<description>[...] about how bloggers (the A-list guys, not the minors like me) can influence the financial world. Applegate erupted when Engadget made a post about how the iPhone may be late and sited as a source an internal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about how bloggers (the A-list guys, not the minors like me) can influence the financial world. Applegate erupted when Engadget made a post about how the iPhone may be late and sited as a source an internal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kompresor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Skuteczne blogers relations</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2064599</link>
		<dc:creator>kompresor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Skuteczne blogers relations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-2064599</guid>
		<description>[...] to potężne narzędzie. Jeden niewinny wpis na popularnym blogu i kryzys gwarantowany. Przykładem niech będzie zeszłoroczny spadek wartości Apple po fałszywej informacji o iphone. Dlatego istotne jest to w jaki sposób komunikować się z [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to potężne narzędzie. Jeden niewinny wpis na popularnym blogu i kryzys gwarantowany. Przykładem niech będzie zeszłoroczny spadek wartości Apple po fałszywej informacji o iphone. Dlatego istotne jest to w jaki sposób komunikować się z [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Influence &#124; milo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1826488</link>
		<dc:creator>Influence &#124; milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 12:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1826488</guid>
		<description>[...] looked like a scoop turned out to be a hoax. Now Techcrunch as well as Engadget itself reported the story to be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looked like a scoop turned out to be a hoax. Now Techcrunch as well as Engadget itself reported the story to be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xBlog.gr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Πώς το engadget βύθισε τη μετοχή της Apple μέσα σε 6 λεπτά!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1670238</link>
		<dc:creator>xBlog.gr &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Πώς το engadget βύθισε τη μετοχή της Apple μέσα σε 6 λεπτά!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1670238</guid>
		<description>[...] Δείτε επίσης τι έγραψε σχετικά με το θέμα ο Ryan Block την επόμενη μέρα στο engadget.com, καθώς επίσης και τα σχετικά δημοσιεύματα για το θέμα στο Gizmodo και το TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Δείτε επίσης τι έγραψε σχετικά με το θέμα ο Ryan Block την επόμενη μέρα στο engadget.com, καθώς επίσης και τα σχετικά δημοσιεύματα για το θέμα στο Gizmodo και το TechCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juicy Links of the Week: May 18, 2007 : Exclusive Concepts Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1491749</link>
		<dc:creator>Juicy Links of the Week: May 18, 2007 : Exclusive Concepts Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1491749</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple and Engadget: just a hoax? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple and Engadget: just a hoax? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the &#8220;Digg Effect&#8221; and How Can it Effect My Bottom Line? &#124; Jeff Woelker ~ Chicago Web, Search, and Usability Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1403121</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the &#8220;Digg Effect&#8221; and How Can it Effect My Bottom Line? &#124; Jeff Woelker ~ Chicago Web, Search, and Usability Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1403121</guid>
		<description>[...] think it can happen? Look at Applegate. It&#8217;s because of Digg, blogs, and other social media that this &#8220;information&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think it can happen? Look at Applegate. It&#8217;s because of Digg, blogs, and other social media that this &#8220;information&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384491</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 03:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384491</guid>
		<description>I am long AAPL and I did not know about the rumor until the market was closed.  And, I am happy about that.  I did see the stock get weak during the day and then recover, but I did nothing since I am long term.  I don't have any stop losses in place, since I know that high tech stocks are volatile and can hit it and then recover, and you would be sold out.  Maybe, it is a lesson learned for the people that put too much trust in what they read on these internet sites and on the yahoo stock boards.  

You only lost money that day, if you sold blindly.  You are still the one controlling your buy and sell orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am long AAPL and I did not know about the rumor until the market was closed.  And, I am happy about that.  I did see the stock get weak during the day and then recover, but I did nothing since I am long term.  I don&#8217;t have any stop losses in place, since I know that high tech stocks are volatile and can hit it and then recover, and you would be sold out.  Maybe, it is a lesson learned for the people that put too much trust in what they read on these internet sites and on the yahoo stock boards.  </p>
<p>You only lost money that day, if you sold blindly.  You are still the one controlling your buy and sell orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384286</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384286</guid>
		<description>Mike, out of curiosity, why does this post say "67 comments" and there's only 63 listed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, out of curiosity, why does this post say &#8220;67 comments&#8221; and there&#8217;s only 63 listed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384276</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384276</guid>
		<description>"But the fact is that big blogs now have an incredible amount of power to move information quickly, and influence people more broadly than ever before"

And with power comes responsibility. If "old media" had of made this huge mistake all the self-righteous bloggers would have been all over them. But when the shoe is on the other foot you don't lay in to people just as much.

So what if the source was reliable before? You don't just get their side of things. Engadget should have waited to hear back from Apple. Plain and simple. If the original source was duped, and subsequently Engadget was duped, then Apple may have just cleared this up. If someone says, "Oh Mike Arrington this and that." Am I just going to post what this someone said without hearing from you first? If I do then it's irresponsible to not give you a right of reply. It's that simple. I think that old media is laughing right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But the fact is that big blogs now have an incredible amount of power to move information quickly, and influence people more broadly than ever before&#8221;</p>
<p>And with power comes responsibility. If &#8220;old media&#8221; had of made this huge mistake all the self-righteous bloggers would have been all over them. But when the shoe is on the other foot you don&#8217;t lay in to people just as much.</p>
<p>So what if the source was reliable before? You don&#8217;t just get their side of things. Engadget should have waited to hear back from Apple. Plain and simple. If the original source was duped, and subsequently Engadget was duped, then Apple may have just cleared this up. If someone says, &#8220;Oh Mike Arrington this and that.&#8221; Am I just going to post what this someone said without hearing from you first? If I do then it&#8217;s irresponsible to not give you a right of reply. It&#8217;s that simple. I think that old media is laughing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384244</guid>
		<description>"“I’m not sure we (bloggers) understood quite how much influence we really had until yesterday..."

You must not invest or trade in the market. 

You don't really think a Money Manager saw a posting on a blog and sold  millions of AAPL on a whim do you?

This was done to help bring the stock to the $108 rage, and what do you know.. someone stood to lose MILLIONS that day... the calls @ $108 where about to expire.

Whomever is behind this needs to be brought to justice, fined and jailed a long LONG time. 

A crime was committed in front of thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“I’m not sure we (bloggers) understood quite how much influence we really had until yesterday&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You must not invest or trade in the market. </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t really think a Money Manager saw a posting on a blog and sold  millions of AAPL on a whim do you?</p>
<p>This was done to help bring the stock to the $108 rage, and what do you know.. someone stood to lose MILLIONS that day&#8230; the calls @ $108 where about to expire.</p>
<p>Whomever is behind this needs to be brought to justice, fined and jailed a long LONG time. </p>
<p>A crime was committed in front of thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 billion dollar faux pas &#171; electronic museum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384161</link>
		<dc:creator>4 billion dollar faux pas &#171; electronic museum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1384161</guid>
		<description>[...] was based on bad intelligence has obvious ramifications for Engadget&#8217;s credibility and as Mr Arrington says, the discussion will go on and on, but more interesting is the unprecedented speed and the power of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was based on bad intelligence has obvious ramifications for Engadget&#8217;s credibility and as Mr Arrington says, the discussion will go on and on, but more interesting is the unprecedented speed and the power of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Recker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383909</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Recker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383909</guid>
		<description>Agree witth #59 - Peter. I read TechCrunch for the topics and analysis - not how fast they break news. There are lots of ways to deliver valuable news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree witth #59 - Peter. I read TechCrunch for the topics and analysis - not how fast they break news. There are lots of ways to deliver valuable news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383743</link>
		<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383743</guid>
		<description>I thought Ryan's comments / response were a bit too defensive.  Hindsight is 20-20, but in the business they are in its clear that you need to have better foresight when it comes to public companies and stock altering news.  Did you see what happened when Jobs was on stage and announced the iPhone?  The  stock increased 10% and has continued to rise based on that news alone.  It obvious investors are very concerned / interested in the iPhone.  I don't think we've heard the last of this situation by far.  I predict another follow up post from either Ryan or Peter.

What I think is more interesting is the lesson that Apple (and all of us) learned about the fragility of the stock.  No wonder they are so secretive about the product pipeline.  I'm an investor, long, so this whole thing is of great interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Ryan&#8217;s comments / response were a bit too defensive.  Hindsight is 20-20, but in the business they are in its clear that you need to have better foresight when it comes to public companies and stock altering news.  Did you see what happened when Jobs was on stage and announced the iPhone?  The  stock increased 10% and has continued to rise based on that news alone.  It obvious investors are very concerned / interested in the iPhone.  I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve heard the last of this situation by far.  I predict another follow up post from either Ryan or Peter.</p>
<p>What I think is more interesting is the lesson that Apple (and all of us) learned about the fragility of the stock.  No wonder they are so secretive about the product pipeline.  I&#8217;m an investor, long, so this whole thing is of great interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383617</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383617</guid>
		<description>i guess it's true what they say - the most edumacated people are the most indoctrinated.  sheeple. no critical analysis.

and endgadget's excuse is hilarious - this was a 'big' and 'urgent' story, dontcha know? 

those are the true determinants of whether a story should run or not on Endgadget.com, right? the bigger and more urgent, the faster they publish it. seems like a sure-fire way to guarantee themselves some face time with a judge.

i mean, what would the tech world have done if they actually had to wait, say, another hour or two, for news that the Apple iPhone would be delayed for several months. how would people manage to go on with their daily routines, really, without this critical piece of information? two hours is a _long_ time. in two hours, do you know how many of your friends you could tell that the iPhone was going to be delayed, and therefore you'd have to wait several more months until you could spend entire days doing nothing productive at all?

and the blame rests with Apple, of course. who do they think they are by not responding to a rumour within two hours, outside business hours? don't they know that they have to respond to _every_ ridiculous rumour that _every_ ridiculous blog can conjure up - all within two hours - preferably much faster? where did Apple get its PR people, anyways? they're horrible. purely incompetent. fire them all, i say.

the reason EndGadget published this rumor was because they could - they could do it, make heaps of money, and there would be very little if any outfall b/c their readers are uncritical - they just accept as gospel any nonsense they hear. 

someone should lose their job over this - preferably the editor who decided to run with this rumor - which has not only destroyed the credibility of Endgadget and other tech blogs, but put a significant dent in the credibility of the blogosphere as a whole.

and please don't compare the blogosphere to the mainstream media - yet. we've a long way to go before the internets are run by the publish-whatever-rumors-you-want-and-let-dead-civilians-and-soldiers-sort-it-out people. 

the faster EndGadget goes under, the better off we'll all be. it's time for the free market to sort this out - any good libertarian would support such an outcome.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess it&#8217;s true what they say - the most edumacated people are the most indoctrinated.  sheeple. no critical analysis.</p>
<p>and endgadget&#8217;s excuse is hilarious - this was a &#8216;big&#8217; and &#8216;urgent&#8217; story, dontcha know? </p>
<p>those are the true determinants of whether a story should run or not on Endgadget.com, right? the bigger and more urgent, the faster they publish it. seems like a sure-fire way to guarantee themselves some face time with a judge.</p>
<p>i mean, what would the tech world have done if they actually had to wait, say, another hour or two, for news that the Apple iPhone would be delayed for several months. how would people manage to go on with their daily routines, really, without this critical piece of information? two hours is a _long_ time. in two hours, do you know how many of your friends you could tell that the iPhone was going to be delayed, and therefore you&#8217;d have to wait several more months until you could spend entire days doing nothing productive at all?</p>
<p>and the blame rests with Apple, of course. who do they think they are by not responding to a rumour within two hours, outside business hours? don&#8217;t they know that they have to respond to _every_ ridiculous rumour that _every_ ridiculous blog can conjure up - all within two hours - preferably much faster? where did Apple get its PR people, anyways? they&#8217;re horrible. purely incompetent. fire them all, i say.</p>
<p>the reason EndGadget published this rumor was because they could - they could do it, make heaps of money, and there would be very little if any outfall b/c their readers are uncritical - they just accept as gospel any nonsense they hear. </p>
<p>someone should lose their job over this - preferably the editor who decided to run with this rumor - which has not only destroyed the credibility of Endgadget and other tech blogs, but put a significant dent in the credibility of the blogosphere as a whole.</p>
<p>and please don&#8217;t compare the blogosphere to the mainstream media - yet. we&#8217;ve a long way to go before the internets are run by the publish-whatever-rumors-you-want-and-let-dead-civilians-and-soldiers-sort-it-out people. </p>
<p>the faster EndGadget goes under, the better off we&#8217;ll all be. it&#8217;s time for the free market to sort this out - any good libertarian would support such an outcome.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383567</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383567</guid>
		<description>what's $4B, really, in the big scheme of things?  :D

It's time to ENDGadget, b/c Endgadget sucks. Economic terrorists is all they are.

Happy Friday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s $4B, really, in the big scheme of things?  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to ENDGadget, b/c Endgadget sucks. Economic terrorists is all they are.</p>
<p>Happy Friday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383430</guid>
		<description>It was irresponsible of Engadget. Ryan’s explanation doesn’t make sense. He mentioned that even after he found out, less than two hours later, that the email was bogus he didn’t edit his post. Why?

Some people mentioned that not much was lost. I’m long on Apple so it didn’t matter much to me. But, did you see the exchange volume? That’s a huge exchange of money there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was irresponsible of Engadget. Ryan’s explanation doesn’t make sense. He mentioned that even after he found out, less than two hours later, that the email was bogus he didn’t edit his post. Why?</p>
<p>Some people mentioned that not much was lost. I’m long on Apple so it didn’t matter much to me. But, did you see the exchange volume? That’s a huge exchange of money there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Burdett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383428</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Burdett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383428</guid>
		<description>for pallet jack: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_with_%22-gate%22_suffix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for pallet jack: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_with_%22-gate%22_suffix" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....%22_suffix</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383425</guid>
		<description>@pallet jack,

The infamous Watergate reference originated from the Watergate Hotel, where the break-in by Nixon people occurred.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pallet jack,</p>
<p>The infamous Watergate reference originated from the Watergate Hotel, where the break-in by Nixon people occurred.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate</a></p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383402</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383402</guid>
		<description>In the media world, Engadget - high traffic or not - is still considered a blog.

In the PR world, it's the PR team/firm's job to get back to reporters. When I used to write for the Today show, it would take WEEKS for Target to get back to me. I don't think any PR department is so busy it can't get back to people. It's all about priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the media world, Engadget - high traffic or not - is still considered a blog.</p>
<p>In the PR world, it&#8217;s the PR team/firm&#8217;s job to get back to reporters. When I used to write for the Today show, it would take WEEKS for Target to get back to me. I don&#8217;t think any PR department is so busy it can&#8217;t get back to people. It&#8217;s all about priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pallet jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383376</link>
		<dc:creator>pallet jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383376</guid>
		<description>Apple Gate --


 - Please someone explain the "Gate" in all the names ... waterGate etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Gate &#8211;</p>
<p> - Please someone explain the &#8220;Gate&#8221; in all the names &#8230; waterGate etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nepal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383243</link>
		<dc:creator>nepal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383243</guid>
		<description>I just don't get it. The fake mail specifically talks about an already issued press release. Well, if several hours pass before the mail is first relayed and there is still no public press release... then guess what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get it. The fake mail specifically talks about an already issued press release. Well, if several hours pass before the mail is first relayed and there is still no public press release&#8230; then guess what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blueprint</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383202</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blueprint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383202</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Power of Blogs: $4 Billion Lost in Six Minutes...&lt;/strong&gt;

Blogs are competing with mainstream media as a source for trusted information. Apple Inc. lost $4B in market capitalization in six minutes yesterday when a popular blog author posted information from an seemingly trusted source that the iPhone would be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Power of Blogs: $4 Billion Lost in Six Minutes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Blogs are competing with mainstream media as a source for trusted information. Apple Inc. lost $4B in market capitalization in six minutes yesterday when a popular blog author posted information from an seemingly trusted source that the iPhone would be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miese Gedanken</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383135</link>
		<dc:creator>miese Gedanken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/#comment-1383135</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;6 Minuten  - 4 Milliarden Dollar...&lt;/strong&gt;


Schonmal &#252;berlegt, was passieren kann, wenn eine falsche Pressemitteilung an die B&#246;rse kommt? Gestern hat dies dazu gef&#252;hrt das der Kurs von Apple heftigen Schwankungen unterlegen war:

Yesterday Engadget posted that the iPhone was goin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>6 Minuten  - 4 Milliarden Dollar&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Schonmal &#252;berlegt, was passieren kann, wenn eine falsche Pressemitteilung an die B&#246;rse kommt? Gestern hat dies dazu gef&#252;hrt das der Kurs von Apple heftigen Schwankungen unterlegen war:</p>
<p>Yesterday Engadget posted that the iPhone was goin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.124 seconds -->
