<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War Of The People Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WhitePages.com To Buy Snapvine for Around $20 Million : New Web 2.0 Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2350866</link>
		<dc:creator>WhitePages.com To Buy Snapvine for Around $20 Million : New Web 2.0 Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2350866</guid>
		<description>[...] Eventually Algard says they&#8217;ll integrate additional information into search results as well, such as social network links. Look out, Wink, Spock, etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eventually Algard says they&#8217;ll integrate additional information into search results as well, such as social network links. Look out, Wink, Spock, etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internet legal compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2344900</link>
		<dc:creator>internet legal compliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2344900</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;internet legal compliance...&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you know that there is a 94% chance that your website isn\'t compliant with current laws. Take a minute and fix it. It really does protect you against all kinds of severe penalties if you get tagged. In this modern day of utter stupidity, all it ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>internet legal compliance&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Did you know that there is a 94% chance that your website isn\&#8217;t compliant with current laws. Take a minute and fix it. It really does protect you against all kinds of severe penalties if you get tagged. In this modern day of utter stupidity, all it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biographicon Wants To Be Wikipedia For The Non-Notable &#124; DistrictSource.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2014113</link>
		<dc:creator>Biographicon Wants To Be Wikipedia For The Non-Notable &#124; DistrictSource.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-2014113</guid>
		<description>[...] “notable” unless you’ve received significant media coverage elsewhere. Other services have filled in the gap for the billion or so people online who can’t get onto Wikipedia - sites like LinkedIn, Wink and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “notable” unless you’ve received significant media coverage elsewhere. Other services have filled in the gap for the billion or so people online who can’t get onto Wikipedia - sites like LinkedIn, Wink and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neuer Trend: Personensuche im Web - work.innovation Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1970517</link>
		<dc:creator>Neuer Trend: Personensuche im Web - work.innovation Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1970517</guid>
		<description>[...] schon wieder etwas abflaut, und Personen-Suchmaschinen. TechCrunch spricht sogar schon von einem War of the People Search. F&#252;r die pers&#246;nliche Reputation, nicht nur Online, tun sich jedenfalls neue Dimensionen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] schon wieder etwas abflaut, und Personen-Suchmaschinen. TechCrunch spricht sogar schon von einem War of the People Search. F&#252;r die pers&#246;nliche Reputation, nicht nur Online, tun sich jedenfalls neue Dimensionen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook search goes public : Silicon Caribe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1917709</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook search goes public : Silicon Caribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1917709</guid>
		<description>[...] people search scene. We’ve recently covered five new people search engines - Spock, Wink, Zoominfo, WikiYou and PeekYou. All of these services count on the fact that people information is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people search scene. We’ve recently covered five new people search engines - Spock, Wink, Zoominfo, WikiYou and PeekYou. All of these services count on the fact that people information is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NexGen Technology Blog » Spock Open Public Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1545685</link>
		<dc:creator>NexGen Technology Blog » Spock Open Public Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1545685</guid>
		<description>[...] differs from differs from recently launched WikiYou and other people search engines by using algorithms to find and merge the majority of their content into a unified profile. User [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] differs from differs from recently launched WikiYou and other people search engines by using algorithms to find and merge the majority of their content into a unified profile. User [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spock Open Public Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1543560</link>
		<dc:creator>Spock Open Public Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1543560</guid>
		<description>[...] differs from differs from recently launched WikiYou and other people search engines by using algorithms to find and merge the majority of their content into a unified profile. User [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] differs from differs from recently launched WikiYou and other people search engines by using algorithms to find and merge the majority of their content into a unified profile. User [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1413301</link>
		<dc:creator>Christi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1413301</guid>
		<description>Even though there is a certain amount of excitement of finding a person on the social networking sites, there is little information that leads to actually finding a person. There will always be a need for other search types that provice "locating" information, such as peoplesearch.com and other similar sites. However, there is relatively little one can do at this point to keep their personal information out of the public records systems, and even less a person can do to keep their info from being available on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though there is a certain amount of excitement of finding a person on the social networking sites, there is little information that leads to actually finding a person. There will always be a need for other search types that provice &#8220;locating&#8221; information, such as peoplesearch.com and other similar sites. However, there is relatively little one can do at this point to keep their personal information out of the public records systems, and even less a person can do to keep their info from being available on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Patrick Wend</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1409569</link>
		<dc:creator>William Patrick Wend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1409569</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ClaimID...&lt;/strong&gt;

Recently there has been a lot of buzz on the internet about “search identity,” primarily because of a Wall Street Journal article about it.  Having been harassed online in the past few years, the perpetrators even going so far as to create a fake M...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ClaimID&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Recently there has been a lot of buzz on the internet about “search identity,” primarily because of a Wall Street Journal article about it.  Having been harassed online in the past few years, the perpetrators even going so far as to create a fake M&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdswitharms</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1394052</link>
		<dc:creator>birdswitharms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1394052</guid>
		<description>Where do all the paid public records service providers come into play here? It is my opinion that these services remain profitable because the laymen user does not know how to correctly use all of the existing free people search technologies. 

Furthermore, all of the major players (http://www.peoplefinders.com and http://www.intelius.com) and their affiliates occupy the top paid spots for the major keyword terms. When will Spock, Wink and Zoominfo and move into the paid placement space? It would be nice to finally click on an ad that promised "free people search" and have it be true.

Lastly, I am not seeing a big pairing up of the major "traditional players" in the people search space pairing up with the newcomers (with the exception of http://www.reunion.com and Wink). Do you think that this new "war" will see the new absorb the old and allow users to be in control of their contact and public records information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do all the paid public records service providers come into play here? It is my opinion that these services remain profitable because the laymen user does not know how to correctly use all of the existing free people search technologies. </p>
<p>Furthermore, all of the major players (http://www.peoplefinders.com and <a href="http://www.intelius.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.intelius.com</a>) and their affiliates occupy the top paid spots for the major keyword terms. When will Spock, Wink and Zoominfo and move into the paid placement space? It would be nice to finally click on an ad that promised &#8220;free people search&#8221; and have it be true.</p>
<p>Lastly, I am not seeing a big pairing up of the major &#8220;traditional players&#8221; in the people search space pairing up with the newcomers (with the exception of <a href="http://www.reunion.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reunion.com</a> and Wink). Do you think that this new &#8220;war&#8221; will see the new absorb the old and allow users to be in control of their contact and public records information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag Wakhlu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1372176</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag Wakhlu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1372176</guid>
		<description>As I was telling one of the Spock guys at this meeting, it would be useful to have some kind of a "social/web rating" for people (similar to a FICO score). 

So I could, for example, search for Michael Arrington, and get a "producer" score of 95.x (leaving room for growth :) Bill Clinton would have a low "producer" but a high "presence" score. A high "quality" blogger would have a higher score than a not so great one. Al Gore would have a score of... 

Achieving this would require a non-trivial analysis of a person's online presence - blogs, links, MySpace/Facebook/YouTube/LinkedIn etc profiles and more. Then these 3 companies could become the web equivalent of Experian/Equifax/Transunion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was telling one of the Spock guys at this meeting, it would be useful to have some kind of a &#8220;social/web rating&#8221; for people (similar to a FICO score). </p>
<p>So I could, for example, search for Michael Arrington, and get a &#8220;producer&#8221; score of 95.x (leaving room for growth <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Bill Clinton would have a low &#8220;producer&#8221; but a high &#8220;presence&#8221; score. A high &#8220;quality&#8221; blogger would have a higher score than a not so great one. Al Gore would have a score of&#8230; </p>
<p>Achieving this would require a non-trivial analysis of a person&#8217;s online presence - blogs, links, MySpace/Facebook/YouTube/LinkedIn etc profiles and more. Then these 3 companies could become the web equivalent of Experian/Equifax/Transunion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wink Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371480</link>
		<dc:creator>Wink Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TechCrunch: War of the People Search...&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael Arrington posted on TechCrunch about the Search SIG Panel he moderated last night at Google:
&#8220;I moderated a fascinating panel tonight at Google headquarters that included execs from three “people search engines” - the CEO of Wink (Mic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TechCrunch: War of the People Search&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michael Arrington posted on TechCrunch about the Search SIG Panel he moderated last night at Google:<br />
&#8220;I moderated a fascinating panel tonight at Google headquarters that included execs from three “people search engines” - the CEO of Wink (Mic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claimID weblog - Manage your online identity.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371411</link>
		<dc:creator>claimID weblog - Manage your online identity.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371411</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Future of People Search...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Wall Street Journal has written an article entitled You&#8217;re a Nobody Unless Your Name Googles Well.  This front-page article has been syndicated to many newspapers around the country, causing substantial buzz.  It reflects somewhat of a new re...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Future of People Search&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal has written an article entitled You&#8217;re a Nobody Unless Your Name Googles Well.  This front-page article has been syndicated to many newspapers around the country, causing substantial buzz.  It reflects somewhat of a new re&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trogdor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371287</link>
		<dc:creator>Trogdor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1371287</guid>
		<description>Another fun wrinkle for these types of search engines is distingushing between real, live, breathing humans, and fictional ones. This includes characters in movies, books, tv shows, as well as any of a plethora of fake identities used by con artists, spies, smugglers, and like. 

In a way, by linking types of relationships together and making intelligent-enough algorithms, one might be able to use these kinds of people-search engines to *identify* if a person is a spy, con artist, etc, based on whether or not their identity / network is *like* one. 

And again, I don't quite see the business model, aside from paid-subscription ... at which point, it seems to be not unlike ussearch.com in a way (with the exception that US Search doesn't spider the 'net, and bases its info on public information held by various levels / kinds of government entities).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fun wrinkle for these types of search engines is distingushing between real, live, breathing humans, and fictional ones. This includes characters in movies, books, tv shows, as well as any of a plethora of fake identities used by con artists, spies, smugglers, and like. </p>
<p>In a way, by linking types of relationships together and making intelligent-enough algorithms, one might be able to use these kinds of people-search engines to *identify* if a person is a spy, con artist, etc, based on whether or not their identity / network is *like* one. </p>
<p>And again, I don&#8217;t quite see the business model, aside from paid-subscription &#8230; at which point, it seems to be not unlike ussearch.com in a way (with the exception that US Search doesn&#8217;t spider the &#8216;net, and bases its info on public information held by various levels / kinds of government entities).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre taliercio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370944</link>
		<dc:creator>andre taliercio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370944</guid>
		<description>Identity control is the key and much more than be found among persons with similar names. It is about showing a clean profile of you. In the course of our live we do many thinks, and many of us get an eclectic profile in the pages search. Stuff we are proud of, others less proud of.
This is what Ziki is about: centralize in one place all you information, make it as your resume or platform for self-promotion.  Ziki manages your profile on major search engines to make displayed on the top. When people click on it, they see what you want them to see. You are in control..
http://www.ziki.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Identity control is the key and much more than be found among persons with similar names. It is about showing a clean profile of you. In the course of our live we do many thinks, and many of us get an eclectic profile in the pages search. Stuff we are proud of, others less proud of.<br />
This is what Ziki is about: centralize in one place all you information, make it as your resume or platform for self-promotion.  Ziki manages your profile on major search engines to make displayed on the top. When people click on it, they see what you want them to see. You are in control..<br />
<a href="http://www.ziki.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ziki.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno Davatz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370697</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno Davatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 07:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370697</guid>
		<description>The thing I do not like about the common search engines is, that they do not recognize documents with similar content. It happens often on the Web that a post or document is spread out over more then 50 websites. Now that is great for the author but not for the searcher because it blows up your search result unnecessarily. With InfoCodex this will not happen because the linguistical database recognizes similar documents and puts them into groups. This does not blow up your search result unnecessarily.

http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.php/Ywesee/InfoCodexProcedure

Three things a modern Search engine should do:

1. Automatically classify a document according to its content.
2. Automatically generate an abstract of a document.
3. Generate a Heat-Map of the Contents of a Search Result.

http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/Main/InfoCodex_22.2.2007.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I do not like about the common search engines is, that they do not recognize documents with similar content. It happens often on the Web that a post or document is spread out over more then 50 websites. Now that is great for the author but not for the searcher because it blows up your search result unnecessarily. With InfoCodex this will not happen because the linguistical database recognizes similar documents and puts them into groups. This does not blow up your search result unnecessarily.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.php/Ywesee/InfoCodexProcedure" rel="nofollow">http://www.ywesee.com/pmwiki.p.....xProcedure</a></p>
<p>Three things a modern Search engine should do:</p>
<p>1. Automatically classify a document according to its content.<br />
2. Automatically generate an abstract of a document.<br />
3. Generate a Heat-Map of the Contents of a Search Result.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/Main/InfoCodex_22.2.2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ywesee.com/uploads/.....2.2007.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Friedly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370466</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Friedly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370466</guid>
		<description>Jomathan Mendez: "Not to mention, a large percentage of name searches are vanity searches."

Hah, that's so true. I have a friend that I've written about in the past. About a year ago I made a blog post mentioning some of the search terms that have brought people to my site, and his name was one of them. Just last week he left a comment on that post along the lines of "I'm so cool people search for my name"

He was totally vanity searching to find that post :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jomathan Mendez: &#8220;Not to mention, a large percentage of name searches are vanity searches.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hah, that&#8217;s so true. I have a friend that I&#8217;ve written about in the past. About a year ago I made a blog post mentioning some of the search terms that have brought people to my site, and his name was one of them. Just last week he left a comment on that post along the lines of &#8220;I&#8217;m so cool people search for my name&#8221;</p>
<p>He was totally vanity searching to find that post <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370434</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370434</guid>
		<description>I was very disappointed when Wink decided to switch from social search to people search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very disappointed when Wink decided to switch from social search to people search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomic1fire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370375</link>
		<dc:creator>atomic1fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370375</guid>
		<description>wow zoominfo made 12 bucks (or is that 12 million Mr Arrington)
And yet they are profitable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow zoominfo made 12 bucks (or is that 12 million Mr Arrington)<br />
And yet they are profitable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370371</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370371</guid>
		<description>How about this one?

TallStreet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this one?</p>
<p>TallStreet.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just.a.guy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370255</link>
		<dc:creator>just.a.guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 22:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370255</guid>
		<description>No mention of Jigsaw?  I'm surprised you didn't mention them again, seeing as how you'd made it a point to post about how "Jigsaw is evil"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Jigsaw?  I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mention them again, seeing as how you&#8217;d made it a point to post about how &#8220;Jigsaw is evil&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tanne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370167</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370167</guid>
		<description>Michael, great job moderating - you and the audience both raised lots of good, challenging questions about people search.  Thanks so much to the organizers at SDForum for putting on these events - and Google for hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, great job moderating - you and the audience both raised lots of good, challenging questions about people search.  Thanks so much to the organizers at SDForum for putting on these events - and Google for hosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370165</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix Holder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370165</guid>
		<description>I am one of the Co-Founders at ProfileLinker and I wanted to speak to our role in the “sandbox”.  At ProfileLinker we provide users with a centralized profile where their different online identities can be managed.  We fit into the people search “sandbox” because of our ability to allow users to discover members based on social network affiliations as well as liked interests.  In comparison with other companies in the people search space, we are not direct competitors because our company focuses on easing the interactions between our users and their social networks as well as our users and their different networks of people.  This is a contrast to the aforementioned companies that primarily focus on indexing people and information from across the web, as Google does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the Co-Founders at ProfileLinker and I wanted to speak to our role in the “sandbox”.  At ProfileLinker we provide users with a centralized profile where their different online identities can be managed.  We fit into the people search “sandbox” because of our ability to allow users to discover members based on social network affiliations as well as liked interests.  In comparison with other companies in the people search space, we are not direct competitors because our company focuses on easing the interactions between our users and their social networks as well as our users and their different networks of people.  This is a contrast to the aforementioned companies that primarily focus on indexing people and information from across the web, as Google does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370080</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370080</guid>
		<description>"John Smith" returns 1.85MM results. Otherwise you're searching for the words John and Smith not "John Smith" the person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;John Smith&#8221; returns 1.85MM results. Otherwise you&#8217;re searching for the words John and Smith not &#8220;John Smith&#8221; the person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold Leung</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370064</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/09/war-of-the-people-search/#comment-1370064</guid>
		<description>There is NO WAY that they can be profitable with 12 dollars in revenue. Even getting a basic web host cost about 20 bucks per year. Is this supposed to be 12 million?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is NO WAY that they can be profitable with 12 dollars in revenue. Even getting a basic web host cost about 20 bucks per year. Is this supposed to be 12 million?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.108 seconds -->
