<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google In Talks To Acquire SimplyHired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-2729664</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-2729664</guid>
		<description>everyone needs a job right now, job sites and job boards are getting tons of traffic from social networks.

I couldn't find job after being laid off so I started a job board website where recruiters from all of the world can &lt;a href="http://www.postfreejobads.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;post free job ads&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everyone needs a job right now, job sites and job boards are getting tons of traffic from social networks.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t find job after being laid off so I started a job board website where recruiters from all of the world can <a href="http://www.postfreejobads.com" rel="nofollow">post free job ads</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-2517831</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-2517831</guid>
		<description>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas : VCsAndAngels - Venture Capital / VCs, Angel Investors, Startup News, Etc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-2516226</link>
		<dc:creator>Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas : VCsAndAngels - Venture Capital / VCs, Angel Investors, Startup News, Etc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-2516226</guid>
		<description>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-2516187</link>
		<dc:creator>Simply Hired Looks For Jobs Overseas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-2516187</guid>
		<description>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is expanding its operations into Canada, UK, Australia and India. The venture-backed startup was once an acquisition target for Google, and was recently called outfor showing enormous jumps in traffic numbers that may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google in discussions to acquire job search engine SimplyHired? : Alootechie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1883531</link>
		<dc:creator>Google in discussions to acquire job search engine SimplyHired? : Alootechie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1883531</guid>
		<description>[...] the company’s valuation has been pegged at $40 million.  Simply Hired president Dion Lim has told TechCrunch that there is “lots of interest in us” from a number of parties but would not comment directly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company’s valuation has been pegged at $40 million.  Simply Hired president Dion Lim has told TechCrunch that there is “lots of interest in us” from a number of parties but would not comment directly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Software Abstractions Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1559190</link>
		<dc:creator>The Software Abstractions Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1559190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;So You've Built an Alternative Search Engine - Now What?...&lt;/strong&gt;

What is the exit strategy for low-traffic Internet Search Engines? This is a question I've been secretly wondering about for the past few months as I study the growing number of companies in this popular category. No Lack of Contenders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>So You&#8217;ve Built an Alternative Search Engine - Now What?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What is the exit strategy for low-traffic Internet Search Engines? This is a question I&#8217;ve been secretly wondering about for the past few months as I study the growing number of companies in this popular category. No Lack of Contenders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAREERMAP &#187; Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1380976</link>
		<dc:creator>CAREERMAP &#187; Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1380976</guid>
		<description>[...] million from Fox Interactive Media (News Corp), Foundation Capital and others, most recently at a rumored sub-$40 million post money valuation. See our coverage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million from Fox Interactive Media (News Corp), Foundation Capital and others, most recently at a rumored sub-$40 million post money valuation. See our coverage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.vmarketics.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1370635</link>
		<dc:creator>www.vmarketics.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 06:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1370635</guid>
		<description>Google's focus is getting clear with this acquisition by having control over "3C portal strategy"  - content, communication &amp; collaboration. It also marks the dominance of new era of web 2.0 services.  Future of web is all about gadgets and widgets. can we call this phenomenon as "web p2p" - web 2.0 plug to play adapters.

OH Google !

~BALA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s focus is getting clear with this acquisition by having control over &#8220;3C portal strategy&#8221;  - content, communication &amp; collaboration. It also marks the dominance of new era of web 2.0 services.  Future of web is all about gadgets and widgets. can we call this phenomenon as &#8220;web p2p&#8221; - web 2.0 plug to play adapters.</p>
<p>OH Google !</p>
<p>~BALA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google an Simply Hired interessiert? &#124; JOBlog - Der Job und Karriere Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1368672</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google an Simply Hired interessiert? &#124; JOBlog - Der Job und Karriere Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1368672</guid>
		<description>[...] Gerüchten zufolge ist der Suchmaschinengigant Google and der US Jobsuchmaschine Simply Hired interessiert! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gerüchten zufolge ist der Suchmaschinengigant Google and der US Jobsuchmaschine Simply Hired interessiert! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gorelik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1367910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gorelik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1367910</guid>
		<description>Could anybody explain this:
If Indeed.com has ~4 times more visitors than SimplyHired.com, why my web site &lt;a href="http://www.postjobfree.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.postjobfree.com&lt;/a&gt; got 23+ times more visitors from Indeed.com than from SimplyHired.com?

(Both Indeed.com and SimplyHired.com use the same &lt;a href="http://www.postjobfree.com/XmlFeed.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;XML feed&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could anybody explain this:<br />
If Indeed.com has ~4 times more visitors than SimplyHired.com, why my web site <a href="http://www.postjobfree.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.postjobfree.com</a> got 23+ times more visitors from Indeed.com than from SimplyHired.com?</p>
<p>(Both Indeed.com and SimplyHired.com use the same <a href="http://www.postjobfree.com/XmlFeed.aspx" rel="nofollow">XML feed</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1367667</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1367667</guid>
		<description>post money valuation says it all---it's a dog, as is indeed. they used jobs, the 3rd biggest reason folks go to the internet, to offer pay per click ads on the side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>post money valuation says it all&#8212;it&#8217;s a dog, as is indeed. they used jobs, the 3rd biggest reason folks go to the internet, to offer pay per click ads on the side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques FROISSANT Altaïde</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1367274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques FROISSANT Altaïde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1367274</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SimplyHired racheté ? : le recrutement 2.0 intéresse Google....&lt;/strong&gt;

D'après AlarmClock et Techcrunch, Google discuterait du rachat de Simplyhired, le moteur de recherche d'offres d'emploi américain.Que Google montre aujourd'hui un véritable appétit autour du vertical search est une excellente nouvelle pour tous...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SimplyHired racheté ? : le recrutement 2.0 intéresse Google&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>D&#8217;après AlarmClock et Techcrunch, Google discuterait du rachat de Simplyhired, le moteur de recherche d&#8217;offres d&#8217;emploi américain.Que Google montre aujourd&#8217;hui un véritable appétit autour du vertical search est une excellente nouvelle pour tous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1366597</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1366597</guid>
		<description>I always wonder if big job aggregating boards are really the future? What about small, niche sites that can cater for particular people looking for jobs in certain sectors like &lt;a href="http://www.hotelscareers.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;HotelsCareers.com&lt;/a&gt; which advertised just hotel jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wonder if big job aggregating boards are really the future? What about small, niche sites that can cater for particular people looking for jobs in certain sectors like <a href="http://www.hotelscareers.com" rel="nofollow">HotelsCareers.com</a> which advertised just hotel jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1366187</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1366187</guid>
		<description>Has anyone else noticed that half their management team has disappeared over the past year? They are running with a skeleton crew compared to last year -- doesn't seem to jive with the relatively large amount of funding. I know at least one exec left to join eQuest out of the east bay -- none of this indicates they are or were seeing significant success but as usual its hard to know the real deal unless you are an insider or close to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone else noticed that half their management team has disappeared over the past year? They are running with a skeleton crew compared to last year &#8212; doesn&#8217;t seem to jive with the relatively large amount of funding. I know at least one exec left to join eQuest out of the east bay &#8212; none of this indicates they are or were seeing significant success but as usual its hard to know the real deal unless you are an insider or close to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1365024</link>
		<dc:creator>bdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1365024</guid>
		<description>@Adam- Actually, they raised $4.2M in an A round, and their pre-money was $26.5 (if my arithmetic is correct. So, that's a little more than 6x. Now, they have the additional funding to go and add more value with this $13.5M. We'll have to hear the acquisition id official before we can guess the exit value (and ROI).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam- Actually, they raised $4.2M in an A round, and their pre-money was $26.5 (if my arithmetic is correct. So, that&#8217;s a little more than 6x. Now, they have the additional funding to go and add more value with this $13.5M. We&#8217;ll have to hear the acquisition id official before we can guess the exit value (and ROI).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1364756</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 22:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1364756</guid>
		<description>Indeed is superior to Simply Hired for finding work. With Simply Hired, I can't stand it when plugging in a job title ads promoting Associated Content are included in with the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed is superior to Simply Hired for finding work. With Simply Hired, I can&#8217;t stand it when plugging in a job title ads promoting Associated Content are included in with the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob V</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1364691</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1364691</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that Indeed.com would be the obvious choice instead of SimplyHired.  I have tried them both and Indeed is a much better site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Indeed.com would be the obvious choice instead of SimplyHired.  I have tried them both and Indeed is a much better site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1364608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1364608</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a self started rumor to me. Analysts can help start conversations with comments like this. Why SH over Indeed? Makes no sense to me if google is trying to get their advertising on popular sites. Indeed is the obvious leader in the job search space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a self started rumor to me. Analysts can help start conversations with comments like this. Why SH over Indeed? Makes no sense to me if google is trying to get their advertising on popular sites. Indeed is the obvious leader in the job search space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1364477</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1364477</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure that this is really that great of a deal for any of the investors.  Even if they were to sell for $50 million, this is barely a 2x return for the investors.  A nice little payday, but nothing to write home about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that this is really that great of a deal for any of the investors.  Even if they were to sell for $50 million, this is barely a 2x return for the investors.  A nice little payday, but nothing to write home about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChiggerBite</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1364074</link>
		<dc:creator>ChiggerBite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1364074</guid>
		<description>The reality is that the job space is different than, say, the travel space for vertical search.(Kayak, etc.) The point of the vertical search engine is to get all the job listings in one place, a phenomenally useful tool for job seekers. But as soon as you have to go to 2 or 3 sites, the vertical search rapidly becomes a lot less useful.

With Hotjobs, CareerBuilder, and Monster providing 30% of the total jobs, if you lose one major provider, you are hurt, and if you lose two major providers, you might be done.

This is what happened to ebay with AuctionWatch many years ago... a vertical search company for auction listings.  If Google acquired SimplyHired, Yahoo! could (and should) simply block their search engine, and its efficacy for job seekers would be crippled.

Alex Rudloff is right; Monster and CareerBuilder are going to be "googled" if they don't shut down Indeed and SimplyHired before it is too late. If they don't, employer traffic will start to flow to low cost providers of job search like JobThread, (employers can build their own job sites and submit jobs to Indeed and SH). Once this happens, the big three lose their ability to drive job seekers to their sites, and employers stop paying for those expensive postings to the (now) Middlemen.

Ironically, this is more or less the same thing that Monster did to Newspaper classifieds in the first go around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality is that the job space is different than, say, the travel space for vertical search.(Kayak, etc.) The point of the vertical search engine is to get all the job listings in one place, a phenomenally useful tool for job seekers. But as soon as you have to go to 2 or 3 sites, the vertical search rapidly becomes a lot less useful.</p>
<p>With Hotjobs, CareerBuilder, and Monster providing 30% of the total jobs, if you lose one major provider, you are hurt, and if you lose two major providers, you might be done.</p>
<p>This is what happened to ebay with AuctionWatch many years ago&#8230; a vertical search company for auction listings.  If Google acquired SimplyHired, Yahoo! could (and should) simply block their search engine, and its efficacy for job seekers would be crippled.</p>
<p>Alex Rudloff is right; Monster and CareerBuilder are going to be &#8220;googled&#8221; if they don&#8217;t shut down Indeed and SimplyHired before it is too late. If they don&#8217;t, employer traffic will start to flow to low cost providers of job search like JobThread, (employers can build their own job sites and submit jobs to Indeed and SH). Once this happens, the big three lose their ability to drive job seekers to their sites, and employers stop paying for those expensive postings to the (now) Middlemen.</p>
<p>Ironically, this is more or less the same thing that Monster did to Newspaper classifieds in the first go around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misconstrued</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1363831</link>
		<dc:creator>misconstrued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 12:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1363831</guid>
		<description>Indeed sure looks a lot like Google:
http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=flash+programmer&amp;l=90210</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed sure looks a lot like Google:<br />
<a href="http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=flash+programmer&amp;l=90210" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=f.....mp;l=90210</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1363702</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 10:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1363702</guid>
		<description>vertical search engines are dead market...i do not remember using single vertical search engine for any thing...why do anyone want to pay anything to them?

these are rumors created by losing companies to get some attention...thats all.....cannot google twist algorithm and list all jobs at googjobs.com or something!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vertical search engines are dead market&#8230;i do not remember using single vertical search engine for any thing&#8230;why do anyone want to pay anything to them?</p>
<p>these are rumors created by losing companies to get some attention&#8230;thats all&#8230;..cannot google twist algorithm and list all jobs at googjobs.com or something!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Abundo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1363636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 08:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1363636</guid>
		<description>Between AdSense and Simply Hired, all your jobs will belong to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between AdSense and Simply Hired, all your jobs will belong to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1363473</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 05:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1363473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google、SimplyHiredに買収を打診中か...&lt;/strong&gt;

今日（米国時間5/4）、Googleが 求職検索エンジンのSimply Hiredと買収交渉に入ったという噂が流れた。Global Equity Researchの調査アナリストTrip Chowdryが最初に言及、その後Alarm:Clockでもこの話が.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google、SimplyHiredに買収を打診中か&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>今日（米国時間5/4）、Googleが 求職検索エンジンのSimply Hiredと買収交渉に入ったという噂が流れた。Global Equity Researchの調査アナリストTrip Chowdryが最初に言及、その後Alarm:Clockでもこの話が&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/comment-page-1/#comment-1363455</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 05:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/google-in-talks-to-acquire-simplyhired/#comment-1363455</guid>
		<description>@ Andrew...   Or maybe SimplyHired can be bought cheaper b/c it has so much less traffic?

I'm pretty sure that Google is well aware of the existance of both companies and hasn't become so successful only by doing "insider" deals with people they know.  That's a ridiculous assertion.

Actually, its more likely that NewsCorp, a SH investor, and major Google partner for MySpace, put the two together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andrew&#8230;   Or maybe SimplyHired can be bought cheaper b/c it has so much less traffic?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that Google is well aware of the existance of both companies and hasn&#8217;t become so successful only by doing &#8220;insider&#8221; deals with people they know.  That&#8217;s a ridiculous assertion.</p>
<p>Actually, its more likely that NewsCorp, a SH investor, and major Google partner for MySpace, put the two together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.162 seconds -->
