<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ScratchYourself: Viral Sweepstakes That Brands Could Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1356046</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1356046</guid>
		<description>Yea great idea,

By the way when are we going to see Gravatars on TechCrunch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea great idea,</p>
<p>By the way when are we going to see Gravatars on TechCrunch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1355698</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1355698</guid>
		<description>Since you win if someone else wins on one of your cards, you can improve your chances by posting your ScratchYourself card at SiteRaffle.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you win if someone else wins on one of your cards, you can improve your chances by posting your ScratchYourself card at SiteRaffle.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Little</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354812</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354812</guid>
		<description>Monty is correct, everything old is new again, on the web.   This is very similar to the greeting card spam of the late 90s with the sligtly new twist of a prize thrown in.

&lt;a&gt;eBusiness&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monty is correct, everything old is new again, on the web.   This is very similar to the greeting card spam of the late 90s with the sligtly new twist of a prize thrown in.</p>
<p><a>eBusiness</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354711</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354711</guid>
		<description>Their privacy policy blows.

-- begin excerpt --

We may, in Our sole discretion, sell, license, or allow access to certain personally identifiable information We collect from You when using this site and/or entering the Sweepstakes to one or more third parties who may then use it for their own purposes.

-- end excerpt --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their privacy policy blows.</p>
<p>&#8211; begin excerpt &#8211;</p>
<p>We may, in Our sole discretion, sell, license, or allow access to certain personally identifiable information We collect from You when using this site and/or entering the Sweepstakes to one or more third parties who may then use it for their own purposes.</p>
<p>&#8211; end excerpt &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Loree</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354694</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty Loree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354694</guid>
		<description>It's fun when I first looked at it.
However, I sent myself a scratch card by mail.  
This reminds me of the spammy greeting cards that get over abused.
I won't ever open greeting cards.

This will be abused by emailers and distrusted by spam haters for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fun when I first looked at it.<br />
However, I sent myself a scratch card by mail.<br />
This reminds me of the spammy greeting cards that get over abused.<br />
I won&#8217;t ever open greeting cards.</p>
<p>This will be abused by emailers and distrusted by spam haters for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomadicalloy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354597</link>
		<dc:creator>nomadicalloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354597</guid>
		<description>cool idea, but i never win with scratch off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool idea, but i never win with scratch off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354310</link>
		<dc:creator>Michell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1354310</guid>
		<description>I win 50$ - Michael Arrington should receive 50 dollars too. But am Russian - to me will not send money?

Strange: www.GoodLuckFinder.com - I create this site and it has brought to me success. It not a spam it is really strange.
Michael will receive from a ScratchYourself acknowledgement of a prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I win 50$ - Michael Arrington should receive 50 dollars too. But am Russian - to me will not send money?</p>
<p>Strange: <a href="http://www.GoodLuckFinder.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GoodLuckFinder.com</a> - I create this site and it has brought to me success. It not a spam it is really strange.<br />
Michael will receive from a ScratchYourself acknowledgement of a prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HowTo Spoter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353713</link>
		<dc:creator>HowTo Spoter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353713</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting information and while I know that many people don't like flash - it creates interactive sites and for my site that concentrates on web 2.0 interactivity is very important. Thank you for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting information and while I know that many people don&#8217;t like flash - it creates interactive sites and for my site that concentrates on web 2.0 interactivity is very important. Thank you for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353686</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353686</guid>
		<description>inspite of the viral concept that this program gets spread through - it still looks like spam marketing that will annoy people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inspite of the viral concept that this program gets spread through - it still looks like spam marketing that will annoy people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353661</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353661</guid>
		<description>This is an idea that should have mass appeal and its a alternative to sending friends an online postcard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an idea that should have mass appeal and its a alternative to sending friends an online postcard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (living in First Life)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353585</guid>
		<description>@ 17 - I pulled it out of my ass.  TechCrunch pulled out "That Brands Could Love" out if its collective ass too.

People who fall for dumb sweepstakes are aplenty but they tend not to have the latest browsers and the companies that they get tricked by tend not to be featured on TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 17 - I pulled it out of my ass.  TechCrunch pulled out &#8220;That Brands Could Love&#8221; out if its collective ass too.</p>
<p>People who fall for dumb sweepstakes are aplenty but they tend not to have the latest browsers and the companies that they get tricked by tend not to be featured on TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Chakravarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353583</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Chakravarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353583</guid>
		<description>Hmm, wouldnt this need a captcha? The prizes are currently pretty low to warrant any interest, but what prevents someone from creating a scratchbot (trademark opportunity anyone? ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, wouldnt this need a captcha? The prizes are currently pretty low to warrant any interest, but what prevents someone from creating a scratchbot (trademark opportunity anyone? ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353561</link>
		<dc:creator>bdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353561</guid>
		<description>Firefox works fine here, but since there are so many add-ons, it doesn't really provide much trouble-shooting info to say just that; maybe disabling 'no script' will help.

Jay, I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering why you can't envision the revenue potential this service possesses. I don't think you even care to consider and would rather nay-say. That's cool, and I do agree with the "1%" characterization. But, you pulled the, "50% who might, won’t be able to scratch these things off." assertion out of your @ss.

The real question is competition and execution. From some of the comments, it sounds like there are several competitive offerings. I still don't understand why a "scratch card" format is necessary, or the specific mechanism for revenue generation, but I can imagine a number of scenarios.

Wait and see, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox works fine here, but since there are so many add-ons, it doesn&#8217;t really provide much trouble-shooting info to say just that; maybe disabling &#8216;no script&#8217; will help.</p>
<p>Jay, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not alone in wondering why you can&#8217;t envision the revenue potential this service possesses. I don&#8217;t think you even care to consider and would rather nay-say. That&#8217;s cool, and I do agree with the &#8220;1%&#8221; characterization. But, you pulled the, &#8220;50% who might, won’t be able to scratch these things off.&#8221; assertion out of your @ss.</p>
<p>The real question is competition and execution. From some of the comments, it sounds like there are several competitive offerings. I still don&#8217;t understand why a &#8220;scratch card&#8221; format is necessary, or the specific mechanism for revenue generation, but I can imagine a number of scenarios.</p>
<p>Wait and see, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_Mccain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353552</link>
		<dc:creator>John_Mccain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353552</guid>
		<description>There are at least 2 different scripts like this that I know for $50 each; anyone can easily setup a website like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are at least 2 different scripts like this that I know for $50 each; anyone can easily setup a website like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I love Flash!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353505</link>
		<dc:creator>I love Flash!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353505</guid>
		<description>I mean hates flash in the first line :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean hates flash in the first line <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I love Flash!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353503</link>
		<dc:creator>I love Flash!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353503</guid>
		<description>Arghh! Another guy who flash! Flash is absolutely elegant and ITS not heavy.
Flash in the hands of a proper programmer can do magic. And it'll load faster than any other script which can do something similar. 

As Amy says, it takes much less time to create things with flash than JS. Why take the pain and spend time on re-inventing things. Flash is getting way better than it used to be. It no longer is the slow turtle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arghh! Another guy who flash! Flash is absolutely elegant and ITS not heavy.<br />
Flash in the hands of a proper programmer can do magic. And it&#8217;ll load faster than any other script which can do something similar. </p>
<p>As Amy says, it takes much less time to create things with flash than JS. Why take the pain and spend time on re-inventing things. Flash is getting way better than it used to be. It no longer is the slow turtle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353462</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353462</guid>
		<description>palletJack, why is flash "weaksauce"? I know some people hate it, but think it's nearing time to get over the aversion. Flash, used correctly, is a powerful (and great looking tool). Sites should use the right tool for each component. If it can be done well with HTML/Javascript, go for it. If it would work out better with Flash, then why waste time recreating something with Javascript that you could build 3 times faster with Flash? Flash is getting better at handling text than it used to, while DHTML is making smoother and fancier animations than it used to. So pros and cons to each, but Flash is not as annoying as it used to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>palletJack, why is flash &#8220;weaksauce&#8221;? I know some people hate it, but think it&#8217;s nearing time to get over the aversion. Flash, used correctly, is a powerful (and great looking tool). Sites should use the right tool for each component. If it can be done well with HTML/Javascript, go for it. If it would work out better with Flash, then why waste time recreating something with Javascript that you could build 3 times faster with Flash? Flash is getting better at handling text than it used to, while DHTML is making smoother and fancier animations than it used to. So pros and cons to each, but Flash is not as annoying as it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Chiang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353448</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Chiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353448</guid>
		<description>OR!, take this live on college campuses where Russian mobsters and French hackers can't *game* the system</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OR!, take this live on college campuses where Russian mobsters and French hackers can&#8217;t *game* the system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (living in First Life)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353397</guid>
		<description>Like #6 Dean, I'm using the latest version of Firefox and the cards don't scratch properly.  Now unlike some of you on here I'm not in the top 0.0001% of most technically savvy people, but I am in the top 1%.  People in the top 1% don't care/respond to advertising anyway and the bottom 50% who might, won't be able to scratch these things off.  Great idea!

It's a "neat idea" but it's not a business.  Then again, the latter rarely get featured on TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like #6 Dean, I&#8217;m using the latest version of Firefox and the cards don&#8217;t scratch properly.  Now unlike some of you on here I&#8217;m not in the top 0.0001% of most technically savvy people, but I am in the top 1%.  People in the top 1% don&#8217;t care/respond to advertising anyway and the bottom 50% who might, won&#8217;t be able to scratch these things off.  Great idea!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a &#8220;neat idea&#8221; but it&#8217;s not a business.  Then again, the latter rarely get featured on TechCrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike La Rotonda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike La Rotonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353396</guid>
		<description>Votigo is another site in this space that allows anyone to easily create their own customized photo or video contest. They’ve worked with partners like Epic Records and The Motley Fool to run online contests but the service also allows anyone to create a contest just for fun. They have some new viral contest features in the works that’s similar to ScratchYourself. In the interest of full disclosure I’m the Co-founder and CEO of Votigo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Votigo is another site in this space that allows anyone to easily create their own customized photo or video contest. They’ve worked with partners like Epic Records and The Motley Fool to run online contests but the service also allows anyone to create a contest just for fun. They have some new viral contest features in the works that’s similar to ScratchYourself. In the interest of full disclosure I’m the Co-founder and CEO of Votigo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pallet jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353367</link>
		<dc:creator>pallet jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353367</guid>
		<description>Everybody is in love with this

 - I am not - 

 -#1 although most are willing to give up their email address (especially on stupid myspace) I am not

 - #2 its flash, therefore - weaksauce

 - #3 Its an old model,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody is in love with this</p>
<p> - I am not - </p>
<p> -#1 although most are willing to give up their email address (especially on stupid myspace) I am not</p>
<p> - #2 its flash, therefore - weaksauce</p>
<p> - #3 Its an old model,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353320</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353320</guid>
		<description>what a cool idea... but maybe the actual scratching can be more fun than just seeing the logo of the company... some surprise element, something to make me laugh... anything than just expecting to see the logo of the brand...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a cool idea&#8230; but maybe the actual scratching can be more fun than just seeing the logo of the company&#8230; some surprise element, something to make me laugh&#8230; anything than just expecting to see the logo of the brand&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353311</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353311</guid>
		<description>How cool is that, I like the fact that you don't leave the site you are on to enter the contest. A great way to encourage daily visitors. But if you do one on one site, can you do one on another site as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How cool is that, I like the fact that you don&#8217;t leave the site you are on to enter the contest. A great way to encourage daily visitors. But if you do one on one site, can you do one on another site as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353307</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;scratch and win 1 meg of transit perhaps ?...&lt;/strong&gt;

transit+peering prospect perhaps ?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>scratch and win 1 meg of transit perhaps ?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>transit+peering prospect perhaps ?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/27/scratchyourself-viral-sweepstakes-that-brands-could-love/#comment-1353300</guid>
		<description>I'm using the latest version of Firefox and it wouldn't scratch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the latest version of Firefox and it wouldn&#8217;t scratch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.086 seconds -->
