<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Open Sources Parts Of Flex Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Open Sources Parts Of Flex Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1585716</link>
		<dc:creator>Goa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Open Sources Parts Of Flex Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1585716</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orkut &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Open Sources Parts Of Flex Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1585692</link>
		<dc:creator>Orkut &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Open Sources Parts Of Flex Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1585692</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1358145</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1358145</guid>
		<description>40th comment will get all prizes LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40th comment will get all prizes LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Freedman &#187; Adobe will continue to sell the candles, give the matches away for free</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1355134</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Freedman &#187; Adobe will continue to sell the candles, give the matches away for free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1355134</guid>
		<description>[...] decision to open source Flex, to me, is explained with this analogy: &#8220;Adobe will continue to sell the candles, give the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision to open source Flex, to me, is explained with this analogy: &#8220;Adobe will continue to sell the candles, give the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiserJozy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1354684</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiserJozy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1354684</guid>
		<description>Flash programs don't have to be heavy. If coded right.

One thing I realized while developling Flash, if you draw in Actionscript Drawing API you can bring down the size of the file considerably.

Take a look.

http://www.flashframing.com

The initial app is 25K. No need for a loader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash programs don&#8217;t have to be heavy. If coded right.</p>
<p>One thing I realized while developling Flash, if you draw in Actionscript Drawing API you can bring down the size of the file considerably.</p>
<p>Take a look.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flashframing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flashframing.com</a></p>
<p>The initial app is 25K. No need for a loader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353438</link>
		<dc:creator>burly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353438</guid>
		<description>2nd paragraph:
"Previously the source code to the ActionScript components in the *Flash* SDK were available..."

Is this a typo? Seems it should read "Flex SDK"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd paragraph:<br />
&#8220;Previously the source code to the ActionScript components in the *Flash* SDK were available&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a typo? Seems it should read &#8220;Flex SDK&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 37th to comment</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353169</link>
		<dc:creator>37th to comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353169</guid>
		<description>Do I get a prize for being 37th?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I get a prize for being 37th?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabrice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353135</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabrice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1353135</guid>
		<description>A lire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352891</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352891</guid>
		<description>Good move on Adobe's part, and I was excited to originally read about it - but the scope of the release really isn't that significant. An entire technology needs to be released, not just portions. It is still too expensive to be a beginner with Adobe based technologies and this is where Microsoft and other companies will win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good move on Adobe&#8217;s part, and I was excited to originally read about it - but the scope of the release really isn&#8217;t that significant. An entire technology needs to be released, not just portions. It is still too expensive to be a beginner with Adobe based technologies and this is where Microsoft and other companies will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Aiglstorfer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Aiglstorfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352697</guid>
		<description>I suspect this was a way to better position their solution vs. OpenLaszlo.  Still, with all the great AJAX frameworks out there one begins to wonder what the use is for a Flash oriented solution like Flex when you can do much of what Flex offers using said frameworks.

If it could be used to generate Flash Lite applications, then you have something interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this was a way to better position their solution vs. OpenLaszlo.  Still, with all the great AJAX frameworks out there one begins to wonder what the use is for a Flash oriented solution like Flex when you can do much of what Flex offers using said frameworks.</p>
<p>If it could be used to generate Flash Lite applications, then you have something interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352670</guid>
		<description>@ 30

Although Adobe isn't a startup in itself, the products it makes are at the center of many web companies. New web apps are popping up all the time based on Flex. So this is definitely big news in the startup world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 30</p>
<p>Although Adobe isn&#8217;t a startup in itself, the products it makes are at the center of many web companies. New web apps are popping up all the time based on Flex. So this is definitely big news in the startup world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Eckman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352660</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352660</guid>
		<description>I'm with Jeffrey from comment 26 - in what sense is Microsoft Visual Studio open? 

Have you looked at the cost of MSDN licenses for developers who work in the .NET platform on a regular basis, plus the ongoing cost of "certification"?

Win32 development tools that are open source exist, of course, but not from the mothership . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Jeffrey from comment 26 - in what sense is Microsoft Visual Studio open? </p>
<p>Have you looked at the cost of MSDN licenses for developers who work in the .NET platform on a regular basis, plus the ongoing cost of &#8220;certification&#8221;?</p>
<p>Win32 development tools that are open source exist, of course, but not from the mothership . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Stock Owned Company pay you write this?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352649</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Stock Owned Company pay you write this?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352649</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure why Techcrunch write articles about stock owned companies.
On Google discription links it says:

Techcrunch -- "Group-edited blog about technology start-ups, particularly the Web 2.0 sector. "

Adobe isn't start-up company.  They should publish articles somewhere paid press like Wall street journal, CBS marketwatch, New York Times, and quality press. Adobe should 100% pay us to read it...  
Now, what the heck TC trying to do? 
Why is TC giving super free pass for gaint companies and backed companies?


We want startup news back!!! 
We want Mike's startup vengence back!!!
We want web 2.0 startup news back!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why Techcrunch write articles about stock owned companies.<br />
On Google discription links it says:</p>
<p>Techcrunch &#8212; &#8220;Group-edited blog about technology start-ups, particularly the Web 2.0 sector. &#8221;</p>
<p>Adobe isn&#8217;t start-up company.  They should publish articles somewhere paid press like Wall street journal, CBS marketwatch, New York Times, and quality press. Adobe should 100% pay us to read it&#8230;<br />
Now, what the heck TC trying to do?<br />
Why is TC giving super free pass for gaint companies and backed companies?</p>
<p>We want startup news back!!!<br />
We want Mike&#8217;s startup vengence back!!!<br />
We want web 2.0 startup news back!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352626</link>
		<dc:creator>pk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352626</guid>
		<description>29th to comment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>29th to comment <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Campo Piombi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352599</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Campo Piombi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352599</guid>
		<description>I love the fact that Adobe, who's known for being a "designer's de facto" brand is supporting Flash developers, and not leaving them aside with what was left from Macromedia.
I think this is their way to say "hey developers, we know what you can do, and we will support you!"
They must have a hard work ahead of the whole flash-flex-actionscript thing, since they must please graphic/web designers and programmers.
Even with the flaws that Flash/Flex might have (as for developers, and for designers) I think they've accomplished great things with both tools, and proven they won't give up on US.
Also, I think that there's no point in comparing flash against flex (or viceversa), since those are tools for almost opposite worlds (and purposes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the fact that Adobe, who&#8217;s known for being a &#8220;designer&#8217;s de facto&#8221; brand is supporting Flash developers, and not leaving them aside with what was left from Macromedia.<br />
I think this is their way to say &#8220;hey developers, we know what you can do, and we will support you!&#8221;<br />
They must have a hard work ahead of the whole flash-flex-actionscript thing, since they must please graphic/web designers and programmers.<br />
Even with the flaws that Flash/Flex might have (as for developers, and for designers) I think they&#8217;ve accomplished great things with both tools, and proven they won&#8217;t give up on US.<br />
Also, I think that there&#8217;s no point in comparing flash against flex (or viceversa), since those are tools for almost opposite worlds (and purposes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352585</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352585</guid>
		<description>Great story except you should embed the video on your site..

[podtech content=

http://media1.podtech.net/media/2007/04/PID_011045/Podtech_Adobe_Flex_Announcement_interv.flv&#38;postURL=http://www.podtech.net/home/scobleshow/2826/breaking-news-adobe-flash-flex-goes-open-sourc&#38;totalTime=1525000&#38;breadcrumb=98439cdf6f554ebaa45469a11a504168]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story except you should embed the video on your site..</p>
<p>[podtech content=</p>
<p><a href="http://media1.podtech.net/media/2007/04/PID_011045/Podtech_Adobe_Flex_Announcement_interv.flv&amp;postURL=http://www.podtech.net/home/scobleshow/2826/breaking-news-adobe-flash-flex-goes-open-sourc&amp;totalTime=1525000&amp;breadcrumb=98439cdf6f554ebaa45469a11a504168" rel="nofollow">http://media1.podtech.net/medi.....a11a504168</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352575</link>
		<dc:creator>carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352575</guid>
		<description>one step closer to 64bit flash...not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one step closer to 64bit flash&#8230;not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352566</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352566</guid>
		<description>"I actually can’t imagine a platform being able to survive *without* all the developer tools and class libraries being completely open"

How many platforms did you consider when you wrote this, Nic? *Most* platforms don't make their developer tools and class libraries completely open. (See: Windows. See also: most mobile devices and OSes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I actually can’t imagine a platform being able to survive *without* all the developer tools and class libraries being completely open&#8221;</p>
<p>How many platforms did you consider when you wrote this, Nic? *Most* platforms don&#8217;t make their developer tools and class libraries completely open. (See: Windows. See also: most mobile devices and OSes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense PR</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352492</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352492</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Adobe&#8217;s Flex News Release Is Effective Because It&#8217;s Real News...&lt;/strong&gt;

The buzz around an Adobe announcement that its &#34;rich Internet applications&#34; development tool Flex SDK will be open source shows that blogger and podcaster relations can co-exist with the traditional news release.
Top of meme.com this morning ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adobe&#8217;s Flex News Release Is Effective Because It&#8217;s Real News&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The buzz around an Adobe announcement that its &quot;rich Internet applications&quot; development tool Flex SDK will be open source shows that blogger and podcaster relations can co-exist with the traditional news release.<br />
Top of meme.com this morning &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Stowell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352488</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352488</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;those waiting for a fully open and cross platform rich application platform from Adobe.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those so afflicted may wish to avail themselves of &lt;a href="http://openlaszlo.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;OpenLaszlo&lt;/a&gt; - it's open and cross-platform. Disclaimer: I work with OpenLaszlo everyday (it's my job) and I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>those waiting for a fully open and cross platform rich application platform from Adobe.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those so afflicted may wish to avail themselves of <a href="http://openlaszlo.org" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/openlaszlo.org');">OpenLaszlo</a> - it&#8217;s open and cross-platform. Disclaimer: I work with OpenLaszlo everyday (it&#8217;s my job) and I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352483</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352483</guid>
		<description>Good news, now if they also plan to open source their eclipse plugin, I'd be ecstatic.  That would go a long ways to get developer support, else, I would assume someone would or may develop another open source plugin to compete since the compile/debugger is open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news, now if they also plan to open source their eclipse plugin, I&#8217;d be ecstatic.  That would go a long ways to get developer support, else, I would assume someone would or may develop another open source plugin to compete since the compile/debugger is open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Chakravarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352398</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Chakravarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352398</guid>
		<description>I wish Adobe were more proactive than reactive. The whole msft push around XAML, XPS, WPF/E (now silverlight) has them responding...
Adobe as a platform has so much potential, but they really need to fix a few things:
1. Decide what they want to push - flash, pdf, svg? Unify the disparities between them, each has advantages and disadvantages..
2. Fix the whole nellymoser codec crap. Geez, if only one could take flvs and convert them to mp3 easily, you would see a whole crop of interesting applications develop. Especially with the nice capabilities Actionscript 3 brings to the table.

Just my two cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Adobe were more proactive than reactive. The whole msft push around XAML, XPS, WPF/E (now silverlight) has them responding&#8230;<br />
Adobe as a platform has so much potential, but they really need to fix a few things:<br />
1. Decide what they want to push - flash, pdf, svg? Unify the disparities between them, each has advantages and disadvantages..<br />
2. Fix the whole nellymoser codec crap. Geez, if only one could take flvs and convert them to mp3 easily, you would see a whole crop of interesting applications develop. Especially with the nice capabilities Actionscript 3 brings to the table.</p>
<p>Just my two cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352393</link>
		<dc:creator>sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352393</guid>
		<description>Adobe is just a big slow lame corporate dinosaur that doesn't get it.  This is just another attempt to be relevant.  They are struggling and their is lots of infighting among the enginerring teams - esp. pdf vs flash.   What are they gonna do when no one buys Cs3 or Acrobat anymore cause there's good options for free??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe is just a big slow lame corporate dinosaur that doesn&#8217;t get it.  This is just another attempt to be relevant.  They are struggling and their is lots of infighting among the enginerring teams - esp. pdf vs flash.   What are they gonna do when no one buys Cs3 or Acrobat anymore cause there&#8217;s good options for free??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wally</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352390</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352390</guid>
		<description>Does anyone notice the irony between this story and a blurry, pixellated adobe logo accompanying it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone notice the irony between this story and a blurry, pixellated adobe logo accompanying it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robots w/Lasers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352384</link>
		<dc:creator>Robots w/Lasers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/26/adobe-open-sources-parts-of-flex-platform/#comment-1352384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Open Source Flash FUD...&lt;/strong&gt;

Every time someone mentions open sourcing the flash player, someone always jumps up to defend Adobe (formerly Macromedia&#8230;I&#8217;ll always think of Flash as a MM product). There are many good reasons why they may not want to opensource the runtim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Open Source Flash FUD&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Every time someone mentions open sourcing the flash player, someone always jumps up to defend Adobe (formerly Macromedia&#8230;I&#8217;ll always think of Flash as a MM product). There are many good reasons why they may not want to opensource the runtim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.102 seconds -->
