<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CastTV Raises $3.1 Million, Battles Google And AOL In Video Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:02:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corvallis Apartment Rentals</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1356114</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvallis Apartment Rentals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1356114</guid>
		<description>CastTV doesn&#039;t seem to resemble search name, but I guess neither does google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CastTV doesn&#8217;t seem to resemble search name, but I guess neither does google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351519</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351519</guid>
		<description>This is a similar approach to what Google does with it&#039;s image search. The information about an image is based on such factors as image name, text around the image and links to the the page with that image. How accurate this approach you can check for yourself by trying to search something on Google Image search. There are chances that you will find whatever you looking for, however there are more chances to find something relevant using stock photography or clip art. 
When it comes to visual data, text search approach has disadvantages. Instead of just give the user text info about the video, the results should display larger  thumbnails and not only one thumbnail. 

So far I&#039;ve been using http://yuxt.com . It&#039;s easier to find something there, plus I like to store the results so I can access them later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a similar approach to what Google does with it&#8217;s image search. The information about an image is based on such factors as image name, text around the image and links to the the page with that image. How accurate this approach you can check for yourself by trying to search something on Google Image search. There are chances that you will find whatever you looking for, however there are more chances to find something relevant using stock photography or clip art.<br />
When it comes to visual data, text search approach has disadvantages. Instead of just give the user text info about the video, the results should display larger  thumbnails and not only one thumbnail. </p>
<p>So far I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://yuxt.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://yuxt.com'>http://yuxt.com</a> . It&#8217;s easier to find something there, plus I like to store the results so I can access them later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heroesfan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351352</link>
		<dc:creator>heroesfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351352</guid>
		<description>I found www.sidereel.com in a forum a few days ago and have been using it to find places to catch up on Heroes (www.sidereel.com/Heroes). It&#039;s like a wiki, so I added some information about some of the older episodes. It&#039;s not perfect, but it helped me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found <a href="http://www.sidereel.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.sidereel.com'>http://www.sidereel.com</a> in a forum a few days ago and have been using it to find places to catch up on Heroes (www.sidereel.com/Heroes). It&#8217;s like a wiki, so I added some information about some of the older episodes. It&#8217;s not perfect, but it helped me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351328</link>
		<dc:creator>john griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351328</guid>
		<description>congrats to casttv.  i remember TC writing about them what seemed like ages ago and then not hearing anything.  glad to have their services out there and good luck to alex and edwin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats to casttv.  i remember TC writing about them what seemed like ages ago and then not hearing anything.  glad to have their services out there and good luck to alex and edwin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daddyclay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351282</link>
		<dc:creator>daddyclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351282</guid>
		<description>As a web video producer, we&#039;re having to do some inelegant things like publish transcripts of video segments below the player to make our content visible to current search (I&#039;ve noticed other producers doing this as well).  We can&#039;t wait for an engine that can mine the video data so we can go to a cleaner interface.  I hope CastTV and all the rest get this right.  We need them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web video producer, we&#8217;re having to do some inelegant things like publish transcripts of video segments below the player to make our content visible to current search (I&#8217;ve noticed other producers doing this as well).  We can&#8217;t wait for an engine that can mine the video data so we can go to a cleaner interface.  I hope CastTV and all the rest get this right.  We need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pallet jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351259</link>
		<dc:creator>pallet jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351259</guid>
		<description>- honestly - 

 - video search will always be second - to word search. So Google being #2 (Although they are #1)

 - isnt the worst thing in the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- honestly &#8211; </p>
<p> &#8211; video search will always be second &#8211; to word search. So Google being #2 (Although they are #1)</p>
<p> &#8211; isnt the worst thing in the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: videosearchinchina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351031</link>
		<dc:creator>videosearchinchina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351031</guid>
		<description>Check out the video search engine in China: www.souxou.com. Michael, I wish you can read Chinese!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the video search engine in China: <a href="http://www.souxou.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.souxou.com'>http://www.souxou.com</a>. Michael, I wish you can read Chinese!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtraa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1351008</link>
		<dc:creator>xtraa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1351008</guid>
		<description>They may  suck. Look at their job descriptions, doesn&#039;t sound like fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may  suck. Look at their job descriptions, doesn&#8217;t sound like fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350676</link>
		<dc:creator>cdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350676</guid>
		<description>The founders are whipsmart. And user-focused - been at work on this for a while. There will be different approaches to video, like other types of search. While switching costs are low to zero, if cast tv gets it right more than half the time, it will be better than the current experience that is charitably described as video &#039;search.&#039; 
They have a gem, methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The founders are whipsmart. And user-focused &#8211; been at work on this for a while. There will be different approaches to video, like other types of search. While switching costs are low to zero, if cast tv gets it right more than half the time, it will be better than the current experience that is charitably described as video &#8217;search.&#8217;<br />
They have a gem, methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350617</link>
		<dc:creator>RaJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350617</guid>
		<description>Nice domain.  Lots of sites with video search.  Never know even google can improve the video search.

www.suggestusability.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice domain.  Lots of sites with video search.  Never know even google can improve the video search.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.suggestusability.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.suggestusability.com'>http://www.sugg...stusability.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350603</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (living in First Life)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350603</guid>
		<description>@ tvlover - I think you are right, there is a need.  That being said, I doubt any of these start-ups are going to solve the need.  Everyone will still turn to Google or YouTube.  

Another case of designing products for the TechCrunch readership and VCs blowing away money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ tvlover &#8211; I think you are right, there is a need.  That being said, I doubt any of these start-ups are going to solve the need.  Everyone will still turn to Google or YouTube.  </p>
<p>Another case of designing products for the TechCrunch readership and VCs blowing away money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350492</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350492</guid>
		<description>:-P Not too big on video search. I&#039;ll just StumbleUpon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  Not too big on video search. I&#8217;ll just StumbleUpon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: API Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350443</link>
		<dc:creator>API Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350443</guid>
		<description>One way to get a leg-up and beat the incumbents is to quickly release and promote an open API to CastTV--any plans of doing that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to get a leg-up and beat the incumbents is to quickly release and promote an open API to CastTV&#8211;any plans of doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreadsword</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350432</link>
		<dc:creator>dreadsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350432</guid>
		<description>tvlover - fair enough, there&#039;s lots of stuff scattered everywhere. That being said, I&#039;ll still ask you to really consider the usage scenarios implied by your examples. If you&#039;re looking for Grey&#039;s Anatomy, where are you going to look? iTunes if you want it legally, YouTube or P2P if not. By providing the most popular platform for distribution YouTube has already addressed a great deal of the problem CastTV seeks to solve.

Certainly, there&#039;s a slice of content out there that isn&#039;t well indexed on one of the big video sites, but I&#039;d argue that that slice is very small and not in demand enough to build a profitable business around. Cool technology != business model. 

The comparative example I&#039;m really thinking of is Riya - remember them?

http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/15/riya-20-on-the-way-major-strategy-shift/

Riya = CastTV for images

Personally, I&#039;d take the technology to collect meta-data around an object (be it a word, phrase, video, etc) across sites and adapt it to a full-on search engine positioned for acquisition by Yahoo or MSN, or build a hyped-up Powerset competitor.

——-
http://techfold.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tvlover &#8211; fair enough, there&#8217;s lots of stuff scattered everywhere. That being said, I&#8217;ll still ask you to really consider the usage scenarios implied by your examples. If you&#8217;re looking for Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, where are you going to look? iTunes if you want it legally, YouTube or P2P if not. By providing the most popular platform for distribution YouTube has already addressed a great deal of the problem CastTV seeks to solve.</p>
<p>Certainly, there&#8217;s a slice of content out there that isn&#8217;t well indexed on one of the big video sites, but I&#8217;d argue that that slice is very small and not in demand enough to build a profitable business around. Cool technology != business model. </p>
<p>The comparative example I&#8217;m really thinking of is Riya &#8211; remember them?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/15/riya-20-on-the-way-major-strategy-shift/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/15/riya-20-on-the-way-major-strategy-shift/'>http://www.tech...strategy-shift/</a></p>
<p>Riya = CastTV for images</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d take the technology to collect meta-data around an object (be it a word, phrase, video, etc) across sites and adapt it to a full-on search engine positioned for acquisition by Yahoo or MSN, or build a hyped-up Powerset competitor.</p>
<p>——-<br />
<a href="http://techfold.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://techfold.com'>http://techfold.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvlover</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350395</link>
		<dc:creator>tvlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350395</guid>
		<description>rod- of course there is a need for video search, and a smart one at that. 

there&#039;s a lot of video on the web beyond google and youtube - like all the content from major networks (grey&#039;s, lost, everything!) - and sometimes it&#039;s hard to find the video you want and weed out what you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rod- of course there is a need for video search, and a smart one at that. </p>
<p>there&#8217;s a lot of video on the web beyond google and youtube &#8211; like all the content from major networks (grey&#8217;s, lost, everything!) &#8211; and sometimes it&#8217;s hard to find the video you want and weed out what you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350273</link>
		<dc:creator>rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350273</guid>
		<description>To some degree I question the need for video search beyond keywords, tags, and social referral. Generally, you can find what you want at YouTube or Google Video without the need for an entire complex meta-video-search-engine. Additionally, verticals like SuTree will provide more relevant results within their silo than CastTV will be able to.

So- ultimately, does this idea/technology really service a need? Or is it going to be one of those firms with a technology flailing around for a business plan?

-------
http://techfold.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some degree I question the need for video search beyond keywords, tags, and social referral. Generally, you can find what you want at YouTube or Google Video without the need for an entire complex meta-video-search-engine. Additionally, verticals like SuTree will provide more relevant results within their silo than CastTV will be able to.</p>
<p>So- ultimately, does this idea/technology really service a need? Or is it going to be one of those firms with a technology flailing around for a business plan?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a href="http://techfold.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://techfold.com'>http://techfold.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350216</link>
		<dc:creator>maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350216</guid>
		<description>i too love Blinkx - have just started using them. especially love the &quot;Blinkx Remote&quot;. great little tool to find entire TV shows online. check em out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i too love Blinkx &#8211; have just started using them. especially love the &#8220;Blinkx Remote&#8221;. great little tool to find entire TV shows online. check em out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacobo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350187</link>
		<dc:creator>jacobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350187</guid>
		<description>what about blinx?  They do speech recognition (so no meta data at all) and also add metadata from other sites to video descriptions so sounds very similar.  They also did a deal with quintura recently who is a very cool new visual search site you should check out too at www.quintura.com!

jacobow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about blinx?  They do speech recognition (so no meta data at all) and also add metadata from other sites to video descriptions so sounds very similar.  They also did a deal with quintura recently who is a very cool new visual search site you should check out too at <a href="http://www.quintura.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.quintura.com'>http://www.quintura.com</a>!</p>
<p>jacobow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: videofanboi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350072</link>
		<dc:creator>videofanboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350072</guid>
		<description>&quot;Since many videos posted on the internet contain little or no associated meta data to describe what’s in the video, services like AOL’s Truveo and CastTV look at surrounding text to&quot;

This will be interesting.  I can only imagine what will happen when they try to make sense of viewer comments, the like of which can be found on YouTube.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since many videos posted on the internet contain little or no associated meta data to describe what’s in the video, services like AOL’s Truveo and CastTV look at surrounding text to&#8221;</p>
<p>This will be interesting.  I can only imagine what will happen when they try to make sense of viewer comments, the like of which can be found on YouTube.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DramedyTV</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1350067</link>
		<dc:creator>DramedyTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/casttv-raises-31-million-battles-google-and-aol-in-video-search/#comment-1350067</guid>
		<description>Nice domain name! .com domains are still king!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice domain name! .com domains are still king!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
