<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati&#8217;s Mating Dance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:13:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technorati's State of the Blogosphere Report for 2008 &#124; Digital Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-2490226</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati's State of the Blogosphere Report for 2008 &#124; Digital Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-2490226</guid>
		<description>[...] since 2007, it has been said that Technorati isnt doing well and it is up for sale, they have held their ground. Dave Sifry, the CEO of Technorati had responded that Technorati isnt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since 2007, it has been said that Technorati isnt doing well and it is up for sale, they have held their ground. Dave Sifry, the CEO of Technorati had responded that Technorati isnt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THINKing &#187; Technorati Is Dead To Me</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-2233034</link>
		<dc:creator>THINKing &#187; Technorati Is Dead To Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-2233034</guid>
		<description>[...] final straw for me was when they turned off the WTF function. This was the last in a long line of missteps by Technorati. It was useful for a time, but it&#8217;s time has passed. So, what&#8217;s next? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] final straw for me was when they turned off the WTF function. This was the last in a long line of missteps by Technorati. It was useful for a time, but it&#8217;s time has passed. So, what&#8217;s next? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati CEO Search Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1423115</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati CEO Search Confirmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1423115</guid>
		<description>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedias.mobi &#187; Technorati CEO Search Confirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1318325</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedias.mobi &#187; Technorati CEO Search Confirmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1318325</guid>
		<description>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1317778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1317778</guid>
		<description>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stats have been largely up recently, although a number of distribution deals they currently have in place may be in jeopardy. Employees [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1314851</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1314851</guid>
		<description>Pallet - people spend all day stirring out stuff up. Sifry quite voluntarily opened this can of worms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pallet &#8211; people spend all day stirring out stuff up. Sifry quite voluntarily opened this can of worms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pallet jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1313460</link>
		<dc:creator>pallet jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1313460</guid>
		<description>They are for sale - Mike but to just

&quot;Stir things up&quot; ... can be considered wrong

 - What if someone had the ability to affect your bottom line - 

and did it &quot;just to stir things up&quot; would you be happy?

 - I am not saying you have a good or bad affect, -RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are for sale &#8211; Mike but to just</p>
<p>&#8220;Stir things up&#8221; &#8230; can be considered wrong</p>
<p> &#8211; What if someone had the ability to affect your bottom line &#8211; </p>
<p>and did it &#8220;just to stir things up&#8221; would you be happy?</p>
<p> &#8211; I am not saying you have a good or bad affect, -RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KNOCKS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312908</link>
		<dc:creator>KNOCKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312908</guid>
		<description>In the beginning I loved their concept, but i feel they have failed to innovate. Plus I love the fact that they are putting up such a good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the beginning I loved their concept, but i feel they have failed to innovate. Plus I love the fact that they are putting up such a good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Weatherby</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312244</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Weatherby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312244</guid>
		<description>While Technorati&#039;s numbers are impressive I fear that the wag has this one right.  Technorati lacks strategic focus.  

They also lack marketing.    Not marketing in the sense that R.J. mentions.  More along the lines of an easy to use complete product offering focused on a specific task sense of marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Technorati&#8217;s numbers are impressive I fear that the wag has this one right.  Technorati lacks strategic focus.  </p>
<p>They also lack marketing.    Not marketing in the sense that R.J. mentions.  More along the lines of an easy to use complete product offering focused on a specific task sense of marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312186</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312186</guid>
		<description>Excellent point Thomas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kewell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312159</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312159</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the inbound links to the &#039;tag&#039; page is because of all the blogging plugins and sites out there that link to Technorati when they display their tags for a post - so for eg. if I tag a post with &#039;wordpress&#039;, most plugins will link that tag back through to Technorati</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the inbound links to the &#8216;tag&#8217; page is because of all the blogging plugins and sites out there that link to Technorati when they display their tags for a post &#8211; so for eg. if I tag a post with &#8216;wordpress&#8217;, most plugins will link that tag back through to Technorati</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kewell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312155</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312155</guid>
		<description>Some of you may have noticed this, but it seems that Technorati has been doing some SEO work, because every time I search for a company name or popular topic, the Technorati &#039;tag&#039; page comes up in the top 2-5 results, eg:

http://www.google.com/search?q=wordpress

in that case, it even appears before the main Wordpress support site. What I would like to know is, what portion of this growth is driven by referrals from Google, and is this likely to last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you may have noticed this, but it seems that Technorati has been doing some SEO work, because every time I search for a company name or popular topic, the Technorati &#8216;tag&#8217; page comes up in the top 2-5 results, eg:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=wordpress" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.google.com/search?q=wordpress'>http://www.goog...rch?q=wordpress</a></p>
<p>in that case, it even appears before the main Wordpress support site. What I would like to know is, what portion of this growth is driven by referrals from Google, and is this likely to last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312091</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312091</guid>
		<description>I guess all we can do now is and wait where Technorati ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess all we can do now is and wait where Technorati ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1312027</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1312027</guid>
		<description>&quot;(Technorati was too small at that point for Comscore to properly measure it).&quot;

Last June?  That doesn&#039;t make sense from the chart so I&#039;m missing something here.

Google traffic to technorati is a plausible explanation.  I&#039;ve gotten drops and jumps as large percentagewise as the recent uptick at technorati.  But obviously I&#039;m just speculating on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(Technorati was too small at that point for Comscore to properly measure it).&#8221;</p>
<p>Last June?  That doesn&#8217;t make sense from the chart so I&#8217;m missing something here.</p>
<p>Google traffic to technorati is a plausible explanation.  I&#8217;ve gotten drops and jumps as large percentagewise as the recent uptick at technorati.  But obviously I&#8217;m just speculating on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311946</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311946</guid>
		<description>The traffic uptick does baffle me a bit. Then again, so does Flixter&#039;s increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traffic uptick does baffle me a bit. Then again, so does Flixter&#8217;s increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311911</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311911</guid>
		<description>Bilal - I will email you about the trackback issue - I can promise you when I see valid ones I do approve them! But with 4500 a day of spam, it takes time to look thru them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bilal &#8211; I will email you about the trackback issue &#8211; I can promise you when I see valid ones I do approve them! But with 4500 a day of spam, it takes time to look thru them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilal Hameed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311894</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilal Hameed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311894</guid>
		<description>Mike´s update just made me laugh, Dave if there is nothing special going on, why are you hopping around blogs that are mentioning the &quot;Mating&quot; word.

Allen the points you made are nice and valid, because referring to Google Blog Search is just not valid any more. Some novice might think that he can not search for blogs on Google itself. Check this for instance and see the top result. 
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;hl=en&amp;q=companies+i+like+to+profile&amp;btnG=Google+Search
Its a search query &quot;companies i like to profile&quot;. In fact I never go to Google Blog search for even blog searches. The Google one box does the trick.

I would have sure linked to your post to Allen, but trackbacks never appear on your site, so it will take real motivation to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike´s update just made me laugh, Dave if there is nothing special going on, why are you hopping around blogs that are mentioning the &#8220;Mating&#8221; word.</p>
<p>Allen the points you made are nice and valid, because referring to Google Blog Search is just not valid any more. Some novice might think that he can not search for blogs on Google itself. Check this for instance and see the top result.<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;hl=en&amp;q=companies+i+like+to+profile&amp;btnG=Google+Search" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;hl=en&amp;q=companies+i+like+to+profile&amp;btnG=Google+Search'>http://www.goog...G=Google+Search</a><br />
Its a search query &#8220;companies i like to profile&#8221;. In fact I never go to Google Blog search for even blog searches. The Google one box does the trick.</p>
<p>I would have sure linked to your post to Allen, but trackbacks never appear on your site, so it will take real motivation to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311881</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311881</guid>
		<description>YUP, they are looking for a buyer.  Nice call but who&#039;s gonna buy it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YUP, they are looking for a buyer.  Nice call but who&#8217;s gonna buy it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311863</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311863</guid>
		<description>Dave Sifry - You&#039;ve disclosed so little information to date, that it&#039;s hard NOT to speculate now that you are. Besides, it&#039;s fun to stir things up a bit. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Sifry &#8211; You&#8217;ve disclosed so little information to date, that it&#8217;s hard NOT to speculate now that you are. Besides, it&#8217;s fun to stir things up a bit. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Pittman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311860</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Pittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311860</guid>
		<description>Well to be fair, Mike and Dave, no company is ever really &quot;up for sale&quot; unless you post your assets on eBay or have a going out of business sale.  Technorati is worth what someone is willing to pay for it, and even Dave has his price.  I know he&#039;s having fun with it now, well deserved growth that didn&#039;t come easy.  We both know a lot about that.   However, if the check is big enough, everyone is for sale, at all times.  

Frankly, Technorati is shy on marketing, I must agree.  Time for Dave and company to start pounding the pavement a bit.  Marketing isn&#039;t just hype and PR, its about strategically building market share, and Technorati could do a much bigger job of it.  This is a good start Dave, keep going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to be fair, Mike and Dave, no company is ever really &#8220;up for sale&#8221; unless you post your assets on eBay or have a going out of business sale.  Technorati is worth what someone is willing to pay for it, and even Dave has his price.  I know he&#8217;s having fun with it now, well deserved growth that didn&#8217;t come easy.  We both know a lot about that.   However, if the check is big enough, everyone is for sale, at all times.  </p>
<p>Frankly, Technorati is shy on marketing, I must agree.  Time for Dave and company to start pounding the pavement a bit.  Marketing isn&#8217;t just hype and PR, its about strategically building market share, and Technorati could do a much bigger job of it.  This is a good start Dave, keep going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311841</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311841</guid>
		<description>AHA! I found it - the cocomment module I added a few months ago is not loading from their server hence the slow load. I removed it for now so it&#039;s back to speedy gonzalez :) (i know the TC readers don&#039;t care :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHA! I found it &#8211; the cocomment module I added a few months ago is not loading from their server hence the slow load. I removed it for now so it&#8217;s back to speedy gonzalez <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (i know the TC readers don&#8217;t care <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311840</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311840</guid>
		<description>Jason - you don&#039;t need to register - give it another try - it appears to be hanging half of the time - but it does load - just imagine being on a 2400 baud modem - let me check into why this is happening all of a sudden.

thank you for the notice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; you don&#8217;t need to register &#8211; give it another try &#8211; it appears to be hanging half of the time &#8211; but it does load &#8211; just imagine being on a 2400 baud modem &#8211; let me check into why this is happening all of a sudden.</p>
<p>thank you for the notice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311824</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311824</guid>
		<description>It is a well known strategy to say &quot;we are doing great&quot;, &quot;we aren&#039;t for sale&quot; to help with the negotiating.  Saying, &quot;uhhh, our growth has slowed&quot;, and &quot;yep, we are for sale&quot; doesn&#039;t exactly lead to a position of strenth at the negotiating table.  

That being said, it will be interesting to see if they are actually acquired.  As per David&#039;s comments (#2 above), I do wish them well either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a well known strategy to say &#8220;we are doing great&#8221;, &#8220;we aren&#8217;t for sale&#8221; to help with the negotiating.  Saying, &#8220;uhhh, our growth has slowed&#8221;, and &#8220;yep, we are for sale&#8221; doesn&#8217;t exactly lead to a position of strenth at the negotiating table.  </p>
<p>That being said, it will be interesting to see if they are actually acquired.  As per David&#8217;s comments (#2 above), I do wish them well either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Alba</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Alba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311821</guid>
		<description>Allen - I went to your blog post to leave a comment but one I hit the comment link it hangs... do I have to register?

Jason Alba
CEO - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.JibberJobber.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JibberJobber.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen &#8211; I went to your blog post to leave a comment but one I hit the comment link it hangs&#8230; do I have to register?</p>
<p>Jason Alba<br />
CEO &#8211; <a href="http://www.JibberJobber.com" rel="nofollow">JibberJobber.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/comment-page-1/#comment-1311811</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/03/technoratis-mating-dance/#comment-1311811</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of this is due to traffic from regular Google - Technorati tag pages do very well for key topics and I would guess they drive a significant amount of traffic.

I also wonder what the stats are on their widgets and other tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of this is due to traffic from regular Google &#8211; Technorati tag pages do very well for key topics and I would guess they drive a significant amount of traffic.</p>
<p>I also wonder what the stats are on their widgets and other tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
