<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Twenty Sites: Most Downtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Auch Topserver haben Schw&#228;chen &#183; Stunden, Jahr, Downtimes, Liste, Downtime, Unerreichbarkeit, Lediglich, Ausfall, Yahoo, Liga &#183; Das Internet lebt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-2049012</link>
		<dc:creator>Auch Topserver haben Schw&#228;chen &#183; Stunden, Jahr, Downtimes, Liste, Downtime, Unerreichbarkeit, Lediglich, Ausfall, Yahoo, Liga &#183; Das Internet lebt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-2049012</guid>
		<description>[...] vor einer Woche wurde hier von techcrunch eine Liste vorgestellt, die die Top 20-Seiten (nach Alexa) und deren Downtimes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vor einer Woche wurde hier von techcrunch eine Liste vorgestellt, die die Top 20-Seiten (nach Alexa) und deren Downtimes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celexa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1915109</link>
		<dc:creator>celexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1915109</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;celexa...&lt;/strong&gt;

ghua rhuoboi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>celexa&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ghua rhuoboi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1356781</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 05:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1356781</guid>
		<description>thanks for the grest info, 
this is an excellent blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the grest info,<br />
this is an excellent blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1356778</link>
		<dc:creator>dez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 05:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1356778</guid>
		<description>I would have thought that google would be the top rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought that google would be the top rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows VPS Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1349638</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows VPS Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1349638</guid>
		<description>Are the stats correct?

I am quite sure Myspace was down for more than an hour cuz at one point I couldn't log in for about 3 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the stats correct?</p>
<p>I am quite sure Myspace was down for more than an hour cuz at one point I couldn&#8217;t log in for about 3 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310936</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310936</guid>
		<description>4 hours of downtime for Blogger... I thought it should be higher. I can still remember how frustrating it was when I was with Blogger last time.... now, I have my own domain. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 hours of downtime for Blogger&#8230; I thought it should be higher. I can still remember how frustrating it was when I was with Blogger last time&#8230;. now, I have my own domain. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310642</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310642</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top Twenty Sites...&lt;/strong&gt;

Measuring total 2007 downtime to date for the top 20 sites on the web as ranked by Alexa. Leading the list is Yahoo with zero downtime. Google’s YouTube and Blogger.com are the worst performers, with over 4 hours of downtime each (although Google.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top Twenty Sites&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Measuring total 2007 downtime to date for the top 20 sites on the web as ranked by Alexa. Leading the list is Yahoo with zero downtime. Google’s YouTube and Blogger.com are the worst performers, with over 4 hours of downtime each (although Google.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish Babu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310530</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish Babu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310530</guid>
		<description>Good Job Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Job Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayal Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayal Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310099</guid>
		<description>It seems that there is a correlation between how new the website (or its popularity in the web community) and how much downtime it has, which makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that there is a correlation between how new the website (or its popularity in the web community) and how much downtime it has, which makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310034</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1310034</guid>
		<description>Simon - both MySpace and Yahoo have more page views than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon - both MySpace and Yahoo have more page views than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon North</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309999</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309999</guid>
		<description>Why isn't Google at the top of this list (not for downtime, for top sites)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t Google at the top of this list (not for downtime, for top sites)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309966</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309966</guid>
		<description>Another thing to consider is what Flickr does while upgrading (which is rare and quick). They put up a page simply saying they are working on upgrading/fixing; would that return as down or up? I would presume up and if so can inflate their numbers...just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to consider is what Flickr does while upgrading (which is rare and quick). They put up a page simply saying they are working on upgrading/fixing; would that return as down or up? I would presume up and if so can inflate their numbers&#8230;just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309939</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309939</guid>
		<description>Information on how GIGRIB works is available here:
http://uptime.pingdom.com/general/methodology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information on how GIGRIB works is available here:<br />
<a href="http://uptime.pingdom.com/general/methodology" rel="nofollow">http://uptime.pingdom.com/general/methodology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rack pallet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309828</link>
		<dc:creator>rack pallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309828</guid>
		<description>I say instead of bashing a list - for technicalities ; 

 - Lets be happy somone is producing numbers; and I agree with the idea that - it would be great to see the technology with each company - 

 - Although I would speculate; most of its proprietary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say instead of bashing a list - for technicalities ; </p>
<p> - Lets be happy somone is producing numbers; and I agree with the idea that - it would be great to see the technology with each company - </p>
<p> - Although I would speculate; most of its proprietary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonbiz_paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309803</link>
		<dc:creator>nonbiz_paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309803</guid>
		<description>Need more info on the methodology. I use yahoo for world, national and business (technology) news. Been seeing more frequency lately with feed errors (no content available). 

If you know more about their methodology, please post.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need more info on the methodology. I use yahoo for world, national and business (technology) news. Been seeing more frequency lately with feed errors (no content available). </p>
<p>If you know more about their methodology, please post.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309793</link>
		<dc:creator>bdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309793</guid>
		<description>recco, which is why you host your blog on blogger? Nice one.

jamie, i dont know what youre talking about, but I havent had any issues with gmail. I know they have been having well publicized issues of late, but my understanding is that many changes are being made to accommodate their new offerings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>recco, which is why you host your blog on blogger? Nice one.</p>
<p>jamie, i dont know what youre talking about, but I havent had any issues with gmail. I know they have been having well publicized issues of late, but my understanding is that many changes are being made to accommodate their new offerings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309780</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309780</guid>
		<description>how about gmail? it has the worst availability among the top three free email providers such as gmail, hotmail and yahoo...it goes down for hours on end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about gmail? it has the worst availability among the top three free email providers such as gmail, hotmail and yahoo&#8230;it goes down for hours on end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309738</link>
		<dc:creator>recco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309738</guid>
		<description>fine. as i think - yahoo the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fine. as i think - yahoo the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309723</link>
		<dc:creator>Payam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309723</guid>
		<description>it would be nice if this service could differentiate the reasons for the failure ie DNS issues, content server being down, 404 error messages, etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be nice if this service could differentiate the reasons for the failure ie DNS issues, content server being down, 404 error messages, etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kewtr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309680</link>
		<dc:creator>Kewtr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309680</guid>
		<description>I doubt they just ping, but who knows. Ping alone would not be the whole picture for sure.

Totally unsurprised by Blogger, surprised by YouTube and that MySpace isn't worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt they just ping, but who knows. Ping alone would not be the whole picture for sure.</p>
<p>Totally unsurprised by Blogger, surprised by YouTube and that MySpace isn&#8217;t worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amsterdam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309671</link>
		<dc:creator>amsterdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309671</guid>
		<description>- Would like to differentiate between transactional site like amazon.com &#38; ebay.com wrt others (google,yahoo etc). Keeping a transactional site functional is order of magnitude difficult than running a read only website..
Kudos to amazon, &#38; ebay - they rock..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Would like to differentiate between transactional site like amazon.com &amp; ebay.com wrt others (google,yahoo etc). Keeping a transactional site functional is order of magnitude difficult than running a read only website..<br />
Kudos to amazon, &amp; ebay - they rock..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webified</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309670</link>
		<dc:creator>webified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309670</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brad. "This site is down" is probably still "pingable". Not a very good measure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brad. &#8220;This site is down&#8221; is probably still &#8220;pingable&#8221;. Not a very good measure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309662</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309662</guid>
		<description>Probably Bloglines beats them all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably Bloglines beats them all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309631</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309631</guid>
		<description>Is there a service that is able to determine accessibility vs. down time.  Ie receiving an error page?  That would be pretty interesting.  Yahoo, MySpace, etc, they all seem to generate quite a few error pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a service that is able to determine accessibility vs. down time.  Ie receiving an error page?  That would be pretty interesting.  Yahoo, MySpace, etc, they all seem to generate quite a few error pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309629</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/02/top-twenty-sites-most-downtime/#comment-1309629</guid>
		<description>You're right Mike. Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Mike. Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.092 seconds -->
