<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FlipTrack Get&#8217;s $1.5 M for Syncing Slide Shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Real Scrapblog is Here&#8230; Finally</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1298223</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Scrapblog is Here&#8230; Finally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1298223</guid>
		<description>[...] along with two newer players, RockYou and Slide, bringing in tens of millions in financing. Like FlipTrack, however, Scrapblog keeps a distinct niche by offering a more richly designed presentation less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] along with two newer players, RockYou and Slide, bringing in tens of millions in financing. Like FlipTrack, however, Scrapblog keeps a distinct niche by offering a more richly designed presentation less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyWarhol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1294663</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyWarhol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1294663</guid>
		<description>U can still do Ok if yer not first out the Door but have a better Product right??

I'm gonna have to Speed UWayCoolr up*

Cheers!  Billy  ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U can still do Ok if yer not first out the Door but have a better Product right??</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to Speed UWayCoolr up*</p>
<p>Cheers!  Billy  ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1293465</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1293465</guid>
		<description>Does this mean I can sell this:
http://ajaxwidgets.com/nnug/
for $2.5 MILL...??

;)

I held it once and people thought it was PPT until the very last slide... ;)
(__45 minutes!! __)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean I can sell this:<br />
<a href="http://ajaxwidgets.com/nnug/" rel="nofollow">http://ajaxwidgets.com/nnug/</a><br />
for $2.5 MILL&#8230;??</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I held it once and people thought it was PPT until the very last slide&#8230; <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
(__45 minutes!! __)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1293044</link>
		<dc:creator>trevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1293044</guid>
		<description>Re: Drama2.0

$1.5M is not a lot of money if you're paying salaries and rent ;-) A lot of us can afford to build something like this for 20-30K only because we work out of our garage and eat ramen every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Drama2.0</p>
<p>$1.5M is not a lot of money if you&#8217;re paying salaries and rent <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> A lot of us can afford to build something like this for 20-30K only because we work out of our garage and eat ramen every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drama 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292962</link>
		<dc:creator>Drama 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292962</guid>
		<description>Still waiting for the business model, let alone why a company like this needs $1.5 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for the business model, let alone why a company like this needs $1.5 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292844</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292844</guid>
		<description>Registered and downloaded the FlipTrack software this morning. Made a quick video and tried to "share" it. The uploading worked without any errors, however the video hasn't showed up on the site yet. Techcrunch effect? Anybody know how long it takes for the videos to actually show up?

I emailed them at support this morning. No response back yet. Hmm ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Registered and downloaded the FlipTrack software this morning. Made a quick video and tried to &#8220;share&#8221; it. The uploading worked without any errors, however the video hasn&#8217;t showed up on the site yet. Techcrunch effect? Anybody know how long it takes for the videos to actually show up?</p>
<p>I emailed them at support this morning. No response back yet. Hmm &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292636</link>
		<dc:creator>trevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292636</guid>
		<description>Interesting... always a new spin...always a new angle.

RockYou blew to the top because they had a super cool slideshow widget... now FlipTrack comes along with "music sync-ing" AND a cool slideshow widget.

I love Web2.0 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; always a new spin&#8230;always a new angle.</p>
<p>RockYou blew to the top because they had a super cool slideshow widget&#8230; now FlipTrack comes along with &#8220;music sync-ing&#8221; AND a cool slideshow widget.</p>
<p>I love Web2.0 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292367</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292367</guid>
		<description>I think I saw some of those girls in the example in some porn movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I saw some of those girls in the example in some porn movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dramatoo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292273</link>
		<dc:creator>dramatoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292273</guid>
		<description>wow, another one!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, another one!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rack pallet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292243</link>
		<dc:creator>rack pallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292243</guid>
		<description>- 1.5mm is a reasonable investment for the amount of footprint it could have on Myspace...

  Also the debate; on rather or not this video is a scam; is a lame one.

 - If it is the company is cheating itself more than the customers; becuase they are not"Under promising and over delivering.."

-rb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- 1.5mm is a reasonable investment for the amount of footprint it could have on Myspace&#8230;</p>
<p>  Also the debate; on rather or not this video is a scam; is a lame one.</p>
<p> - If it is the company is cheating itself more than the customers; becuase they are not&#8221;Under promising and over delivering..&#8221;</p>
<p>-rb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frenchie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292158</link>
		<dc:creator>Frenchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1292158</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't that be "FlipTrack Gets"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t that be &#8220;FlipTrack Gets&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291921</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291921</guid>
		<description>Yes this is possible in flash but flash transitions on pictures are a little grainy / animated and there is no sign of that on this example. These are video's. I am trying their system now, however it has definitely crashed (after 25 minutes of processing). I have made an example and at the end of choosing the settings it goes into a processing mode? from which it has not yet recovered after 25 minutes or so. So maybe what they are doing is actually using flash to compile video's but the processor is video based not flash. If that's the case, that explains the need for the processing mode. 

It's a good idea mind and my filmator does something like this, though our output is pure flash, and thus the pictures are not converted into video. As such we retain the original quality of the images so that they can be displayed in full screen mode and they look perfect on output. Clearly when you convert images into video you will loose much of the quality and at the same time add huge amount of bandwidth to your final product. 

So what this looks like is yet another video editing tool but this time for images with stock music that you select (they have 300 songs to choose from). So if I were to review this I would say it was a little limited in its performance and rather expensive (considering I made filmator for next to nothing) compared to their millions that they will be unlikely to make back IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is possible in flash but flash transitions on pictures are a little grainy / animated and there is no sign of that on this example. These are video&#8217;s. I am trying their system now, however it has definitely crashed (after 25 minutes of processing). I have made an example and at the end of choosing the settings it goes into a processing mode? from which it has not yet recovered after 25 minutes or so. So maybe what they are doing is actually using flash to compile video&#8217;s but the processor is video based not flash. If that&#8217;s the case, that explains the need for the processing mode. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good idea mind and my filmator does something like this, though our output is pure flash, and thus the pictures are not converted into video. As such we retain the original quality of the images so that they can be displayed in full screen mode and they look perfect on output. Clearly when you convert images into video you will loose much of the quality and at the same time add huge amount of bandwidth to your final product. </p>
<p>So what this looks like is yet another video editing tool but this time for images with stock music that you select (they have 300 songs to choose from). So if I were to review this I would say it was a little limited in its performance and rather expensive (considering I made filmator for next to nothing) compared to their millions that they will be unlikely to make back IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291880</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291880</guid>
		<description>@Filmator - the service does store the final movie in an FLV video format. The meta data for the project remains on FlipTrack's server so that users can come back and remix them later.

I don't see what the problem is finished product being in a movie format, except for resizing. In that case FlipTrack will probably just encode multiple sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Filmator - the service does store the final movie in an FLV video format. The meta data for the project remains on FlipTrack&#8217;s server so that users can come back and remix them later.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see what the problem is finished product being in a movie format, except for resizing. In that case FlipTrack will probably just encode multiple sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291856</guid>
		<description>Filmator, all it does is either resize, move, or fade various images. Are these not all possible in flash? I've created some animations with flash and to my knowledge it's certainly possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filmator, all it does is either resize, move, or fade various images. Are these not all possible in flash? I&#8217;ve created some animations with flash and to my knowledge it&#8217;s certainly possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291826</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291826</guid>
		<description>If you new flash, its possibilities and its limitations you would know that the fades are not being made in flash. These are video fades/zooms. Clearly done in an attempt to trick some people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you new flash, its possibilities and its limitations you would know that the fades are not being made in flash. These are video fades/zooms. Clearly done in an attempt to trick some people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291781</guid>
		<description>Not sure why you think it's a scam Filmator. I don't see how you could make such speculations. 

The service seems interesting, though the pictures seemed to jump too much during quicker parts of the song. Services like these need to hit the 'tipping point' to become successful, and I don't see that happening for fliptrack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why you think it&#8217;s a scam Filmator. I don&#8217;t see how you could make such speculations. </p>
<p>The service seems interesting, though the pictures seemed to jump too much during quicker parts of the song. Services like these need to hit the &#8216;tipping point&#8217; to become successful, and I don&#8217;t see that happening for fliptrack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291754</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291754</guid>
		<description>This is a scam. This example is not using simple pictures that are being manipulated in their custom Flash player. The fades are not Flash fades. Instead they have used video editing software to make this example in what is clearly an attempt to cheat the investors and users of their compilers capabilities! 

If I was an investor I would be demanding to see this live example recreated before my own eyes... Or I would want my money back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a scam. This example is not using simple pictures that are being manipulated in their custom Flash player. The fades are not Flash fades. Instead they have used video editing software to make this example in what is clearly an attempt to cheat the investors and users of their compilers capabilities! </p>
<p>If I was an investor I would be demanding to see this live example recreated before my own eyes&#8230; Or I would want my money back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291655</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291655</guid>
		<description>It's "Eye of the Tiger" by Survivor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;Eye of the Tiger&#8221; by Survivor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291593</link>
		<dc:creator>Romain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/27/fliptrack-gets-1-5-m-for-synching-slide-shows/#comment-1291593</guid>
		<description>What is the song that is played during the slide show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the song that is played during the slide show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.083 seconds -->
