<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GrandCentral A Little Too &#8220;Beta&#8221; For Some</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google To Acquire GrandCentral</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1472001</link>
		<dc:creator>Google To Acquire GrandCentral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1472001</guid>
		<description>[...] may have received too much press attention before the product was ready, and we reported on some backlash from beta users abandoning the service in March. Still, the company pushed ahead, launching a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have received too much press attention before the product was ready, and we reported on some backlash from beta users abandoning the service in March. Still, the company pushed ahead, launching a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a random blog !</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1400679</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a random blog !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1400679</guid>
		<description>[...] follow up coverage wasn&#8217;t entirely positive. In late March we noted some hiccups with the service that led some beta testers to abandon it. But we&#8217;ve continued to use the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] follow up coverage wasn&rsquo;t entirely positive. In late March we noted some hiccups with the service that led some beta testers to abandon it. But we&rsquo;ve continued to use the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1341755</link>
		<dc:creator>Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1341755</guid>
		<description>GC - in theory, the best phone situation I can think of.  

In practice, well:

I was recently unemployed, and moved cities, leaving an old cell phone behind, and planning to start new service.  During this period, I went through about 4 phone numbers (old cell, new landline, temporary pre-paid cell, and then new cell phone service).  It would have been an ideal time to use a SINGLE number to bridge all the various services. 

So I started using my GC number on job applications.  During the course of the interview process/period, I missed an important call from a prospective employer.  Luckily, I contacted them, and resolved the miscommunication.  (And after testing my account, discovered that it was indeed down, for two days - w/o notice or warning.)

If GC works 95% of the time, that's great.  But let's face it, the convenience of managing multiple phone lines completely disappears when you miss one important phone call.  

As much as we all hate the telecoms, they have a proven track record and have service that we can trust.  (at least 98% of the time)  Trust... no price for that.

Anyway, I'm glad that I waited to send out my GC number in a mass email.  Now I don't have to sound like a complete tool when I send an "oops", never mind.  


I hope this service is up and running in a few years.  It would be unstoppable if it was reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GC - in theory, the best phone situation I can think of.  </p>
<p>In practice, well:</p>
<p>I was recently unemployed, and moved cities, leaving an old cell phone behind, and planning to start new service.  During this period, I went through about 4 phone numbers (old cell, new landline, temporary pre-paid cell, and then new cell phone service).  It would have been an ideal time to use a SINGLE number to bridge all the various services. </p>
<p>So I started using my GC number on job applications.  During the course of the interview process/period, I missed an important call from a prospective employer.  Luckily, I contacted them, and resolved the miscommunication.  (And after testing my account, discovered that it was indeed down, for two days - w/o notice or warning.)</p>
<p>If GC works 95% of the time, that&#8217;s great.  But let&#8217;s face it, the convenience of managing multiple phone lines completely disappears when you miss one important phone call.  </p>
<p>As much as we all hate the telecoms, they have a proven track record and have service that we can trust.  (at least 98% of the time)  Trust&#8230; no price for that.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m glad that I waited to send out my GC number in a mass email.  Now I don&#8217;t have to sound like a complete tool when I send an &#8220;oops&#8221;, never mind.  </p>
<p>I hope this service is up and running in a few years.  It would be unstoppable if it was reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMinSF</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1310465</link>
		<dc:creator>DMinSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1310465</guid>
		<description>I discovered the GrandCentral site a few weeks and fell in love with it and it seemed perfect... until now.  Last night someone said "Hey, I can't call you, I just get a fast-busy" and when people using Skype were trying to call me today they would just get disconnected.  Oddly, if I disabled all my phones in my Settings, they could get to my voice mail.  If I enabled any one of the phones, Skype would drop the call.  Very strange.  The person last night was trying to call me from a plain 'ol PacBell POTS line and got the fast-busy signal.  Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered the GrandCentral site a few weeks and fell in love with it and it seemed perfect&#8230; until now.  Last night someone said &#8220;Hey, I can&#8217;t call you, I just get a fast-busy&#8221; and when people using Skype were trying to call me today they would just get disconnected.  Oddly, if I disabled all my phones in my Settings, they could get to my voice mail.  If I enabled any one of the phones, Skype would drop the call.  Very strange.  The person last night was trying to call me from a plain &#8216;ol PacBell POTS line and got the fast-busy signal.  Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFinSF</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1306647</link>
		<dc:creator>SFinSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1306647</guid>
		<description>Just got GC set up but haven't tried it yet. Very glad to find this forum...

I echo the concern of the mobile/caller ID situation. If your GC # can't show up in the recipient's log, it can result in more confusion than it's worth esp. in business. Ditto for the bad sound quality; we don't need more degradation of phone audio. I can barely stand using my mobile as it is.

As for me I don't know how I will proceed w/ GC given the mixed reviews. Probably just use it with a few pals for awhile and see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got GC set up but haven&#8217;t tried it yet. Very glad to find this forum&#8230;</p>
<p>I echo the concern of the mobile/caller ID situation. If your GC # can&#8217;t show up in the recipient&#8217;s log, it can result in more confusion than it&#8217;s worth esp. in business. Ditto for the bad sound quality; we don&#8217;t need more degradation of phone audio. I can barely stand using my mobile as it is.</p>
<p>As for me I don&#8217;t know how I will proceed w/ GC given the mixed reviews. Probably just use it with a few pals for awhile and see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asterisk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1303401</link>
		<dc:creator>Asterisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1303401</guid>
		<description>Why pay Grand Central when you can run asterisk on a virtual private server? 

There's nothing that amazing about a hunt group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why pay Grand Central when you can run asterisk on a virtual private server? </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing that amazing about a hunt group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Maugars</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1297214</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Maugars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1297214</guid>
		<description>Talking about beta... 

We just launched MasqueNumber:
Kleenex numbers with custom caller-id and time-of-day call filtering.

A bit like TalkPlus except it works on any phone without any download, a GrandCentral type of call control technology and with one mantra: Easy-To-Use.

When you choose to forward to voicemail by time-of-day, your phone does not even ring, real peace-of-mind... You get voicemails by email, and you can check your call records in real-time online.

We are thinking of a Netflix type of pricing: you pay for the number of Masque Numbers you use per month, you drop numbers at anytime without any deactivation fee.

Feedback and beta-users very welcome (we are in real beta, online for 10 days only!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about beta&#8230; </p>
<p>We just launched MasqueNumber:<br />
Kleenex numbers with custom caller-id and time-of-day call filtering.</p>
<p>A bit like TalkPlus except it works on any phone without any download, a GrandCentral type of call control technology and with one mantra: Easy-To-Use.</p>
<p>When you choose to forward to voicemail by time-of-day, your phone does not even ring, real peace-of-mind&#8230; You get voicemails by email, and you can check your call records in real-time online.</p>
<p>We are thinking of a Netflix type of pricing: you pay for the number of Masque Numbers you use per month, you drop numbers at anytime without any deactivation fee.</p>
<p>Feedback and beta-users very welcome (we are in real beta, online for 10 days only!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harprit Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1296049</link>
		<dc:creator>Harprit Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1296049</guid>
		<description>Hello TechCrunch ... why wait for this new implementation of a well-established idea? Our company has been offering this service for several years -- and our product isn't beta. It’s production, and it works. We have a long list of customers who depend on it every day. There are also other companies providing one number (find me/follow me) services. They're not "free", but they work. Free services seem to get the attention of the media, but it's also important to balance that with coverage of commercial services -- especially when those services are mature, and proven to work. For most people, business people especially, completing a call is far more important than the call or the number being free! There's a huge disparity between the cost of a missed opportunity due to a lost call, versus paying for a reliable, dependable, and affordable hosted or virtual phone system. For consumers, maybe the catch word is “free”. For businesses, the catch word is "reliable". Just my 2c.
–Harprit Singh, http://www.innoport.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello TechCrunch &#8230; why wait for this new implementation of a well-established idea? Our company has been offering this service for several years &#8212; and our product isn&#8217;t beta. It’s production, and it works. We have a long list of customers who depend on it every day. There are also other companies providing one number (find me/follow me) services. They&#8217;re not &#8220;free&#8221;, but they work. Free services seem to get the attention of the media, but it&#8217;s also important to balance that with coverage of commercial services &#8212; especially when those services are mature, and proven to work. For most people, business people especially, completing a call is far more important than the call or the number being free! There&#8217;s a huge disparity between the cost of a missed opportunity due to a lost call, versus paying for a reliable, dependable, and affordable hosted or virtual phone system. For consumers, maybe the catch word is “free”. For businesses, the catch word is &#8220;reliable&#8221;. Just my 2c.<br />
–Harprit Singh, <a href="http://www.innoport.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.innoport.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1293784</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1293784</guid>
		<description>I looked into signing up for Grand Central, but won't touch it until it's out of Beta and working perfectly. The whole idea is to fix a bunch of imperfect phone #'s and services. Hopefully that'll happen sooner than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked into signing up for Grand Central, but won&#8217;t touch it until it&#8217;s out of Beta and working perfectly. The whole idea is to fix a bunch of imperfect phone #&#8217;s and services. Hopefully that&#8217;ll happen sooner than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291512</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291512</guid>
		<description>Hi,

We've been using GC for some time, I think 6-8 weeks, for some of our incoming 800 numbers for sales and tech support.

It works reasonably well. Customers call a given 800 number, which terminates at the appropriate GC number, which then distributes the call to multiple staff members around the country at the same time.

We quickly found that receiving GC calls via a landline is much better. For instance, my cell *and* landline are included in the sales group. If I'm near the landline, I WAY prefer to use that to answer the call.

We have experienced the problem of pressing "1" to answer the call and the GC system apparently not detecting the "1". That's really frustrating - to have a customer calling and not be able to connect. Definitely happens more frequently when receiving the call on my cell. Not often on the landline, but still sometimes.

As for the threat of losing the number we've given to customers, in our case, it's not a problem, as we give out the 800 number, which we *do* control ourselves. GC could go out of business and we can still terminate the 800 number anywhere we want. 800 numbers are super cheap these days, so I'd recommend that for any business use, plus I'd never trust my business number not being "owned" by my business :-).

The call-out caller ID thing is indeed a problem. Our tech guys call back customers and the customers capture their cell phone or landline IDs. Then guess what? In time, customers start calling those numbers directly, which is not good... it means that those customers start depending on one particular person, which they would get better service from the whole team (ie, what if that person is on vacation?!).

Anyway, overall pretty good experience, but we are still looking at options, including some old fashioned POTS or otherwise more traditional phone system options.

We have a largely distributed workforce, which makes it tough to find a "perfect" solution. But we also really value the quality of communications with customers, so whenever we miss a call because pressing "1" didn't work, we really cringe!

Oh, as for call audio quality itself, we have not had many problems with that, mainly because we have paid for everyone to have landlines and to use them whenever possible to receive calls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been using GC for some time, I think 6-8 weeks, for some of our incoming 800 numbers for sales and tech support.</p>
<p>It works reasonably well. Customers call a given 800 number, which terminates at the appropriate GC number, which then distributes the call to multiple staff members around the country at the same time.</p>
<p>We quickly found that receiving GC calls via a landline is much better. For instance, my cell *and* landline are included in the sales group. If I&#8217;m near the landline, I WAY prefer to use that to answer the call.</p>
<p>We have experienced the problem of pressing &#8220;1&#8243; to answer the call and the GC system apparently not detecting the &#8220;1&#8243;. That&#8217;s really frustrating - to have a customer calling and not be able to connect. Definitely happens more frequently when receiving the call on my cell. Not often on the landline, but still sometimes.</p>
<p>As for the threat of losing the number we&#8217;ve given to customers, in our case, it&#8217;s not a problem, as we give out the 800 number, which we *do* control ourselves. GC could go out of business and we can still terminate the 800 number anywhere we want. 800 numbers are super cheap these days, so I&#8217;d recommend that for any business use, plus I&#8217;d never trust my business number not being &#8220;owned&#8221; by my business :-).</p>
<p>The call-out caller ID thing is indeed a problem. Our tech guys call back customers and the customers capture their cell phone or landline IDs. Then guess what? In time, customers start calling those numbers directly, which is not good&#8230; it means that those customers start depending on one particular person, which they would get better service from the whole team (ie, what if that person is on vacation?!).</p>
<p>Anyway, overall pretty good experience, but we are still looking at options, including some old fashioned POTS or otherwise more traditional phone system options.</p>
<p>We have a largely distributed workforce, which makes it tough to find a &#8220;perfect&#8221; solution. But we also really value the quality of communications with customers, so whenever we miss a call because pressing &#8220;1&#8243; didn&#8217;t work, we really cringe!</p>
<p>Oh, as for call audio quality itself, we have not had many problems with that, mainly because we have paid for everyone to have landlines and to use them whenever possible to receive calls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291325</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291325</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is that 100 years of POTS have made us used to having a phone that always works.  There's very rarely downtime with the POTS.  Contrast that with cell phones, and especially the new services delivered over IP.  I wonder how long it will take them to get it to the same level of service, if ever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is that 100 years of POTS have made us used to having a phone that always works.  There&#8217;s very rarely downtime with the POTS.  Contrast that with cell phones, and especially the new services delivered over IP.  I wonder how long it will take them to get it to the same level of service, if ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Warner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291170</link>
		<dc:creator>J Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1291170</guid>
		<description>I'm amazed at the way people are jumping on board with this. GC says their service will always be free but I've seen dozens of free internet services turn into fee based services. What if they end up going out of business... I'd have 200+ customers with a dead number.  I've been using gotvoice which has many of the same features as GC and it works with my existing number; in fact it works with all of my numbers. The last thing I need is "another" phone number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed at the way people are jumping on board with this. GC says their service will always be free but I&#8217;ve seen dozens of free internet services turn into fee based services. What if they end up going out of business&#8230; I&#8217;d have 200+ customers with a dead number.  I&#8217;ve been using gotvoice which has many of the same features as GC and it works with my existing number; in fact it works with all of my numbers. The last thing I need is &#8220;another&#8221; phone number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Spink</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290845</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Spink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290845</guid>
		<description>I read the post from Marc about GC calls getting routed to the wrong phone. This unfortunately is a huge problem with follow-me services of this kind because if one of the phones in the chain is turned off, then most likely callers will get routed to the voicemail of that phone, rather than to the phone where the person they are calling really is.

I tried a follow-me service of this kind a while back and this 'feature' drove me crazy. As Marc points out GC has no control over this and it doesn't seem like there anything GC could do anything about, is there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the post from Marc about GC calls getting routed to the wrong phone. This unfortunately is a huge problem with follow-me services of this kind because if one of the phones in the chain is turned off, then most likely callers will get routed to the voicemail of that phone, rather than to the phone where the person they are calling really is.</p>
<p>I tried a follow-me service of this kind a while back and this &#8216;feature&#8217; drove me crazy. As Marc points out GC has no control over this and it doesn&#8217;t seem like there anything GC could do anything about, is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290775</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290775</guid>
		<description>I made a post about delays during a call and Craig Walker from GrandCentral contacted me to try and figure out what may be the problem.  I must say that I'm surprised by the amount of customer service.  I have also had very responsive communication with their Live Chat Help feature on their website.  Back to the problem... I did find it odd that I was the only one making a complaint about the delay problem during a conversation.  It could very well be the VOIP line provider connecting to my number.  Some providers are better than others and GrandCentral is in talks to work with another provider.  It's a new company with very good ideas and I'm looking forward to using the service more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a post about delays during a call and Craig Walker from GrandCentral contacted me to try and figure out what may be the problem.  I must say that I&#8217;m surprised by the amount of customer service.  I have also had very responsive communication with their Live Chat Help feature on their website.  Back to the problem&#8230; I did find it odd that I was the only one making a complaint about the delay problem during a conversation.  It could very well be the VOIP line provider connecting to my number.  Some providers are better than others and GrandCentral is in talks to work with another provider.  It&#8217;s a new company with very good ideas and I&#8217;m looking forward to using the service more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290647</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290647</guid>
		<description>Does GC plan to come out with a feature where you can leave voicemails on cell phones and answering machines like gotvoice?

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does GC plan to come out with a feature where you can leave voicemails on cell phones and answering machines like gotvoice?</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290514</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290514</guid>
		<description>I think this is an incredible idea!  My only problem is, it's offered to every city in Tennessee except Chattanooga!  My area code (423) is not available!  Any idea when more will be added?  Will it not be until after the beta period???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an incredible idea!  My only problem is, it&#8217;s offered to every city in Tennessee except Chattanooga!  My area code (423) is not available!  Any idea when more will be added?  Will it not be until after the beta period???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basicity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290349</link>
		<dc:creator>Basicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290349</guid>
		<description>Nice domain name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice domain name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290287</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290287</guid>
		<description>phil,

The only way that you can call somebody and have them see you as calling from your GC number would be to use the click to call in the address book.  It would be great if you could call into GC and have voice dialing for your address book.  Then everybody will see you as calling from your GC number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phil,</p>
<p>The only way that you can call somebody and have them see you as calling from your GC number would be to use the click to call in the address book.  It would be great if you could call into GC and have voice dialing for your address book.  Then everybody will see you as calling from your GC number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil swenson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290048</link>
		<dc:creator>phil swenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1290048</guid>
		<description>One major issue with GC I haven't heard addressed.....

If you sign up with GC and call someone with your cell phone, the number displayed to everyone will still be the cell number.  Which means 1) the receiver's history will show the cell # 2) the receiver might capture that number as your contact number 3) if they use GC to call and have that assoicated with your name, then when you call on your cell they won't know who your are....

etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One major issue with GC I haven&#8217;t heard addressed&#8230;..</p>
<p>If you sign up with GC and call someone with your cell phone, the number displayed to everyone will still be the cell number.  Which means 1) the receiver&#8217;s history will show the cell # 2) the receiver might capture that number as your contact number 3) if they use GC to call and have that assoicated with your name, then when you call on your cell they won&#8217;t know who your are&#8230;.</p>
<p>etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289842</guid>
		<description>I've been waiting to use this service since it started public beta, but I live in Arkansas and apparently the entire mid-west is not a target area, so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting to use this service since it started public beta, but I live in Arkansas and apparently the entire mid-west is not a target area, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lambie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289685</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lambie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289685</guid>
		<description>ok, i hopped aboard the grand central train. i am totally in love with this service. it's the customization i've always wanted for my voicemail and phone settings on an easy web interface. Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i hopped aboard the grand central train. i am totally in love with this service. it&#8217;s the customization i&#8217;ve always wanted for my voicemail and phone settings on an easy web interface. Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Mowery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289436</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Mowery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289436</guid>
		<description>I have been using GC since private beta and have found the service to be great (for this being a beta product). Granted they may need to work on handling the larger load as their service grows, but I have had better reliability with GC then I have had with my Vonage features or my Cingular wireless features.  The only bad thing at the moment is that I cannot call out through my GC # since people getting my calls have my GC# programmed in their cells and when I call from my home # or cell #, they get those numbers showing up rather then my GC#.  Also wish I could login to GC from my mobile. 
Other then those 2 nit picky items, I have been very impressed with Grand Centrals "Beta" product which surpasses other betas I have used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using GC since private beta and have found the service to be great (for this being a beta product). Granted they may need to work on handling the larger load as their service grows, but I have had better reliability with GC then I have had with my Vonage features or my Cingular wireless features.  The only bad thing at the moment is that I cannot call out through my GC # since people getting my calls have my GC# programmed in their cells and when I call from my home # or cell #, they get those numbers showing up rather then my GC#.  Also wish I could login to GC from my mobile.<br />
Other then those 2 nit picky items, I have been very impressed with Grand Centrals &#8220;Beta&#8221; product which surpasses other betas I have used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289421</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289421</guid>
		<description>I would really like to see this service available for use in Canada, as the idea behind it seems very useful.  I guess I'll just have to wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like to see this service available for use in Canada, as the idea behind it seems very useful.  I guess I&#8217;ll just have to wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289087</link>
		<dc:creator>EP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289087</guid>
		<description>It's really a tough call - do you push a service out as early as possible with a half baked product or do you hold-off until everything is perfect. The answer is probably a balance between the two, but with a board, investors, and family all pushing to see you roll it out, sometimes CEO's can make bad decisions and push a service out too early...I hope they can fix the issues soon and maintain a solid user base of happ customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really a tough call - do you push a service out as early as possible with a half baked product or do you hold-off until everything is perfect. The answer is probably a balance between the two, but with a board, investors, and family all pushing to see you roll it out, sometimes CEO&#8217;s can make bad decisions and push a service out too early&#8230;I hope they can fix the issues soon and maintain a solid user base of happ customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CReichert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289085</link>
		<dc:creator>CReichert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/26/grandcentral-a-little-too-beta-for-some/#comment-1289085</guid>
		<description>I signed up based on Pogue's article.  I tested it from my home at about 2AM (late nights, ahem).  It worked brilliantly for the first few times, but then I constantly got the busy circuits message.    I called my cell to test which circuit was busy, and it was never T-Mobile..so I assume it was GC's system; the  Pogue-effect" in this case vs "the Digg effect".

I personally would cross over fully if it was 5 nines, but till then, it is for family and friends to use.  

A suggestion, which I'll put up on the GC site is to allow you to direct the call to a specific line of your pool...maybe *xx (xx being the last two digits of one of your chosen lines) as opposed to the whole set ringing..confusing to people who might be at home when you are at the office and want just the office to ring..

Really interesting solution...look forward to a fully matured implementation..this one has legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up based on Pogue&#8217;s article.  I tested it from my home at about 2AM (late nights, ahem).  It worked brilliantly for the first few times, but then I constantly got the busy circuits message.    I called my cell to test which circuit was busy, and it was never T-Mobile..so I assume it was GC&#8217;s system; the  Pogue-effect&#8221; in this case vs &#8220;the Digg effect&#8221;.</p>
<p>I personally would cross over fully if it was 5 nines, but till then, it is for family and friends to use.  </p>
<p>A suggestion, which I&#8217;ll put up on the GC site is to allow you to direct the call to a specific line of your pool&#8230;maybe *xx (xx being the last two digits of one of your chosen lines) as opposed to the whole set ringing..confusing to people who might be at home when you are at the office and want just the office to ring..</p>
<p>Really interesting solution&#8230;look forward to a fully matured implementation..this one has legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.120 seconds -->
