<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wink Pulls Half An Odeo, Partially Liquidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wink: No Bookmarks and Repurchase of Shares at Not So Relevant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1561488</link>
		<dc:creator>Wink: No Bookmarks and Repurchase of Shares at Not So Relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1561488</guid>
		<description>[...] Relating to the new focus Wink announced that it has bought back shares of its stock from investors. This seems to be logical as the original idea of Wink was quite different. Though it looks like most investors remain invested with the company and don&#8217;t try to save what&#8217;s left of their capital as could have been guessed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Relating to the new focus Wink announced that it has bought back shares of its stock from investors. This seems to be logical as the original idea of Wink was quite different. Though it looks like most investors remain invested with the company and don&#8217;t try to save what&#8217;s left of their capital as could have been guessed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Geary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1252458</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1252458</guid>
		<description>Thats OK Mike. I dont think most TechCrunch readers worry much about it's punctuation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats OK Mike. I dont think most TechCrunch readers worry much about it&#8217;s punctuation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1252155</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1252155</guid>
		<description>Bill - get over it. This is a blog. I write fast and I don't have an editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill - get over it. This is a blog. I write fast and I don&#8217;t have an editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jtearre</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1251293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jtearre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1251293</guid>
		<description>I read techcrunch often, but it disappoints me when you use punctuation incorrectly. "It's" is only appropriate as a contraction between "it" and "is". "It's a disappointment" is a good example of its correct usage. As it were. You are a well-regarded journalist, come on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read techcrunch often, but it disappoints me when you use punctuation incorrectly. &#8220;It&#8217;s&#8221; is only appropriate as a contraction between &#8220;it&#8221; and &#8220;is&#8221;. &#8220;It&#8217;s a disappointment&#8221; is a good example of its correct usage. As it were. You are a well-regarded journalist, come on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1250586</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1250586</guid>
		<description>Michael -- just a note that I need to send as I see this in all of your posts:

it's = it is
its = possessive

&#62;&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8212; just a note that I need to send as I see this in all of your posts:</p>
<p>it&#8217;s = it is<br />
its = possessive</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Kahn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1250286</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1250286</guid>
		<description>Alaska (#3) is correct, search is indeed a hard business.

I find it even harder to understand their new focus when a "People Search Engine" such as &lt;a href="http://www.pipl.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pipl&lt;/a&gt; is showing results from social sites AND many other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alaska (#3) is correct, search is indeed a hard business.</p>
<p>I find it even harder to understand their new focus when a &#8220;People Search Engine&#8221; such as <a href="http://www.pipl.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.pipl.com');">Pipl</a> is showing results from social sites AND many other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249098</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249098</guid>
		<description>I think it is a smart move, and Michael is a very smart guy who has founded and exited two companies successfully.  Sometimes the deal dynamics just don't make sense for both sides; investors and entrepreneurs alike have to evolve their strategies.  It sounds like Wink is focusing on the more important aspect of its business and some of its investors want to move on instead of doubling-down on the new strategy.  I am glad that they were all able to work something out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a smart move, and Michael is a very smart guy who has founded and exited two companies successfully.  Sometimes the deal dynamics just don&#8217;t make sense for both sides; investors and entrepreneurs alike have to evolve their strategies.  It sounds like Wink is focusing on the more important aspect of its business and some of its investors want to move on instead of doubling-down on the new strategy.  I am glad that they were all able to work something out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249071</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249071</guid>
		<description>Sell the Hummer!  Sorry, that was too much.  Good luck guys! Wink has some of the nicest people in the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sell the Hummer!  Sorry, that was too much.  Good luck guys! Wink has some of the nicest people in the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249065</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249065</guid>
		<description>The Wink guys are some of the nicest in the business, they've got that going for them.  That hummer is ridiculous but hey, they are cool cats.  Best of luck to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wink guys are some of the nicest in the business, they&#8217;ve got that going for them.  That hummer is ridiculous but hey, they are cool cats.  Best of luck to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249031</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1249031</guid>
		<description>Search seems like a hard business despite how shitty google now is. I guess branding/distribution now wins out over technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search seems like a hard business despite how shitty google now is. I guess branding/distribution now wins out over technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1248913</link>
		<dc:creator>Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1248913</guid>
		<description>And they have the perfect domain name too. Did I mention its 4 letters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they have the perfect domain name too. Did I mention its 4 letters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1248819</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/19/wink-pulls-half-an-odeo-partially-liquidates/#comment-1248819</guid>
		<description>I could that being pretty interesting, although I hate it when people find out where my MySpace is and suddenly start talking to me about a blog or some dumb thing I wrote. Unfortunately, it's a decent idea and someone will do it, might as well be wink.

Between them and Zabasearch I've nowhere left to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could that being pretty interesting, although I hate it when people find out where my MySpace is and suddenly start talking to me about a blog or some dumb thing I wrote. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s a decent idea and someone will do it, might as well be wink.</p>
<p>Between them and Zabasearch I&#8217;ve nowhere left to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.051 seconds -->
