<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch has 15,000 Spam Comments Per Day</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spam Comments &#124; moverton.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1922670</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam Comments &#124; moverton.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1922670</guid>
		<description>[...] posts, per day. They had the same problem I did, spam comments in old posts.  They then decided to install a new plug-in that closed comments on the older posts. I read through some of the comments since I was having the same problem and one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] posts, per day. They had the same problem I did, spam comments in old posts.  They then decided to install a new plug-in that closed comments on the older posts. I read through some of the comments since I was having the same problem and one [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mesh ferrari 360</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1685815</link>
		<dc:creator>mesh ferrari 360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1685815</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;mesh ferrari 360...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>mesh ferrari 360&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adult japan tv</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1597186</link>
		<dc:creator>adult japan tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1597186</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;adult japan tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch has 15000 Spam Comments Per Day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>adult japan tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch has 15000 Spam Comments Per Day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akismet - I think I love you! &#124; Bookmark Bliss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1509778</link>
		<dc:creator>Akismet - I think I love you! &#124; Bookmark Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1509778</guid>
		<description>[...] of spam filter. If you need proof of Akismet&#8217;s value, TechCrunch just recently passed the 2 million spam blocked mark. Now THAT is a lot of spam. We&#8217;ve just barely passed the 300 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of spam filter. If you need proof of Akismet&#8217;s value, TechCrunch just recently passed the 2 million spam blocked mark. Now THAT is a lot of spam. We&#8217;ve just barely passed the 300 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCorner &#187; Extending WordPress - Plugins Used</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1457890</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCorner &#187; Extending WordPress - Plugins Used</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1457890</guid>
		<description>[...] installation (FYI: This is site is powered by WordPress around a month). TechCrunh reports Akismet blocks around 15000 comments per day . This plugin comes pre-installed with WordPress and make sure you activate this plugin. You may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] installation (FYI: This is site is powered by WordPress around a month). TechCrunh reports Akismet blocks around 15000 comments per day . This plugin comes pre-installed with WordPress and make sure you activate this plugin. You may [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMISoftware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spam, spam, spam..</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1331420</link>
		<dc:creator>MMISoftware &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spam, spam, spam..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1331420</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent post at techcrunch (read their post) they have said they get around 15,000 spam comments per day! 15,000!!! Wow! They have caught over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a recent post at techcrunch (read their post) they have said they get around 15,000 spam comments per day! 15,000!!! Wow! They have caught over [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogAjuda &#187; Como resolver o problema dos spams?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1256474</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogAjuda &#187; Como resolver o problema dos spams?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1256474</guid>
		<description>[...] comparado aos 15 mil diários que o TechCrunch recebe, claro, mas ainda assim, um número considerável. Imagine o caos que seria, no caso deles, apagar, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] comparado aos 15 mil diários que o TechCrunch recebe, claro, mas ainda assim, um número considerável. Imagine o caos que seria, no caso deles, apagar, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan McDonnell - &#187; Stop comment spam on a Wordpress blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1247362</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McDonnell - &#187; Stop comment spam on a Wordpress blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1247362</guid>
		<description>[...] originally posted this in the comments on a recent TechCrunch article, TechCrunch has 15,000 Spam Comments Per Day. I thought it was worth archiving here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] originally posted this in the comments on a recent TechCrunch article, TechCrunch has 15,000 Spam Comments Per Day. I thought it was worth archiving here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Tocher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1246301</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Tocher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1246301</guid>
		<description>Apologies if I've missed it (I can only see two green "boxes" above from the author, and I can't see it there), but what IS the recommended WordPress plug-in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies if I&#8217;ve missed it (I can only see two green &#8220;boxes&#8221; above from the author, and I can&#8217;t see it there), but what IS the recommended WordPress plug-in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1245807</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McDonnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1245807</guid>
		<description>Rename wp-comments-post.php to something else.

Create a blank wp-comments-post.php file (just so that the spammers still get a 200 HTTP status code)

Edit the "comments" page in template:
Leave the "action" attribute pointing to the default wp-comments-post.php page. Add some Javascript to the FORM tag's "onSubmit" method. Something like:

onsubmit="this.action='location-of-new-wp-comments-post.php'; return true;"

Anyone with Javascript enabled (nearly 100%) will be able to post comments but the spam bots (which do not parse Javascript) will not.

You can even obfuscate the Javascript code further by throwing in some random concatenation...

onsubmit="this.action='location' + '-of-new-wp-comments-post.' + 'php'; return true;"

... or setting the URL in a variable and referencing the variable instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rename wp-comments-post.php to something else.</p>
<p>Create a blank wp-comments-post.php file (just so that the spammers still get a 200 HTTP status code)</p>
<p>Edit the &#8220;comments&#8221; page in template:<br />
Leave the &#8220;action&#8221; attribute pointing to the default wp-comments-post.php page. Add some Javascript to the FORM tag&#8217;s &#8220;onSubmit&#8221; method. Something like:</p>
<p>onsubmit=&#8221;this.action=&#8217;location-of-new-wp-comments-post.php&#8217;; return true;&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone with Javascript enabled (nearly 100%) will be able to post comments but the spam bots (which do not parse Javascript) will not.</p>
<p>You can even obfuscate the Javascript code further by throwing in some random concatenation&#8230;</p>
<p>onsubmit=&#8221;this.action=&#8217;location&#8217; + &#8216;-of-new-wp-comments-post.&#8217; + &#8216;php&#8217;; return true;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; or setting the URL in a variable and referencing the variable instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1244859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1244859</guid>
		<description>I think my comments seem to get sucked up by Akismet I guess, I posted a comment about the BBC article from last week but it never showed up. :(

Who knows if this comment will show up either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my comments seem to get sucked up by Akismet I guess, I posted a comment about the BBC article from last week but it never showed up. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Who knows if this comment will show up either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayal Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243917</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayal Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243917</guid>
		<description>I guess my curiousity is how many anonymous comments does TechCrunch receive, and what does it consider anonymous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my curiousity is how many anonymous comments does TechCrunch receive, and what does it consider anonymous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243484</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243484</guid>
		<description>As an able bodied user, I have no problem with Captcha. I think claims to the contrary are overreaching, perhaps exageration by advocates for the disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an able bodied user, I have no problem with Captcha. I think claims to the contrary are overreaching, perhaps exageration by advocates for the disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechYob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243306</link>
		<dc:creator>TechYob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243306</guid>
		<description>Bad Behaviour is another comment-spam filtering tool that can prevent a site from being accessed at the IP level.  

I understand the author worked on Akismet in the early days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad Behaviour is another comment-spam filtering tool that can prevent a site from being accessed at the IP level.  </p>
<p>I understand the author worked on Akismet in the early days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulf (ULE)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulf (ULE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243113</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one lamenting the two week timeout? I kind of like how some unique or especially illuminating old blog posts continue to live their own life in the comments and on Google. That's part of the internet and blog magic for me, to see things take on their own life, and morph, and spawn new ideas and discussions that weren't intended.

The old blog post about "post secret" that You (TechCrunch) linked to a few weeks back - don't you regret missing out on that kind of continous commenting over the years? 

Even if it doesn't happen all too often, you must have at something like 10-100 blogposts that continue to get well deserved traffic through google long after their debut and among those, there must be some legitimate continuing of some kind of discussion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one lamenting the two week timeout? I kind of like how some unique or especially illuminating old blog posts continue to live their own life in the comments and on Google. That&#8217;s part of the internet and blog magic for me, to see things take on their own life, and morph, and spawn new ideas and discussions that weren&#8217;t intended.</p>
<p>The old blog post about &#8220;post secret&#8221; that You (TechCrunch) linked to a few weeks back - don&#8217;t you regret missing out on that kind of continous commenting over the years? </p>
<p>Even if it doesn&#8217;t happen all too often, you must have at something like 10-100 blogposts that continue to get well deserved traffic through google long after their debut and among those, there must be some legitimate continuing of some kind of discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to start a clothing line from scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243020</link>
		<dc:creator>How to start a clothing line from scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1243020</guid>
		<description>we get a whopping 50 spam comments a day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we get a whopping 50 spam comments a day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advertisespace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242937</link>
		<dc:creator>Advertisespace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242937</guid>
		<description>I couldn't have comments on my blog without it. 
Thanks Akismet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have comments on my blog without it.<br />
Thanks Akismet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242851</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242851</guid>
		<description>I think the amount of spam just depends on how big the site is. I used to get at 50 a day one blog and then around 10 on another but 15,000 a day is really big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the amount of spam just depends on how big the site is. I used to get at 50 a day one blog and then around 10 on another but 15,000 a day is really big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242805</link>
		<dc:creator>datter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242805</guid>
		<description>Can I interest anyone here in some v.1.a.g.ra? Just checking... you never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I interest anyone here in some v.1.a.g.ra? Just checking&#8230; you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elias</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242180</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242180</guid>
		<description>Oh my god, this is really many spam. On my site i get 50-100 spam comments or trackbacks. But, Akismet works fine. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god, this is really many spam. On my site i get 50-100 spam comments or trackbacks. But, Akismet works fine. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the1gofer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242094</link>
		<dc:creator>the1gofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1242094</guid>
		<description>I get 400-500 every day, and I don't get a fraction of even that number of visitors.  I wish their was something to be done.  It seems like a societal problem more than anything else.  Those people responsible aren't concerned about anyone other than them selfs and the money they are making.  And societal problems are much harder to fix than computer problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get 400-500 every day, and I don&#8217;t get a fraction of even that number of visitors.  I wish their was something to be done.  It seems like a societal problem more than anything else.  Those people responsible aren&#8217;t concerned about anyone other than them selfs and the money they are making.  And societal problems are much harder to fix than computer problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241988</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241988</guid>
		<description>I don't get anywhere near as many as you do, but I certainly get a lot. We need to encourage search engines like Google to set up a way where we can forward them unwanted spam comments, and if they get a certain number of them they will blacklist the domain that the spammers are hoping to increase the page rank for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get anywhere near as many as you do, but I certainly get a lot. We need to encourage search engines like Google to set up a way where we can forward them unwanted spam comments, and if they get a certain number of them they will blacklist the domain that the spammers are hoping to increase the page rank for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Heyes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241948</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241948</guid>
		<description>Hi,

You might want to try my plugin it requires no captchas and we haven't had a single spam comment on our site. Try it out:-
http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/02/12/spambam/

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>You might want to try my plugin it requires no captchas and we haven&#8217;t had a single spam comment on our site. Try it out:-<br />
<a href="http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/02/12/spambam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thespanner.co.uk/2007/02/12/spambam/</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241918</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241918</guid>
		<description>If anyone is interested in the plugin Mike alluded to it's available on our new plugin directory here:

http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin/close-old-posts/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is interested in the plugin Mike alluded to it&#8217;s available on our new plugin directory here:</p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/plugin/close-old-posts/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/pl.....old-posts/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/17/techcrunch-has-15000-spam-comments-per-day/#comment-1241666</guid>
		<description>CAPTCHAs break usability. In the quest to end spam, we cannot and should not ever resort to challenges like CAPTCHAs and "reply if you're not spam" e-mails. They frustrate users and discourage participation while being no more effective than a good collaborative reporting system like Akismet.

When I run a mail server with Spam Assassin, I end up with a very low rate of false-positives and false-negatives without making users jump through hoops. Google's spam filtering is even more effective without making users do the hokey pokey in reverse or something equally as inane.

Spam is inconvenient and can take a lot of work to defeat, but CAPTCHAs are a solution worse than the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAPTCHAs break usability. In the quest to end spam, we cannot and should not ever resort to challenges like CAPTCHAs and &#8220;reply if you&#8217;re not spam&#8221; e-mails. They frustrate users and discourage participation while being no more effective than a good collaborative reporting system like Akismet.</p>
<p>When I run a mail server with Spam Assassin, I end up with a very low rate of false-positives and false-negatives without making users jump through hoops. Google&#8217;s spam filtering is even more effective without making users do the hokey pokey in reverse or something equally as inane.</p>
<p>Spam is inconvenient and can take a lot of work to defeat, but CAPTCHAs are a solution worse than the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.520 seconds -->
