<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Drops a $1 Billion Nuke on Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apricado: Selling Your Music Has Never Been This Easy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2410795</link>
		<dc:creator>Apricado: Selling Your Music Has Never Been This Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2410795</guid>
		<description>[...] using DMCA takedown notices to help them track down pirated music. This may work well enough (or not) for YouTube, but there&#8217;s a major difference: Apricado will actually be selling the goods, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using DMCA takedown notices to help them track down pirated music. This may work well enough (or not) for YouTube, but there&#8217;s a major difference: Apricado will actually be selling the goods, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google/Viacom Agree To Preserve User Anonymity In Data Shakedown</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2408771</link>
		<dc:creator>Google/Viacom Agree To Preserve User Anonymity In Data Shakedown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2408771</guid>
		<description>[...] The Google-Viacom showdown over the handover of YouTube user data appears to be over. The two sides agreed to changes in a previous ruling that would have required Google to hand over user id&#8217;s, IP addresses and a list of all viewed YouTube videos to Viacom in connection with their ongoing copyright infringement litigation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Google-Viacom showdown over the handover of YouTube user data appears to be over. The two sides agreed to changes in a previous ruling that would have required Google to hand over user id&#8217;s, IP addresses and a list of all viewed YouTube videos to Viacom in connection with their ongoing copyright infringement litigation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dream Incubator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Issue Of Trust Is With Google, Not Viacom &#187; ドリームインキュベータ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2407129</link>
		<dc:creator>Dream Incubator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Issue Of Trust Is With Google, Not Viacom &#187; ドリームインキュベータ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2407129</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube user log data to Viacom to help Viacom determine damages in their ongoing billion dollar litigation with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube user log data to Viacom to help Viacom determine damages in their ongoing billion dollar litigation with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Issue Of Trust Is With Google, Not Viacom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2406993</link>
		<dc:creator>The Issue Of Trust Is With Google, Not Viacom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2406993</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube user log data to Viacom to help Viacom determine damages in their ongoing billion dollar litigation with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube user log data to Viacom to help Viacom determine damages in their ongoing billion dollar litigation with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Protects YouTube’s Source Code, Throws Users To The Wolves &#124; NewsMeToday</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2398511</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Protects YouTube’s Source Code, Throws Users To The Wolves &#124; NewsMeToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2398511</guid>
		<description>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to users with a court order requiring Google to turn over massive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to users with a court order requiring Google to turn over massive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom-Google, användarna slängs till vargarna &#124; Bloggtidningen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2398097</link>
		<dc:creator>Viacom-Google, användarna slängs till vargarna &#124; Bloggtidningen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2398097</guid>
		<description>[...] kräver dessutom miljarder i skadestånd och har svepande krav på nedtagning av [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kräver dessutom miljarder i skadestånd och har svepande krav på nedtagning av [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Affaire Viacom: la cour demande à Google de fournir les données de toutes les vidéos vues sur YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2397497</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Affaire Viacom: la cour demande à Google de fournir les données de toutes les vidéos vues sur YouTube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2397497</guid>
		<description>[...] Plus de details sur l&#8217;affaire YouTube/Viacom/Google à lire ici et là [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plus de details sur l&#8217;affaire YouTube/Viacom/Google à lire ici et là [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Warez BR - www.thewarezbr.org &#187; Usuários do YouTube podem ter sua privacidade violada</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2397009</link>
		<dc:creator>The Warez BR - www.thewarezbr.org &#187; Usuários do YouTube podem ter sua privacidade violada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2397009</guid>
		<description>[...] tempos o Google briga na justiça com a Viacom, que diz ter perdido US$ 1 bilhão com a exibição não autorizada de seu conteúdo no site de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tempos o Google briga na justiça com a Viacom, que diz ter perdido US$ 1 bilhão com a exibição não autorizada de seu conteúdo no site de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2396917</link>
		<dc:creator>ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2396917</guid>
		<description>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to users with a court order requiring Google to turn over massive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to users with a court order requiring Google to turn over massive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Protects YouTube&#8217;s Source Code, Throws Users To The Wolves</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2396185</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Protects YouTube&#8217;s Source Code, Throws Users To The Wolves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2396185</guid>
		<description>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to directly affect users with a court order requiring Google to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ongoing Google/YouTube-Viacom litigation has now officially spilled over to directly affect users with a court order requiring Google to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Il faut repenser les lois de protection des droits d&#8217;auteurs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2334914</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Il faut repenser les lois de protection des droits d&#8217;auteurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2334914</guid>
		<description>[...] payer pour leur contenu afin de le maintenir sur YouTube. C&#8217;est devenu aujourd&#8217;hui une poursuite judicière qui dépasse le milliard de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] payer pour leur contenu afin de le maintenir sur YouTube. C&#8217;est devenu aujourd&#8217;hui une poursuite judicière qui dépasse le milliard de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The &#8220;Secondary Liability&#8221; Theory on YouTube/iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2302263</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8220;Secondary Liability&#8221; Theory on YouTube/iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2302263</guid>
		<description>[...] and other are trying to do exactly that, and are playing a $1 billion game of poker with Google, YouTube&#8217;s parent company. But to add Apple to the mix, who simply show YouTube [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and other are trying to do exactly that, and are playing a $1 billion game of poker with Google, YouTube&#8217;s parent company. But to add Apple to the mix, who simply show YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Fails To Blink</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2302162</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Fails To Blink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-2302162</guid>
		<description>[...] responded to Viacom&#8217;s $1 billion lawsuit over alleged YouTube copyright infringement today. Their answer: Let&#8217;s fight this out, in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] responded to Viacom&#8217;s $1 billion lawsuit over alleged YouTube copyright infringement today. Their answer: Let&#8217;s fight this out, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secrets In Websites II &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1918119</link>
		<dc:creator>Secrets In Websites II &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1918119</guid>
		<description>[...] site has search powered by a Google Search Appliance. MTV is also owned by Viacom who sued Google, the parent company of YouTube. The folks at MTV awesomely admitted the irony during relaunch on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site has search powered by a Google Search Appliance. MTV is also owned by Viacom who sued Google, the parent company of YouTube. The folks at MTV awesomely admitted the irony during relaunch on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Year in TechCrunch Headlines (2007 Edition)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1883435</link>
		<dc:creator>The Year in TechCrunch Headlines (2007 Edition)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1883435</guid>
		<description>[...] 13: Viacom Drops a $1 Billion Nuke on Google. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 13: Viacom Drops a $1 Billion Nuke on Google. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gootube We Hardly Knew Ye</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1844949</link>
		<dc:creator>Gootube We Hardly Knew Ye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1844949</guid>
		<description>[...] lactating] over the news. But it&#8217;s also the talk of the town over on Mike Arrington&#8217;s [Techcrunch] and at [Scobleizer]. Aside from the 20-year-olds yelling &#8220;Fuck Viacom&#8221;, the consensus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lactating] over the news. But it&#8217;s also the talk of the town over on Mike Arrington&#8217;s [Techcrunch] and at [Scobleizer]. Aside from the 20-year-olds yelling &#8220;Fuck Viacom&#8221;, the consensus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Anti-Piracy Alliance To Be Launched Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1681770</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Anti-Piracy Alliance To Be Launched Friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1681770</guid>
		<description>[...] Google launched anti-piracy technology on YouTube Monday.Viacom sued Google over YouTube content in March. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google launched anti-piracy technology on YouTube Monday.Viacom sued Google over YouTube content in March. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollivier Jacq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veoh ataca UniversalMusic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1585943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollivier Jacq &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Veoh ataca UniversalMusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 19:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1585943</guid>
		<description>[...] hemos visto muchas companias como Youtube, DailyMotion, etc&#8230; siendo atacada por los propietarios de derechos. El caso Veoh / [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hemos visto muchas companias como Youtube, DailyMotion, etc&#8230; siendo atacada por los propietarios de derechos. El caso Veoh / [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Sphere France &#187; Joost: 1 million d’utilisateurs déjà, lancement prévu en fin d’année</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1555924</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Sphere France &#187; Joost: 1 million d’utilisateurs déjà, lancement prévu en fin d’année</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1555924</guid>
		<description>[...] dollars en mai dernier est l’une des statups les plus en vue. Et ils ont également bénéficié des démélés juridiques de YouTube et sont devenus de factor l’alternative de choix pour le clan des anti [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dollars en mai dernier est l’une des statups les plus en vue. Et ils ont également bénéficié des démélés juridiques de YouTube et sont devenus de factor l’alternative de choix pour le clan des anti [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future Of Copyright Protection Is Here And It Costs $11 An Hour &#124; Tekjuice.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1554711</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future Of Copyright Protection Is Here And It Costs $11 An Hour &#124; Tekjuice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1554711</guid>
		<description>[...] content. But as these sites get acquired, integrate advertising, or just want to avoid a billion dollar lawsuit, they seek to shed their seedy past to stay kosher with the big media giants they hope will feed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content. But as these sites get acquired, integrate advertising, or just want to avoid a billion dollar lawsuit, they seek to shed their seedy past to stay kosher with the big media giants they hope will feed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NexGen Technology Blog » Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1547432</link>
		<dc:creator>NexGen Technology Blog » Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1547432</guid>
		<description>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a random blog !</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1547372</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a random blog !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1547372</guid>
		<description>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1546863</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1546863</guid>
		<description>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1546679</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: Veoh Sues Universal Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1546679</guid>
		<description>[...] startup Veoh has filed a lawsuit against Universal Music. Given that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] startup Veoh has filed a lawsuit against Universal Music. Given that the lawsuits tend to flow one way against the video startups, this is a major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future Of Copyright Protection Is Here And It Costs $11 An Hour</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1544501</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future Of Copyright Protection Is Here And It Costs $11 An Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/13/5217/#comment-1544501</guid>
		<description>[...] content. But as these sites get acquired, integrate advertising, or just want to avoid a billion dollar lawsuit, they seek to shed their seedy past to stay kosher with the big media giants they hope will feed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content. But as these sites get acquired, integrate advertising, or just want to avoid a billion dollar lawsuit, they seek to shed their seedy past to stay kosher with the big media giants they hope will feed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.089 seconds -->
