<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChaCha: 90% Pranksters</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha Makes Me Laugh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2270328</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha Makes Me Laugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2270328</guid>
		<description>[...] powered search engine, but a cottage industry sprang up of people who asked inane questions to mess with the guides.  TechCrunch LOVES [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] powered search engine, but a cottage industry sprang up of people who asked inane questions to mess with the guides.  TechCrunch LOVES [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO and Webmarketing Blog &#124; Webrunch &#187; Stumpedia - O poder humano!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2219222</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO and Webmarketing Blog &#124; Webrunch &#187; Stumpedia - O poder humano!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2219222</guid>
		<description>[...] O Stumpedia, mais do que os resultados obtidos na pesquisa normal, permite ainda acrescentar e actualizar directamente os resultados que não existam. Fornece respostas em directo, semelhante ao que acontece no ChaCha - contudo, o serviço do ChaCha não tem resultado muito bem, devido à qualidade dos seus &#8220;utilizadores&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] O Stumpedia, mais do que os resultados obtidos na pesquisa normal, permite ainda acrescentar e actualizar directamente os resultados que não existam. Fornece respostas em directo, semelhante ao que acontece no ChaCha - contudo, o serviço do ChaCha não tem resultado muito bem, devido à qualidade dos seus &#8220;utilizadores&#8221;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha Ditches Guided Search Model. I Love To Hate This Startup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2068753</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha Ditches Guided Search Model. I Love To Hate This Startup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-2068753</guid>
		<description>[...] Well it only took ChaCha fourteen months to figure out what everyone except ChaCha (and these guys) knew when it launched - search with a human guide as a business idea is ridiculously stupid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Well it only took ChaCha fourteen months to figure out what everyone except ChaCha (and these guys) knew when it launched - search with a human guide as a business idea is ridiculously stupid. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $16m investment cant by you good geek press&#8230; &#171; Urban Horizon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1897742</link>
		<dc:creator>$16m investment cant by you good geek press&#8230; &#171; Urban Horizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1897742</guid>
		<description>[...] just launched. I say surprised because we have not been kind to the service in our three posts on them so far. In the most recent post, I called them “a bad idea, poorly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just launched. I say surprised because we have not been kind to the service in our three posts on them so far. In the most recent post, I called them “a bad idea, poorly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha Launches Mobile Interface. They Still Suck.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1896793</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha Launches Mobile Interface. They Still Suck.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1896793</guid>
		<description>[...] just launched. I say surprised because we have not been kind to the service in our three posts on them so far. In the most recent post, I called them &#8220;a bad idea, poorly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just launched. I say surprised because we have not been kind to the service in our three posts on them so far. In the most recent post, I called them &#8220;a bad idea, poorly [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha: A Bad Idea Poorly Executed, Raises $10 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1758738</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha: A Bad Idea Poorly Executed, Raises $10 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1758738</guid>
		<description>[...] noted, that most people who go to the site are just screwing around (one ex search guide said 90% of the traffic is pranksters). And as you can see from the image, the search guides [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] noted, that most people who go to the site are just screwing around (one ex search guide said 90% of the traffic is pranksters). And as you can see from the image, the search guides [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recent Techcrunch coverage for ChaCha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1403523</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recent Techcrunch coverage for ChaCha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1403523</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Antics &#187; Bored? Mess With Chacha.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1314532</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Antics &#187; Bored? Mess With Chacha.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1314532</guid>
		<description>[...] Should Be a Game Not a Search Engine Most people agree that a majority of the searches done are pranks, and for good reason too. What&#8217;s better, waiting 5 minutes for the third guide in a row to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Should Be a Game Not a Search Engine Most people agree that a majority of the searches done are pranks, and for good reason too. What&#8217;s better, waiting 5 minutes for the third guide in a row to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaCha Guide Pay Lies and Scams &#124; JMH Techtronics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1298878</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaCha Guide Pay Lies and Scams &#124; JMH Techtronics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1298878</guid>
		<description>[...] to my other article about ChaCha Pranksters as well as those that commented on the article at TechCrunch that linked to it, have looked at ChaCha from the technology standpoint more than anything. Most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to my other article about ChaCha Pranksters as well as those that commented on the article at TechCrunch that linked to it, have looked at ChaCha from the technology standpoint more than anything. Most [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1253137</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1253137</guid>
		<description>I am a ChaCha guide and chacha is indeed a piece of crap but it is easy money. Half the time I don't even help the people...I just act like im searching and then tell them i cant find anything and boom, like that i have a few bucks! But chacha wont beat google...EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a ChaCha guide and chacha is indeed a piece of crap but it is easy money. Half the time I don&#8217;t even help the people&#8230;I just act like im searching and then tell them i cant find anything and boom, like that i have a few bucks! But chacha wont beat google&#8230;EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1236940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1236940</guid>
		<description>You guys all are evaluating the service as to why or why not it is good from a technology standpoint, but my thoughts on this have more to do with how they treat those who represent them. The guides. The way they are treated and the overwhelming negativity they are starting to portray around blogs and forums is what is the problem with ChaCha. They don't pay anyone enough to get good help. So how are we to even expect the service to be viable with that kind of group running the searches? 

Eventually I would assume they would outsource it to a country that thinks $3 an hour is a good pay rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys all are evaluating the service as to why or why not it is good from a technology standpoint, but my thoughts on this have more to do with how they treat those who represent them. The guides. The way they are treated and the overwhelming negativity they are starting to portray around blogs and forums is what is the problem with ChaCha. They don&#8217;t pay anyone enough to get good help. So how are we to even expect the service to be viable with that kind of group running the searches? </p>
<p>Eventually I would assume they would outsource it to a country that thinks $3 an hour is a good pay rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1236929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1236929</guid>
		<description>@studly

Don't lie here please. You do not make a $100 a week in a couple hours invested a day being a guide unless you have a network, which is a crapshoot. It isn't possible and you know it. Even if you worked 7 days a week it would still take you at least 3 hours a day and that is if you get paid the full $5/per search hour. The guides I talk to regularly can't even make $20 in a day unless they are on for a full shift. 

I like the ChaCha RahRahs though. Very commited to a company that treats them like they have just kicked their baby. 

Amy there is related to some ChaCha help so she has gotten some nice benefits. She has a right to be cheery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@studly</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t lie here please. You do not make a $100 a week in a couple hours invested a day being a guide unless you have a network, which is a crapshoot. It isn&#8217;t possible and you know it. Even if you worked 7 days a week it would still take you at least 3 hours a day and that is if you get paid the full $5/per search hour. The guides I talk to regularly can&#8217;t even make $20 in a day unless they are on for a full shift. </p>
<p>I like the ChaCha RahRahs though. Very commited to a company that treats them like they have just kicked their baby. </p>
<p>Amy there is related to some ChaCha help so she has gotten some nice benefits. She has a right to be cheery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Users Will Always Take Advantage - Tyler Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1218168</link>
		<dc:creator>Users Will Always Take Advantage - Tyler Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1218168</guid>
		<description>[...] Search [what is ChaCha?] According to an article on TechCrunch, 90% of guided searches are done by pranksters. South Africans are doing it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Search [what is ChaCha?] According to an article on TechCrunch, 90% of guided searches are done by pranksters. South Africans are doing it [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Gioet &#187; Cha Cha and the future of search.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1211231</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Gioet &#187; Cha Cha and the future of search.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1211231</guid>
		<description>[...] A post at TechCrunch on ChaCha&#8217;s new search service has gotten me thinking on the future of search engines. ChaCha [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A post at TechCrunch on ChaCha&#8217;s new search service has gotten me thinking on the future of search engines. ChaCha [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1200460</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1200460</guid>
		<description>"rapid member of a niche subculture."

I meant, rabid member of a niche subculture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;rapid member of a niche subculture.&#8221;</p>
<p>I meant, rabid member of a niche subculture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1200447</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1200447</guid>
		<description>I haven't attempted to evaluate the service but I was originally accepted into the ChaCha guide program.  Everything seemed quite legit and I did not pursue for reasons unrelated to the validity of their service.

There seems to be a real misunderstanding of how a Guide should operate and, as a recent MLS recipient with a focus in reference services, I find the role quite similar that of a professional reference librarian.

Mike's comment shows some confusion in that regard:
"You can’t expect the guides to know everything, since they’re paid $5 - 10/hour, but you won’t find Google asking you what Digg is when looking for a UK equivalent."

A well trained reference librarian (let's focus on the real professionals for a moment) would not be expected to "know everything" even with a PhD (which I have).  No credible information professional would be expected to know everything about a body of knowledge.

A credible professional would be expected to ask questions and clarify the nature of the request and any details about which the librarian is uncertain.  Sometimes this may mean asking what may appear to be an obvious question to a rapid member of a niche subculture.

Reference librarians (Guides seem similar in this regard) are expected to know how to find information, identify and evaluate sources and so forth.  By the nature of the pay scale and requirements, Guides will not be as effective as a well trained librarian but that's fine as long as they don't claim to be something they're not.

Does legitimacy make it a good business?

No and I doubt they'll succeed.  The problem is, public libraries across the nation offer these same services for free.  The opening for companies such as ChaCha has much more to do with the lack of visibility of library services and the general lack of understanding of what can be expected from such services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t attempted to evaluate the service but I was originally accepted into the ChaCha guide program.  Everything seemed quite legit and I did not pursue for reasons unrelated to the validity of their service.</p>
<p>There seems to be a real misunderstanding of how a Guide should operate and, as a recent MLS recipient with a focus in reference services, I find the role quite similar that of a professional reference librarian.</p>
<p>Mike&#8217;s comment shows some confusion in that regard:<br />
&#8220;You can’t expect the guides to know everything, since they’re paid $5 - 10/hour, but you won’t find Google asking you what Digg is when looking for a UK equivalent.&#8221;</p>
<p>A well trained reference librarian (let&#8217;s focus on the real professionals for a moment) would not be expected to &#8220;know everything&#8221; even with a PhD (which I have).  No credible information professional would be expected to know everything about a body of knowledge.</p>
<p>A credible professional would be expected to ask questions and clarify the nature of the request and any details about which the librarian is uncertain.  Sometimes this may mean asking what may appear to be an obvious question to a rapid member of a niche subculture.</p>
<p>Reference librarians (Guides seem similar in this regard) are expected to know how to find information, identify and evaluate sources and so forth.  By the nature of the pay scale and requirements, Guides will not be as effective as a well trained librarian but that&#8217;s fine as long as they don&#8217;t claim to be something they&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>Does legitimacy make it a good business?</p>
<p>No and I doubt they&#8217;ll succeed.  The problem is, public libraries across the nation offer these same services for free.  The opening for companies such as ChaCha has much more to do with the lack of visibility of library services and the general lack of understanding of what can be expected from such services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1164136</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1164136</guid>
		<description>You are crazy ex-ChaCha guide!  You must not have been worth a crap because I easily make about $125-$150 a week, sometimes more.  The first 2 wks. are the slowest because 1. you are still training and should be practicing to get better so you can move up.  2. you are skilled enough to handle back to back searches.  3. you probably didn't get 'greats' when being trained on your 3 first keywords.

All you have to do to move to being paid right now is get 3 greats on any one of your first 3 keywords.  How hard is that?!?!  When there is maintenance going on you won't get many trainings but that is only one of the issues.  The other issue is that you are to practice 25 times in the Practice area before even being trained.  Sure some trainings slip through but it is best to practice, then train.

The favs were messed up and everyone THOUGHT they lost theirs.  They are back and that problem has been addressed.  They are still making a few changes so the app. is in proxy error right now but you can still work or train and get credit for it.

All I can say is that you were probably told that you would have to put in hours to make money and that the base pay is $5 per search hour for Pro and Master and $10 per search hour for Elite.  You can get paid at Elite Status on a keyword even if you are at Master Level.  I know because I've done this SEVERAL times.  You can also make a lot more than $5 per search hour at Master if you build your network.  I know because I make well over this most hours when I am working.

You are an Independant Contractor for ChaCha.  If you can't work independant and be your own boss......don't even bother accepting or BEGGING for an invite!

Hope you love all your SPAM mail from filling out surverys!  lol  Talk about a crappy job!  ::gagging::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are crazy ex-ChaCha guide!  You must not have been worth a crap because I easily make about $125-$150 a week, sometimes more.  The first 2 wks. are the slowest because 1. you are still training and should be practicing to get better so you can move up.  2. you are skilled enough to handle back to back searches.  3. you probably didn&#8217;t get &#8216;greats&#8217; when being trained on your 3 first keywords.</p>
<p>All you have to do to move to being paid right now is get 3 greats on any one of your first 3 keywords.  How hard is that?!?!  When there is maintenance going on you won&#8217;t get many trainings but that is only one of the issues.  The other issue is that you are to practice 25 times in the Practice area before even being trained.  Sure some trainings slip through but it is best to practice, then train.</p>
<p>The favs were messed up and everyone THOUGHT they lost theirs.  They are back and that problem has been addressed.  They are still making a few changes so the app. is in proxy error right now but you can still work or train and get credit for it.</p>
<p>All I can say is that you were probably told that you would have to put in hours to make money and that the base pay is $5 per search hour for Pro and Master and $10 per search hour for Elite.  You can get paid at Elite Status on a keyword even if you are at Master Level.  I know because I&#8217;ve done this SEVERAL times.  You can also make a lot more than $5 per search hour at Master if you build your network.  I know because I make well over this most hours when I am working.</p>
<p>You are an Independant Contractor for ChaCha.  If you can&#8217;t work independant and be your own boss&#8230;&#8230;don&#8217;t even bother accepting or BEGGING for an invite!</p>
<p>Hope you love all your SPAM mail from filling out surverys!  lol  Talk about a crappy job!  ::gagging::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-ChaChaGuide</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1162978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-ChaChaGuide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1162978</guid>
		<description>I was signed up with Chacha as a guide for 2 weeks.  I recently quit.  &lt;i&gt;You can't make $5-10/hour with Chacha!&lt;/i&gt;  You make $5-10 for search hour!  At the most 20$ per "search" hour  if you make it to that elite group of individuals.  Most of the time you won't get an hour's worth of work within a day! It all depends on how many keywords they allow you to be a chachaguide for.  They start you out with only 3 kewords that you have to master, and slowly allow you to have more!

Their guide application that you have to use is retarded.   It's hard to navigate people to the proper sites because it's slower than hell and isn't hands-on or very easy to use.   I tried using their favorites option to add sites based on my keywords I chose, but it never saved them!  New Chacha guides usually give up after dealing with the guide application because it isn't made well.  It's a java application, and it sucks!


Overall it's not worth the effort to join Chacha.com as a guide.  You'll have better luck with google searching on your own!  Chacha.com 

P.S. - I've made more money with survery websites then I did with Chacha.com , and I spent less time filling in surveys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was signed up with Chacha as a guide for 2 weeks.  I recently quit.  <i>You can&#8217;t make $5-10/hour with Chacha!</i>  You make $5-10 for search hour!  At the most 20$ per &#8220;search&#8221; hour  if you make it to that elite group of individuals.  Most of the time you won&#8217;t get an hour&#8217;s worth of work within a day! It all depends on how many keywords they allow you to be a chachaguide for.  They start you out with only 3 kewords that you have to master, and slowly allow you to have more!</p>
<p>Their guide application that you have to use is retarded.   It&#8217;s hard to navigate people to the proper sites because it&#8217;s slower than hell and isn&#8217;t hands-on or very easy to use.   I tried using their favorites option to add sites based on my keywords I chose, but it never saved them!  New Chacha guides usually give up after dealing with the guide application because it isn&#8217;t made well.  It&#8217;s a java application, and it sucks!</p>
<p>Overall it&#8217;s not worth the effort to join Chacha.com as a guide.  You&#8217;ll have better luck with google searching on your own!  Chacha.com </p>
<p>P.S. - I&#8217;ve made more money with survery websites then I did with Chacha.com , and I spent less time filling in surveys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1158580</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1158580</guid>
		<description>This is what Happens when College kids get ahold of chcha

http://www.campusblender.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=255944</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what Happens when College kids get ahold of chcha</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campusblender.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=255944" rel="nofollow">http://www.campusblender.com/m.....pic=255944</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1157928</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1157928</guid>
		<description>Why is it that in the so-called Internet global age one has to be able to work in the US and give a social security number in order to work for such a website? I guess I wouldn't mind making some extra-money from home beside my daytime job but... well (never hear about paypal or what?) :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that in the so-called Internet global age one has to be able to work in the US and give a social security number in order to work for such a website? I guess I wouldn&#8217;t mind making some extra-money from home beside my daytime job but&#8230; well (never hear about paypal or what?) <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1149782</link>
		<dc:creator>studly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1149782</guid>
		<description>First I'm a guide, and I do enjoy the job.  No, you can't make a living on it, but you can earn some nice "fun" money.  I can easily make $100 a week with only a couple hours a day invested.  

After reading most of these comments bashing ChaCha, I put most into the category of "mind puke" not worthy of comment.  But one really opened my eyes!

One very short, one line message.

4chan + sponsors = profits

Now it all makes sense!  That's why they don't try to stop the pranksters!  That's why when a guide tries to fight back against them, they will be fired.  That's why when we beg ChaCha to stop them they won't!  

It's their main customer base!  When you are trying to convince advertisers that your service is popular, why would you want to block 90% of the searches?  

But again...I'm just a guide.  I get paid to sit and babysit pranksters.  After 4 months and many hundreds of searches under my belt....I've earned enough to place a down payment on a car.   

I just wish that 4chan would put a bit of effort into some more cleaver pranks.  Mudkips is getting awful boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First I&#8217;m a guide, and I do enjoy the job.  No, you can&#8217;t make a living on it, but you can earn some nice &#8220;fun&#8221; money.  I can easily make $100 a week with only a couple hours a day invested.  </p>
<p>After reading most of these comments bashing ChaCha, I put most into the category of &#8220;mind puke&#8221; not worthy of comment.  But one really opened my eyes!</p>
<p>One very short, one line message.</p>
<p>4chan + sponsors = profits</p>
<p>Now it all makes sense!  That&#8217;s why they don&#8217;t try to stop the pranksters!  That&#8217;s why when a guide tries to fight back against them, they will be fired.  That&#8217;s why when we beg ChaCha to stop them they won&#8217;t!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s their main customer base!  When you are trying to convince advertisers that your service is popular, why would you want to block 90% of the searches?  </p>
<p>But again&#8230;I&#8217;m just a guide.  I get paid to sit and babysit pranksters.  After 4 months and many hundreds of searches under my belt&#8230;.I&#8217;ve earned enough to place a down payment on a car.   </p>
<p>I just wish that 4chan would put a bit of effort into some more cleaver pranks.  Mudkips is getting awful boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lnahinu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1149264</link>
		<dc:creator>Lnahinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1149264</guid>
		<description>I tried ChaCha and had a good 66% on the search assistants.  One time I was worried because the things said Google Results.  I'm wondering how they are pulling these results for their search and how smart they have to be also.  If a search assistant doesn't know digg you might be in trouble for social media optimization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried ChaCha and had a good 66% on the search assistants.  One time I was worried because the things said Google Results.  I&#8217;m wondering how they are pulling these results for their search and how smart they have to be also.  If a search assistant doesn&#8217;t know digg you might be in trouble for social media optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Cohen-Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1147087</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Cohen-Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1147087</guid>
		<description>ChaCha is NOT a new idea, as CJ just pointed out, us reference librarians have been doing this sort of search for years. ChaCha has just come up with another way of doing it.

As a cybrarian, I enjoy helping people find info online. My problem with ChaCha is that, in order to be a guide, you need to use their set of resources. I am faster if I do my own searching. 

If anyone needs help, please feel free to ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChaCha is NOT a new idea, as CJ just pointed out, us reference librarians have been doing this sort of search for years. ChaCha has just come up with another way of doing it.</p>
<p>As a cybrarian, I enjoy helping people find info online. My problem with ChaCha is that, in order to be a guide, you need to use their set of resources. I am faster if I do my own searching. </p>
<p>If anyone needs help, please feel free to ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1146855</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1146855</guid>
		<description>You can chat most places with your librarian.  Or call them.  They can do mediated searches that are not lame because they are trained to do so and also have access to databases that you may not.  Just because the information is not in print, don't underestimate the power of your library.
Sheesh. 

Librarians  Rule!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can chat most places with your librarian.  Or call them.  They can do mediated searches that are not lame because they are trained to do so and also have access to databases that you may not.  Just because the information is not in print, don&#8217;t underestimate the power of your library.<br />
Sheesh. </p>
<p>Librarians  Rule!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1143659</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/03/chacha-90-pranksters/#comment-1143659</guid>
		<description>YES!!!  You can use them for a research paper!!  Search with or without a guide to get great results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!!!  You can use them for a research paper!!  Search with or without a guide to get great results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.522 seconds -->
