<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Troubled Insider Pages Acquired By CitySearch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:52:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yelp Focuses On Mobile, New And Improved iPhone App Coming Soon &#171; Programming and more</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-2/#comment-2682564</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp Focuses On Mobile, New And Improved iPhone App Coming Soon &#171; Programming and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2682564</guid>
		<description>[...] the way, Yelp has decimated most of its competitors. Insider Pages laid off 2/3 of their staff and sold quickly to CitySearch in February 2007, Intuit said “goodbye” to Zipingo in August 2007, and Judy’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the way, Yelp has decimated most of its competitors. Insider Pages laid off 2/3 of their staff and sold quickly to CitySearch in February 2007, Intuit said “goodbye” to Zipingo in August 2007, and Judy’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-2/#comment-2616193</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2616193</guid>
		<description>And probably financial resources as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And probably financial resources as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-2616191</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2616191</guid>
		<description>Insider Pages lack technology expertise to develop new features to attract loyal users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insider Pages lack technology expertise to develop new features to attract loyal users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget birdwatching - welcome to commentwatching - Tech Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-2562652</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget birdwatching - welcome to commentwatching - Tech Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2562652</guid>
		<description>[...] read about another 20, and almost every single one had a comment by Kevin L. You can see his work here, here, here, here, and so forth. It consisted of him saying how no one cares about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read about another 20, and almost every single one had a comment by Kevin L. You can see his work here, here, here, here, and so forth. It consisted of him saying how no one cares about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citysearch Acquires Insider Pages &#171; Your Suspect</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-2306434</link>
		<dc:creator>Citysearch Acquires Insider Pages &#171; Your Suspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2306434</guid>
		<description>[...] I can&#8217;t even begin to estimate Insider Pages valuation. I&#8217;ll leave that to others, and already there are theories, critiques, shock, even applause. I think the rumored price is interesting though. Insider Pages, an Idea Lab company if I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can&#8217;t even begin to estimate Insider Pages valuation. I&#8217;ll leave that to others, and already there are theories, critiques, shock, even applause. I think the rumored price is interesting though. Insider Pages, an Idea Lab company if I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yelp Raises $15 Million Fourth Round, Rumored Valuation $200 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-2008057</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp Raises $15 Million Fourth Round, Rumored Valuation $200 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-2008057</guid>
		<description>[...] Analytics stats that the company shared with us). Yelp is in a competitive space with InsiderPages (acquired by Citysearch), and YellowBot. The real competition, though, will eventually be Google Local and Yahoo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Analytics stats that the company shared with us). Yelp is in a competitive space with InsiderPages (acquired by Citysearch), and YellowBot. The real competition, though, will eventually be Google Local and Yahoo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1895972</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete List of 2007 Web / Technology Acquisitions &#187; The StartUp Blog at PartnerUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1895972</guid>
		<description>[...] was not disclosed, but TechCrunch reported that the price was approximately $13M.Press Release &#124;  TechCrunch &#124;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was not disclosed, but TechCrunch reported that the price was approximately $13M.Press Release |  TechCrunch |  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarageSeek Rates Mechanics, But Yelp Will Kill This Category Too &#124; K E K U [alpha]</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1647587</link>
		<dc:creator>GarageSeek Rates Mechanics, But Yelp Will Kill This Category Too &#124; K E K U [alpha]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1647587</guid>
		<description>[...] and starting back in 2004. Despite this, Insiderpages went through a slew of layoff and eventually sold off to CitySearch for $13 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and starting back in 2004. Despite this, Insiderpages went through a slew of layoff and eventually sold off to CitySearch for $13 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarageSeek Rates Mechanics, But Yelp Will Kill This Category Too</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1645836</link>
		<dc:creator>GarageSeek Rates Mechanics, But Yelp Will Kill This Category Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1645836</guid>
		<description>[...] and starting back in 2004. Despite this, Insiderpages went through a slew of layoff and eventually sold off to CitySearch for $13 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and starting back in 2004. Despite this, Insiderpages went through a slew of layoff and eventually sold off to CitySearch for $13 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Chiang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1106435</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Chiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1106435</guid>
		<description>perpetuity (n) - to operate an entity ad infinitum.  Its a non silicon valley goal to have.  Its also opposite the hit it and quit it model that has worked so well for companies managed in a portfolio

liquidate (v) - actions a VC with zero nerve take in an effort to make the $2k in carry

Hockey stick employee growth doesn&#039;t always precede hockey stick revenue explosion

Hmmm, who can I fire JK

Yelp.  http://bigducky.yelp.com.  Ad sales are great but what about charging users for features that augment their community factor (i.e. hook up catalyst:
1) ghost authors.  Yes I&#039;d pay to have someone draft and org my thoughts
2) Featured Yelpers.  Yes I&#039;d pay for placements on Yelp pages at
jean, christinem , lilpeanut and especially, therockstar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perpetuity (n) &#8211; to operate an entity ad infinitum.  Its a non silicon valley goal to have.  Its also opposite the hit it and quit it model that has worked so well for companies managed in a portfolio</p>
<p>liquidate (v) &#8211; actions a VC with zero nerve take in an effort to make the $2k in carry</p>
<p>Hockey stick employee growth doesn&#8217;t always precede hockey stick revenue explosion</p>
<p>Hmmm, who can I fire JK</p>
<p>Yelp.  <a href="http://bigducky.yelp.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bigducky.yelp.com'>http://bigducky.yelp.com</a>.  Ad sales are great but what about charging users for features that augment their community factor (i.e. hook up catalyst:<br />
1) ghost authors.  Yes I&#8217;d pay to have someone draft and org my thoughts<br />
2) Featured Yelpers.  Yes I&#8217;d pay for placements on Yelp pages at<br />
jean, christinem , lilpeanut and especially, therockstar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellowbot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1104605</link>
		<dc:creator>yellowbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1104605</guid>
		<description>Regardless of what everyone thinks of Yelp, I&#039;ll be interested to see what Citysearch ends up doing with Insiderpages.  I came across an article that says they&#039;re planning to move the team up to San Francisco, possibly near (parent company) IAC&#039;s Ask City rather than down to West Hollywood, CA where CS is.  Remember, IP used to be in Pasadena, CA (Idealab offices) not too long ago...that&#039;s just a hop, skip, and a jump away from West Hollywood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of what everyone thinks of Yelp, I&#8217;ll be interested to see what Citysearch ends up doing with Insiderpages.  I came across an article that says they&#8217;re planning to move the team up to San Francisco, possibly near (parent company) IAC&#8217;s Ask City rather than down to West Hollywood, CA where CS is.  Remember, IP used to be in Pasadena, CA (Idealab offices) not too long ago&#8230;that&#8217;s just a hop, skip, and a jump away from West Hollywood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1103030</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1103030</guid>
		<description>Lots of good points. Of course Yelp&#039;s advantage is that people are much more likely to be inspired to review a great bar or restaurant than they are a great plumber. Yelp wisely targets people who are online all the time anyway and writing about this stuff anyway. Getting people to care enough to write a review is tough for other sectors because it&#039;s an effort, no matter how dis/satisfied you may have been with a service. As I said earlier, Yelp/Citysearch are very different than IP. That&#039;s why IAC&#039;s multi-site approach makes perfect sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of good points. Of course Yelp&#8217;s advantage is that people are much more likely to be inspired to review a great bar or restaurant than they are a great plumber. Yelp wisely targets people who are online all the time anyway and writing about this stuff anyway. Getting people to care enough to write a review is tough for other sectors because it&#8217;s an effort, no matter how dis/satisfied you may have been with a service. As I said earlier, Yelp/Citysearch are very different than IP. That&#8217;s why IAC&#8217;s multi-site approach makes perfect sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev Vashisht</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1100655</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajeev Vashisht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1100655</guid>
		<description>No smoke without fire, strong nose, keep going.

http://www.o3.indiatimes.com/voiceofindia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No smoke without fire, strong nose, keep going.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.o3.indiatimes.com/voiceofindia" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.o3.indiatimes.com/voiceofindia'>http://www.o3.i...om/voiceofindia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1096200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1096200</guid>
		<description>is yelp considered a social networking site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is yelp considered a social networking site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrence coburn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095966</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrence coburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095966</guid>
		<description>Patrick, you nailed it.  Yelp is a lightweight, group, structured blogging platform.  Reviews falling naturally out of self expression.  I don&#039;t get that feeling from any of the other big guys - they seem to be all business.  The problem about being all business, is that it ain&#039;t fun to review in that environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, you nailed it.  Yelp is a lightweight, group, structured blogging platform.  Reviews falling naturally out of self expression.  I don&#8217;t get that feeling from any of the other big guys &#8211; they seem to be all business.  The problem about being all business, is that it ain&#8217;t fun to review in that environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095656</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095656</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always used citysearch but it&#039;s gotten a lot harder to find what I need with all the junk they&#039;ve got on it. Yelp is great but I find it doesn&#039;t have as much on it for searching, etc., so it&#039;s hard to use as a replacement for citysearch (at least for now)

Citysearch seems to have fallen behind a little so it&#039;s great to see them making moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always used citysearch but it&#8217;s gotten a lot harder to find what I need with all the junk they&#8217;ve got on it. Yelp is great but I find it doesn&#8217;t have as much on it for searching, etc., so it&#8217;s hard to use as a replacement for citysearch (at least for now)</p>
<p>Citysearch seems to have fallen behind a little so it&#8217;s great to see them making moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superhelix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095651</link>
		<dc:creator>superhelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095651</guid>
		<description>Patrick -

I said what you said in 9 words, before you even said it.

Top that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick -</p>
<p>I said what you said in 9 words, before you even said it.</p>
<p>Top that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095087</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095087</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a great slogan for Yelp that sums up why they&#039;ve succeeded: &quot;I review, therefore I am.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a great slogan for Yelp that sums up why they&#8217;ve succeeded: &#8220;I review, therefore I am.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095061</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095061</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty simple if you remember that users are inherently selfish. Insiderpages has little benefit to the user who is submitting reviews. The reviewer has to spend time to write a review and only the business and other users get any benefit from that time. This is the same problem that Citysearch has. 

Yelp differs in that it subtlely focuses on the user, that is, the user is creating their online identity through the places they visit and the reviews they write. Read some of the reviews of popular restaurants and you&#039;ll notice that they frequently start with some long-winded story about the trip to the restaurant/nightclub/whatever or a completely irrelevant story. Only in the last few sentences do they actually make any mention of the place. The other type of review is what I call the &quot;masturbatory&quot; review: the type where the reviewer is showing off his/her command of aristocratic English and/or knowledge of gastronomic terminology. If you haven&#039;t figured it out yet, Yelp is actually a blogging service disguised as a review website. The majority of its content is being created by people who define their online identities by the ability to review places and services. THAT is why Yelp is succeeding.

As long as Insiderpages, Citysearch, and other competitors continue to advertise their services as &quot;good for the community&quot;, they&#039;ll never top Yelp. Good for the user always trumps good for the community. Even Jimbo Wales over at Wikia knows that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple if you remember that users are inherently selfish. Insiderpages has little benefit to the user who is submitting reviews. The reviewer has to spend time to write a review and only the business and other users get any benefit from that time. This is the same problem that Citysearch has. </p>
<p>Yelp differs in that it subtlely focuses on the user, that is, the user is creating their online identity through the places they visit and the reviews they write. Read some of the reviews of popular restaurants and you&#8217;ll notice that they frequently start with some long-winded story about the trip to the restaurant/nightclub/whatever or a completely irrelevant story. Only in the last few sentences do they actually make any mention of the place. The other type of review is what I call the &#8220;masturbatory&#8221; review: the type where the reviewer is showing off his/her command of aristocratic English and/or knowledge of gastronomic terminology. If you haven&#8217;t figured it out yet, Yelp is actually a blogging service disguised as a review website. The majority of its content is being created by people who define their online identities by the ability to review places and services. THAT is why Yelp is succeeding.</p>
<p>As long as Insiderpages, Citysearch, and other competitors continue to advertise their services as &#8220;good for the community&#8221;, they&#8217;ll never top Yelp. Good for the user always trumps good for the community. Even Jimbo Wales over at Wikia knows that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superhelix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1095038</link>
		<dc:creator>superhelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1095038</guid>
		<description>Yelp has personality.

IP does not.

End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yelp has personality.</p>
<p>IP does not.</p>
<p>End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinL.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1094893</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinL.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1094893</guid>
		<description>I think MerchantCircle has the only truely unique model (then again, I work for them). But think about it, reviews, local, consumers... who&#039;s watching out for the business owners?!? We aggregate all these reviews for them so they can see what&#039;s being said about them and we give them a free web presence! That I think is complementary....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think MerchantCircle has the only truely unique model (then again, I work for them). But think about it, reviews, local, consumers&#8230; who&#8217;s watching out for the business owners?!? We aggregate all these reviews for them so they can see what&#8217;s being said about them and we give them a free web presence! That I think is complementary&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Away Yelp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1094583</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Away Yelp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1094583</guid>
		<description>@ #27 Carmen,

Are you referring to yelp.com or Insiderpages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #27 Carmen,</p>
<p>Are you referring to yelp.com or Insiderpages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanguy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1094414</link>
		<dc:creator>vanguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1094414</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen so many of these companies just flame out because they cannot monetize on what ever unqiue attributes they had or thought they had.  It is nice to see Natural Selection working on the Web as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen so many of these companies just flame out because they cannot monetize on what ever unqiue attributes they had or thought they had.  It is nice to see Natural Selection working on the Web as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mooland</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1094266</link>
		<dc:creator>Mooland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1094266</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t know that Citysearch is still around; thought it went under a few years back. I used to frequent Citysearch to look for restaurants information but stopped using the site a few years back because the site looked dead and didn&#039;t find any new content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know that Citysearch is still around; thought it went under a few years back. I used to frequent Citysearch to look for restaurants information but stopped using the site a few years back because the site looked dead and didn&#8217;t find any new content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pureweb20.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/comment-page-1/#comment-1093660</link>
		<dc:creator>pureweb20.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/01/troubled-insider-pages-acquired-by-citysearch/#comment-1093660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Troubled Insider Pages Acquired By CitySearch...&lt;/strong&gt;

In crunching the publis numbers, it appears Insider Pages elected to cut their loses early selling for $13 millions after raising a total of $9 million....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Troubled Insider Pages Acquired By CitySearch&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In crunching the publis numbers, it appears Insider Pages elected to cut their loses early selling for $13 millions after raising a total of $9 million&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
