<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Valentine&#8217;s Logo Sure Looks Like &#8220;Googe&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:41:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ella.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-1/#comment-2906476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2906476</guid>
		<description>the &#039;&#039;G&quot; is writtin in the chocolate swirl beneath the strawberry and the &quot;L&quot; is the strawberry stem.
its really not that difficult people, seriously.
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8221;G&#8221; is writtin in the chocolate swirl beneath the strawberry and the &#8220;L&#8221; is the strawberry stem.<br />
its really not that difficult people, seriously.<br />
 <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Chandler &#124; Google.com has new logo updates: Company becoming less innovative, and more creative on the design side?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-2761606</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chandler &#124; Google.com has new logo updates: Company becoming less innovative, and more creative on the design side?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2761606</guid>
		<description>[...] hard in creating new logos for every type of occasion possible, including Valentines Day (which didn&#8217;t work out so well), Paddington Bear&#8217;s Birthday, and the Doodle4Google initiative, first started in 2000 by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hard in creating new logos for every type of occasion possible, including Valentines Day (which didn&#8217;t work out so well), Paddington Bear&#8217;s Birthday, and the Doodle4Google initiative, first started in 2000 by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-2625636</link>
		<dc:creator>jro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2625636</guid>
		<description>the 2009 one looks an exxon logo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 2009 one looks an exxon logo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t.a.m.s.y.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-2625224</link>
		<dc:creator>t.a.m.s.y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2625224</guid>
		<description>Debbie Googe is the bassist for My Bloody Valentine. So there&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie Googe is the bassist for My Bloody Valentine. So there&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manoj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-1/#comment-2621962</link>
		<dc:creator>manoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2621962</guid>
		<description>nice logo designing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice logo designing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-1/#comment-2462226</link>
		<dc:creator>jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-2462226</guid>
		<description>e4tttt5j6yrtgedfytgretrefrhgt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e4tttt5j6yrtgedfytgretrefrhgt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#35895;&#27468;&#27835;&#21360; Google Blogoscoped &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; &#187; 关于那个“Googe” Logo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-1482546</link>
		<dc:creator>&#35895;&#27468;&#27835;&#21360; Google Blogoscoped &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; &#187; 关于那个“Googe” Logo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-1482546</guid>
		<description>[...] 昨天，Google的情人节Logo让一些人困惑了很久。我今天看到了一封邮件，把它放在这里： 亲爱的负责为Google创作节日Logo的人（们）： [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 昨天，Google的情人节Logo让一些人困惑了很久。我今天看到了一封邮件，把它放在这里： 亲爱的负责为Google创作节日Logo的人（们）： [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ituloy AngSulong &#124; Ituloy AngSulong SEO Philippines</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-987702</link>
		<dc:creator>Ituloy AngSulong &#124; Ituloy AngSulong SEO Philippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-987702</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google&#8217;s Valentines Day Logo...&lt;/strong&gt;

	
	Google Valentine&#8217;s Day Logo!!!
	Keyphrases: Ituloy AngSulong, Ituloy AngSulong SEO Contest, Ituloy AngSulong SEO Philippines
	Technorati Tags:
Ituloy AngSulong, Google, Valentines
Add to: &#124; Technorati &#124;  Digg &#124;  del.icio.us &#124;  Yahoo &#124;  BlinkLi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google&#8217;s Valentines Day Logo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	Google Valentine&#8217;s Day Logo!!!<br />
	Keyphrases: Ituloy AngSulong, Ituloy AngSulong SEO Contest, Ituloy AngSulong SEO Philippines<br />
	Technorati Tags:<br />
Ituloy AngSulong, Google, Valentines<br />
Add to: | Technorati |  Digg |  del.icio.us |  Yahoo |  BlinkLi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phizzpop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-981812</link>
		<dc:creator>phizzpop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-981812</guid>
		<description>how long does it take for a post to show up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how long does it take for a post to show up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phizzpop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-958656</link>
		<dc:creator>phizzpop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-958656</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody, 

It&#039;s all great how everyone piled on my exclusive story and made it there own. 

I logged the first story on the Internet about the logo at 7am on Valentines Day,and can prove it. This is the third exclusive I&#039;ve had on the Internet in 3 months. 

Where&#039;s the justice?
http://www.monkeytypesthebible.com/2007/02/googles-front-page-logo-hacked-for.html

-MTB
coming soon:
http://thegoogleblogger.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody, </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all great how everyone piled on my exclusive story and made it there own. </p>
<p>I logged the first story on the Internet about the logo at 7am on Valentines Day,and can prove it. This is the third exclusive I&#8217;ve had on the Internet in 3 months. </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the justice?<br />
<a href="http://www.monkeytypesthebible.com/2007/02/googles-front-page-logo-hacked-for.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.monkeytypesthebible.com/2007/02/googles-front-page-logo-hacked-for.html'>http://www.monk...hacked-for.html</a></p>
<p>-MTB<br />
coming soon:<br />
<a href="http://thegoogleblogger.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://thegoogleblogger.com'>http://thegoogleblogger.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-948651</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-948651</guid>
		<description>a little bit bored on valentine&#039;s day, mike, to post this?
nothing better to do?
rb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a little bit bored on valentine&#8217;s day, mike, to post this?<br />
nothing better to do?<br />
rb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-946518</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-946518</guid>
		<description>Common guys. How hard is it to see a heart shaped chocolate in that logo. Heart is a symbol of love, thus L. Googe sounds cute, but I am afraid we are back to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common guys. How hard is it to see a heart shaped chocolate in that logo. Heart is a symbol of love, thus L. Googe sounds cute, but I am afraid we are back to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaux's Insight</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-945397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaux's Insight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-945397</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Do People Understand What Romantic is?...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#8220;Oh, Google is silly! They miss the letter &#8220;L&#8221; in their logo.&#8221; Lots of such words arose when people saw Google&#8217;s Valentine&#8217;s Day logo.

Those people commonly &#8220;read&#8221; the chocolate-covered strawberry as the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do People Understand What Romantic is?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, Google is silly! They miss the letter &#8220;L&#8221; in their logo.&#8221; Lots of such words arose when people saw Google&#8217;s Valentine&#8217;s Day logo.</p>
<p>Those people commonly &#8220;read&#8221; the chocolate-covered strawberry as the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velioncho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-945379</link>
		<dc:creator>Velioncho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-945379</guid>
		<description>As the competetion slowly gaining momentum, Google knows it will vanish in  about 6 year from nows.Google known for its creative ways in expressing, wants to accept this bitter truth  in their own style.

So starting from this year, they will take out one letter each year -- Googe, Gooe, Goe,Go,G and &quot; &quot;.

They are being creative even when they go down :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the competetion slowly gaining momentum, Google knows it will vanish in  about 6 year from nows.Google known for its creative ways in expressing, wants to accept this bitter truth  in their own style.</p>
<p>So starting from this year, they will take out one letter each year &#8212; Googe, Gooe, Goe,Go,G and &#8221; &#8220;.</p>
<p>They are being creative even when they go down <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-945061</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-945061</guid>
		<description>Noel, Noel, Noel, Noel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel, Noel, Noel, Noel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hornswaggled</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-944537</link>
		<dc:creator>Hornswaggled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-944537</guid>
		<description>&quot;I did but see her passing by, and yet I love her till I die.&quot;
- Barnabe Googe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I did but see her passing by, and yet I love her till I die.&#8221;<br />
- Barnabe Googe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: openPeople Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-944191</link>
		<dc:creator>openPeople Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-944191</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nennt Google sich zukünftig Googe?...&lt;/strong&gt;


Man muss schon zweimal hinschauen, damit man den Stiel der Erdbeere in Kombinantion mit der zerfließenden Schokolade als &#8220;L&#8221; entziffern kann, dennoch ist das Google Doodle zum Valentinstag mal wieder richtig schick geworden&#8230;
PS: Den...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nennt Google sich zukünftig Googe?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Man muss schon zweimal hinschauen, damit man den Stiel der Erdbeere in Kombinantion mit der zerfließenden Schokolade als &#8220;L&#8221; entziffern kann, dennoch ist das Google Doodle zum Valentinstag mal wieder richtig schick geworden&#8230;<br />
PS: Den&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacStansbury</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-944029</link>
		<dc:creator>MacStansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-944029</guid>
		<description>I, for one, am looking forward to more from Googe-gate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, am looking forward to more from Googe-gate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pankaj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943988</link>
		<dc:creator>pankaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943988</guid>
		<description>Google posted a blog clarifying that this is not a missing of letter.
Checkout Google&#039;s official blog for more info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google posted a blog clarifying that this is not a missing of letter.<br />
Checkout Google&#8217;s official blog for more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Me!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943986</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Me!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943986</guid>
		<description>That is unbelievable.  How could they get that wrong.  For TechCrunch with a twist http://www.techcrunchme.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is unbelievable.  How could they get that wrong.  For TechCrunch with a twist <a href="http://www.techcrunchme.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunchme.com'>http://www.techcrunchme.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Billian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943923</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Billian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943923</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they should have left the &quot;l&quot; and used the strawberry for the o&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they should have left the &#8220;l&#8221; and used the strawberry for the o&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943801</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943801</guid>
		<description>I hate it when comments get deleted and then you sound like are retard coz you refrencing a non existant comment. Mike can&#039;t you put comment deleted or something when you delete someones comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it when comments get deleted and then you sound like are retard coz you refrencing a non existant comment. Mike can&#8217;t you put comment deleted or something when you delete someones comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey-myCams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey-myCams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943746</guid>
		<description>Maybe i&#039;m looking at this(among the majority of things i come across daily) from a marketing point of view, but to me it seemed obvious at first sight that they did it on purpose. Why? Because people talk about it.
Did they get free press? Definitely.
Did it harm the brand? I highly doubt it.
Mission accomplished.

(and yes, i read the blog entry Mark Kelso posted. Is it true? That&#039;s up to you to decide.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe i&#8217;m looking at this(among the majority of things i come across daily) from a marketing point of view, but to me it seemed obvious at first sight that they did it on purpose. Why? Because people talk about it.<br />
Did they get free press? Definitely.<br />
Did it harm the brand? I highly doubt it.<br />
Mission accomplished.</p>
<p>(and yes, i read the blog entry Mark Kelso posted. Is it true? That&#8217;s up to you to decide.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james citron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943698</link>
		<dc:creator>james citron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943698</guid>
		<description>i think they are going for &quot;goo e&quot; -- pronounced &quot;gooey&quot; -- thus &quot;entendre-izing&quot; their name, with the icon separating the 2 syllables for added effect...imho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think they are going for &#8220;goo e&#8221; &#8212; pronounced &#8220;gooey&#8221; &#8212; thus &#8220;entendre-izing&#8221; their name, with the icon separating the 2 syllables for added effect&#8230;imho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hou.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s Questionable Spelling Abilities</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/comment-page-2/#comment-943633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hou.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s Questionable Spelling Abilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/14/googles-valentines-logo-sure-looks-like-googe/#comment-943633</guid>
		<description>[...] as TechCrunch points out, there&#8217;s something amiss. Take a look for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as TechCrunch points out, there&#8217;s something amiss. Take a look for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
