<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Hands Over User&#8217;s Info to Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: technologytalk.net &#187; The CopyFight Against YouTube &#124; A look at technology's role in modern culture</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-1368331</link>
		<dc:creator>technologytalk.net &#187; The CopyFight Against YouTube &#124; A look at technology's role in modern culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-1368331</guid>
		<description>[...] Fox demanded that Google turn over user data on anyone that uploaded unaired episodes of 24 - and Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fox demanded that Google turn over user data on anyone that uploaded unaired episodes of 24 - and Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek And Poke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-944552</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek And Poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-944552</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Simple YouTube Rules...&lt;/strong&gt;

The YouTube Party is getting a bit harder (see TechCrunch)....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Simple YouTube Rules&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The YouTube Party is getting a bit harder (see TechCrunch)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-944213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-944213</guid>
		<description>i like the comments as much as the article!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the comments as much as the article!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datter is a loser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-943868</link>
		<dc:creator>datter is a loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-943868</guid>
		<description>DATTER:

wow..
you seriously need to take a chill pill.. and um.. stop being so miserable. no one cares but you. 

and if you dont like it.. dont come here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DATTER:</p>
<p>wow..<br />
you seriously need to take a chill pill.. and um.. stop being so miserable. no one cares but you. </p>
<p>and if you dont like it.. dont come here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Irish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942996</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942996</guid>
		<description>Thx Marshall. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Marshall. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942356</link>
		<dc:creator>datter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942356</guid>
		<description>"Datter: Quit moaning. Honestly. Go outside and get some fresh air - will this bother you tomorrow?"

No, I won't "quit moaning".

People make a big deal about big issues (sometimes) but often overlook the small ones. This means circumstances get held to to higher standards than others... and being blind to the little things doesn't do anyone any favors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Datter: Quit moaning. Honestly. Go outside and get some fresh air - will this bother you tomorrow?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I won&#8217;t &#8220;quit moaning&#8221;.</p>
<p>People make a big deal about big issues (sometimes) but often overlook the small ones. This means circumstances get held to to higher standards than others&#8230; and being blind to the little things doesn&#8217;t do anyone any favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942285</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-942285</guid>
		<description>Shahid is correct - im suprised YouTube has survived for so long - how can any decent content stay on there in view of everyone? rapidshare et al is where the future is at because the little guys actions are virtually protected (or at least much better protected than YouTube clients) - if you give an uploaded file an arbitary name its almost impossible for that file to be located without you publishing the link.

The web will become a much more policed environment in the future but dont think for one minute that it will be easy for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shahid is correct - im suprised YouTube has survived for so long - how can any decent content stay on there in view of everyone? rapidshare et al is where the future is at because the little guys actions are virtually protected (or at least much better protected than YouTube clients) - if you give an uploaded file an arbitary name its almost impossible for that file to be located without you publishing the link.</p>
<p>The web will become a much more policed environment in the future but dont think for one minute that it will be easy for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snurd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941947</link>
		<dc:creator>Snurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941947</guid>
		<description>Datter: grow the f&#38;^% up, child.

drew: you got it right, man.  Big takeaway from this is the impact it will have on the uploaders once it's known that YT will give you up for a pack of smokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Datter: grow the f&amp;^% up, child.</p>
<p>drew: you got it right, man.  Big takeaway from this is the impact it will have on the uploaders once it&#8217;s known that YT will give you up for a pack of smokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941608</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941608</guid>
		<description>Datter: Quit moaning. Honestly. Go outside and get some fresh air - will this bother you tomorrow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Datter: Quit moaning. Honestly. Go outside and get some fresh air - will this bother you tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogdan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941293</link>
		<dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-941293</guid>
		<description>i think that all these problems represent the agony of an old system... services like youtube represent the future. don't fight with them, use them!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that all these problems represent the agony of an old system&#8230; services like youtube represent the future. don&#8217;t fight with them, use them!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940656</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940656</guid>
		<description>"Youtube was built on people violating copyrights by doing stupid..."

The whole culture of filesharing is built on copyright violations.  If you think YT is full of it, check out Rapidshare, Megaupload, or the like.  Commercial sites able to charge a monthly subscription fee, for the sole purpose of facilitating these violations.  They're not even like torrent trackers who can claim they host nothing illegal, they just index .torrent files - but instead they exist solely to make infinging easier.  Gofigure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Youtube was built on people violating copyrights by doing stupid&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The whole culture of filesharing is built on copyright violations.  If you think YT is full of it, check out Rapidshare, Megaupload, or the like.  Commercial sites able to charge a monthly subscription fee, for the sole purpose of facilitating these violations.  They&#8217;re not even like torrent trackers who can claim they host nothing illegal, they just index .torrent files - but instead they exist solely to make infinging easier.  Gofigure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940493</guid>
		<description>I will say this, they use to say it was great to burn books that were bad for the people. I think YouTube is trying hard to come off nice and clean. Wash their hands of their past. The funny thing is that you can't just erase the past. It doesn't work like, at least not in 2007.

Rex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say this, they use to say it was great to burn books that were bad for the people. I think YouTube is trying hard to come off nice and clean. Wash their hands of their past. The funny thing is that you can&#8217;t just erase the past. It doesn&#8217;t work like, at least not in 2007.</p>
<p>Rex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric B</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940376</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940376</guid>
		<description>"Bad analogy. Stealing is NOT the equivalent of copying."

Yes, the analogy is slightly flawed, but if downloading an illicit copy of a show/game/whatever causes one not to purchase a legitimate copy then the end result to the copyright holder is the same.

The problem that most people have with the above analogy is that they are looking at it through too narrow of scope. 

While I dislike the heavy handed techniques of many of the media companies, I also find the wide spread support of copyright infringement to be sickening as well. I'm sick of seeing Digg/slashdot/whatever hip new cool tech news site filled with all the latest pirating technology and methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bad analogy. Stealing is NOT the equivalent of copying.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, the analogy is slightly flawed, but if downloading an illicit copy of a show/game/whatever causes one not to purchase a legitimate copy then the end result to the copyright holder is the same.</p>
<p>The problem that most people have with the above analogy is that they are looking at it through too narrow of scope. </p>
<p>While I dislike the heavy handed techniques of many of the media companies, I also find the wide spread support of copyright infringement to be sickening as well. I&#8217;m sick of seeing Digg/slashdot/whatever hip new cool tech news site filled with all the latest pirating technology and methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940345</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940345</guid>
		<description>WTF!  Anyone STUPID enough to post copyrighted material on-line in violation of the law deserves to be nailed.  Youtube was built on people violating copyrights by doing stupid crap with someone else's music and/or videos in it.  It's obvious that Youtube has never been willing or able to abide by copyright law.

Anyone with any sense just copies movies or cds directly instead of putting it on-line where they can be tracked.  Eventually, they'll go after the little guy just like they have done with pot smokers.  88% of those in jail for pot offenses are in for possesion, not distribution.

Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF!  Anyone STUPID enough to post copyrighted material on-line in violation of the law deserves to be nailed.  Youtube was built on people violating copyrights by doing stupid crap with someone else&#8217;s music and/or videos in it.  It&#8217;s obvious that Youtube has never been willing or able to abide by copyright law.</p>
<p>Anyone with any sense just copies movies or cds directly instead of putting it on-line where they can be tracked.  Eventually, they&#8217;ll go after the little guy just like they have done with pot smokers.  88% of those in jail for pot offenses are in for possesion, not distribution.</p>
<p>Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940227</link>
		<dc:creator>tard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-940227</guid>
		<description>Sascha wrote: 

"Nobody would ever go to a store, steal a couple of DVDs, and then put them outside their house for everybody who wants to have them. Publishing videos on YouTube like that is pretty much the digital equivalent of that action."

Bad analogy. Stealing is NOT the equivalent of copying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sascha wrote: </p>
<p>&#8220;Nobody would ever go to a store, steal a couple of DVDs, and then put them outside their house for everybody who wants to have them. Publishing videos on YouTube like that is pretty much the digital equivalent of that action.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bad analogy. Stealing is NOT the equivalent of copying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939657</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939657</guid>
		<description>I just hope YouTube doesn't tell my ex about that video I posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope YouTube doesn&#8217;t tell my ex about that video I posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939428</link>
		<dc:creator>datter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939428</guid>
		<description>"Paul and Datter, I’m puting that sentence at the end of one post a day so I think we’ll all live."

How about TechCrunch's regular paying advertisers? Those little ad units up there run for $10,000 per month a piece on this site you know, and you're getting a link-a-day for free... you could at least be a bit more conciliatory rather than so defensive.

When it comes right down to it, your attitude sucks... so yay for Splashcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Paul and Datter, I’m puting that sentence at the end of one post a day so I think we’ll all live.&#8221;</p>
<p>How about TechCrunch&#8217;s regular paying advertisers? Those little ad units up there run for $10,000 per month a piece on this site you know, and you&#8217;re getting a link-a-day for free&#8230; you could at least be a bit more conciliatory rather than so defensive.</p>
<p>When it comes right down to it, your attitude sucks&#8230; so yay for Splashcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939426</guid>
		<description>I have an idea to solve all these problems and stop future ones, stop illegally uploading content!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an idea to solve all these problems and stop future ones, stop illegally uploading content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939266</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939266</guid>
		<description>Will this result in people thinking twice about posting copyright videos? It may not be Google’s policy to hand over user details in the past but it is clearly YouTubes policy and I guess seems they are owned by Google it’s now Google’s policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this result in people thinking twice about posting copyright videos? It may not be Google’s policy to hand over user details in the past but it is clearly YouTubes policy and I guess seems they are owned by Google it’s now Google’s policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague Dawley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939265</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague Dawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939265</guid>
		<description>Content providers are showing muscle in order to strengthen their hand in negotiations. I doubt they're interested in court fights -- they want revenue sharing and partner relationships  in posting of content.

Youtube is morphing from a business dependent upon free, user-provided (stolen) content to a version of mini-TV. What I don't get is why Google is dragging the process out -- especially when their other hand is trying to become a media buying intermediary between large advertisers and media companies... unless, perhaps, this plays into the terms under negotiation.

With the speed that things happen on the Interweb, the delay could allow a competitor their chance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content providers are showing muscle in order to strengthen their hand in negotiations. I doubt they&#8217;re interested in court fights &#8212; they want revenue sharing and partner relationships  in posting of content.</p>
<p>Youtube is morphing from a business dependent upon free, user-provided (stolen) content to a version of mini-TV. What I don&#8217;t get is why Google is dragging the process out &#8212; especially when their other hand is trying to become a media buying intermediary between large advertisers and media companies&#8230; unless, perhaps, this plays into the terms under negotiation.</p>
<p>With the speed that things happen on the Interweb, the delay could allow a competitor their chance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939135</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939135</guid>
		<description>POT
KETTLE
BLACK!!!

seriously, how many gigs of copyrighted material must there be on myspace!??!

judging by the myspace relationship with google and youtube being owned by google, this has got to draw similarities with the time fox allegidly sued itself:
http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/3745.html

this is a seriously stupid move. just as the RIAA suing random people for sharing mp3s, this won't have any effect on distribution of their TV shows on the internet just as the RIAA didn't have any effect on mp3 sharing on p2p networks. i can't see anything other than bad PR coming of this. i wonder what the folks at FOX interactive think......

Marcus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POT<br />
KETTLE<br />
BLACK!!!</p>
<p>seriously, how many gigs of copyrighted material must there be on myspace!??!</p>
<p>judging by the myspace relationship with google and youtube being owned by google, this has got to draw similarities with the time fox allegidly sued itself:<br />
<a href="http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/3745.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/3745.html</a></p>
<p>this is a seriously stupid move. just as the RIAA suing random people for sharing mp3s, this won&#8217;t have any effect on distribution of their TV shows on the internet just as the RIAA didn&#8217;t have any effect on mp3 sharing on p2p networks. i can&#8217;t see anything other than bad PR coming of this. i wonder what the folks at FOX interactive think&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Marcus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939103</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939103</guid>
		<description>M-

Nice post.  It's nice to have you back on TC - even if it's just for a bit.

-C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M-</p>
<p>Nice post.  It&#8217;s nice to have you back on TC - even if it&#8217;s just for a bit.</p>
<p>-C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: College Marketing 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939051</link>
		<dc:creator>College Marketing 4.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939051</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Beginning of the End for YouTube...&lt;/strong&gt;

Oh man is Google Tube in trouble. TechCrunch announced today that YouTube, after a subpoena from Fox, released to fox the personal information of a user, ECOTtotal, that 20th Century Fox Television accused of uploading episodes of 24 (great show)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Beginning of the End for YouTube&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Oh man is Google Tube in trouble. TechCrunch announced today that YouTube, after a subpoena from Fox, released to fox the personal information of a user, ECOTtotal, that 20th Century Fox Television accused of uploading episodes of 24 (great show)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tester23</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tester23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-939045</guid>
		<description>As far as I see, YouTube had no choice but to release this information else they would be in legal hotwater because lack of cooperation with a court process in identifying an infringing user could be construed as collusion with that user, especially since the DMCA Safe Harbor statutes are so vague in nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I see, YouTube had no choice but to release this information else they would be in legal hotwater because lack of cooperation with a court process in identifying an infringing user could be construed as collusion with that user, especially since the DMCA Safe Harbor statutes are so vague in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-938850</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/13/youtube-hands-over-users-info-to-fox/#comment-938850</guid>
		<description>Paul and Datter, I'm puting that sentence at the end of one post a day so I think we'll all live.  Thanks for putting it plainly re YouTube and btw, I love Aurgasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul and Datter, I&#8217;m puting that sentence at the end of one post a day so I think we&#8217;ll all live.  Thanks for putting it plainly re YouTube and btw, I love Aurgasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.097 seconds -->
