Ein wirklich schöner Artikel zum Thema Online Videocutting…

Some other comments on the sites

Both Jumpcut and Motionbox support teams are very quick to respond to questions. Both allow editing/remixing.
jumpcut- Plus: Good jumpcut instructional video editing with accessible founder.
Uploader allows multiple uploads. Email notification of comments say what the comment is.
Minus: Experimenting with different start points is difficult. This is something required for editing. Slight delays when clicking on part of clip. Not yet competitive with imovie or other desktop editors. This may be a high bar but until it’s met I don’t see a reason to switch. The site doesn’t let you email people directly. You can only send them a public comment.
If you put more than one clip at a time in the uploader it wants to package them into one movie. That’s not how I roll. In fact, Jumpcut’s separation of movies and clips tends to create extra steps.
The site shows a posting time for clips but this only reflects when it was last edited (even if only the description was changed). This definitely made writing this harder as I could not tell how long ago I had posted the videos on jumpcut.

motionbox- Plus: Has deep tagging a very good function. For example in the “huff and puff” video, I could title parts something like “face starts shaking” and another part “unable to keep screaming” and then someone else can come and grab just the face shaking sections, or whatever. When editing it displays the individual frames of the clip which is probably even more important for editing. Minus: The deep tagging is only available for your own videos. A lot of ads on the site now. It requires the newest flash player.
Youtube- Minus: Email notification of comments doesn’t say what the comment is.
Myspace- Minus: Attracts 0 random viewers (for me). Let’s you rate your own video. Puts a myspace logo overlay on the video.

http://www.nissim.com
http://www.customplay.com

Susan

i’d like to comment your

“Some major points of clarification – we do not host video, import video, or alter the original in anyway.”

I don’t know yet which video sharing services will be supported by Cuts, but as the STubes guy i know that even grabbing the YouTube flv’s source path isn’t a straightforward/documented/api based thing, which could create some legal problems – depends on them.
And YouTube is an easy example, other services’ sources are harder to figure out.
Plus, both Cuts or STubes alter the _presentation_ of the original, which is the important part: for example if you are using a cracked software (i know you’re not, nobody, it’s just a fiction ) you are not altering the original dvd… but create a new “presentation”.

Cheers for the hair dresser.

G

What is our Goal?

Today we can watch whatever, whenever and wherever we want. Tivo, broadband, iPod, YouTube, and On Demand have radically changed the way we consume video. Cuts mission is to enable the next logical step – easy control of the video experience itself.

Our platform controls how video is played back and allows for easy creation of new experiences from existing videos without altering the original. We are focused on developing the simplest way to create and share your version (aka your take) utilizing the amazing quality and breadth of media already available and being created everyday.

What happened to the service Cuts announced at DEMO last year?

Based on user feedback, we decided to launch our online video service as the first of three services that will leverage our Cutlist platform. First to launch is the service covered here, next is our full length service designed for DVD’s and downloaded videos, which will offer users the ability to create Cuts that control the playback experience of movies and TV shows. Lastly, CutsTV is being developed for cable and satellite providers and will enable them to deliver new forms of parental control and premium services on top of their On-Demand and DVR products.

Legal, Corp, Product, etc?

Some major points of clarification – we do not host video, import video, or alter the original in anyway. Our technology controls playback and offers users the ability to create and share their take of videos already published and open for sharing.

We respect the editor communities such as Jumpcut and Eyspot tremendously, though we see it as a bit heavier than most users want. Our experience is that people want to quickly tweak videos and share it with their friends, not actually fully edit them. They want to add commentary so that they can communicate while the video is playing versus sending an explanation in email. They want to skip certain parts because the video is too long, or add sound effects and loop scenes to call attention to specific moments or just be funny. Our goal is to make this “stupid easy” and quick so that everyone can get involved. We also felt the world has enough video hosting sites at this point.

Domain Name?

And no our domain name did not cost half our budget – it only cost a few thousand dollars and a very happy hair dresser

PS> Beta is launching very soon – keep signing up.

I think there is value in an online editing platform…makes it more available to the masses.

mmm i need to replicate myself so that i can develop and implement my plans faster

http://www.stubes.net

There is no money behind the service but i continously developing it. You can create a “TV channel” from YouTube and other videos, plus publish the channel in your blog with an embedded player.

It has some limited start from/play to functionality and the videos are streamed from the original sites. And random play… no seek option… blah blah.

Unfortunately, without professional marketing knowledge/support i couldn’t make attention from the important sites like TechCrunch.

Please check it out, every feedback is welcome and thanks for reading.

Gabor

It basically allows for dialog in terms of video. People can now make edited video conversations online. I think this is great.

I don’t think folks will use it for longer video pieces in general but splicing together stuff online quickly and easily for a video dialog makes a lot of sense.

Stan

Idea Thunderdome

http://www.tekn...ld.blogspot.com

Myspace for that matter too.

I will be anxious to see how this turns out.

vQuote facilitates such conversations by allowing viewers of a video to sample just the portions of the clip that are interesting or memorable to them. When such an element is sampled, the derivative sample is automatically linked as a trackback to the content master. Trackbacks ensure not only that links are maintained between the sample and the master, but that mastered content owners can easily determine who is sampling their content. We have also built in the ability to index via deep tags and time-boxed portions of videos that can have inline comments instanced within them.

vQuote changes the equation for mastered content owners and consumers by reconciling the desire of consumers to personalize meaningful content and make it their own, and content owners’ fears of losing control, integrity and monetization of their content. We at vSocial believe it is important to think through the entire life cycle of the online video sharing experience – both from facilitating the “you” conversations of viewers to the crediting the mastered content owners.