<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Delivers Knock-Out Punch to Competitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What makes an Indian Digg tick? &#124; pluGGd.in</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-1615328</link>
		<dc:creator>What makes an Indian Digg tick? &#124; pluGGd.in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-1615328</guid>
		<description>[...] any opportunity to make even a small dough gets a huge traction. See how YouTube has delivered a knock-out punch to it&#8217;s competitors by sharing ad revenues.Similarly, one of the smartest feature that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any opportunity to make even a small dough gets a huge traction. See how YouTube has delivered a knock-out punch to it&#8217;s competitors by sharing ad revenues.Similarly, one of the smartest feature that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Launches Revenue Sharing Partners Program, but no Pre-Rolls</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-1362168</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Launches Revenue Sharing Partners Program, but no Pre-Rolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 10:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-1362168</guid>
		<description>[...] covered rumors about the introduction of in-video advertising previously, in January Steve Poland noted the BBC reporting that the advertising on YouTube may take the form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covered rumors about the introduction of in-video advertising previously, in January Steve Poland noted the BBC reporting that the advertising on YouTube may take the form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links You Can’t Live Without &#124; Copyblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-928400</link>
		<dc:creator>Links You Can’t Live Without &#124; Copyblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-928400</guid>
		<description>[...] to see how sites provide incentives for “user generated content” as the year progresses, from You Tube on down. Derek comments on that topic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to see how sites provide incentives for “user generated content” as the year progresses, from You Tube on down. Derek comments on that topic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UC-Berkeley Digital Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; YouTube to include advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-848565</link>
		<dc:creator>UC-Berkeley Digital Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; YouTube to include advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-848565</guid>
		<description>[...] This in from TechCrunch (and feels like it should be old news), YouTube co-founder Chad Hurley has hinted future plans of revenue sharing at YouTube in the coming months. While it seems like the writing was on the wall, it is interesting to see that YouTube is actually going to become more aggressive in monetizing its huge user base. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This in from TechCrunch (and feels like it should be old news), YouTube co-founder Chad Hurley has hinted future plans of revenue sharing at YouTube in the coming months. While it seems like the writing was on the wall, it is interesting to see that YouTube is actually going to become more aggressive in monetizing its huge user base. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plotkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-843817</link>
		<dc:creator>plotkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-843817</guid>
		<description>A new video sharing service which is technologically going even beyond YouTube, has been launched in Jan 2007. It is named MYUBO. Except of web it also supports mobile phones (upload &#38; watch) and supports all data networks even GPRS, EDGE, or CDMA and 3G/UMTS as well.

http://www.myubo.com
http://myubo.mobi

It is in beta phase, but it captured great interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new video sharing service which is technologically going even beyond YouTube, has been launched in Jan 2007. It is named MYUBO. Except of web it also supports mobile phones (upload &amp; watch) and supports all data networks even GPRS, EDGE, or CDMA and 3G/UMTS as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.myubo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.myubo.com</a><br />
<a href="http://myubo.mobi" rel="nofollow">http://myubo.mobi</a></p>
<p>It is in beta phase, but it captured great interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talia Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-833354</link>
		<dc:creator>Talia Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-833354</guid>
		<description>Other than the fact that, yes, YouTube does not yet a revenue model published (or created, according to them), you must remember that not everyone is LonelyGirl15, ZeFrank, Brookers, or the Evolution of Dance guy.

Success on YouTube relies heavily on marketing yourself or being super lucky and getting featured on the front page. In order to be featured, the YouTube editors need to choose your video to be featured (and once they start paying, they are effectively deciding who they will pay, since everyone knows that the chances of you making it on YouTube are slim to none if you're not featured).

By contract, Metacafe uses its ranking system to push good videos to the top. We don't decide what videos are released to the Highest Rated pages of the day, etc. Videos are released to the Most Recent page - and to our downloadable application - and if the community likes it - it goes to the Highest Ranked pages, Most Discussed page, etc. Every single video has the same chance of making it. Metacafe pays creators solely on the merits of the video and the views it accumulates - not click-through rates. We've had 3 people earn over $20,000 so far, and countless others in the thousands - and they didn't have to market their videos or beg to be featured to make it.

Yes, it's exciting that YouTube is going to (eventually) pay users for their content. Don't forget that it's very hard to make it, though, and YouTube will have to work out several kinks in the system (including the featured videos) before they begin to pay out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the fact that, yes, YouTube does not yet a revenue model published (or created, according to them), you must remember that not everyone is LonelyGirl15, ZeFrank, Brookers, or the Evolution of Dance guy.</p>
<p>Success on YouTube relies heavily on marketing yourself or being super lucky and getting featured on the front page. In order to be featured, the YouTube editors need to choose your video to be featured (and once they start paying, they are effectively deciding who they will pay, since everyone knows that the chances of you making it on YouTube are slim to none if you&#8217;re not featured).</p>
<p>By contract, Metacafe uses its ranking system to push good videos to the top. We don&#8217;t decide what videos are released to the Highest Rated pages of the day, etc. Videos are released to the Most Recent page - and to our downloadable application - and if the community likes it - it goes to the Highest Ranked pages, Most Discussed page, etc. Every single video has the same chance of making it. Metacafe pays creators solely on the merits of the video and the views it accumulates - not click-through rates. We&#8217;ve had 3 people earn over $20,000 so far, and countless others in the thousands - and they didn&#8217;t have to market their videos or beg to be featured to make it.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s exciting that YouTube is going to (eventually) pay users for their content. Don&#8217;t forget that it&#8217;s very hard to make it, though, and YouTube will have to work out several kinks in the system (including the featured videos) before they begin to pay out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-826197</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-826197</guid>
		<description>What kind of brand recognition can an advertiser expect to get in a 3 second ad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of brand recognition can an advertiser expect to get in a 3 second ad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig chaucer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-823219</link>
		<dc:creator>craig chaucer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-823219</guid>
		<description>Revenue sharing video sites across the board are probably realising that google has this one stitched up.

Infectious Videos are trying to bail out.

http://www.infectiousvideos.com/index.php?p=news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revenue sharing video sites across the board are probably realising that google has this one stitched up.</p>
<p>Infectious Videos are trying to bail out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infectiousvideos.com/index.php?p=news" rel="nofollow">http://www.infectiousvideos.com/index.php?p=news</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-822541</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-822541</guid>
		<description>The key point for my choice to use revver is that the revver API allows your users to upload videos without leaving the site. As far as I am aware, if I used youtube, the user would have to go off and sign up to youtube. Youtube is not a complete web development api, revver is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key point for my choice to use revver is that the revver API allows your users to upload videos without leaving the site. As far as I am aware, if I used youtube, the user would have to go off and sign up to youtube. Youtube is not a complete web development api, revver is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mefeedia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-822446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mefeedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-822446</guid>
		<description>This is great news. "Knock-out Punch to Competitors" is a little bit of an exaggeration, of course. We are still in the very early days of innovation in what will be the "personalized media experience".  Entertainment is becoming more and more about delivering what you want, when you want it, and where you want it. YouTube (and others, including us at Mefeedia) are far from delivering on this. Meaning, of course, that there is still a lot of opportunity.

-Frank, Mefeedia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news. &#8220;Knock-out Punch to Competitors&#8221; is a little bit of an exaggeration, of course. We are still in the very early days of innovation in what will be the &#8220;personalized media experience&#8221;.  Entertainment is becoming more and more about delivering what you want, when you want it, and where you want it. YouTube (and others, including us at Mefeedia) are far from delivering on this. Meaning, of course, that there is still a lot of opportunity.</p>
<p>-Frank, Mefeedia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821958</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821958</guid>
		<description>I embed YouTube videos as a usage model for my site.  Having a split of the advertising as a publisher would be welcomed by me of course.  But on the flip side do I want my visitors to have to wade through what will end up being minutes of advertising once they watch a volume of videos?  It depends on how intrusive it is, I guess. Youtube has to be very careful not to kill the viewing experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I embed YouTube videos as a usage model for my site.  Having a split of the advertising as a publisher would be welcomed by me of course.  But on the flip side do I want my visitors to have to wade through what will end up being minutes of advertising once they watch a volume of videos?  It depends on how intrusive it is, I guess. Youtube has to be very careful not to kill the viewing experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micki Krimmel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821773</link>
		<dc:creator>Micki Krimmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821773</guid>
		<description>While it certainly is big news that YouTube is finally moving in the direction of sharing revenue with creators, it's important to note that there is little detail available on how this will actually happen or who will really benefit most from this arrangement. Revver was built with a revenue-sharing model from the outset. Our technology supports open syndication and equal opportunity earning potential for every video on our system, and our network is free of any copyright violations. Many of our artists have done quite well financially on the Revver network.  It’s a big world out there and the demand for online video is growing. With our creator-friendly TOS and comittment to a democratic revenue-sharing model, Revver will continue to be a good home for independent artists’ work.
- Micki, Revver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it certainly is big news that YouTube is finally moving in the direction of sharing revenue with creators, it&#8217;s important to note that there is little detail available on how this will actually happen or who will really benefit most from this arrangement. Revver was built with a revenue-sharing model from the outset. Our technology supports open syndication and equal opportunity earning potential for every video on our system, and our network is free of any copyright violations. Many of our artists have done quite well financially on the Revver network.  It’s a big world out there and the demand for online video is growing. With our creator-friendly TOS and comittment to a democratic revenue-sharing model, Revver will continue to be a good home for independent artists’ work.<br />
- Micki, Revver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: :: r ::</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821446</link>
		<dc:creator>:: r ::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821446</guid>
		<description>YouTube is a dumping ground of junk content and bootleg media. I look at that site in terms of signal to noise ratio. Lots of noise, little signal. What happens when all of the anime, music videos, and other copyright violations are firmly stamped out on YouTube? What happens when Google shifts all of it's Google Video over to YouTube in an attempt to legitimize the site? Will all the kids on MySpace with their overstuffed profiles still use it? Will they switch to MySpace Video and use that more.

When Google takes YouTube and makes the transition into IPTV things will get interesting. That's when the knockout blow comes. Because suddenly it's a heavyweight fight where startups like Revver, Heavy, Metacafe and their clones will have to transition into exclusive content and licensing agreements to the larger players or become niche sites. The battle is still very much kicking up clouds of dust and while you may see YouTube's head above that could, the dust hasn't settled yet.

(Side Note) 

"Monetization" should be one of 2007's words of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is a dumping ground of junk content and bootleg media. I look at that site in terms of signal to noise ratio. Lots of noise, little signal. What happens when all of the anime, music videos, and other copyright violations are firmly stamped out on YouTube? What happens when Google shifts all of it&#8217;s Google Video over to YouTube in an attempt to legitimize the site? Will all the kids on MySpace with their overstuffed profiles still use it? Will they switch to MySpace Video and use that more.</p>
<p>When Google takes YouTube and makes the transition into IPTV things will get interesting. That&#8217;s when the knockout blow comes. Because suddenly it&#8217;s a heavyweight fight where startups like Revver, Heavy, Metacafe and their clones will have to transition into exclusive content and licensing agreements to the larger players or become niche sites. The battle is still very much kicking up clouds of dust and while you may see YouTube&#8217;s head above that could, the dust hasn&#8217;t settled yet.</p>
<p>(Side Note) </p>
<p>&#8220;Monetization&#8221; should be one of 2007&#8217;s words of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadCellZones.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821288</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadCellZones.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821288</guid>
		<description>Now I understand why I received this email below from AdSense as a publisher.  AdSense / Adwords &#38; YouTube Integration is coming and will be huge for all. 

Dear Publisher, 

After a recent review of your site, we would like to include deadcellzones.com in our custom placement packs program.  Custom placement packs are selections of individually-reviewed sites designed for our largest brand advertisers.   

We would like to feature your site more frequently in these advertiser packages, but to do so, we need you to place more image and text-enabled medium rectangle ad units (300x250) on your site. Visit https://www.google.com/adsense/adformats to see a sample of the medium rectangle unit.

The medium rectangle is the most demanded size among our brand advertisers that utilize these packages for both text and image ads. These advertisers want to ensure they reach visitors on high quality sites like yours, and are willing to bid more for ads prominently displayed on these sites.  They require that the units be placed "above the fold" on a page so that the ads are immediately visible to your site's visitors without scrolling down.

If you decide to add medium rectangle units to your site, please notify us by replying to this email so that we can begin featuring your site in more of our advertiser packages. 

We also recommend you use the newly launched ad placements feature to define your ad slots to advertisers so they can bid on specific placements on your site.  For instructions on how to create ad placements, please visit https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=50691 .  

 
Sincerely,
AdSense Support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I understand why I received this email below from AdSense as a publisher.  AdSense / Adwords &amp; YouTube Integration is coming and will be huge for all. </p>
<p>Dear Publisher, </p>
<p>After a recent review of your site, we would like to include deadcellzones.com in our custom placement packs program.  Custom placement packs are selections of individually-reviewed sites designed for our largest brand advertisers.   </p>
<p>We would like to feature your site more frequently in these advertiser packages, but to do so, we need you to place more image and text-enabled medium rectangle ad units (300&#215;250) on your site. Visit <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/adformats" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/adsense/adformats</a> to see a sample of the medium rectangle unit.</p>
<p>The medium rectangle is the most demanded size among our brand advertisers that utilize these packages for both text and image ads. These advertisers want to ensure they reach visitors on high quality sites like yours, and are willing to bid more for ads prominently displayed on these sites.  They require that the units be placed &#8220;above the fold&#8221; on a page so that the ads are immediately visible to your site&#8217;s visitors without scrolling down.</p>
<p>If you decide to add medium rectangle units to your site, please notify us by replying to this email so that we can begin featuring your site in more of our advertiser packages. </p>
<p>We also recommend you use the newly launched ad placements feature to define your ad slots to advertisers so they can bid on specific placements on your site.  For instructions on how to create ad placements, please visit <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=50691" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=50691</a> .  </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
AdSense Support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guna the Startup Booster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821225</link>
		<dc:creator>Guna the Startup Booster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821225</guid>
		<description>3 seconds ads like Josh said seems very short to make any real revenue. I've made a post on my blog yesterday about YouTube may pressure other social medias to begin to share revenue with their users. I think YouTube will find a way to make money and pretty must take over their competitors marketplace with this model. 

Also interestingly I received an email from Ty Graham today claiming that he has the patent to where YouTube is heading. You can find that on my blog as well. Check out his email an tell me if it is true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 seconds ads like Josh said seems very short to make any real revenue. I&#8217;ve made a post on my blog yesterday about YouTube may pressure other social medias to begin to share revenue with their users. I think YouTube will find a way to make money and pretty must take over their competitors marketplace with this model. </p>
<p>Also interestingly I received an email from Ty Graham today claiming that he has the patent to where YouTube is heading. You can find that on my blog as well. Check out his email an tell me if it is true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821149</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-821149</guid>
		<description>I wrote about ads on Youtube back in 2006 when Google bought it out. Find out more:
http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-9-more-things-to.html
http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-ultimate-roundup.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about ads on Youtube back in 2006 when Google bought it out. Find out more:<br />
<a href="http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-9-more-things-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://mediavidea.blogspot.com.....gs-to.html</a><br />
<a href="http://mediavidea.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-youtube-deal-ultimate-roundup.html" rel="nofollow">http://mediavidea.blogspot.com.....undup.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820735</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820735</guid>
		<description>Yay!! Commercials!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!! Commercials!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820455</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820455</guid>
		<description>3 second ads seem short. I seem to remember liking adbrite's video ad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 second ads seem short. I seem to remember liking adbrite&#8217;s video ad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820443</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820443</guid>
		<description>I think intro ads would kill You Tube.  I'm in You Tube's target age group, and I sit and watch people for 30 seconds doing stupid stuff because its funny.  Add a 5 second commercial at the beginning and I probably don't click the video.  Add it at the end and then maybe you don't lose my eyeballs.  The beauty of the viral video is that people are uploading things just because they want to be seen, not to make money.  Start paying them and the viral aspect starts to dwindle.  What's next?  Product placement?  Mentos turning the Coke and Mentos eruption videos into product placement commercials?

I'll go to MetaCafe if that happens.  Since acquisition I already go to You Tube a whole lost less since all the Comedy Central stuff has been removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think intro ads would kill You Tube.  I&#8217;m in You Tube&#8217;s target age group, and I sit and watch people for 30 seconds doing stupid stuff because its funny.  Add a 5 second commercial at the beginning and I probably don&#8217;t click the video.  Add it at the end and then maybe you don&#8217;t lose my eyeballs.  The beauty of the viral video is that people are uploading things just because they want to be seen, not to make money.  Start paying them and the viral aspect starts to dwindle.  What&#8217;s next?  Product placement?  Mentos turning the Coke and Mentos eruption videos into product placement commercials?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go to MetaCafe if that happens.  Since acquisition I already go to You Tube a whole lost less since all the Comedy Central stuff has been removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820032</link>
		<dc:creator>heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820032</guid>
		<description>i agree with chris dodge. but i remembered that google is building data centers around the country so bandwidth cost is solved. i dont see youtube generating money within a few years though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with chris dodge. but i remembered that google is building data centers around the country so bandwidth cost is solved. i dont see youtube generating money within a few years though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820023</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820023</guid>
		<description>Once YouTube starts sharing revenue with publishers Revver will be no more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once YouTube starts sharing revenue with publishers Revver will be no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820003</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-820003</guid>
		<description>I use Revver on one of my sites to try and monetize our video clips, and it's ok.  But you only get the visitors from your site viewing the videos.  If YouTube monetize, i'll definitely be shifting the videos over there and won't bother with Revver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Revver on one of my sites to try and monetize our video clips, and it&#8217;s ok.  But you only get the visitors from your site viewing the videos.  If YouTube monetize, i&#8217;ll definitely be shifting the videos over there and won&#8217;t bother with Revver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Dodge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819928</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819928</guid>
		<description>I'm still not sure how big the "pot" is to split up. After the costs of serving up the content, how much margin is there to split 4 (or more) ways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not sure how big the &#8220;pot&#8221; is to split up. After the costs of serving up the content, how much margin is there to split 4 (or more) ways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819822</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819822</guid>
		<description>Interesting, there was an article today in RedHerring about Youtube.com and LiveDigital.com about this same topic...

See article here: http://redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20993&#38;hed=YouTube+and+LiveDigital+to+Share+Ad+Profits+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, there was an article today in RedHerring about Youtube.com and LiveDigital.com about this same topic&#8230;</p>
<p>See article here: <a href="http://redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20993&amp;hed=YouTube+and+LiveDigital+to+Share+Ad+Profits+" rel="nofollow">http://redherring.com/Article......d+Profits+</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819716</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/29/youtube-delivers-knock-out-punch-to-competitors/#comment-819716</guid>
		<description>This blog entry is being directed at the impact YouTube's revenue sharing will have on the competition (hence the title). 

I like the people who comment to let us know this is old news (because if I haven't heard about it until now, it's not old... and if I have heard about it, then I don't need to be reminded that it's old). Ah, the good ol' web paradox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog entry is being directed at the impact YouTube&#8217;s revenue sharing will have on the competition (hence the title). </p>
<p>I like the people who comment to let us know this is old news (because if I haven&#8217;t heard about it until now, it&#8217;s not old&#8230; and if I have heard about it, then I don&#8217;t need to be reminded that it&#8217;s old). Ah, the good ol&#8217; web paradox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.151 seconds -->
