<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google TV - An Elaborate Hoax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google TV &#124; Poltrona.TV</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-2180157</link>
		<dc:creator>Google TV &#124; Poltrona.TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-2180157</guid>
		<description>[...] a brincadeira est&#225; cada vez melhor, como garante o TechCrunch. Para desmentir aqueles que afirmam que o Google TV &#233; um hoax, Erickson criou um segundo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a brincadeira est&aacute; cada vez melhor, como garante o TechCrunch. Para desmentir aqueles que afirmam que o Google TV &eacute; um hoax, Erickson criou um segundo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google TV Beta - Frag On Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1821149</link>
		<dc:creator>Google TV Beta - Frag On Sight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1821149</guid>
		<description>[...] if u want to waste ur time......  if u do want to try, let us know how it turns out  Google TV - An Elaborate Hoax    __________________  My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if u want to waste ur time&#8230;&#8230;  if u do want to try, let us know how it turns out  Google TV - An Elaborate Hoax    __________________  My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoogleTV is really coming soon! &#171; Gizmoojo!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1470817</link>
		<dc:creator>GoogleTV is really coming soon! &#171; Gizmoojo!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1470817</guid>
		<description>[...] while back, there were rumors and videos (that was put to rest as an elaborate hoax) signaling that Google is possibly working on a &#8220;TV&#8221; type product. Well, it appears [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back, there were rumors and videos (that was put to rest as an elaborate hoax) signaling that Google is possibly working on a &#8220;TV&#8221; type product. Well, it appears [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da Z man</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1201731</link>
		<dc:creator>Da Z man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1201731</guid>
		<description>dat guy temolate yeah i pinged www.warrock.net n i got 100% packet loss aldo i now da site iz real den i pinged tv.google.com n it could not find it den i pinged video.google.co.uk n i got 75% paket loss yeah so google tv iz probs unda anova domain yeah n 100% packet loss dusnt mean it doesnt exist. if it sais coudnt find host den it dusnt exist yeah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dat guy temolate yeah i pinged <a href="http://www.warrock.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.warrock.net</a> n i got 100% packet loss aldo i now da site iz real den i pinged tv.google.com n it could not find it den i pinged video.google.co.uk n i got 75% paket loss yeah so google tv iz probs unda anova domain yeah n 100% packet loss dusnt mean it doesnt exist. if it sais coudnt find host den it dusnt exist yeah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1154528</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1154528</guid>
		<description>Alright Someone try prove me wrong here on my statements.... I have not yet got google tv beta but if you have seen all of marks videos you can tell that he is really a smart man... Why would an older age, old fashion man like that get his jollys off on making a big hoax?  And the people who dont believe its real should try some of his other expeiriments and see if those work cuz im pretty sure that they do and if they did why would he make all these real videos of things you didnt know and then come up with a phony google tv betta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Someone try prove me wrong here on my statements&#8230;. I have not yet got google tv beta but if you have seen all of marks videos you can tell that he is really a smart man&#8230; Why would an older age, old fashion man like that get his jollys off on making a big hoax?  And the people who dont believe its real should try some of his other expeiriments and see if those work cuz im pretty sure that they do and if they did why would he make all these real videos of things you didnt know and then come up with a phony google tv betta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1136992</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1136992</guid>
		<description>this is just so retarded, im mean like, now googles getting like millions of dollars of advertising from these people who are trying to get into "google tv" i think its just a big hoax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is just so retarded, im mean like, now googles getting like millions of dollars of advertising from these people who are trying to get into &#8220;google tv&#8221; i think its just a big hoax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (ritural)_+2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100624</link>
		<dc:creator>(ritural)_+2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100624</guid>
		<description>oh yeh and again 

for the people who says its real prove you fuking point, your not helping by going

"its real loging blah blahg blah shit"

fuking dorks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeh and again </p>
<p>for the people who says its real prove you fuking point, your not helping by going</p>
<p>&#8220;its real loging blah blahg blah shit&#8221;</p>
<p>fuking dorks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (ritural)_+2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100567</link>
		<dc:creator>(ritural)_+2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100567</guid>
		<description>and on the other hand, wtf is going on with this way to apply. its so gay who would come up with somthink like that just to apply to a betta program.

it really is pointless, 

"hey apply to our better, email you self this link www.google.com/456/%$^%$"/435 and login 100000 times and you might see the tv link on the top left"

its so gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and on the other hand, wtf is going on with this way to apply. its so gay who would come up with somthink like that just to apply to a betta program.</p>
<p>it really is pointless, </p>
<p>&#8220;hey apply to our better, email you self this link <a href="http://www.google.com/456/%" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/456/%</a>^%$&#8221;/435 and login 100000 times and you might see the tv link on the top left&#8221;</p>
<p>its so gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (ritural)_+2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100540</link>
		<dc:creator>(ritural)_+2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1100540</guid>
		<description>Yeh right and who would think that google would not make up google tv. All you people who think its fake are going to get owned as soon as it comes out by google.

Check out http://whois.com/WhoisLookup.aspx?dnl=googletv.com
What do you know, google have got that domain hmmmmm i rest my case.

ttfn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh right and who would think that google would not make up google tv. All you people who think its fake are going to get owned as soon as it comes out by google.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://whois.com/WhoisLookup.aspx?dnl=googletv.com" rel="nofollow">http://whois.com/WhoisLookup.aspx?dnl=googletv.com</a><br />
What do you know, google have got that domain hmmmmm i rest my case.</p>
<p>ttfn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1095648</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1095648</guid>
		<description>Stubborn timewaster  what links did you copy and paste</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stubborn timewaster  what links did you copy and paste</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1089323</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1089323</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha. That guy's a prankster. And he's really cool! Way to go Mark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha. That guy&#8217;s a prankster. And he&#8217;s really cool! Way to go Mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stubborn timewaster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1076371</link>
		<dc:creator>Stubborn timewaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1076371</guid>
		<description>OMG !
Google guys are really working on login improvements. It took me 12 days and 3204 login attempts to get this thing work. I would do it 10000 times, it is worthy.

Wish everyone luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG !<br />
Google guys are really working on login improvements. It took me 12 days and 3204 login attempts to get this thing work. I would do it 10000 times, it is worthy.</p>
<p>Wish everyone luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1069695</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1069695</guid>
		<description>@Herald of the Great Dumas

"Would someone who’s gotten this to work please right-click on the Google TV logo, copy the link to the image, and post it? If it comes from a Google domain … that’s pretty solid proof."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Herald of the Great Dumas</p>
<p>&#8220;Would someone who’s gotten this to work please right-click on the Google TV logo, copy the link to the image, and post it? If it comes from a Google domain … that’s pretty solid proof.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herald of the Great Dumas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1050525</link>
		<dc:creator>Herald of the Great Dumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1050525</guid>
		<description>For the non-believers here this is real, I've been watching GoogleTV for a while now and it is great, if you can give me a link to a free screen capturing program I'll make a video of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the non-believers here this is real, I&#8217;ve been watching GoogleTV for a while now and it is great, if you can give me a link to a free screen capturing program I&#8217;ll make a video of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1047934</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1047934</guid>
		<description>I've tried it a billion times and I haven't gotten it to work yet. I'll really only believe it when I'm watching something on it. I hope it works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried it a billion times and I haven&#8217;t gotten it to work yet. I&#8217;ll really only believe it when I&#8217;m watching something on it. I hope it works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kath</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1011422</link>
		<dc:creator>kath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-1011422</guid>
		<description>i have a few points to make about this:
1. i will only believe it or not if i can see it in front of me, not on a video but on somebodies computer/laptop/mac screen
2. if it does work then i wouldnt do it over 100 times because i really can't be bothered when i could be doing something interesting
3. thats a bit hypocritical of me because i could be doing something interesting rather than writing this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a few points to make about this:<br />
1. i will only believe it or not if i can see it in front of me, not on a video but on somebodies computer/laptop/mac screen<br />
2. if it does work then i wouldnt do it over 100 times because i really can&#8217;t be bothered when i could be doing something interesting<br />
3. thats a bit hypocritical of me because i could be doing something interesting rather than writing this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-986470</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-986470</guid>
		<description>what about the rest of his crap? does any of it work? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNQLDgkUXvk&#38;mode=user&#38;search=
and this should tell you that this is a joke....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY8Wi7XRXCA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the rest of his crap? does any of it work? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNQLDgkUXvk&amp;mode=user&amp;search=" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....mp;search=</a><br />
and this should tell you that this is a joke&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY8Wi7XRXCA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY8Wi7XRXCA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-980746</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-980746</guid>
		<description>is this just me or has the rollover image that he shows changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this just me or has the rollover image that he shows changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De-cloaker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-933506</link>
		<dc:creator>De-cloaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-933506</guid>
		<description>The first thing I noticed that told me right away, the guy was logged into his "gmail" account without a SSL connection. DEAD GIVEAWAY! The least he could have done was spoof a SSL cert to make this authentic. ROFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing I noticed that told me right away, the guy was logged into his &#8220;gmail&#8221; account without a SSL connection. DEAD GIVEAWAY! The least he could have done was spoof a SSL cert to make this authentic. ROFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-916322</link>
		<dc:creator>scoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-916322</guid>
		<description>It may exist, mark could just be full of it. Or I could be wrong and he is just full of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may exist, mark could just be full of it. Or I could be wrong and he is just full of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KiNg_N00b</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-916308</link>
		<dc:creator>KiNg_N00b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-916308</guid>
		<description>just started poking around the net and found this


Whois Record

Registrant:
      Google Inc. (DOM-258925)
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US

  Domain Name: googletv.com

      Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com
      Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com
      Registrar Homepage: http://www.markmonitor.com

  Administrative Contact:
      DNS Admin (NIC-1467103) Google Inc.
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US
      Whois Privacy and Spam Prevention by DomainTools.com +1.6502530000 Fax- +1.6506188571
  Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
      DNS Admin (NIC-1467103) Google Inc.
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US
      Whois Privacy and Spam Prevention by DomainTools.com +1.6502530000 Fax- +1.6506188571

  Created on..............: 2000-Mar-01.
  Expires on..............: 2008-Mar-01.
  Record last updated on..: 2007-Jan-29 05:35:38.

  Domain servers in listed order:

  NS1.GOOGLE.COM
  NS2.GOOGLE.COM
  NS3.GOOGLE.COM
  NS4.GOOGLE.COM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just started poking around the net and found this</p>
<p>Whois Record</p>
<p>Registrant:<br />
      Google Inc. (DOM-258925)<br />
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US</p>
<p>  Domain Name: googletv.com</p>
<p>      Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com<br />
      Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com<br />
      Registrar Homepage: <a href="http://www.markmonitor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.markmonitor.com</a></p>
<p>  Administrative Contact:<br />
      DNS Admin (NIC-1467103) Google Inc.<br />
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US<br />
      Whois Privacy and Spam Prevention by DomainTools.com +1.6502530000 Fax- +1.6506188571<br />
  Technical Contact, Zone Contact:<br />
      DNS Admin (NIC-1467103) Google Inc.<br />
      1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US<br />
      Whois Privacy and Spam Prevention by DomainTools.com +1.6502530000 Fax- +1.6506188571</p>
<p>  Created on&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..: 2000-Mar-01.<br />
  Expires on&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..: 2008-Mar-01.<br />
  Record last updated on..: 2007-Jan-29 05:35:38.</p>
<p>  Domain servers in listed order:</p>
<p>  NS1.GOOGLE.COM<br />
  NS2.GOOGLE.COM<br />
  NS3.GOOGLE.COM<br />
  NS4.GOOGLE.COM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallsy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-896767</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-896767</guid>
		<description>&#62; If this is a hoax, which I believe it is (2000+ tries with a program and no
&#62; results), then why are there so many people saying they got it to work?
&#62; There is nothing to gain by lying that you got Erickson’s “trick” to work.
&#62; Someone enlightne me!


You get to pretend that you weren't fooled and that you're in on the joke, then make fun of anyone who believes you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; If this is a hoax, which I believe it is (2000+ tries with a program and no<br />
&gt; results), then why are there so many people saying they got it to work?<br />
&gt; There is nothing to gain by lying that you got Erickson’s “trick” to work.<br />
&gt; Someone enlightne me!</p>
<p>You get to pretend that you weren&#8217;t fooled and that you&#8217;re in on the joke, then make fun of anyone who believes you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-852846</link>
		<dc:creator>Braddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-852846</guid>
		<description>The hoax proved how foolish people can be! a major google project like this would be announced many months before on all major TV stations fools!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hoax proved how foolish people can be! a major google project like this would be announced many months before on all major TV stations fools!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjapietjap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-838844</link>
		<dc:creator>tjapietjap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-838844</guid>
		<description>wow... 1843 is THE number.. dan werkt het. Mocht het niet werken dan even een zielig mailtje naar google en ze signen je up. Als ze dat niet doen dan hebben ze ja naam gegoogled en dan blijk je een looser te zijn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230; 1843 is THE number.. dan werkt het. Mocht het niet werken dan even een zielig mailtje naar google en ze signen je up. Als ze dat niet doen dan hebben ze ja naam gegoogled en dan blijk je een looser te zijn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-838256</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/28/google-tv-an-elaborate-prank/#comment-838256</guid>
		<description>If this is a hoax, which I believe it is (2000+ tries with a program and no results), then why are there so many people saying they got it to work? There is nothing to gain by lying that you got Erickson's "trick" to work. Someone enlightne me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is a hoax, which I believe it is (2000+ tries with a program and no results), then why are there so many people saying they got it to work? There is nothing to gain by lying that you got Erickson&#8217;s &#8220;trick&#8221; to work. Someone enlightne me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.093 seconds -->
