So now that Microsoft has screwed their PlaysForSure partners they’re licensing the Zune DRM to third parties?? The only reason this isn’t a bigger story is because the Zune has already become a footnote.

I’d be interested in the reasons why you shouldn’t.

While I want to avoid giving any sort of legal advice, I gotta comment on your lawyers, Michael. They are not displaying much judgment, which is what you are paying for. You’re a blogger first and foremost and absolutely need to comment cutting edge issues, including potential illegal ones. As long as you aren’t complicit in the illegal activity, I would think that your role as commentator should be protected. I read your blog for quite awhile now because you have exhibited some good judgment in what you cover; don’t let your lawyers gut that judgment. You’ll lose readers, including me, if you water down the content. Read about the Grokster decision for yourself, ’cause your lawyers seem too scared to give you decent advice.

Coincidence?

- 53% of people hadn’t heard of DRM
- 19% have heard of it but don’t know what it is
- 15% know something about it
- 7% have a good understanding
- 5% know exactly what it means

As the fate of DRM will likely be decided by the consumers’ dollar, it appears then educating people about DRM is key to quickening the pace of DRM-free adoption.

I realize not all speech is protected, but you should be free to comment on outside events, no matter what.