<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google &#8220;Tips&#8221; Pulled?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Yahoo Search Better Than Google? : Appendum.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-2040426</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Yahoo Search Better Than Google? : Appendum.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 04:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-2040426</guid>
		<description>[...] depth:1 will include www.google.com/help/features.html because it has a single directory, but not www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled, which has three directories. This could be useful to find web pages that are important relatively [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] depth:1 will include <a href="http://www.google.com/help/features.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/help/features.html</a> because it has a single directory, but not <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007.....ips-pulled</a>, which has three directories. This could be useful to find web pages that are important relatively [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-675863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-675863</guid>
		<description>I personally agree with people who see no evil here. It IS their site and they'd be fullish not to promote their services there, either as sponsored or organic results. No harm done. What I find amusing is if you search MSN for "spreadsheets", Google Spearsheets links come up above the rest :) Is MS so fair that they don't promote Office on their own search engine? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally agree with people who see no evil here. It IS their site and they&#8217;d be fullish not to promote their services there, either as sponsored or organic results. No harm done. What I find amusing is if you search MSN for &#8220;spreadsheets&#8221;, Google Spearsheets links come up above the rest <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Is MS so fair that they don&#8217;t promote Office on their own search engine? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredhead</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-668320</link>
		<dc:creator>fredhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-668320</guid>
		<description>in addition its interesting to look at how google promotes its services in its own web results - this is surely more 'evil' than tips. e.g. im sure google spreadsheets its not the most relevant thing for this search even though its in the first 2 results twice:  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#38;lr=&#38;q=spreadsheets&#38;btnG=Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in addition its interesting to look at how google promotes its services in its own web results - this is surely more &#8216;evil&#8217; than tips. e.g. im sure google spreadsheets its not the most relevant thing for this search even though its in the first 2 results twice:  <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;q=spreadsheets&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?h.....tnG=Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google “Tips” Pulled? &#171; Universe_JDJ&#8217;s News Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-664290</link>
		<dc:creator>Google “Tips” Pulled? &#171; Universe_JDJ&#8217;s News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-664290</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-664243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-664243</guid>
		<description>@7136398

i think ryanw was right in what he said, you're just not comprehending it.  take this example:

internet explorer is dominant in MARKET SHARE compared to firefox.
according to most of the blog-o-web, firefox is by far the superior browser.
by your logic everyone who claims firefox is better is wrong because more people use internet explorer, so i.e. must be better.  
yet, i.e. is not BETTER, they just have a more widely known name - hence dominant market share.

more people using, voting for or whatever does not make a thing - be it website, software or person - better.  ownership of the market and product quality don't have to go hand-in-hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@7136398</p>
<p>i think ryanw was right in what he said, you&#8217;re just not comprehending it.  take this example:</p>
<p>internet explorer is dominant in MARKET SHARE compared to firefox.<br />
according to most of the blog-o-web, firefox is by far the superior browser.<br />
by your logic everyone who claims firefox is better is wrong because more people use internet explorer, so i.e. must be better.<br />
yet, i.e. is not BETTER, they just have a more widely known name - hence dominant market share.</p>
<p>more people using, voting for or whatever does not make a thing - be it website, software or person - better.  ownership of the market and product quality don&#8217;t have to go hand-in-hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Savoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663914</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Savoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663914</guid>
		<description>Credit Google with the foresight to realize how quickly company goodwill can dissipate as the 800 lb gorilla of the internet. Microsoft 
only paid attention to its stock price with an attitude towards their customers that said try to do without us, where you gonna go?

Microsoft first bought up any company they felt, hey, maybe this is the Windows Killer , secondly loaded up their software with all sorts
of gizmos, IE browser capability, unrelated to their core product and what was eventually determined to be anti-trust.

Google has great instincts common sense to realize why antagonize 
the web. our customers, clients?? a good business practices concept tMicrosoft is absolutely incapable of comprehending. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit Google with the foresight to realize how quickly company goodwill can dissipate as the 800 lb gorilla of the internet. Microsoft<br />
only paid attention to its stock price with an attitude towards their customers that said try to do without us, where you gonna go?</p>
<p>Microsoft first bought up any company they felt, hey, maybe this is the Windows Killer , secondly loaded up their software with all sorts<br />
of gizmos, IE browser capability, unrelated to their core product and what was eventually determined to be anti-trust.</p>
<p>Google has great instincts common sense to realize why antagonize<br />
the web. our customers, clients?? a good business practices concept tMicrosoft is absolutely incapable of comprehending. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Tea Time (Weekly Roundup) &#187; TheMadHat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663887</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Tea Time (Weekly Roundup) &#187; TheMadHat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663887</guid>
		<description>[...] * I initially wasn&#8217;t going to include this, but Google pulls it tips from searches. Overreaction in my opinion, I didn&#8217;t mind them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * I initially wasn&#8217;t going to include this, but Google pulls it tips from searches. Overreaction in my opinion, I didn&#8217;t mind them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7136398</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663547</link>
		<dc:creator>7136398</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663547</guid>
		<description>@RyanW:

"I think we need only look at myspace to see an example of a poor product with lots of better alternatives that is blowing the competition away in terms of marketshare."

I think you need a different definition of "better".  If it is "blowing away the competition", then it _is_ better.  Maybe, in theory, the site could be prettier or easier to use, and in some way be better still, but if it is used more, then those are simply more people "voting" for it as their choice for the better alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RyanW:</p>
<p>&#8220;I think we need only look at myspace to see an example of a poor product with lots of better alternatives that is blowing the competition away in terms of marketshare.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you need a different definition of &#8220;better&#8221;.  If it is &#8220;blowing away the competition&#8221;, then it _is_ better.  Maybe, in theory, the site could be prettier or easier to use, and in some way be better still, but if it is used more, then those are simply more people &#8220;voting&#8221; for it as their choice for the better alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Diggity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Diggity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-663419</guid>
		<description>HAHA...Google got Pwn'd!! Listen to the users cause we are your master!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA&#8230;Google got Pwn&#8217;d!! Listen to the users cause we are your master!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662841</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662841</guid>
		<description>A handful of bloggers moan means "the world generally piled on". Come on, get a grip on reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A handful of bloggers moan means &#8220;the world generally piled on&#8221;. Come on, get a grip on reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvirs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662683</link>
		<dc:creator>elvirs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662683</guid>
		<description>few days ago my the java runtime environment asked for update and during update the window saying "download google toolbar" and "download google desktop" was there, toolbar one was already checked but the desktop was not. 
obviously google agreed with sun, but just a moment, what if microsoft does the same with windows for their live services? then google will get fckd:)
i think google should step back from this agressive strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>few days ago my the java runtime environment asked for update and during update the window saying &#8220;download google toolbar&#8221; and &#8220;download google desktop&#8221; was there, toolbar one was already checked but the desktop was not.<br />
obviously google agreed with sun, but just a moment, what if microsoft does the same with windows for their live services? then google will get fckd:)<br />
i think google should step back from this agressive strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Word (Beta)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662626</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Word (Beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662626</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Advertisements where you wouldn't expect them...&lt;/strong&gt;

The latest buzz doing the round of all the 'well-known' bloggers is how Google has begun pushing it's own services. Unfortunately or not, this is true. If you do a search for anything which has a remo......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Advertisements where you wouldn&#8217;t expect them&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The latest buzz doing the round of all the &#8216;well-known&#8217; bloggers is how Google has begun pushing it&#8217;s own services. Unfortunately or not, this is true. If you do a search for anything which has a remo&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techulate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662386</link>
		<dc:creator>Techulate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Caves in to the Blogosphere, Removes Tips...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yes, you read that right, Google has caved in to pressure from the blogosphere and removed the tips which were advertising it's own services above search results on their search engine. I made my opinion on the matter quite clear in this post, but in ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Caves in to the Blogosphere, Removes Tips&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yes, you read that right, Google has caved in to pressure from the blogosphere and removed the tips which were advertising it&#8217;s own services above search results on their search engine. I made my opinion on the matter quite clear in this post, but in &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalwar.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google entfernt &#8220;Tipps&#8221; bei Suchergebnissen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662060</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalwar.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google entfernt &#8220;Tipps&#8221; bei Suchergebnissen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662060</guid>
		<description>[...] via Techcrunch, mich überrascht es ein bisschen aber auf jeden Fall eine gute Sache. Bis vor ein paar Tagen noch erschienen bei Suchen wie z.B. &#8220;Blog&#8221; oder &#8220;Kalendar&#8221; über dem Suchergebniss (und auch über den AdWords Anzeigen) ein &#8220;Tipp&#8221; vom jeweiligen Google Pedant, also z.B. Blogger.com oder Google Calendar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Techcrunch, mich überrascht es ein bisschen aber auf jeden Fall eine gute Sache. Bis vor ein paar Tagen noch erschienen bei Suchen wie z.B. &#8220;Blog&#8221; oder &#8220;Kalendar&#8221; über dem Suchergebniss (und auch über den AdWords Anzeigen) ein &#8220;Tipp&#8221; vom jeweiligen Google Pedant, also z.B. Blogger.com oder Google Calendar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dory</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-662033</guid>
		<description>Does not look like they have stopped

25 searches result Google as a result on first page. Often  either sponsored or conveniently ranked. 50 ads where found all together in this short search. 20 ads(40%) of which where sponsored results.

View ad screenshots. http://img113.imageshack.us/my.php?image=google2007cm3.gif

Search Terms used.
Books, patent search, Video, News, Maps, Email, Calendar, Calendars, Spreadsheets, 
Spreadsheet, On-line payments, Online payments, Payments, Desktop, Earth, Finance, 
Business News, Mobile, Blog, Globe, Online Shop, Online Shopping, Web, Web Accelerator,
Sketch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not look like they have stopped</p>
<p>25 searches result Google as a result on first page. Often  either sponsored or conveniently ranked. 50 ads where found all together in this short search. 20 ads(40%) of which where sponsored results.</p>
<p>View ad screenshots. <a href="http://img113.imageshack.us/my.php?image=google2007cm3.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img113.imageshack.us/my.....007cm3.gif</a></p>
<p>Search Terms used.<br />
Books, patent search, Video, News, Maps, Email, Calendar, Calendars, Spreadsheets,<br />
Spreadsheet, On-line payments, Online payments, Payments, Desktop, Earth, Finance,<br />
Business News, Mobile, Blog, Globe, Online Shop, Online Shopping, Web, Web Accelerator,<br />
Sketch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661964</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661964</guid>
		<description>Maybe Blake Ross should also listen to bloggers complaints about Firefox?

Disclaimer: I use Firefox and think it's great but there's some bugs that are a constant nuisance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Blake Ross should also listen to bloggers complaints about Firefox?</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I use Firefox and think it&#8217;s great but there&#8217;s some bugs that are a constant nuisance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Business - &#187; Google preference to their own products in search results</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661762</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Business - &#187; Google preference to their own products in search results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661762</guid>
		<description>[...] Google preference to their own products in search results   By ian There was some controversy over google giving preference to some of its own products within search results. I dont think this is the right thing to do, imagine the money they could make by acquiring new companies and pushing them to the top of their search results. But they would also lose a lot of credibility as well. According to this post at techcrunch, they have stopped doing that. Once a company gets to the size of google, they come under all kinds of scrutiny and strict standards, like those imposed on Microsoft. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google preference to their own products in search results   By ian There was some controversy over google giving preference to some of its own products within search results. I dont think this is the right thing to do, imagine the money they could make by acquiring new companies and pushing them to the top of their search results. But they would also lose a lot of credibility as well. According to this post at techcrunch, they have stopped doing that. Once a company gets to the size of google, they come under all kinds of scrutiny and strict standards, like those imposed on Microsoft. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661636</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661636</guid>
		<description>I find it strange how many people here are complaining that Google gave into "bloggers" given that, as far as I can tell, the vast majority of people disagreed with my position on these tips. I spent many hours debating (and reconsidering, and reshaping) that position.

I know from working on Firefox how important it is to put feedback in perspective, and I'm confident (and happy) that Google is not the kind of company that makes rash decisions based on whoever is loudest. If the recent discussions played any role in Google's decision to turn off the tips, I imagine it was simply to spark some debate within the company. And that's fine by me, since that was the only purpose of the post in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it strange how many people here are complaining that Google gave into &#8220;bloggers&#8221; given that, as far as I can tell, the vast majority of people disagreed with my position on these tips. I spent many hours debating (and reconsidering, and reshaping) that position.</p>
<p>I know from working on Firefox how important it is to put feedback in perspective, and I&#8217;m confident (and happy) that Google is not the kind of company that makes rash decisions based on whoever is loudest. If the recent discussions played any role in Google&#8217;s decision to turn off the tips, I imagine it was simply to spark some debate within the company. And that&#8217;s fine by me, since that was the only purpose of the post in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661594</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661594</guid>
		<description>fancis - yep. see #3 above. and my original post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fancis - yep. see #3 above. and my original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 03:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-661060</guid>
		<description>"Tips" may be gone, but a quick search for "spreadsheet" and "calendar" resulted in links to Google services at the top of the page in a sponsored link box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tips&#8221; may be gone, but a quick search for &#8220;spreadsheet&#8221; and &#8220;calendar&#8221; resulted in links to Google services at the top of the page in a sponsored link box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fancis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660977</link>
		<dc:creator>fancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660977</guid>
		<description>Big Deal. You know what? YOU would promote your own products over other crappier competitors as well. Man, I saw it and i didn't care. Bloggers really need to suck it up. I just saw post here on techcrunch over crunchgear. Is that as bad? No because they are getting the word out about one of their related products. That is exactly what google is doing. Bloggers need to suck it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Deal. You know what? YOU would promote your own products over other crappier competitors as well. Man, I saw it and i didn&#8217;t care. Bloggers really need to suck it up. I just saw post here on techcrunch over crunchgear. Is that as bad? No because they are getting the word out about one of their related products. That is exactly what google is doing. Bloggers need to suck it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pushpendrakumar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660789</link>
		<dc:creator>pushpendrakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660789</guid>
		<description>That Ok,
cHHERS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Ok,<br />
cHHERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660786</link>
		<dc:creator>John Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660786</guid>
		<description>I suspect it was more about annoyed advertisers rather than a concession to the whiny bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect it was more about annoyed advertisers rather than a concession to the whiny bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660764</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660764</guid>
		<description>#20, #22, sure. and just for the record, i said google had every right to do this, and i had no issue with it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#20, #22, sure. and just for the record, i said google had every right to do this, and i had no issue with it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pushpendrakumar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660748</link>
		<dc:creator>pushpendrakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/04/google-tips-pulled/#comment-660748</guid>
		<description>yes, I think Brandon is right, his comment makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, I think Brandon is right, his comment makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.095 seconds -->
