<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Woes, cont&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Nirvana -- by Mario Sundar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-1088140</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Nirvana -- by Mario Sundar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-1088140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gmail is starting to bug&#160;me!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Quick update: Google woes, cont&#8230; from Michael Arrington. Back to my original post &#8211;
Strike 1, Strike 2, and Corporate Blog Blues
Strike 1   
After all the love&#8230;Gmail is starting to bug me with its incessant problems. Not a great way t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gmail is starting to bug&nbsp;me!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Quick update: Google woes, cont&#8230; from Michael Arrington. Back to my original post &#8211;<br />
Strike 1, Strike 2, and Corporate Blog Blues<br />
Strike 1<br />
After all the love&#8230;Gmail is starting to bug me with its incessant problems. Not a great way t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazily</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-770592</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-770592</guid>
		<description>Google Blog Search is down tonight, add it to the list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Blog Search is down tonight, add it to the list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johan web20 blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659865</link>
		<dc:creator>johan web20 blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659865</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The power of Google...&lt;/strong&gt;

I noticed that there are quite a lot of rather negative postings about Google on sites I often vi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The power of Google&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I noticed that there are quite a lot of rather negative postings about Google on sites I often vi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edukált kommunikációs blog » Blog Archive &#187; A Google se nem ördög, se nem angyal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659538</link>
		<dc:creator>Edukált kommunikációs blog » Blog Archive &#187; A Google se nem ördög, se nem angyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659538</guid>
		<description>[...] Ehhez képest az ünnepek alatt a Google több hibába is belefutott. Ezek közül szerintem a legszemléletesebb (és a legkevésbé technikai) a Google javaslata, hogy milyen Naptárat használjunk. Ha az elmúlt napokban valaki a Calendar szóra keresett, akkor a legelső (akár fizetett link előtt is) tippként a Google Calendart ajánlotta neki a rendszer. Ehhez hasonló eredményre vezetett a Blog kifejezés is. Persze erre még akár vállat is vonhatnánk. Ami viszont már végképp túlzásnak tűnik, hogy a Yahoo Calendarra keresve is megmaradt a tipp. (Mára a Google eltűntette ezeket a tippeket, ezért nem linkeltem be a találati oldalakat.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ehhez képest az ünnepek alatt a Google több hibába is belefutott. Ezek közül szerintem a legszemléletesebb (és a legkevésbé technikai) a Google javaslata, hogy milyen Naptárat használjunk. Ha az elmúlt napokban valaki a Calendar szóra keresett, akkor a legelső (akár fizetett link előtt is) tippként a Google Calendart ajánlotta neki a rendszer. Ehhez hasonló eredményre vezetett a Blog kifejezés is. Persze erre még akár vállat is vonhatnánk. Ami viszont már végképp túlzásnak tűnik, hogy a Yahoo Calendarra keresve is megmaradt a tipp. (Mára a Google eltűntette ezeket a tippeket, ezért nem linkeltem be a találati oldalakat.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzRun.com &#187; Archive &#187; Google Under Fire in the Blogosphere. Trust them or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659229</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzRun.com &#187; Archive &#187; Google Under Fire in the Blogosphere. Trust them or not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-659229</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: See TechCrunch&#8217;s post on the latest Google Woes that continue to pile up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: See TechCrunch&#8217;s post on the latest Google Woes that continue to pile up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You other brothers can&#8217;t deny the trends &#171; Ralston Ventures</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-657324</link>
		<dc:creator>You other brothers can&#8217;t deny the trends &#171; Ralston Ventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-657324</guid>
		<description>[...] You other brothers can&#8217;t deny the&#160;trends January 4th, 2007   Google finally stopped the bleeding and did something right today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You other brothers can&#8217;t deny the&nbsp;trends January 4th, 2007   Google finally stopped the bleeding and did something right today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-654161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-654161</guid>
		<description>Thank you for filing coming to terms with your Google addiction, Mike.

It took a while, but you finally realized that Google is the next Evil Empire. At least MS didn't have the temerity to claim that their evil acts were actually disguised benevolence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for filing coming to terms with your Google addiction, Mike.</p>
<p>It took a while, but you finally realized that Google is the next Evil Empire. At least MS didn&#8217;t have the temerity to claim that their evil acts were actually disguised benevolence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-653876</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-653876</guid>
		<description>Blogger Status page seems to be up for me. Took this image just a couple minutes ago.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sr74/344480729/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger Status page seems to be up for me. Took this image just a couple minutes ago.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sr74/344480729/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/sr74/344480729/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortshire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-653347</link>
		<dc:creator>shortshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-653347</guid>
		<description>Google guy must of had one crazy New Years.  My Gmail is down with the 766 error.  I checked with others and they had the same problem.  A few months ago I was having problems with their analytics.  The analytics is working now but it was a pain back then. 

Google just needs to take a breath and fix a few little bugs.  Everyone that is trying to out Google Google, will capitalize on these things so Google just needs to take a breath and then go full force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google guy must of had one crazy New Years.  My Gmail is down with the 766 error.  I checked with others and they had the same problem.  A few months ago I was having problems with their analytics.  The analytics is working now but it was a pain back then. </p>
<p>Google just needs to take a breath and fix a few little bugs.  Everyone that is trying to out Google Google, will capitalize on these things so Google just needs to take a breath and then go full force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleverr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-652961</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleverr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-652961</guid>
		<description>I think aggregating the woes into one post and referencing them may, given the popularity of this blog, push us closer to the Google tipping point. We inherently seek patterns and risk sensationalizing minor issues: "Google problems? Oh no, Google problems! Oh, here's a few more Google problems! Just like the rest of the Google problems! Google is problematic! Oh no! What am I going to do now?!"

I found Google in 2000 and it was the underdog. To me it will always be that underdog, doing useful things, benevolently, in the face of so much Machiavellian evil in Redmond, in spite of it's +/- 50% share of the search market. 

I think a lot of the comments above are missing the point: this is obviously not a ploy to get more traffic to TechCrunch. I agree that there continues to be balanced reporting. Relating similar issues might be interpreted as a slant here, but that interpretation would be wrong. 

What I don't like is the potential for snowballing negativity that linking 6 recent Google problems has on the perception of reality in the minds of those who won't read the actual posts. Hopefully informed, rational readers will see past it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think aggregating the woes into one post and referencing them may, given the popularity of this blog, push us closer to the Google tipping point. We inherently seek patterns and risk sensationalizing minor issues: &#8220;Google problems? Oh no, Google problems! Oh, here&#8217;s a few more Google problems! Just like the rest of the Google problems! Google is problematic! Oh no! What am I going to do now?!&#8221;</p>
<p>I found Google in 2000 and it was the underdog. To me it will always be that underdog, doing useful things, benevolently, in the face of so much Machiavellian evil in Redmond, in spite of it&#8217;s +/- 50% share of the search market. </p>
<p>I think a lot of the comments above are missing the point: this is obviously not a ploy to get more traffic to TechCrunch. I agree that there continues to be balanced reporting. Relating similar issues might be interpreted as a slant here, but that interpretation would be wrong. </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t like is the potential for snowballing negativity that linking 6 recent Google problems has on the perception of reality in the minds of those who won&#8217;t read the actual posts. Hopefully informed, rational readers will see past it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-652927</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-652927</guid>
		<description>And the google mail deletion, had nothing to do with google! they were firefox bugs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the google mail deletion, had nothing to do with google! they were firefox bugs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rulepark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-651077</link>
		<dc:creator>Rulepark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-651077</guid>
		<description>Mike, dun resign cuz of this unharmful comments...hahaha....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, dun resign cuz of this unharmful comments&#8230;hahaha&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarry Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-651034</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarry Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-651034</guid>
		<description>I must admit, TechCrunch and even GigaOM are turning into some really frustrated folks. I guessed these guys/gals are being snubbed by industry folks and any hope of selling their *blog* (duh) to anyone is rapidly disappearing. 

And hey after all these guys are just bloggers who get to shoulder the barrel on their shoulder while someone else fires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, TechCrunch and even GigaOM are turning into some really frustrated folks. I guessed these guys/gals are being snubbed by industry folks and any hope of selling their *blog* (duh) to anyone is rapidly disappearing. </p>
<p>And hey after all these guys are just bloggers who get to shoulder the barrel on their shoulder while someone else fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650774</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650774</guid>
		<description>Google is just taking on too much too quickly. They need to go back to their previous way of working. They did one thing at a time and they did it well. Now they're grabbing everything they can and doing it all at once. It's a stupid way to work. They need to concentrate on one or two services at a time and making them work perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is just taking on too much too quickly. They need to go back to their previous way of working. They did one thing at a time and they did it well. Now they&#8217;re grabbing everything they can and doing it all at once. It&#8217;s a stupid way to work. They need to concentrate on one or two services at a time and making them work perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650613</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650613</guid>
		<description>Hahaha! You commenters make me laugh! Please breathe a bit and realize that Michael is NOT writing about your mothers so please do not react so offended...

I think it is very interesting to see how Michael is noticing a trend at Google and maybe in about a year after the collapse of the Google empire you will all see how right he was :) (or maybe not, but it still is newsworthy to me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha! You commenters make me laugh! Please breathe a bit and realize that Michael is NOT writing about your mothers so please do not react so offended&#8230;</p>
<p>I think it is very interesting to see how Michael is noticing a trend at Google and maybe in about a year after the collapse of the Google empire you will all see how right he was <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> (or maybe not, but it still is newsworthy to me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650572</link>
		<dc:creator>daya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650572</guid>
		<description>have been Google lover, and have been using all the Google service as they come out, and have been experience googles horrible service nowdays. 

When they came out with their Picasa web album invite, I am one of the few who crabbed it first and have been enjoying their service.

I finished my 250Mb photo upload option in few days  Since, my storage limit has finished, I had only two option, either to delete the photos I have uploaded, else, upgrade my storage by paying so that, I could upload new photos.  

Hence, I decided to pay and opt for 6 GB storage, Since, the time, I have upgraded my storage to 6 GB, for last 15 days, trying day and night, all that I could upload was mere 2 MB of photos, while the free 250MB storage of photo were uploaded in a day or two.

I checked all that possible tweaks, and tricks, even try to use the web browser based upload but not use. I wrote to Google, as usual, when in trouble, Google never replies.

Tried their forums, groups, help, FAQ, no use at all.

The worst think happen is that, I recommended Picasa service two of my friend, who just like me, opt for the paid upgradation of their storage, since, they also, have similar story of not able to upload any photos or if at all they could do just one photo in a day.

So As on now, just sticking back to flickr and riya photo upload service.

So, dear user, be careful, think twice, before upgrading to goggles Picasa 6GB or any paid storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have been Google lover, and have been using all the Google service as they come out, and have been experience googles horrible service nowdays. </p>
<p>When they came out with their Picasa web album invite, I am one of the few who crabbed it first and have been enjoying their service.</p>
<p>I finished my 250Mb photo upload option in few days  Since, my storage limit has finished, I had only two option, either to delete the photos I have uploaded, else, upgrade my storage by paying so that, I could upload new photos.  </p>
<p>Hence, I decided to pay and opt for 6 GB storage, Since, the time, I have upgraded my storage to 6 GB, for last 15 days, trying day and night, all that I could upload was mere 2 MB of photos, while the free 250MB storage of photo were uploaded in a day or two.</p>
<p>I checked all that possible tweaks, and tricks, even try to use the web browser based upload but not use. I wrote to Google, as usual, when in trouble, Google never replies.</p>
<p>Tried their forums, groups, help, FAQ, no use at all.</p>
<p>The worst think happen is that, I recommended Picasa service two of my friend, who just like me, opt for the paid upgradation of their storage, since, they also, have similar story of not able to upload any photos or if at all they could do just one photo in a day.</p>
<p>So As on now, just sticking back to flickr and riya photo upload service.</p>
<p>So, dear user, be careful, think twice, before upgrading to goggles Picasa 6GB or any paid storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650482</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650482</guid>
		<description>Mike - keep up the informative posts -- esp about Google.  

People forget that without Google and the 'long tail' it created none of this web 2.o ajaxiness would have had as much traction and media coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - keep up the informative posts &#8212; esp about Google.  </p>
<p>People forget that without Google and the &#8216;long tail&#8217; it created none of this web 2.o ajaxiness would have had as much traction and media coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srini</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650205</link>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650205</guid>
		<description>Can you blame Mike?  Any mundane post about Google brings traffic and at least 50 comments.  

Techcrunch and other blogs are all about the traffic.

We, the audience, are to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you blame Mike?  Any mundane post about Google brings traffic and at least 50 comments.  </p>
<p>Techcrunch and other blogs are all about the traffic.</p>
<p>We, the audience, are to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not anony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650056</link>
		<dc:creator>not anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650056</guid>
		<description>Guys, you need to relax. It is not a crime to be critical of Google. Just thank your stars that Michael is just reporting on service problems and he is not wasting our time uncovering conspiracies of Google being in bed with the CIA!

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, you need to relax. It is not a crime to be critical of Google. Just thank your stars that Michael is just reporting on service problems and he is not wasting our time uncovering conspiracies of Google being in bed with the CIA!</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Goog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650027</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Goog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-650027</guid>
		<description>Mike - keep up the great posts.

The truth of the matter is that Google is abusing the piles of cash they collected from 401k and pension funds. Why are they spending so much money on projects that they can't make money on? simple - because they can afford it. Just as microsoft drove dozens of software companies out of the market by giving WordPad for free. In effect - they killed any small company that could have grown to compete with MS-WORD - no matter how good this small company is - they can't compete with a free product.

Google in effect is doing the same? I work for a software company that actually sells software services. Our products are much higher in quality than google's. Our customer's would not tolerate 13 hour downtime!. However, we do charge for services and google doesn't. They can afford it because they raised 9B $ in cash and wall street allows them to get away with those stupidities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - keep up the great posts.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that Google is abusing the piles of cash they collected from 401k and pension funds. Why are they spending so much money on projects that they can&#8217;t make money on? simple - because they can afford it. Just as microsoft drove dozens of software companies out of the market by giving WordPad for free. In effect - they killed any small company that could have grown to compete with MS-WORD - no matter how good this small company is - they can&#8217;t compete with a free product.</p>
<p>Google in effect is doing the same? I work for a software company that actually sells software services. Our products are much higher in quality than google&#8217;s. Our customer&#8217;s would not tolerate 13 hour downtime!. However, we do charge for services and google doesn&#8217;t. They can afford it because they raised 9B $ in cash and wall street allows them to get away with those stupidities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falcon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649992</link>
		<dc:creator>falcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649992</guid>
		<description>Google has become incredibly important in many of our daily lives.  It has huge amount of information about us.  The author most certainly should look at Google with a critical eye.  Don't worry about those who complain about your 'google bashing.'

"To whom much is given, much is expected."
"Heavy is the head that wears the crown."
etc., etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has become incredibly important in many of our daily lives.  It has huge amount of information about us.  The author most certainly should look at Google with a critical eye.  Don&#8217;t worry about those who complain about your &#8216;google bashing.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;To whom much is given, much is expected.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Heavy is the head that wears the crown.&#8221;<br />
etc., etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649914</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649914</guid>
		<description>No, I don't work at Google, so it's hardly a threat in that sense.  It just seems like this site is in such a rush to find the "next Google" that it may be over-eager in tearing down the current one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t work at Google, so it&#8217;s hardly a threat in that sense.  It just seems like this site is in such a rush to find the &#8220;next Google&#8221; that it may be over-eager in tearing down the current one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Cefalu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649883</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Cefalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649883</guid>
		<description>@Beau

Beau Dietl?  If this is Beau Dietl, you got problsm Micheal lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beau</p>
<p>Beau Dietl?  If this is Beau Dietl, you got problsm Micheal lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649778</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649778</guid>
		<description>Google makes a great read for some. For other people, all they want to read about is the next hot company. If you don't want to read about Google, just jump over to somewhere else. I'm sure Mike will be uncovering the next "FreakDesignWeAreNotPhotoShop" site before the night is done. He always does, and that is why I check his site daily. 

Right now, there are some major issues at Google, and I'm sure as big as they are, they are scrambling this week to fix it all. You know, so the blogosphere will get off their back! ;) 

Rex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google makes a great read for some. For other people, all they want to read about is the next hot company. If you don&#8217;t want to read about Google, just jump over to somewhere else. I&#8217;m sure Mike will be uncovering the next &#8220;FreakDesignWeAreNotPhotoShop&#8221; site before the night is done. He always does, and that is why I check his site daily. </p>
<p>Right now, there are some major issues at Google, and I&#8217;m sure as big as they are, they are scrambling this week to fix it all. You know, so the blogosphere will get off their back! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Grote</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649762</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Grote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/02/google-woes-cont/#comment-649762</guid>
		<description>Everyone has thought that Google can scale as much as needed, but can they? Are some of these issues, including search, related to capacity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has thought that Google can scale as much as needed, but can they? Are some of these issues, including search, related to capacity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.104 seconds -->
