<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Top Searches: Based on Everything and Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:29:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! Announces Top Searches In 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-3008638</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo! Announces Top Searches In 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-3008638</guid>
		<description>[...] hasn&#8217;t released their figures for this year yet, but you can see what they were last year. If that is any indication of Google search trends then you can bet that the top searches this year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hasn&#8217;t released their figures for this year yet, but you can see what they were last year. If that is any indication of Google search trends then you can bet that the top searches this year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap kaspersky key</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2821343</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap kaspersky key</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2821343</guid>
		<description>I think google results is based on quality and how many visitors visit the website. Because when people visit more based on one particular keywords. When people search that particular keywords that website which is most visited will come out first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google results is based on quality and how many visitors visit the website. Because when people visit more based on one particular keywords. When people search that particular keywords that website which is most visited will come out first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2646367</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2646367</guid>
		<description>Please check out my blog out and leave your comments. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check out my blog out and leave your comments. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: software updateAsk.com Has Top Searches Too; They’re Just Really Boring &#124; 82123</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2552592</link>
		<dc:creator>software updateAsk.com Has Top Searches Too; They’re Just Really Boring &#124; 82123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2552592</guid>
		<description>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whoehoe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ask.com Has Top Searches Too; They’re Just Really Boring</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2552266</link>
		<dc:creator>Whoehoe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ask.com Has Top Searches Too; They’re Just Really Boring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2552266</guid>
		<description>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask.com Has Top Searches Too; They&#8217;re Just Really Boring</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2552207</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask.com Has Top Searches Too; They&#8217;re Just Really Boring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2552207</guid>
		<description>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] play the game. To compile these, big search engines take all the top search terms for the year and promptly throw the data out. They then compile a list of terms that they think properly reflects key trends that people are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2534134</link>
		<dc:creator>Pesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2534134</guid>
		<description>Nobody knows if the top searched terms are really those. As time goes by people change along with it like interests and searched words.
xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody knows if the top searched terms are really those. As time goes by people change along with it like interests and searched words.<br />
xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbrian017</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-2482938</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrian017</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-2482938</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s completely meaningless I think the list has much potential for webmaster trying to make a buck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s completely meaningless I think the list has much potential for webmaster trying to make a buck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Le Top des recherches Yahoo 2007: Encore et toujours Britney</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-1807645</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Le Top des recherches Yahoo 2007: Encore et toujours Britney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1807645</guid>
		<description>[...] avaient du clarifier un peu le processus de fabrication de cette liste suite à des protestations .En conclusion ,ils avaient annoncé qu&#8217;ils donnaient plus d&#8217;influence au contenu nouveau plutôt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] avaient du clarifier un peu le processus de fabrication de cette liste suite à des protestations .En conclusion ,ils avaient annoncé qu&#8217;ils donnaient plus d&#8217;influence au contenu nouveau plutôt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Announces Fastest Growing Search Terms</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-1807643</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Announces Fastest Growing Search Terms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1807643</guid>
		<description>[...] top search trends for 2007. Google&#8217;s list traditionally come later in December (here&#8217;s last years list), but today VP of Search and User Experience Marissa Mayer revealed the &#8220;fastest rising U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top search trends for 2007. Google&#8217;s list traditionally come later in December (here&#8217;s last years list), but today VP of Search and User Experience Marissa Mayer revealed the &#8220;fastest rising U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Announces Fastest Growing Search Terms</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-1807642</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Announces Fastest Growing Search Terms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1807642</guid>
		<description>[...] top search trends for 2007. Google&#8217;s list traditionally come later in December (here&#8217;s last years list), but today VP of Search and User Experience Marissa Mayer revealed the &#8220;fastest rising U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top search trends for 2007. Google&#8217;s list traditionally come later in December (here&#8217;s last years list), but today VP of Search and User Experience Marissa Mayer revealed the &#8220;fastest rising U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voizd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Zeitgeist vs Yahoo Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-1358750</link>
		<dc:creator>Voizd &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Zeitgeist vs Yahoo Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1358750</guid>
		<description>[...] many servers that they have present in various locations. Google’s yearly list of 2006, however, raised a few eyebrows when certain unlikely terms like Bebo made it to the top of the list. Google’s explanation was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many servers that they have present in various locations. Google’s yearly list of 2006, however, raised a few eyebrows when certain unlikely terms like Bebo made it to the top of the list. Google’s explanation was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yasmin koreshi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-2/#comment-1207543</link>
		<dc:creator>yasmin koreshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1207543</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bulk tramadol...&lt;/strong&gt;

prozac and facial edema...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bulk tramadol&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>prozac and facial edema&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lil Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-1083783</link>
		<dc:creator>Lil Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-1083783</guid>
		<description>It is amazing how a name such as bebo which had little traffic in 2005 can be the top searched word in 2006!

That should give us all some encouragement!

We may be a nobody one day to standing on top of the world the next day.

Hard work does pay off in the end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how a name such as bebo which had little traffic in 2005 can be the top searched word in 2006!</p>
<p>That should give us all some encouragement!</p>
<p>We may be a nobody one day to standing on top of the world the next day.</p>
<p>Hard work does pay off in the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-950319</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-950319</guid>
		<description>Google really needs help on alot of there methods of search engine placement. You search for something the results show websites that are 2 - 3 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google really needs help on alot of there methods of search engine placement. You search for something the results show websites that are 2 &#8211; 3 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dipankar Chakraborty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-943565</link>
		<dc:creator>Dipankar Chakraborty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-943565</guid>
		<description>I like the methodology and idology of Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the methodology and idology of Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-908541</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-908541</guid>
		<description>I am so happy and excited to know that rebelde is in the top I mean. Just to think of that it all started as a Mexican novela (soap opera) and now they are the hottest music group in the world. Every one knows them, not just Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so happy and excited to know that rebelde is in the top I mean. Just to think of that it all started as a Mexican novela (soap opera) and now they are the hottest music group in the world. Every one knows them, not just Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-675982</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-675982</guid>
		<description>I agree with the methodology Google used.
I created a daily updated mashup using the ClearForest semantic web services and CNN news feed, with the aim of showing the &quot;product/person/city/country&quot; of the day, etc. I started with absolute daily counts determining the newsmakers of the days, but I always got the same thing - bush, USA, new york, etc.
So then I used same algorithm as Google- computed a daily average for each entity, and saw on each day, which entity had the most number of articles above the average.
Now I get more exciting results, that really reflect what&#039;s new &amp; important for the day. &amp;I continued calling them &quot;product/city/country of the days,&quot; as they&#039;re still a top result for the day, just by a different measure.
I&#039;d say Google had same thought process.
Info on my mashup here- http://imagine-it.org/sblog/index.php?entry=entry061215-190257</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the methodology Google used.<br />
I created a daily updated mashup using the ClearForest semantic web services and CNN news feed, with the aim of showing the &#8220;product/person/city/country&#8221; of the day, etc. I started with absolute daily counts determining the newsmakers of the days, but I always got the same thing &#8211; bush, USA, new york, etc.<br />
So then I used same algorithm as Google- computed a daily average for each entity, and saw on each day, which entity had the most number of articles above the average.<br />
Now I get more exciting results, that really reflect what&#8217;s new &amp; important for the day. &amp;I continued calling them &#8220;product/city/country of the days,&#8221; as they&#8217;re still a top result for the day, just by a different measure.<br />
I&#8217;d say Google had same thought process.<br />
Info on my mashup here- <a href="http://imagine-it.org/sblog/index.php?entry=entry061215-190257" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://imagine-it.org/sblog/index.php?entry=entry061215-190257'>http://imagine-...ry061215-190257</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-654557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-654557</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s hand-chosen list of &quot;most popular queries&quot; reminds me of The New York Times bestseller list: It&#039;s interesting, but it isn&#039;t a list of bestsellers. The NYT list arbitrarily excludes categories that include most of the books sold in the US (among them the Bible, perenially #1) because they&#039;re too middlebrow to interest NYT book editors. My job requires me to spend a lot of time looking at Web search logs for another large search engine, and unless Googlers are somehow unique, I can tell you that their list of &quot;most popular queries&quot; bears almost no resemblance to what users actually enter most frequently in their browsers. It&#039;s a carefully pruned and sanitized list designed to make Google look good, not to represent actual user behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s hand-chosen list of &#8220;most popular queries&#8221; reminds me of The New York Times bestseller list: It&#8217;s interesting, but it isn&#8217;t a list of bestsellers. The NYT list arbitrarily excludes categories that include most of the books sold in the US (among them the Bible, perenially #1) because they&#8217;re too middlebrow to interest NYT book editors. My job requires me to spend a lot of time looking at Web search logs for another large search engine, and unless Googlers are somehow unique, I can tell you that their list of &#8220;most popular queries&#8221; bears almost no resemblance to what users actually enter most frequently in their browsers. It&#8217;s a carefully pruned and sanitized list designed to make Google look good, not to represent actual user behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Woes, cont&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-648347</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Woes, cont&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-648347</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Notebook: Use the Privacy Option Gmail Disaster: Reports Of Mass Email Deletions Google Top Searches: Based on Everything and Nothing Google’s Orkut Down For 13+ Hours Google’s Tipping Point Another Gmail Problem  Google  Sphere It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Notebook: Use the Privacy Option Gmail Disaster: Reports Of Mass Email Deletions Google Top Searches: Based on Everything and Nothing Google’s Orkut Down For 13+ Hours Google’s Tipping Point Another Gmail Problem  Google  Sphere It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-647392</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-647392</guid>
		<description>Bebo is also the nickname of a popular young Indian film actress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bebo is also the nickname of a popular young Indian film actress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syam Buradagunta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-640421</link>
		<dc:creator>Syam Buradagunta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-640421</guid>
		<description>what?  you didn&#039;t search for &#039;rebelde&#039; everday in 2006?  

2006 was also the year when I stopped believing that everything that Google made worked and made sense.  Maybe it&#039;s time to get back to being a search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what?  you didn&#8217;t search for &#8216;rebelde&#8217; everday in 2006?  </p>
<p>2006 was also the year when I stopped believing that everything that Google made worked and made sense.  Maybe it&#8217;s time to get back to being a search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-629110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-629110</guid>
		<description>Huh. Wonder how high &quot;china censorship&quot; got?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. Wonder how high &#8220;china censorship&#8221; got?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Monetizing Search At Double Over Two Years Ago &#187; InsideGoogle &#187; part of the Blog News Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-629067</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Monetizing Search At Double Over Two Years Ago &#187; InsideGoogle &#187; part of the Blog News Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-629067</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, TechCrunch posts about Google&#8217;s Zeitgeist, and Google&#8217;s statement explaining the confusion. As they and GigaOm note, Google&#8217;s methodology renders the results meaningless, making Google&#8217;s Zeitgeist quite the opposite of a &#8220;sign of the times&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, TechCrunch posts about Google&#8217;s Zeitgeist, and Google&#8217;s statement explaining the confusion. As they and GigaOm note, Google&#8217;s methodology renders the results meaningless, making Google&#8217;s Zeitgeist quite the opposite of a &#8220;sign of the times&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-621416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-top-searches-based-on-nothing/#comment-621416</guid>
		<description>This looks a lot like &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf-idf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TF-IDF&lt;/a&gt; which is commonly used in data mining to uncover terms that help to best differentiate one &quot;document&quot; from another, which seems to me to be what something like Zeitgeist should be going for.

If you have a collection of documents (or popular search terms for different years), TF-IDF gives you the terms that help to best differentiate one document from the rest.  If something like &quot;bebo&quot; was never searched for before this year and then reasonably high in the top searches this year, TF-IDF would rank it very highly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks a lot like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf-idf" rel="nofollow">TF-IDF</a> which is commonly used in data mining to uncover terms that help to best differentiate one &#8220;document&#8221; from another, which seems to me to be what something like Zeitgeist should be going for.</p>
<p>If you have a collection of documents (or popular search terms for different years), TF-IDF gives you the terms that help to best differentiate one document from the rest.  If something like &#8220;bebo&#8221; was never searched for before this year and then reasonably high in the top searches this year, TF-IDF would rank it very highly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
