<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Wish Google Could Buy AllofMP3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:55:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Missing the Big Picture &#124; The Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-2/#comment-2396607</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing the Big Picture &#124; The Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-2396607</guid>
		<description>[...] data size instead of a straight price. It was illegal which is not cool, but many people went to great lengths to purchase songs from that website. You could get between four and seven songs for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] data size instead of a straight price. It was illegal which is not cool, but many people went to great lengths to purchase songs from that website. You could get between four and seven songs for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fighting Will-O&#8217;-Wisps: A Primer &#171; The Sophistry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-2/#comment-1481889</link>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Will-O&#8217;-Wisps: A Primer &#171; The Sophistry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-1481889</guid>
		<description>[...] has taken a firm position that the RIAA should go to hell. In a now famous response to a RIAA $1.65 trillion (yes, trillion) lawsuit for copyright infringement, the company said: “AllofMP3 understands that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has taken a firm position that the RIAA should go to hell. In a now famous response to a RIAA $1.65 trillion (yes, trillion) lawsuit for copyright infringement, the company said: “AllofMP3 understands that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-2/#comment-989851</link>
		<dc:creator>Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-989851</guid>
		<description>cmon... cmon.... in europe u have to pay 25 Euros for a CD, 1 Euro it&#039;s for the singer, 3 Euros tax, 1 for shipping, 2 for the store, and the other 18 Euros? recording studios.
that&#039;s the truth.

let me pay a cd what&#039;s worth (5-6 Euro / 7-8$ ) u&#039;ll see no one will search alternative pirate methods to download music.

one hit parade can sell about 2/3.000.000 original cd, and can be grabbed illegally for other 12.000.000 copies.
if they&#039;r smart enough they can just use the calculator to understand that musics and movies cost too much on the retail store:

Now: CD 24.99$
@singer: 3.000.000 * 1.7$ (each copy) = 5.100.000 $
@singer: 12.000.000 * 0$ (downloaded) = 0 $

@studios: 3.000.000 * 20$ (each copy) = 60.000.000 $
@studios: 12.000.000 * 0$ (downloaded) = 0 $


Hope for the future: Digital Album for 4.4$
@singer: 15.000.000 * 0.4$ (each copy) = 6.000.000 $
@studios: 15.000.000 * 4$ (each copy) = 60.000.000 $

and for sure we&#039;ll buy that album if sold for  5-8$, so they can have a lot of profit, but they won&#039;t. 
bcose they wants to gain more money, they won&#039;t stop, for them it&#039;s not enough.
they wants gain 60.000.000$ (like now) from the selling of the retail store, plus then other 100.000.000$ from digital copyrighted copy, that&#039;s the truth.
they wants more, always more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cmon&#8230; cmon&#8230;. in europe u have to pay 25 Euros for a CD, 1 Euro it&#8217;s for the singer, 3 Euros tax, 1 for shipping, 2 for the store, and the other 18 Euros? recording studios.<br />
that&#8217;s the truth.</p>
<p>let me pay a cd what&#8217;s worth (5-6 Euro / 7-8$ ) u&#8217;ll see no one will search alternative pirate methods to download music.</p>
<p>one hit parade can sell about 2/3.000.000 original cd, and can be grabbed illegally for other 12.000.000 copies.<br />
if they&#8217;r smart enough they can just use the calculator to understand that musics and movies cost too much on the retail store:</p>
<p>Now: CD 24.99$<br />
@singer: 3.000.000 * 1.7$ (each copy) = 5.100.000 $<br />
@singer: 12.000.000 * 0$ (downloaded) = 0 $</p>
<p>@studios: 3.000.000 * 20$ (each copy) = 60.000.000 $<br />
@studios: 12.000.000 * 0$ (downloaded) = 0 $</p>
<p>Hope for the future: Digital Album for 4.4$<br />
@singer: 15.000.000 * 0.4$ (each copy) = 6.000.000 $<br />
@studios: 15.000.000 * 4$ (each copy) = 60.000.000 $</p>
<p>and for sure we&#8217;ll buy that album if sold for  5-8$, so they can have a lot of profit, but they won&#8217;t.<br />
bcose they wants to gain more money, they won&#8217;t stop, for them it&#8217;s not enough.<br />
they wants gain 60.000.000$ (like now) from the selling of the retail store, plus then other 100.000.000$ from digital copyrighted copy, that&#8217;s the truth.<br />
they wants more, always more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the messiah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-2/#comment-640875</link>
		<dc:creator>the messiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-640875</guid>
		<description>Apostle - do you really expect the consumers to feel sorry for people like Robbie Williams with his £80M Sony recording contract? Sure, artists should get paid for their creative output but let&#039;s be honest about it - they&#039;re unlikely to miss their &quot;potential&quot; earnings. You could argue that artists/bands who are trying to break out will miss out on revenue also but they will probably get tremendous amount of exposure from sites like AllofMP3 without getting involved with recording studios in the first place. And so the obvious conclusion is that the trans-national corporate recording studios are the only ones threatened by the Russian site and hence are trying their hardest to close it down. Ultimately, forward-thinking artists will become involved with AllofMP3 and cut out the corporate middlemen. I&#039;m sure owners of AllofMP3 will only be too pleased to deal directly with the artists, legitimise their business and challenge iTunes and others. This way music will become cheaper, more easily available and more original (less manufactured pop and boy/girl bands created by advertising and media moguls like Simon Cowell). Google has already shown how a small company with an innovative business model can succesfully compete with an established corporate behemoth like Microsoft. AllofMP3, if not strangled in its infancy, has the potential to revolutionise the way music and video entertainment content is produced and enjoyed. If they won&#039;t then someone else will (if internet remains neutral). This is not a question of &quot;if&quot; but of &quot;when&quot;, in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apostle &#8211; do you really expect the consumers to feel sorry for people like Robbie Williams with his £80M Sony recording contract? Sure, artists should get paid for their creative output but let&#8217;s be honest about it &#8211; they&#8217;re unlikely to miss their &#8220;potential&#8221; earnings. You could argue that artists/bands who are trying to break out will miss out on revenue also but they will probably get tremendous amount of exposure from sites like AllofMP3 without getting involved with recording studios in the first place. And so the obvious conclusion is that the trans-national corporate recording studios are the only ones threatened by the Russian site and hence are trying their hardest to close it down. Ultimately, forward-thinking artists will become involved with AllofMP3 and cut out the corporate middlemen. I&#8217;m sure owners of AllofMP3 will only be too pleased to deal directly with the artists, legitimise their business and challenge iTunes and others. This way music will become cheaper, more easily available and more original (less manufactured pop and boy/girl bands created by advertising and media moguls like Simon Cowell). Google has already shown how a small company with an innovative business model can succesfully compete with an established corporate behemoth like Microsoft. AllofMP3, if not strangled in its infancy, has the potential to revolutionise the way music and video entertainment content is produced and enjoyed. If they won&#8217;t then someone else will (if internet remains neutral). This is not a question of &#8220;if&#8221; but of &#8220;when&#8221;, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedias.mobi &#187; AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA’s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-611492</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedias.mobi &#187; AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA’s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-611492</guid>
		<description>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAAâs $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-610565</link>
		<dc:creator>AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAAâs $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-610565</guid>
		<description>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA’s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-610504</link>
		<dc:creator>AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA’s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-610504</guid>
		<description>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York against them. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-610430</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AllOfMP3 Responds To RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 Trillion Lawsuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-610430</guid>
		<description>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York, against them today. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Russia-based, DRM-free music download site AllOfMP3 made a brief statement today in response to the RIAA&#8217;s $1.65 trillion lawsuit, filed in New York, against them today. In effect, they told the RIAA to go pound sand: &#8220;AllofMP3 understands that several U.S. record label companies filed a lawsuit against Media Services in New York,&#8221; an unnamed &#8220;senior company official&#8221; stated. &#8220;This suit is unjustified as AllofMP3 does not operate in New York. Certainly the labels are free to file any suit they wish, despite knowing full well that AllofMP3 operates legally in Russia. In the mean time, AllofMP3 plans to continue to operate legally and comply with all Russian laws.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti-apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-608672</link>
		<dc:creator>anti-apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-608672</guid>
		<description>the apostle  - I honestly believe that people with your opinion could only be in the employment of RIAA.

I have been ripped off to the tune of 10&#039;s of thousands over the past 10 years that I have been buying CDs. New releases in Ireland cost 20euro!!!

Allofmp3 was a breath of fresh air. I was finaly getting music at a affordable price. Frankly I could&#039;t give a sh!te about the arguments about &#039;artists rights&#039; - the record companies were shafting them long before allofmp3 came along.

DRM is a joke - plain &amp; simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the apostle  &#8211; I honestly believe that people with your opinion could only be in the employment of RIAA.</p>
<p>I have been ripped off to the tune of 10&#8217;s of thousands over the past 10 years that I have been buying CDs. New releases in Ireland cost 20euro!!!</p>
<p>Allofmp3 was a breath of fresh air. I was finaly getting music at a affordable price. Frankly I could&#8217;t give a sh!te about the arguments about &#8216;artists rights&#8217; &#8211; the record companies were shafting them long before allofmp3 came along.</p>
<p>DRM is a joke &#8211; plain &amp; simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wu Di @ Myth &#187; Arrington&#8217;s Xmas Gift</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-595457</link>
		<dc:creator>Wu Di @ Myth &#187; Arrington&#8217;s Xmas Gift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-595457</guid>
		<description>[...] AllOfMP3 is still hanging in there, but it would be a big stretch to call them “legal.” And they aren’t free, just close to free. BitToreent is free, of course. But it is far from legal. This was and always will be a stretch, but there are encouraging signs out there that at least DRM may be going away. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllOfMP3 is still hanging in there, but it would be a big stretch to call them “legal.” And they aren’t free, just close to free. BitToreent is free, of course. But it is far from legal. This was and always will be a stretch, but there are encouraging signs out there that at least DRM may be going away. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-594847</link>
		<dc:creator>the apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-594847</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, if you&#039;re gonna mention that DRM is bad and should be removed/replaced, provide or suggest an alternative other than freely distributed files - &#039;cause that ain&#039;t gonna happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, if you&#8217;re gonna mention that DRM is bad and should be removed/replaced, provide or suggest an alternative other than freely distributed files &#8211; &#8217;cause that ain&#8217;t gonna happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-594831</link>
		<dc:creator>the apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-594831</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great that the internet has created an environment whereby the artists get completely robbed. Too many people are stealing. Yep, probably 90%, or more, of the people who posted here have or are actively stealing music (and other intellectual property, including software, movies, clip art, digital images, fonts, etc.). If a bunch of Russians broke in to your house and stole all your stuff, many of you would sing a different tune. It&#039;s not any different than stealing property via the Internet (save for people&#039;s whacko perceptions that they are entitled to free music). Theft is theft. Just because you don&#039;t like prices, record companies, distribution deals, DRM, etc doesn&#039;t give YOU or anyone else the right to circumvent the system and start stealing. Deal with reality folks!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that the internet has created an environment whereby the artists get completely robbed. Too many people are stealing. Yep, probably 90%, or more, of the people who posted here have or are actively stealing music (and other intellectual property, including software, movies, clip art, digital images, fonts, etc.). If a bunch of Russians broke in to your house and stole all your stuff, many of you would sing a different tune. It&#8217;s not any different than stealing property via the Internet (save for people&#8217;s whacko perceptions that they are entitled to free music). Theft is theft. Just because you don&#8217;t like prices, record companies, distribution deals, DRM, etc doesn&#8217;t give YOU or anyone else the right to circumvent the system and start stealing. Deal with reality folks!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Year Later: The Companies I Wanted To Profile (but didn&#8217;t exist)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-592908</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Year Later: The Companies I Wanted To Profile (but didn&#8217;t exist)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-592908</guid>
		<description>[...] AllOfMP3 is still hanging in there, but it would be a big stretch to call them &#8220;legal.&#8221; And they aren&#8217;t free, just close to free. BitToreent is free, of course. But it is far from legal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllOfMP3 is still hanging in there, but it would be a big stretch to call them &#8220;legal.&#8221; And they aren&#8217;t free, just close to free. BitToreent is free, of course. But it is far from legal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-587431</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-587431</guid>
		<description>2MC:

Concerning GoMusic.ru - it&#039;s just a mirror of mp3search.ru... One of the oldest russian mp3 sites. 

MP3SALE.ru - is my favourite now.. Absolutely safe CC transactions (thru independent proccessing), great music collection, and now there&#039;s a 100% christmas bonus to $50 payment til January, 15th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2MC:</p>
<p>Concerning GoMusic.ru &#8211; it&#8217;s just a mirror of mp3search.ru&#8230; One of the oldest russian mp3 sites. </p>
<p>MP3SALE.ru &#8211; is my favourite now.. Absolutely safe CC transactions (thru independent proccessing), great music collection, and now there&#8217;s a 100% christmas bonus to $50 payment til January, 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-585408</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-585408</guid>
		<description>The question is - is AllofMP3 legal under Russian law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is &#8211; is AllofMP3 legal under Russian law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clancolin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-578888</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-578888</guid>
		<description>Actually AllofMP3 does pay royalties in Russia, but the RIAA Mafia are so obsessed with closing AOM down that they refuse to take the money! Also, AOM offered to bring their business model to the USA - guess who opposed them?

As for greed and theft, google this:- &quot;RIAA Petitions For Lower Songwriter Royalties&quot;  for reprehensible behavoiur.

IMHO, the RIAA are doing a splendid job of harrassing individuals and alienating America with millions worldwide (see &quot;RIAA conducting &quot;reign of terror,&quot; lawyer says&quot;).  if I were American, I&#039;d be a bit more concerned about those issues, than if tracks should sell at 69 cents because they can&#039;t sell at 79.

If you *are* American and concerned, there is a &quot;Take a Stand Against the Madness&quot;  petition  that currently has 97,000 signatures and needs 100,000 to petition Congress.

Finally, AOM is a great site. It works well and I&#039;d still use it even if they doubled their prices. Artists should get rewarded for their work, but not in perpetuity and not to gratuitous excess. AOM is too cheap, I-Tunes too expensive - there is a solution in there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually AllofMP3 does pay royalties in Russia, but the RIAA Mafia are so obsessed with closing AOM down that they refuse to take the money! Also, AOM offered to bring their business model to the USA &#8211; guess who opposed them?</p>
<p>As for greed and theft, google this:- &#8220;RIAA Petitions For Lower Songwriter Royalties&#8221;  for reprehensible behavoiur.</p>
<p>IMHO, the RIAA are doing a splendid job of harrassing individuals and alienating America with millions worldwide (see &#8220;RIAA conducting &#8220;reign of terror,&#8221; lawyer says&#8221;).  if I were American, I&#8217;d be a bit more concerned about those issues, than if tracks should sell at 69 cents because they can&#8217;t sell at 79.</p>
<p>If you *are* American and concerned, there is a &#8220;Take a Stand Against the Madness&#8221;  petition  that currently has 97,000 signatures and needs 100,000 to petition Congress.</p>
<p>Finally, AOM is a great site. It works well and I&#8217;d still use it even if they doubled their prices. Artists should get rewarded for their work, but not in perpetuity and not to gratuitous excess. AOM is too cheap, I-Tunes too expensive &#8211; there is a solution in there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-575903</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-575903</guid>
		<description>Hey, what happened to features, not products?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, what happened to features, not products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emre Sokullu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-575636</link>
		<dc:creator>Emre Sokullu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-575636</guid>
		<description>How can you support a company that f*ck up the industry! These guys do not follow honest business practices! Would you promote an illegal MP3 search engine site on this site? This has no difference... We should think from the producer perspective also, I&#039;d prefer to pay $0.9 more not to let the artist I listen to die from hunger!!! (well, a bit exaggerated of course)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you support a company that f*ck up the industry! These guys do not follow honest business practices! Would you promote an illegal MP3 search engine site on this site? This has no difference&#8230; We should think from the producer perspective also, I&#8217;d prefer to pay $0.9 more not to let the artist I listen to die from hunger!!! (well, a bit exaggerated of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hornswaggled</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-575397</link>
		<dc:creator>Hornswaggled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-575397</guid>
		<description>After thinking about it Google would better off purchasing Pandora. That service seems like it would be something Google would appreciate a bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking about it Google would better off purchasing Pandora. That service seems like it would be something Google would appreciate a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hornswaggled</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-574791</link>
		<dc:creator>Hornswaggled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 03:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-574791</guid>
		<description>I know many who went from Napster/Kazaa/DirectConnect to AllofMp3 and didnt look back. People are WILLING to pay for music if its in the format and quality they like. 2-3 Bucks per album are good, 5 tops. If we can get it for free then the service needs to be better and more convenient than the other ways. 

When/if this gets shut down there will be more people looking for other free sources,  I cant imagine going from a buck an album to being okay with paying 99 cents per track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know many who went from Napster/Kazaa/DirectConnect to AllofMp3 and didnt look back. People are WILLING to pay for music if its in the format and quality they like. 2-3 Bucks per album are good, 5 tops. If we can get it for free then the service needs to be better and more convenient than the other ways. </p>
<p>When/if this gets shut down there will be more people looking for other free sources,  I cant imagine going from a buck an album to being okay with paying 99 cents per track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerd Approved - News and Reviews - &#187; US Music Publishers Sue AllofMP3.com For A Billion Gagillion Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-574539</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerd Approved - News and Reviews - &#187; US Music Publishers Sue AllofMP3.com For A Billion Gagillion Dollars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-574539</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch   Filed Under: Audio, Around the Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch   Filed Under: Audio, Around the Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaze</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-574284</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-574284</guid>
		<description>AllofMP3 was almost perfect except for the not-paying-artists part. If they are smart they could change their business model &amp; everyone would be happy. Especially after all the new traffic they should be getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AllofMP3 was almost perfect except for the not-paying-artists part. If they are smart they could change their business model &amp; everyone would be happy. Especially after all the new traffic they should be getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-574239</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-574239</guid>
		<description>AllofMP3 can only offer their low prices because they pay ONLY for bandwidth and infrastructure - no money at all goes back to any of the people (artists, producers, labels) who helped create the music.  It&#039;s a business model that cannot work if they showed any respect towards the artists or labels.  And for those of you opposed to the business models of the four or five big music labels making commercially-safe music, at least spare a thought for the four of five THOUSAND small, independent music labels and truly creative artists who are GOING BROKE because of sites like AllofMP3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AllofMP3 can only offer their low prices because they pay ONLY for bandwidth and infrastructure &#8211; no money at all goes back to any of the people (artists, producers, labels) who helped create the music.  It&#8217;s a business model that cannot work if they showed any respect towards the artists or labels.  And for those of you opposed to the business models of the four or five big music labels making commercially-safe music, at least spare a thought for the four of five THOUSAND small, independent music labels and truly creative artists who are GOING BROKE because of sites like AllofMP3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-573615</link>
		<dc:creator>pwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-573615</guid>
		<description>YouTube strikes me as significantly different from Kazaa/AllofMP3.

Kazaa/AllofMP3 provide near-perfect, complete copies of things otherwise available for purchase. YouTube provides imperfect, incomplete streams of things that were free in the first place and not otherwise available for sale.

YouTube has DMCA and possibly even fair use on its side. Not so with Kazaa/AllofMP3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube strikes me as significantly different from Kazaa/AllofMP3.</p>
<p>Kazaa/AllofMP3 provide near-perfect, complete copies of things otherwise available for purchase. YouTube provides imperfect, incomplete streams of things that were free in the first place and not otherwise available for sale.</p>
<p>YouTube has DMCA and possibly even fair use on its side. Not so with Kazaa/AllofMP3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NLtrooper</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/comment-page-1/#comment-573458</link>
		<dc:creator>NLtrooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/i-wish-google-could-buy-allofmp3/#comment-573458</guid>
		<description>@ABCota
Copyright infringement is not theft, so that analogy is wrong. You&#039;re not taking music away when you download a song. You merely copy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ABCota<br />
Copyright infringement is not theft, so that analogy is wrong. You&#8217;re not taking music away when you download a song. You merely copy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
