<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC May Regulate PayPerPost</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 小叮当 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC 可能会控制 PayPerPost 付费评论</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-1634969</link>
		<dc:creator>小叮当 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC 可能会控制 PayPerPost 付费评论</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-1634969</guid>
		<description>[...] 原文作者：Michael Arrington原文链接：FTC May Regulate PayPerPost译者：Spider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 原文作者：Michael Arrington原文链接：FTC May Regulate PayPerPost译者：Spider [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 美容・健康・ダイエット関連リンク集</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-1363021</link>
		<dc:creator>美容・健康・ダイエット関連リンク集</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-1363021</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;健康関連サイトリンク集...&lt;/strong&gt;

 血圧.com   血圧.comでは、日本人の平均値と比較して血圧  が高い場合の血圧の下げる方法や、測定方法、高血圧に効果的な薬など、さまざまなお役立ち情  報をご紹介しています。    高血...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>健康関連サイトリンク集&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> 血圧.com   血圧.comでは、日本人の平均値と比較して血圧  が高い場合の血圧の下げる方法や、測定方法、高血圧に効果的な薬など、さまざまなお役立ち情  報をご紹介しています。    高血&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rqtect</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-761410</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rqtect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-761410</guid>
		<description>Thanks Again Mike

I was just about to launch BlogPayola.com and/or IBlog4Cash.com
BlogVison.com These were going to be My Blogging for Dolars sites.
FTC Frowns on Radio Payola.
Payola is Pay To Play Certain Songs or ones Labels songs.
This is Totally Different concept this is Guerilla Marketing.
Has anyone heard of freedom of speech?
So what if its Pay For Speech and Not Free Speech. 


Rqtect
Rqtect.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Again Mike</p>
<p>I was just about to launch BlogPayola.com and/or IBlog4Cash.com<br />
BlogVison.com These were going to be My Blogging for Dolars sites.<br />
FTC Frowns on Radio Payola.<br />
Payola is Pay To Play Certain Songs or ones Labels songs.<br />
This is Totally Different concept this is Guerilla Marketing.<br />
Has anyone heard of freedom of speech?<br />
So what if its Pay For Speech and Not Free Speech. </p>
<p>Rqtect<br />
Rqtect.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechSoapBox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-721627</link>
		<dc:creator>TechSoapBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-721627</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet he continues to puzzle me about the evil PayPerPost. If the company is so evil, and if he wishes it would die - why such obsession? So he doesn&#8217;t like paid-blog posting - that is fine. Mention who evil PayPerPost is the first time, and then move on and talk about the problem (and not the company). Even subsequent posts about companies that pay you to blog (which all have much more clarified disclosure policies) were always compared to PayPerPost. This post about ReviewMe and CreamAid only mentions PayPerPost in the title. This next post about ReviewMe launching again mentions PayPerPost in the title. When the FTC announced it will start regulating word-of-mouth marketing, the title was all about FTC regulating PayPerPost. The latest post, just one day old, was about Another PayPerPost competitor. No need to mention SponsoredReviews.com (the actual site the content was about) - naw, lets just mention PayPerPost again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yet he continues to puzzle me about the evil PayPerPost. If the company is so evil, and if he wishes it would die - why such obsession? So he doesn&#8217;t like paid-blog posting - that is fine. Mention who evil PayPerPost is the first time, and then move on and talk about the problem (and not the company). Even subsequent posts about companies that pay you to blog (which all have much more clarified disclosure policies) were always compared to PayPerPost. This post about ReviewMe and CreamAid only mentions PayPerPost in the title. This next post about ReviewMe launching again mentions PayPerPost in the title. When the FTC announced it will start regulating word-of-mouth marketing, the title was all about FTC regulating PayPerPost. The latest post, just one day old, was about Another PayPerPost competitor. No need to mention SponsoredReviews.com (the actual site the content was about) - naw, lets just mention PayPerPost again. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayPerPost Does Something Right</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-681865</link>
		<dc:creator>PayPerPost Does Something Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-681865</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC &#124; Word of Mouth and Affiliates - Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-623083</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC &#124; Word of Mouth and Affiliates - Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-623083</guid>
		<description>[...] FTC May Regulate Pay Per Post @ Techcrunch - The Techcrunch post targets Pay Per Post, which in my opinion is actually totally missing out on the much target picture. It also affects many of the companies Techcrunch cover who use affiliate programs for monetization. FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off at Matthew Ingram - Matthew does mention affiliate marketing, thus why target PPP with this. This affects Google more than PPP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] FTC May Regulate Pay Per Post @ Techcrunch - The Techcrunch post targets Pay Per Post, which in my opinion is actually totally missing out on the much target picture. It also affects many of the companies Techcrunch cover who use affiliate programs for monetization. FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off at Matthew Ingram - Matthew does mention affiliate marketing, thus why target PPP with this. This affects Google more than PPP. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Playmaker's Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-560379</link>
		<dc:creator>The Playmaker's Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-560379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FTC to regulate word of mouth?...&lt;/strong&gt;

The FTC is challenging marketers to make their propaganda more transparent.  It may be uncomfortable to think of marketing as propaganda, but look at the definitions of White Propaganda and Grey Propaganda......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FTC to regulate word of mouth?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The FTC is challenging marketers to make their propaganda more transparent.  It may be uncomfortable to think of marketing as propaganda, but look at the definitions of White Propaganda and Grey Propaganda&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-up.co.nz &#187; PayPerPost Does Something Right</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-549365</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-up.co.nz &#187; PayPerPost Does Something Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-549365</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: “FTC” is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: “FTC” is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayPerPost Does Something Right at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-545115</link>
		<dc:creator>PayPerPost Does Something Right at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-545115</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PayPerPost Does Something Right</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-545056</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PayPerPost Does Something Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-545056</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] PayPerPost, a marketplace for advertisers to pay bloggers to write about their products, will make a significant policy change on Monday: Bloggers will now be required to disclose that they are being paid for their posts. This looks to be at least partially due to recent moves by the FTC to force word-of-mouth advertisers to disclose any financial incentives to promote products: &#8220;FTC&#8221; is mentioned five times in the press release that will be issued on Monday (a copy of the press release is below). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web Conferencing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-540192</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web Conferencing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-540192</guid>
		<description>There is no way this is seriously going to happen, what  a waste of time and energy. Doesn't the FTC have more important things to review?

http://davidchao.typepad.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way this is seriously going to happen, what  a waste of time and energy. Doesn&#8217;t the FTC have more important things to review?</p>
<p><a href="http://davidchao.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://davidchao.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-539611</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-539611</guid>
		<description>Maybe FTC should regulate on this. But I'm afraid it's really hard to have a good achievement. 
Bloggers don't like any regulation, anyway.

-Mike
Tech Tutorials: http://www.hotcoding.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe FTC should regulate on this. But I&#8217;m afraid it&#8217;s really hard to have a good achievement.<br />
Bloggers don&#8217;t like any regulation, anyway.</p>
<p>-Mike<br />
Tech Tutorials: <a href="http://www.hotcoding.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotcoding.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-539181</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-539181</guid>
		<description>I think blogs should disclose when they are posting for money, but I'm not sure this is something the FTC should regulate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blogs should disclose when they are posting for money, but I&#8217;m not sure this is something the FTC should regulate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-538606</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-538606</guid>
		<description>I'm not a fan of paid posts (in fact, I just wrote a blog entry today about this very topic)... however I am even less of a fan of the government becoming more and more involved in common practices such as word of mouth marketing. I don't even know how many things I have talked about on my blog just because I felt they were neat products (not paid to do so), and now someone is going to tell me that I can't do that unless I meet certain critiria?? Isn't this a freedom of speech issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of paid posts (in fact, I just wrote a blog entry today about this very topic)&#8230; however I am even less of a fan of the government becoming more and more involved in common practices such as word of mouth marketing. I don&#8217;t even know how many things I have talked about on my blog just because I felt they were neat products (not paid to do so), and now someone is going to tell me that I can&#8217;t do that unless I meet certain critiria?? Isn&#8217;t this a freedom of speech issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-537774</link>
		<dc:creator>sly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-537774</guid>
		<description>Will this affect  product placement in movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this affect  product placement in movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Wagoner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-531659</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Wagoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-531659</guid>
		<description>My 2c: Govt should regulate trade and advertising to help ensure rip-offs do not occur, otherwise people are forced to waste vast amounts of extra time before every transaction doing due dilligence to ensure that they are not being fooled.  Government regulations are the price you pay for an efficient interdependent society. If the regulations are often badly drawn up, or actually designed to give advantage to one group over another rather than to make the system fairer or more efficient,  then you start loooking at unelecting the current government, and also pushing for electoral reform, campaign finance reform, and (much) more transparency, rather than simply moaning that all regulations are evil. To do that is merely to play into the hands of the snake oil salesmen.  

I live in New Zealand. We have it easy here, in terms of sensible government regulation. Despite the fact that our right wing bloggers claim our Govt is "socialist" we are the #1 place to do business on this planet according to the World Bank.  I really do sympathise with you Americans and your crazy inefficient multilayered inconsistent systems of government, I can see why you hate them so much, but trust me, anarchy would be worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2c: Govt should regulate trade and advertising to help ensure rip-offs do not occur, otherwise people are forced to waste vast amounts of extra time before every transaction doing due dilligence to ensure that they are not being fooled.  Government regulations are the price you pay for an efficient interdependent society. If the regulations are often badly drawn up, or actually designed to give advantage to one group over another rather than to make the system fairer or more efficient,  then you start loooking at unelecting the current government, and also pushing for electoral reform, campaign finance reform, and (much) more transparency, rather than simply moaning that all regulations are evil. To do that is merely to play into the hands of the snake oil salesmen.  </p>
<p>I live in New Zealand. We have it easy here, in terms of sensible government regulation. Despite the fact that our right wing bloggers claim our Govt is &#8220;socialist&#8221; we are the #1 place to do business on this planet according to the World Bank.  I really do sympathise with you Americans and your crazy inefficient multilayered inconsistent systems of government, I can see why you hate them so much, but trust me, anarchy would be worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uzi Ben-Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-531336</link>
		<dc:creator>Uzi Ben-Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-531336</guid>
		<description>Freedom of money is the most important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom of money is the most important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MistOne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-529783</link>
		<dc:creator>MistOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-529783</guid>
		<description>I think disclosure by journalists is a good thing, which includes TC when they write up stories on companies they have close / material relationships with, it has to go across the board. 
Radio needs even more disclosure rules because we are talking big bucks, not a a few hundred bucks to a blogger, or whatever the model is. 

My startup, &lt;a href="http://www.promoterforce.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Promoterforce.com&lt;/a&gt; which is platform for WOM for SME's, is currently developing our full disclosure messaging strategy around  this issue.  We fully agree with the &lt;a href="http://www.womma.org/ethicscode.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;WOMMA that disclosure is a fundamental element of trustworthy (credible, meaningful) marketing.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think disclosure by journalists is a good thing, which includes TC when they write up stories on companies they have close / material relationships with, it has to go across the board.<br />
Radio needs even more disclosure rules because we are talking big bucks, not a a few hundred bucks to a blogger, or whatever the model is. </p>
<p>My startup, <a href="http://www.promoterforce.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.promoterforce.com');">Promoterforce.com</a> which is platform for WOM for SME&#8217;s, is currently developing our full disclosure messaging strategy around  this issue.  We fully agree with the <a href="http://www.womma.org/ethicscode.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.womma.org');">WOMMA that disclosure is a fundamental element of trustworthy (credible, meaningful) marketing.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RqTect</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-529159</link>
		<dc:creator>RqTect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-529159</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike

I was just about to launch BlogPayola.com and/or IBlog4Cash.com
These were going to be My Pay for Post Sites.  
FTC Frowns on Radio Payola.  
Payola is Pay To Play Certain Songs or ones Labels songs.
This is Totally Different concept this is Guerilla Marketing.
Has anyone heard of freedom of speech?
So what if its Pay For Speech and Not Free Speech.  

Rqtect
Rqtect.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike</p>
<p>I was just about to launch BlogPayola.com and/or IBlog4Cash.com<br />
These were going to be My Pay for Post Sites.<br />
FTC Frowns on Radio Payola.<br />
Payola is Pay To Play Certain Songs or ones Labels songs.<br />
This is Totally Different concept this is Guerilla Marketing.<br />
Has anyone heard of freedom of speech?<br />
So what if its Pay For Speech and Not Free Speech.  </p>
<p>Rqtect<br />
Rqtect.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-528957</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-528957</guid>
		<description>Just a response to MT (11):
"The government getting involved in trade practices is a pretty scary concept."

Concept? Its a reality. There is no such thing anywhere in the world as a government that is not involved in regulating trade. We have and have historically had a very involved government. If you think this is just a "concept" you are severely out of touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a response to MT (11):<br />
&#8220;The government getting involved in trade practices is a pretty scary concept.&#8221;</p>
<p>Concept? Its a reality. There is no such thing anywhere in the world as a government that is not involved in regulating trade. We have and have historically had a very involved government. If you think this is just a &#8220;concept&#8221; you are severely out of touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-528162</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-528162</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael

I think you need to look at this a little deeper, and not specifically in regards to Pay Per Post.

This affects billion dollar companies, not just startups.

Here are some references to what 2 lawyers have written about this

http://www.copywritersblog.com/2006/12/13/ftc-cracks-down-on-word-of-mouth-advertising/
http://www.copyblogger.com/affiliate-marketing-disclosure-now-required-by-law/

This affects Amazon, Google, Ebay, Clickbank, Commission Junction, Linkshare and a host of other billion dollar companies that allow affiliates to link directly through to a particular product or service with a recommendation.

In fact this affects affiliate marketeres more than Pay Per Post, because a PPP writer earns very little per article they write compared to an affiliate who may earn thousands of dollars per affiliate product mention.

Solution? My Disclosure Policy Plugin possibly if you use Wordpress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael</p>
<p>I think you need to look at this a little deeper, and not specifically in regards to Pay Per Post.</p>
<p>This affects billion dollar companies, not just startups.</p>
<p>Here are some references to what 2 lawyers have written about this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.copywritersblog.com/2006/12/13/ftc-cracks-down-on-word-of-mouth-advertising/" rel="nofollow">http://www.copywritersblog.com.....vertising/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/affiliate-marketing-disclosure-now-required-by-law/" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyblogger.com/aff.....ed-by-law/</a></p>
<p>This affects Amazon, Google, Ebay, Clickbank, Commission Junction, Linkshare and a host of other billion dollar companies that allow affiliates to link directly through to a particular product or service with a recommendation.</p>
<p>In fact this affects affiliate marketeres more than Pay Per Post, because a PPP writer earns very little per article they write compared to an affiliate who may earn thousands of dollars per affiliate product mention.</p>
<p>Solution? My Disclosure Policy Plugin possibly if you use Wordpress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-527453</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-527453</guid>
		<description>Hello Mike. 

Thanks for offering a weblog like TechCrunch for general consumption; I really appreciate it. I like what you write about it and I like how quickly you get up to date information out there. Thanks for keeping me informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mike. </p>
<p>Thanks for offering a weblog like TechCrunch for general consumption; I really appreciate it. I like what you write about it and I like how quickly you get up to date information out there. Thanks for keeping me informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmmm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526991</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526991</guid>
		<description>Mike, your position is clear - but a tad hypocritical, no?  You can't exactly invest in Dogster, while at the same time blog about them (and slam competition, pawspot) - then turn around a criticize PPP.  I really like your blog, but watch out for the whole "glass houses" and "stones" thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, your position is clear - but a tad hypocritical, no?  You can&#8217;t exactly invest in Dogster, while at the same time blog about them (and slam competition, pawspot) - then turn around a criticize PPP.  I really like your blog, but watch out for the whole &#8220;glass houses&#8221; and &#8220;stones&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Nu är det slut med smygbuzzandet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526907</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Nu är det slut med smygbuzzandet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526907</guid>
		<description>[...] Via TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Via TechCrunch. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526688</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/13/ftc-may-regulate-payperpost/#comment-526688</guid>
		<description>@ calvin, yes for sure i've seen that too, especially with smaller shows. the thing is, though, that's kind of killing the shows too.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ calvin, yes for sure i&#8217;ve seen that too, especially with smaller shows. the thing is, though, that&#8217;s kind of killing the shows too&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.830 seconds -->
