<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Surrenders To Social News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Information Architects Japan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 unchains free market</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1946858</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Architects Japan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 unchains free market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1946858</guid>
		<description>[...] Lately even The New York Times surrendered to social news. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lately even The New York Times surrendered to social news. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-12-10 &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1830363</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-12-10 &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1830363</guid>
		<description>[...] New York Times Surrenders To Social News The New York Times has decided to let users post stories directly from their site to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. As of Monday, the paper will embed links to all three sites to most of their online stories. (tags: newspaper newspapers nytimes socialbookmarking) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York Times Surrenders To Social News The New York Times has decided to let users post stories directly from their site to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. As of Monday, the paper will embed links to all three sites to most of their online stories. (tags: newspaper newspapers nytimes socialbookmarking) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wall Street Journal Gets Cozy With Digg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1755597</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wall Street Journal Gets Cozy With Digg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1755597</guid>
		<description>[...] in town at the venerable Wall Street Journal, and they certainly seem willing to try new things.  Like the New York Times, the WSJ is now adding Digg buttons to articles. And clicks from Digg get the added benefit of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in town at the venerable Wall Street Journal, and they certainly seem willing to try new things.  Like the New York Times, the WSJ is now adding Digg buttons to articles. And clicks from Digg get the added benefit of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A great Resource Directory &#187; Xanadu - Theater - Review - New York Times</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1660642</link>
		<dc:creator>A great Resource Directory &#187; Xanadu - Theater - Review - New York Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1660642</guid>
		<description>[...] New York Times Surrenders To Social NewsThe following are paid death notices from the print edition of The New York Times, along with Memorial Services, In Memoriam, and Guest Books. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York Times Surrenders To Social NewsThe following are paid death notices from the print edition of The New York Times, along with Memorial Services, In Memoriam, and Guest Books. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 十分钟内学会：让你的博客文章也有机会成上Digg头版 at ZhangYu&#8217;blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1318340</link>
		<dc:creator>十分钟内学会：让你的博客文章也有机会成上Digg头版 at ZhangYu&#8217;blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-1318340</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch上个星期有条新闻标题为New York Times Surrenders To Social News，意思是&#8221;纽约时报向社会化新闻投降&#8221;，说的是New York Times网站上面部分版面的文章已经加入了共享功能，包括把文章共享到Digg、Facebook和Newsvine的链接。既然连New York Times这样的传统媒体巨头也加入了&#8221;Digg This!&#8221;按钮，我们又怎能不加？ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch上个星期有条新闻标题为New York Times Surrenders To Social News，意思是&#8221;纽约时报向社会化新闻投降&#8221;，说的是New York Times网站上面部分版面的文章已经加入了共享功能，包括把文章共享到Digg、Facebook和Newsvine的链接。既然连New York Times这样的传统媒体巨头也加入了&#8221;Digg This!&#8221;按钮，我们又怎能不加？ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7daysandmore&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New York Times Adds Sharing Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-841583</link>
		<dc:creator>7daysandmore&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New York Times Adds Sharing Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-841583</guid>
		<description>[...] With a new service the New York Times has made the decision to increase the interoperability between its portal and social networking sites from Digg, Facebook and Newsvine for increased traffic and readership.  Read more at TechCrunch or here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With a new service the New York Times has made the decision to increase the interoperability between its portal and social networking sites from Digg, Facebook and Newsvine for increased traffic and readership.  Read more at TechCrunch or here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Web 2.0 Soap Opera : Qwerky, Notebook of the Weirdest New Web 2.0 Names!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-584285</link>
		<dc:creator>A Web 2.0 Soap Opera : Qwerky, Notebook of the Weirdest New Web 2.0 Names!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-584285</guid>
		<description>[...] In one of the more popular areas of the webosphere (slash blogosphere), a soap opera has just bubbled up. This involves Mr. Web 2.0, who dissed the New York Times, much to the dismay of fellow A-list bloggers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In one of the more popular areas of the webosphere (slash blogosphere), a soap opera has just bubbled up. This involves Mr. Web 2.0, who dissed the New York Times, much to the dismay of fellow A-list bloggers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FKCBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Media Following New</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-557305</link>
		<dc:creator>FKCBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Media Following New</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-557305</guid>
		<description>[...] Combine this with recent developments like The Washington Post allowing comments on all its online news stories and The New York Times recently deciding to include Digg and other social media posting links to news stories, and we&#8217;ve got a powerful idea: Traditional media is going to follow where the bloggers and podcasters have led. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Combine this with recent developments like The Washington Post allowing comments on all its online news stories and The New York Times recently deciding to include Digg and other social media posting links to news stories, and we&#8217;ve got a powerful idea: Traditional media is going to follow where the bloggers and podcasters have led. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicked : Who is you?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-554793</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicked : Who is you?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-554793</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medienlese &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Jarvis liest Medienlese&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-539371</link>
		<dc:creator>medienlese &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Jarvis liest Medienlese&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-539371</guid>
		<description>[...] Das ist fast so gut, wie in der New York Times zitiert zu werden: Journalistik-Professor Jeff Jarvis hat in einem sarkastischen Beitrag zur laufenden Kontroverse unter den Uber-Bloggern (Michael Arrington vs New York Times &#38; Dave Winer &#38; Jeff Jarvis &#38; Rafat Ali) unter dem Titel &#8220;Ist die Pause endlich vorbei?&#8221; auf den Beitrag der Medienlese verwiesen: &#8220;sogar in Deutschland lacht man &#252;ber uns alle, die Schlagzeile lautet &#8216;Kindergarten - Schlacht der Blog-Giganten&#8217;. K&#246;nnen wir bitte in die n&#228;chste Schulstunde zur&#252;ckkehren?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Das ist fast so gut, wie in der New York Times zitiert zu werden: Journalistik-Professor Jeff Jarvis hat in einem sarkastischen Beitrag zur laufenden Kontroverse unter den Uber-Bloggern (Michael Arrington vs New York Times &amp; Dave Winer &amp; Jeff Jarvis &amp; Rafat Ali) unter dem Titel &#8220;Ist die Pause endlich vorbei?&#8221; auf den Beitrag der Medienlese verwiesen: &#8220;sogar in Deutschland lacht man &#252;ber uns alle, die Schlagzeile lautet &#8216;Kindergarten - Schlacht der Blog-Giganten&#8217;. K&#246;nnen wir bitte in die n&#228;chste Schulstunde zur&#252;ckkehren?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeky Granny &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geeks, Get Real!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-534879</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeky Granny &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geeks, Get Real!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-534879</guid>
		<description>[...] Take the recent dustup between Michael Arrington and Dave Winer over Arrington&#8217;s somewhat backhanded slap at the NY Times (not to mention Jeff Jarvis and Rafat Ali and Arrington&#8217;s subsequent tussle with his UK counterpart over nasty names being bandied about on a blog post about LeWebhttp://www.valleywag.com/tech/techcrunch/uk-publisher-fired-after-euro-conference-fiasco-221614.php. Geeky Granny is at a loss to understand what could possibly motivate Arrington to whine over the woes of blogging after being so quick to lash out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Take the recent dustup between Michael Arrington and Dave Winer over Arrington&#8217;s somewhat backhanded slap at the NY Times (not to mention Jeff Jarvis and Rafat Ali and Arrington&#8217;s subsequent tussle with his UK counterpart over nasty names being bandied about on a blog post about <a href='LeWebhttp://www.valleywag.com/tech/techcrunch/uk-publisher-fired-after-euro-conference-fiasco-221614.php.' rel='nofollow'>LeWebhttp://www.valleywag.com/tech/techcrunch/uk-publisher-fired-after-euro-conference-fiasco-221614.php.</a> Geeky Granny is at a loss to understand what could possibly motivate Arrington to whine over the woes of blogging after being so quick to lash out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offline.pl &#187; New York Times i social networking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-527726</link>
		<dc:creator>offline.pl &#187; New York Times i social networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-527726</guid>
		<description>[...] Źr&#243;dło: techcrunch.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Źr&oacute;dło: techcrunch.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicked : Any portal is a storm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-524705</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicked : Any portal is a storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-524705</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:00 PM by Will Femia I finally took the time to read into the "de-portalization of the Internet" discussion.&#160; What I clicked:  Buzzword alert: De-portalization De-portalization and Internet revenues Platforms are the new portals What the heck is a portal? What drew me to the discussion is that I had understood the opposite to be happening.&#160; My reading led me to understand that with so many individual content creators out there, we'd see a new importance placed on aggregators to gather up the good stuff.&#160; If you click through the links above you'll see that what I was thinking and what "de-portalization" is really about is in the same family but really different topics, confused by a poorly defined set of terms.&#160; The issue is that the really big companies who used to do it all, now have to figure out a way to also include the independent little guys (bloggers, indie sites, user generated content, etc.) and more importantly to some people, figure out how to keep making money. The news that the New York Times is offering new social site sharing tools on its articles has been interpreted as a vindication for the social Web in every analysis I've read.&#160; One remark (sorry I lost track of the link) pointed to the Alexa traffic graph of the Times versus Digg as reason enough why the Times should be courting Digg users. But while the graph does show that Digg gets more traffic than the Times, what it doesn't show (yet) is that the Times has seen a jump in traffic as the result of making it easier for users to submit their stories to Digg.&#160; Clicking on the Page Views tab shows quite the opposite, in fact. If you work for a news outlet with very little offered on its pages for sharing on social sites and you want to encourage your dev team to come up with more options for readers, not being able to show a return in page views for sites already doing it is not very helpful. P.S.&#160; I wonder if the new permalink feature will render the NYTimes link generator obsolete. For a nice concise splash of cold water on this whole idea: If You Think The NY Times 'Gets' Social Media, Digg This! Speaking of social sites not paying off, Why digg is destined for failure - I understand the arguments made here but I'm not sure the perspective is right.&#160; Digg wasn't created so that the referral traffic would be valuable, it was build for the community using it.&#160; And judging by the size and success of that community, they like the site just fine. Speaking of taking the shine off a site that receives a lot of positive press, Clay Shirky says Second Life is built on sand.&#160;&#160;"Like video phones, which have been just one technological revolution away from mass adoption since 1964, virtual reality is so appealingly simple that its persistent failure to be a good idea, as measured by user adoption, has done little to dampen enthusiasm for the coming day of Keanu Reeves interfaces and Snow Crash interactions." I admit that once the "cool, I can fly" euphoria wore off I lost my zeal for Second Life.&#160; I'm glad I've familiarized myself with it and it wouldn't take much to draw me back with a news event or special performance or meeting, but as a regular form of recreation, what I've found so far doesn't hold my interest. Where families lived in 1920 This scientist in this story draws a conclusion from pretty much nowhere that car drivers assume cyclists with helmets are more experienced and therefore can give them less space on the road.&#160; My own unqualified conclusion from what's reported in the article is that a human with a helmet seems less human and is therefore regarded with less caution. The history of the button 33 Names of Things You Never Knew had Names Short stroll in a Chinese national park - I'm thinking this is what parks look like in places where there are no law suits. In case you have or are a smart ass kid who thinks your generation invented headbanging, check out the bass player at 1:09 in this video. Who has the power to arrest the president? Lifestyles of the Rich and Fascist Speaking of fashion, the reporting on Al Gore's wardrobe over more substantive matters in the 2000 election is still a sore spot for many liberal bloggers.&#160; Seeing a similar tactic adopted in Obama coverage (and leading it to an association with Iran's president) has set off online alarm bells. "Many of us would like to believe that different types of alcohol can produce very different effects. If only it were that simple."&#160; It totally makes sense to me that alcohol is alcohol as far as the body is concerned, but for some reason I want to cling to the idea that different liquors produce different "kinds of drunk." Christmas 2.0: Subverting the Holidays With Re-dubbing - Still more mashed up children's holiday specials. "The Nietzsche Family Circus pairs a randomized Family Circus cartoon with a randomized Friedrich Nietzsche quote." Giant knitting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:00 PM by Will Femia I finally took the time to read into the &#8220;de-portalization of the Internet&#8221; discussion.&nbsp; What I clicked:  Buzzword alert: De-portalization De-portalization and Internet revenues Platforms are the new portals What the heck is a portal? What drew me to the discussion is that I had understood the opposite to be happening.&nbsp; My reading led me to understand that with so many individual content creators out there, we&#8217;d see a new importance placed on aggregators to gather up the good stuff.&nbsp; If you click through the links above you&#8217;ll see that what I was thinking and what &#8220;de-portalization&#8221; is really about is in the same family but really different topics, confused by a poorly defined set of terms.&nbsp; The issue is that the really big companies who used to do it all, now have to figure out a way to also include the independent little guys (bloggers, indie sites, user generated content, etc.) and more importantly to some people, figure out how to keep making money. The news that the New York Times is offering new social site sharing tools on its articles has been interpreted as a vindication for the social Web in every analysis I&#8217;ve read.&nbsp; One remark (sorry I lost track of the link) pointed to the Alexa traffic graph of the Times versus Digg as reason enough why the Times should be courting Digg users. But while the graph does show that Digg gets more traffic than the Times, what it doesn&#8217;t show (yet) is that the Times has seen a jump in traffic as the result of making it easier for users to submit their stories to Digg.&nbsp; Clicking on the Page Views tab shows quite the opposite, in fact. If you work for a news outlet with very little offered on its pages for sharing on social sites and you want to encourage your dev team to come up with more options for readers, not being able to show a return in page views for sites already doing it is not very helpful. P.S.&nbsp; I wonder if the new permalink feature will render the NYTimes link generator obsolete. For a nice concise splash of cold water on this whole idea: If You Think The NY Times &#8216;Gets&#8217; Social Media, Digg This! Speaking of social sites not paying off, Why digg is destined for failure - I understand the arguments made here but I&#8217;m not sure the perspective is right.&nbsp; Digg wasn&#8217;t created so that the referral traffic would be valuable, it was build for the community using it.&nbsp; And judging by the size and success of that community, they like the site just fine. Speaking of taking the shine off a site that receives a lot of positive press, Clay Shirky says Second Life is built on sand.&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8221;Like video phones, which have been just one technological revolution away from mass adoption since 1964, virtual reality is so appealingly simple that its persistent failure to be a good idea, as measured by user adoption, has done little to dampen enthusiasm for the coming day of Keanu Reeves interfaces and Snow Crash interactions.&#8221; I admit that once the &#8220;cool, I can fly&#8221; euphoria wore off I lost my zeal for Second Life.&nbsp; I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;ve familiarized myself with it and it wouldn&#8217;t take much to draw me back with a news event or special performance or meeting, but as a regular form of recreation, what I&#8217;ve found so far doesn&#8217;t hold my interest. Where families lived in 1920 This scientist in this story draws a conclusion from pretty much nowhere that car drivers assume cyclists with helmets are more experienced and therefore can give them less space on the road.&nbsp; My own unqualified conclusion from what&#8217;s reported in the article is that a human with a helmet seems less human and is therefore regarded with less caution. The history of the button 33 Names of Things You Never Knew had Names Short stroll in a Chinese national park - I&#8217;m thinking this is what parks look like in places where there are no law suits. In case you have or are a smart ass kid who thinks your generation invented headbanging, check out the bass player at 1:09 in this video. Who has the power to arrest the president? Lifestyles of the Rich and Fascist Speaking of fashion, the reporting on Al Gore&#8217;s wardrobe over more substantive matters in the 2000 election is still a sore spot for many liberal bloggers.&nbsp; Seeing a similar tactic adopted in Obama coverage (and leading it to an association with Iran&#8217;s president) has set off online alarm bells. &#8220;Many of us would like to believe that different types of alcohol can produce very different effects. If only it were that simple.&#8221;&nbsp; It totally makes sense to me that alcohol is alcohol as far as the body is concerned, but for some reason I want to cling to the idea that different liquors produce different &#8220;kinds of drunk.&#8221; Christmas 2.0: Subverting the Holidays With Re-dubbing - Still more mashed up children&#8217;s holiday specials. &#8220;The Nietzsche Family Circus pairs a randomized Family Circus cartoon with a randomized Friedrich Nietzsche quote.&#8221; Giant knitting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New York Times Tries To Get Social, Doesn&#8217;t Quite Get It</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-524267</link>
		<dc:creator>The New York Times Tries To Get Social, Doesn&#8217;t Quite Get It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-524267</guid>
		<description>[...] By now you have read about The New York Times and its decision to allow readers to post stories directly from their website to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. Although TechCrunch remarks that New York Times Surrenders To Social News, allow me to explore some problems with the purported &#8217;surrender&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By now you have read about The New York Times and its decision to allow readers to post stories directly from their website to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. Although TechCrunch remarks that New York Times Surrenders To Social News, allow me to explore some problems with the purported &#8217;surrender&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MondoBlog &#187; Blog &#187; Gossip dalla blogosfera - Edizione Speciale</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-523964</link>
		<dc:creator>MondoBlog &#187; Blog &#187; Gossip dalla blogosfera - Edizione Speciale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-523964</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington vs Dave Winer: Michael (TechCrunch) ha accolto con commenti al vetriolo la comparsa sul NYT di uno spazio per l&#8217;interazione con i social nookmarking ottenuto da alcune icone pixel. Dave Winer (Scripting.com) è giunto in soccorso del NYT e i commenti sui rispettivi blog  appaiono infuocati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington vs Dave Winer: Michael (TechCrunch) ha accolto con commenti al vetriolo la comparsa sul NYT di uno spazio per l&#8217;interazione con i social nookmarking ottenuto da alcune icone pixel. Dave Winer (Scripting.com) è giunto in soccorso del NYT e i commenti sui rispettivi blog  appaiono infuocati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medienlese &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Kindergarten-Schlacht der Blog-Giganten</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-523778</link>
		<dc:creator>medienlese &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Kindergarten-Schlacht der Blog-Giganten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-523778</guid>
		<description>[...] In der amerikanischen Medien-Blog-Szene fliegen die Fetzen: Michael Arrington, &#8220;Herausgeber&#8221; des ph&#228;nomenal erfolgreichen Blogs &#8220;Techcrunch&#8221;, hat das Kriegsbeil gegen Medien-Blogger Jeff Jarvis (&#8221;Buzzmachine&#8221;) und Blogging-Urgestein Dave Winer (&#8221;Scripting News&#8221;) ausgegraben. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In der amerikanischen Medien-Blog-Szene fliegen die Fetzen: Michael Arrington, &#8220;Herausgeber&#8221; des ph&#228;nomenal erfolgreichen Blogs &#8220;Techcrunch&#8221;, hat das Kriegsbeil gegen Medien-Blogger Jeff Jarvis (&#8221;Buzzmachine&#8221;) und Blogging-Urgestein Dave Winer (&#8221;Scripting News&#8221;) ausgegraben. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iStudio &#187; links for 2006-12-13</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-522770</link>
		<dc:creator>iStudio &#187; links for 2006-12-13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-522770</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch » New York Times Surrenders To Social News The New York Times has decided to let users post stories directly from their site to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. As of Monday, the paper will embed links to all three sites to most of their online stories (tags: socialmedia media bookmarks community internet News web2.0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch » New York Times Surrenders To Social News The New York Times has decided to let users post stories directly from their site to Digg, Facebook, and Newsvine. As of Monday, the paper will embed links to all three sites to most of their online stories (tags: socialmedia media bookmarks community internet News web2.0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Little big man</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-520195</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Little big man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-520195</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington loses it in the comments on his own blog, attacking his friend Dave Winer, Rafat Ali, and me. This all seems to spring from his odd, fetishistic hate of The New York Times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington loses it in the comments on his own blog, attacking his friend Dave Winer, Rafat Ali, and me. This all seems to spring from his odd, fetishistic hate of The New York Times. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rinkusu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2006-12-12</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516949</link>
		<dc:creator>rinkusu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2006-12-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516949</guid>
		<description>[...] New York TImesへの記事へDigg, Facebook, Newsvineへのリンクが付くように [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York TImesへの記事へDigg, Facebook, Newsvineへのリンクが付くように [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Kopija, integracija i online booking @ futuria.hr - internet marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516377</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Kopija, integracija i online booking @ futuria.hr - internet marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516377</guid>
		<description>[...] Što zajedničkog New York Times ima sa Diggom, Facebookom i Newsvineom? Pa eto, do sada baš i nije bilo neke pretjerane veze, ali i ograđeni vrtovi se počinju otvarati. Građansko novinarstvo i sudjelovanje su u điru. O čemu se radi provjerite na Techcrunchu. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Što zajedničkog New York Times ima sa Diggom, Facebookom i Newsvineom? Pa eto, do sada baš i nije bilo neke pretjerane veze, ali i ograđeni vrtovi se počinju otvarati. Građansko novinarstvo i sudjelovanje su u điru. O čemu se radi provjerite na Techcrunchu. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexblog.com: Rex Hammock&#8217;s weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-12</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516018</link>
		<dc:creator>rexblog.com: Rex Hammock&#8217;s weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-516018</guid>
		<description>[...] New York Times surrenders to social news &#124; TechCrunch NYTimes.com adds lots more icon flare to each story, confusing most, but tickling the fancies of Web 2.0 geeks everywhere. (tags: newspaper web2.0 social+media) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York Times surrenders to social news | TechCrunch NYTimes.com adds lots more icon flare to each story, confusing most, but tickling the fancies of Web 2.0 geeks everywhere. (tags: newspaper web2.0 social+media) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave vs. Mike &#124; The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave vs. Mike &#124; The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515789</guid>
		<description>[...] Today&#8217;s Dave Winer vs. Mike Arrington &#8216;debate&#8217; on TechCrunch was a pain to watch. I am with Dave on this one, by the way - why did Mike Arrington get so angry? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today&#8217;s Dave Winer vs. Mike Arrington &#8216;debate&#8217; on TechCrunch was a pain to watch. I am with Dave on this one, by the way - why did Mike Arrington get so angry? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey Mike &#8212; chill out, dude &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515348</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey Mike &#8212; chill out, dude &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515348</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay, so I thought Mike Arrington of TechCrunch had decided to take some time off to ski and hang out at his parents&#8217; place in upstate Washington, as he described on his personal blog last month. So then who is that doing all the flaming in the comments section at TechCrunch under the name &#8220;Mike Arrington?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay, so I thought Mike Arrington of TechCrunch had decided to take some time off to ski and hang out at his parents&#8217; place in upstate Washington, as he described on his personal blog last month. So then who is that doing all the flaming in the comments section at TechCrunch under the name &#8220;Mike Arrington?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515052</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515052</guid>
		<description>And I'm shutting down comments on this post. 

Dave, I'll still spearhead the effort to put a statue of you up in Palo Alto for all that you've contributed to our community, but you pissed me off today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m shutting down comments on this post. </p>
<p>Dave, I&#8217;ll still spearhead the effort to put a statue of you up in Palo Alto for all that you&#8217;ve contributed to our community, but you pissed me off today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Winer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515042</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Winer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/10/new-york-times-surrenders-to-social-news/#comment-515042</guid>
		<description>Please, let's stay on friendly terms Mike. I have great respect for you personally and professionally. I'm offering a virtual handshake to you. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, let&#8217;s stay on friendly terms Mike. I have great respect for you personally and professionally. I&#8217;m offering a virtual handshake to you. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.131 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
