<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNBC Relaunches: Heavy Focus on Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stress</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-1202672</link>
		<dc:creator>stress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-1202672</guid>
		<description>i hope they ll give better info than on tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope they ll give better info than on tv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New CNBC.com: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly &#187; The Bivings Report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-488130</link>
		<dc:creator>New CNBC.com: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly &#187; The Bivings Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-488130</guid>
		<description>[...] CNBC relaunched its website a few days ago after being offline for six months due the expiration of it&#8217;s deal with Microsoft.&#160; Here is&#160;a quick look at the Good, the Bad and the Ugly on the new site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNBC relaunched its website a few days ago after being offline for six months due the expiration of it&#8217;s deal with Microsoft.&nbsp; Here is&nbsp;a quick look at the Good, the Bad and the Ugly on the new site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-485286</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 04:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-485286</guid>
		<description>Finances, who cares about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finances, who cares about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483602</guid>
		<description>It's not even working (Firefox, Mac PPC).

Getting "NOT FOUND" errors. 

What's with the frames?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not even working (Firefox, Mac PPC).</p>
<p>Getting &#8220;NOT FOUND&#8221; errors. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s with the frames?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483532</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483532</guid>
		<description>Dude it is not even free, like bloomberg, how are they suppose to compete ... what a waste of a remake if your not going to make your webcasts streaming free.

Have they not even learned from the TV Stations mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude it is not even free, like bloomberg, how are they suppose to compete &#8230; what a waste of a remake if your not going to make your webcasts streaming free.</p>
<p>Have they not even learned from the TV Stations mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; CNBC、リニューアルでスタート、ビデオに重点</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483006</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; CNBC、リニューアルでスタート、ビデオに重点</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-483006</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  CNBC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  CNBC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Try again</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482889</link>
		<dc:creator>Try again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482889</guid>
		<description>They got it all wrong.  Ads are slow loading and it's missing important features.  I have to agree with these guys that it really sucks.

&lt;a href="http://www.digg.com/business_finance/CNBC_Launches_New_Website_It_Sucks" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.digg.com/business_finance/CNBC_Launches_New_Website_It_Sucks&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They got it all wrong.  Ads are slow loading and it&#8217;s missing important features.  I have to agree with these guys that it really sucks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digg.com/business_finance/CNBC_Launches_New_Website_It_Sucks" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.digg.com');">http://www.digg.com/business_f.....e_It_Sucks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482885</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482885</guid>
		<description>The ticker at the bottom of the page is annoying -- now my page up / page down doesn't work for the main article and I have to use the mouse to click on the scroll bar.  That's almost enough right there to not make me want to go back.

If they're really stuck on this ticker idea they could make it a pop under that people have control over if they want to see it.

Also I'm not sure if they are going to be succesful charging $10 a month for a video feed.  I really just want to watch about 30 minutes of it a day but can't see paying for it.  Maybe mutual fund / banks will subsidize this, ie open up a Charles Schwab account and get a free CNBC Plus account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ticker at the bottom of the page is annoying &#8212; now my page up / page down doesn&#8217;t work for the main article and I have to use the mouse to click on the scroll bar.  That&#8217;s almost enough right there to not make me want to go back.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re really stuck on this ticker idea they could make it a pop under that people have control over if they want to see it.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m not sure if they are going to be succesful charging $10 a month for a video feed.  I really just want to watch about 30 minutes of it a day but can&#8217;t see paying for it.  Maybe mutual fund / banks will subsidize this, ie open up a Charles Schwab account and get a free CNBC Plus account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bowles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482732</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482732</guid>
		<description>Bad design -  - coulumns - to many - advertisments - too many - Tech crunch went to far with the top banner ad - by the way - 

 - Mike?! Do you really have to whore out the top banner ? space -  if you need some money I could loan ya some bucks :) heh - later, RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad design -  - coulumns - to many - advertisments - too many - Tech crunch went to far with the top banner ad - by the way - </p>
<p> - Mike?! Do you really have to whore out the top banner ? space -  if you need some money I could loan ya some bucks <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> heh - later, RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482680</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482680</guid>
		<description>When are designers going to get away from taking a sharepoint style blocky multi-column approach for these large finance/corporate sites?  They paid someone a hell of a lot of money to design this site most likely, and it's just murder to get through.  There are multiple navigation metaphors, ajaxy scrolling, browser scrolling, horizontal scrolling, big ads, small ads, content in 10 different formats...Web 2.0 is sometimes a lot of b*llsh*t but one thing it has done is brought a heightened attention to design.  I don't think a lot of people will even deal with a site like this anymore - why bother when you can get the same information from a much better designed YahooFinance.  You gotta nail it or people feel like their time is being wasted.  And because this isn't a startup who lives the release early and often mantra, one shouldn't expect to see CNBC online change much any time soon. Hopefully they will prove me wrong and be more nimble than I give them credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are designers going to get away from taking a sharepoint style blocky multi-column approach for these large finance/corporate sites?  They paid someone a hell of a lot of money to design this site most likely, and it&#8217;s just murder to get through.  There are multiple navigation metaphors, ajaxy scrolling, browser scrolling, horizontal scrolling, big ads, small ads, content in 10 different formats&#8230;Web 2.0 is sometimes a lot of b*llsh*t but one thing it has done is brought a heightened attention to design.  I don&#8217;t think a lot of people will even deal with a site like this anymore - why bother when you can get the same information from a much better designed YahooFinance.  You gotta nail it or people feel like their time is being wasted.  And because this isn&#8217;t a startup who lives the release early and often mantra, one shouldn&#8217;t expect to see CNBC online change much any time soon. Hopefully they will prove me wrong and be more nimble than I give them credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoTechie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482647</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoTechie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-482647</guid>
		<description>News sites will have to embed more videos on their sits if they want to stay 
competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News sites will have to embed more videos on their sits if they want to stay<br />
competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481382</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481382</guid>
		<description>The large flashy ads under the tab navigation and on the right are quite distracting. Site is too content heavy with layout quite confusing. Can't really focus on anything. Too many tools/features/content featured on a single page. 

Didn't found anything to switch. Stick with Yahoo finance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The large flashy ads under the tab navigation and on the right are quite distracting. Site is too content heavy with layout quite confusing. Can&#8217;t really focus on anything. Too many tools/features/content featured on a single page. </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t found anything to switch. Stick with Yahoo finance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 07:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481307</guid>
		<description>I liked the site design but hated the ticker at the bottom. Also the horizontal scroll bar was annoying..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the site design but hated the ticker at the bottom. Also the horizontal scroll bar was annoying..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481162</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481162</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michael :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481156</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481156</guid>
		<description>Oops, i meant to say 'T' missing in the last sentence of third para from the top. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, i meant to say &#8216;T&#8217; missing in the last sentence of third para from the top. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481154</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481154</guid>
		<description>Slow and bulky...just like a Myspace page. Ugh. I'm not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slow and bulky&#8230;just like a Myspace page. Ugh. I&#8217;m not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481124</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03/cnbc-relaunches-heavy-focus-on-video/#comment-481124</guid>
		<description>Couple of typos. Extra "T" at the end of the post and "T" missing in the last sentence of the last para :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of typos. Extra &#8220;T&#8221; at the end of the post and &#8220;T&#8221; missing in the last sentence of the last para <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.068 seconds -->
