<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Says They&#8217;re Not Building A Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DEPRESSIONE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-1197027</link>
		<dc:creator>DEPRESSIONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-1197027</guid>
		<description>i agree that google is a lot better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that google is a lot better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-479518</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-479518</guid>
		<description>Google is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-476823</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 06:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-476823</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo! affirme ne pas construire de bibliothèque...&lt;/strong&gt;

La société Yahoo! http://www.yahoo.com/ insiste sur le fait qu&#8217;elle n&#8217;essaie pas d&#8217;entrer en concurrence avec Google Book Search .
Le 20 Novembre Google assigné Yahoo! devant la justice concernant les activités de ce dernier sur l...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo! affirme ne pas construire de bibliothèque&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>La société Yahoo! <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yahoo.com/</a> insiste sur le fait qu&#8217;elle n&#8217;essaie pas d&#8217;entrer en concurrence avec Google Book Search .<br />
Le 20 Novembre Google assigné Yahoo! devant la justice concernant les activités de ce dernier sur l&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basement Tapes &#187; Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-473114</link>
		<dc:creator>Basement Tapes &#187; Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-473114</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-472711</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-472711</guid>
		<description>I happen to like using Google's book search and almost wish that I was back in school writing papers. Oh the sources I could find!

However, as a content creator, I understand the concerns expressed by organizations and authors that are worried about losing control of their copyrighted material. In some ways, I want to tell them to get on the bus and realize that the searches will probably not hurt their book sales and might even help new customers to find them, but I also think that Google should make some financial agreements before simply exposing the content.

It is great that Yahoo and friends are trying to come up with a method that both satisfies customers and providers, but so far, I will stick with Google Book Search and hope that it just keeps getting better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to like using Google&#8217;s book search and almost wish that I was back in school writing papers. Oh the sources I could find!</p>
<p>However, as a content creator, I understand the concerns expressed by organizations and authors that are worried about losing control of their copyrighted material. In some ways, I want to tell them to get on the bus and realize that the searches will probably not hurt their book sales and might even help new customers to find them, but I also think that Google should make some financial agreements before simply exposing the content.</p>
<p>It is great that Yahoo and friends are trying to come up with a method that both satisfies customers and providers, but so far, I will stick with Google Book Search and hope that it just keeps getting better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomic Insights Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-472667</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-472667</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The enemy of my enemy is my friend...&lt;/strong&gt;

One of my goals with this blog is to help people to understand that the energy debates are not just a discussion about technology - it is also a very important financial "game". Unfortunately, it is very difficult to tell which "team" many of the p...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The enemy of my enemy is my friend&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One of my goals with this blog is to help people to understand that the energy debates are not just a discussion about technology - it is also a very important financial &#8220;game&#8221;. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to tell which &#8220;team&#8221; many of the p&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheese</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 04:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471604</guid>
		<description>Considering that Google took funding from Yahoo and partnered with Yahoo on search services based on not competing with Yahoo (they were going to take on Micro$oft right?), then turned around and instead of competing with M$ they jut bit into every product Yahoo has, I'd say that the passive/agressive medal goes to Google.

Aside from a lame online spreadsheet Google's done nothing  in the way of competition with M$.  Instead they've tried to enter every product space Yahoo has, and with sucky and/or unpopular results so far.  Aside from their search advertising and maybe maps there's not a single product of Google's that is more popular than the equivalent Yahoo one.

As for the library battle, all's fair once your competitor is a major biter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that Google took funding from Yahoo and partnered with Yahoo on search services based on not competing with Yahoo (they were going to take on Micro$oft right?), then turned around and instead of competing with M$ they jut bit into every product Yahoo has, I&#8217;d say that the passive/agressive medal goes to Google.</p>
<p>Aside from a lame online spreadsheet Google&#8217;s done nothing  in the way of competition with M$.  Instead they&#8217;ve tried to enter every product space Yahoo has, and with sucky and/or unpopular results so far.  Aside from their search advertising and maybe maps there&#8217;s not a single product of Google&#8217;s that is more popular than the equivalent Yahoo one.</p>
<p>As for the library battle, all&#8217;s fair once your competitor is a major biter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471316</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471316</guid>
		<description>I think Google is making a smart move with this books move, and that it could be good for publishers as well. Its a nice way to read brief extracts from a book you are interested in, or finding information on rare subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is making a smart move with this books move, and that it could be good for publishers as well. Its a nice way to read brief extracts from a book you are interested in, or finding information on rare subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 「ライブラリーは作っていません」とYahoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471037</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 「ライブラリーは作っていません」とYahoo!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-471037</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  Google Yahoo! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  Google Yahoo! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denver Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470489</link>
		<dc:creator>Denver Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470489</guid>
		<description>From my point of view, the core technology of Yahoo and google is similar, but talking about the execution, Google is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my point of view, the core technology of Yahoo and google is similar, but talking about the execution, Google is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pirate o'hara</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470426</link>
		<dc:creator>pirate o'hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470426</guid>
		<description>So google's sexual organs are bigger. Big deal. 10 years from now another company will come and beat Google, and another Peter will bash on techcrunch about them not being really rivals; then 20 years from now another company will come and beat the other company ... and blabla blabla. And when your teeth are falling and you're wearing diapers, you'll perhaps realize all the bs you wasted your time with...
What arrogance to say Yahoo will be gone in 6 months. Not even the founders of Google know it all to be able to say that - clearly you're not one of them because you waste your time writing about the absolute truth and other bs only you believe in. In an age with such a diversity for products as today, saying that Yahoo will be gone within 6 months just because of Google's success is plain stupid. You seem to have a really narrow vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So google&#8217;s sexual organs are bigger. Big deal. 10 years from now another company will come and beat Google, and another Peter will bash on techcrunch about them not being really rivals; then 20 years from now another company will come and beat the other company &#8230; and blabla blabla. And when your teeth are falling and you&#8217;re wearing diapers, you&#8217;ll perhaps realize all the bs you wasted your time with&#8230;<br />
What arrogance to say Yahoo will be gone in 6 months. Not even the founders of Google know it all to be able to say that - clearly you&#8217;re not one of them because you waste your time writing about the absolute truth and other bs only you believe in. In an age with such a diversity for products as today, saying that Yahoo will be gone within 6 months just because of Google&#8217;s success is plain stupid. You seem to have a really narrow vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George P.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470406</link>
		<dc:creator>George P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470406</guid>
		<description>@Peter:

"yahoo will be gone in six months - with a weasly enough managment team - something they surely possess - they might last 12 months. in the arena of totalitarian organizations - that is, corporations - google has a strong and willing tri-dictatorship."

Thats a pretty ridiculous statement.  Yahoo! and Google are two very different companies, that find common ground on Search and Marketing (selling).  Yahoo! is a social media company, that actually outgrew Google in search traffic last year (http://googlewatch.eweek.com/blogs/google_watch/archive/2006/11/20/14741.aspx)
.

At the core of Yahoo's problem, is a very bad technology for monetizing their traffic (both search and other).  Hopefully, this will change very soon.  In January Panama will be fully implemented and be used by everyone.

-- George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter:</p>
<p>&#8220;yahoo will be gone in six months - with a weasly enough managment team - something they surely possess - they might last 12 months. in the arena of totalitarian organizations - that is, corporations - google has a strong and willing tri-dictatorship.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats a pretty ridiculous statement.  Yahoo! and Google are two very different companies, that find common ground on Search and Marketing (selling).  Yahoo! is a social media company, that actually outgrew Google in search traffic last year (http://googlewatch.eweek.com/blogs/google_watch/archive/2006/11/20/14741.aspx)<br />
.</p>
<p>At the core of Yahoo&#8217;s problem, is a very bad technology for monetizing their traffic (both search and other).  Hopefully, this will change very soon.  In January Panama will be fully implemented and be used by everyone.</p>
<p>&#8211; George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library at dmense - beyond the web 2.0 hype</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470357</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library at dmense - beyond the web 2.0 hype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470357</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Yahoo! Says They’re Not Building A Library [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470343</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470343</guid>
		<description>in sports, it is objectionable to call any two teams 'rivals' when one team consistently beats down the other. thus, comparing Yahoo to Google is just not credible - it's without meaning.

sure, Russia was once a world power, but they'd been declining in power for decades when the Wall finally came down. the only reason any kind of 'cold war' mythology persisted for so long unchallenged was because the punditocracy saw fit to play their role correctly - that is, to not challenge conventional wisdom, to support the owners of our society.

further, Yahoo and Google are now more than ever, apples and oranges. Yahoo is a content company (at best). Google is a technology company.

yahoo will be gone in six months - with a weasly enough managment team - something they surely possess - they might last 12 months. in the arena of totalitarian organizations - that is, corporations - google has a strong and willing tri-dictatorship. 

these companies are not comparable. there is no 'saga' to be spoken of between them. the saga of a pathetic media company once the darling of the internet, though? si.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in sports, it is objectionable to call any two teams &#8216;rivals&#8217; when one team consistently beats down the other. thus, comparing Yahoo to Google is just not credible - it&#8217;s without meaning.</p>
<p>sure, Russia was once a world power, but they&#8217;d been declining in power for decades when the Wall finally came down. the only reason any kind of &#8216;cold war&#8217; mythology persisted for so long unchallenged was because the punditocracy saw fit to play their role correctly - that is, to not challenge conventional wisdom, to support the owners of our society.</p>
<p>further, Yahoo and Google are now more than ever, apples and oranges. Yahoo is a content company (at best). Google is a technology company.</p>
<p>yahoo will be gone in six months - with a weasly enough managment team - something they surely possess - they might last 12 months. in the arena of totalitarian organizations - that is, corporations - google has a strong and willing tri-dictatorship. </p>
<p>these companies are not comparable. there is no &#8217;saga&#8217; to be spoken of between them. the saga of a pathetic media company once the darling of the internet, though? si.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Huseman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470116</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Huseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/01/yahoo-says-theyre-not-building-a-library/#comment-470116</guid>
		<description>www.barristersites.com

www.lagunabeachlaw.com
www.lagunahillslaw.com
www.schaumburglaw.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.barristersites.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.barristersites.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lagunabeachlaw.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lagunabeachlaw.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lagunahillslaw.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lagunahillslaw.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.schaumburglaw.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.schaumburglaw.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.074 seconds -->
