<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Jotspot/Google Post Deleted Under Pressure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DEPRESSIONE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-1196982</link>
		<dc:creator>DEPRESSIONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-1196982</guid>
		<description>so good resoure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so good resoure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peni</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-1115443</link>
		<dc:creator>Peni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-1115443</guid>
		<description>Your site best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick M. Kolla</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-944572</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick M. Kolla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-944572</guid>
		<description>if your system got Fu^cked up by RogueRemover, here is what i did to fix it, I ended up hiding my partition with all my important stuff on it (Using Hirens Boot CD 8.8 and Paragon Partition Manager) , then remove assigned drive letter, and then did a full destroy and recover to Factory Specs., then after everything was back, i used Paragon Partition Manager to assign drive letter then unhide my Valuable partition. DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE, DO NOT INSTALL RogurRemover, it damages your boot sector and that will make it impossible to recover unless you do the steps that i mentioned here. I will raise my voice on their forums from now on, because this was such a bad headacke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your system got Fu^cked up by RogueRemover, here is what i did to fix it, I ended up hiding my partition with all my important stuff on it (Using Hirens Boot CD 8.8 and Paragon Partition Manager) , then remove assigned drive letter, and then did a full destroy and recover to Factory Specs., then after everything was back, i used Paragon Partition Manager to assign drive letter then unhide my Valuable partition. DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE, DO NOT INSTALL RogurRemover, it damages your boot sector and that will make it impossible to recover unless you do the steps that i mentioned here. I will raise my voice on their forums from now on, because this was such a bad headacke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra &#187; Why Web 2.0 is dangerous.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-609217</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra &#187; Why Web 2.0 is dangerous.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 00:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-609217</guid>
		<description>[...] With the move to webbify all our personal stuff we are also creating a potential disaster. After all what happens if any one of these companies that you are using to store your personal information with&#160;goes tits up - where&#8217;s your information? This is especially significant with regards to companies that are being conned into using Web 2.0 based on cost benefits. Sure the Web 2.0 companies may say that everything is safe and on the up and up but what happens if you invest time and energy in a Web 2.0 company only to be left out in the cold. A good example of this is the JotSpot purchase by Google (TechCrunch Article). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With the move to webbify all our personal stuff we are also creating a potential disaster. After all what happens if any one of these companies that you are using to store your personal information with&nbsp;goes tits up - where&#8217;s your information? This is especially significant with regards to companies that are being conned into using Web 2.0 based on cost benefits. Sure the Web 2.0 companies may say that everything is safe and on the up and up but what happens if you invest time and energy in a Web 2.0 company only to be left out in the cold. A good example of this is the JotSpot purchase by Google (TechCrunch Article). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-528414</link>
		<dc:creator>ggman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-528414</guid>
		<description>nice one!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice one!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Надежная основа &#124; AJAX Planet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-521210</link>
		<dc:creator>Надежная основа &#124; AJAX Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-521210</guid>
		<description>[...] Как недавно показала практика, это проблемы далеко не только небольших сайтов и сервисов. В начале месяца разразился небольшой скандал – один из партнеров JotSpot, коммерческого вики-сервиса, поведал в своем блоге о многочисленных проблемах, вызванных покупкой JotSpot Гуглом. Затем анонимный блоггер, скрывавшийся под ником Кевин, был вынужден убрать своё сообщение. TechCrunch не замедлил заинтересоваться этим вопросом. Вскоре выяснилось и кто же был этот «анонимный блоггер» &#8212; Kevin Hague, сооснователь Knowesys, золотого партнера JotSpot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Как недавно показала практика, это проблемы далеко не только небольших сайтов и сервисов. В начале месяца разразился небольшой скандал – один из партнеров JotSpot, коммерческого вики-сервиса, поведал в своем блоге о многочисленных проблемах, вызванных покупкой JotSpot Гуглом. Затем анонимный блоггер, скрывавшийся под ником Кевин, был вынужден убрать своё сообщение. TechCrunch не замедлил заинтересоваться этим вопросом. Вскоре выяснилось и кто же был этот «анонимный блоггер» &#8212; Kevin Hague, сооснователь Knowesys, золотого партнера JotSpot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofia Vergara</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-500059</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia Vergara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-500059</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;wiki farm...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting post. I came across this blog by accident, but it was a good accident. I have now bookmarked your blog for future use. Best wishes. Sofia Vergara....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>wiki farm&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting post. I came across this blog by accident, but it was a good accident. I have now bookmarked your blog for future use. Best wishes. Sofia Vergara&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computing at Scale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infrastructure as a Service</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-487178</link>
		<dc:creator>Computing at Scale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infrastructure as a Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-487178</guid>
		<description>[...] Much has been written over the past few years on &#8220;Software as a Service&#8221; (SaaS), the idea that basic office applications and other software will increasingly be delivered as hosted services by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and other leading web companies. The recent JotSpot/Google issue shows however that smaller SaaS compnaies may find it more difficult to persuade customers to give up control of even that kind of software to a service provider, although they probably would to a major player. In application areas where the software delivers major competitive advantage, such as business intelligence, it also seems unlikely that large corporations would contemplate outsourcing those applications to an external service provider of any size, rather than running their own internal systems and appliances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Much has been written over the past few years on &#8220;Software as a Service&#8221; (SaaS), the idea that basic office applications and other software will increasingly be delivered as hosted services by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and other leading web companies. The recent JotSpot/Google issue shows however that smaller SaaS compnaies may find it more difficult to persuade customers to give up control of even that kind of software to a service provider, although they probably would to a major player. In application areas where the software delivers major competitive advantage, such as business intelligence, it also seems unlikely that large corporations would contemplate outsourcing those applications to an external service provider of any size, rather than running their own internal systems and appliances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bronstein</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-483712</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bronstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-483712</guid>
		<description>In parallel with my comment here, the Jot folks made some changes that resolved our problems. Thanks Ben et al!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In parallel with my comment here, the Jot folks made some changes that resolved our problems. Thanks Ben et al!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcfads</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474686</link>
		<dc:creator>mcfads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474686</guid>
		<description>I'm deeply disturbed with myself for reading this far down the line of comments but I'll have to say I was entertained.  Like watching a car accident, it isn't pretty but something keeps you from starring.

I'll get back to my Saturday morning.  Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m deeply disturbed with myself for reading this far down the line of comments but I&#8217;ll have to say I was entertained.  Like watching a car accident, it isn&#8217;t pretty but something keeps you from starring.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get back to my Saturday morning.  Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Hilferding &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Lesson In Reputation Management Damage Control</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474317</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Hilferding &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Lesson In Reputation Management Damage Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474317</guid>
		<description>[...] Dec 1 8:51 AM: Kevin responds, clarifying that neither Jotspot or Google requested he remove the post. He doesn&#8217;t backpeddle on his position though (which is good): &#8220;I can imagine the synergies Google can provide and can’t wait to see what’s in store for the Jot platform and I’m sorry you are unable give more answers about this future. It’s a real bummer for us.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dec 1 8:51 AM: Kevin responds, clarifying that neither Jotspot or Google requested he remove the post. He doesn&#8217;t backpeddle on his position though (which is good): &#8220;I can imagine the synergies Google can provide and can’t wait to see what’s in store for the Jot platform and I’m sorry you are unable give more answers about this future. It’s a real bummer for us.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474137</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-474137</guid>
		<description>Now I know why I like this site. Here's the blogger (Michael) talking to himself (hiptrigger) in the wee hours, for public consumption. Is this what it is to live in the Valley? I'll stay in Seattle. 

P.S. to HoHoHum: Amen. I feel your pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I know why I like this site. Here&#8217;s the blogger (Michael) talking to himself (hiptrigger) in the wee hours, for public consumption. Is this what it is to live in the Valley? I&#8217;ll stay in Seattle. </p>
<p>P.S. to HoHoHum: Amen. I feel your pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-472709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-472709</guid>
		<description>It's ok. It's only you and me (and possibly Joe Kraus) reading this thread at this point. :-) Go make fun of our sponsor thank you post. I've left comments on for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ok. It&#8217;s only you and me (and possibly Joe Kraus) reading this thread at this point. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Go make fun of our sponsor thank you post. I&#8217;ve left comments on for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiptrigger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471441</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiptrigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471441</guid>
		<description>It's all good.

I understand. Huntington Beach. Is there an abbreviation for that? "A lawyer from LA" is just so rich though. Huntington Beach, well, is a real place. So I can't use that. I'll only use LA if I am really bent outta shape. 

Sorry for hijacking your comments. I'll get my own blog or something.
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>I understand. Huntington Beach. Is there an abbreviation for that? &#8220;A lawyer from LA&#8221; is just so rich though. Huntington Beach, well, is a real place. So I can&#8217;t use that. I&#8217;ll only use LA if I am really bent outta shape. </p>
<p>Sorry for hijacking your comments. I&#8217;ll get my own blog or something.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoHoHum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471433</link>
		<dc:creator>HoHoHum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 04:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471433</guid>
		<description>Dave Newton, I certainly believe in individual success and I am at least ambivalent with respect to successful companies (why someone would ever get attached to a legal entity is beyond me, but I guess that's why I don't work for anyone else). 

But I despise hypocrisy above all else. Don't pretend that you're morally superior and then turn around and sell your own Grandmother to the Chinese for a nickel. And don't bleat about inconvenient intellectual property laws as you steal the world's copyrights yet keep your own IP locked inside a bank vault. 

If you're going to screw me at least have the dignity to be honest about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Newton, I certainly believe in individual success and I am at least ambivalent with respect to successful companies (why someone would ever get attached to a legal entity is beyond me, but I guess that&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t work for anyone else). </p>
<p>But I despise hypocrisy above all else. Don&#8217;t pretend that you&#8217;re morally superior and then turn around and sell your own Grandmother to the Chinese for a nickel. And don&#8217;t bleat about inconvenient intellectual property laws as you steal the world&#8217;s copyrights yet keep your own IP locked inside a bank vault. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to screw me at least have the dignity to be honest about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471373</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471373</guid>
		<description>I definitely wanna-get-rich, but I also love what I do. And I'm from Huntington Beach, which isn't LA at all. All the other stuff is accurate though. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely wanna-get-rich, but I also love what I do. And I&#8217;m from Huntington Beach, which isn&#8217;t LA at all. All the other stuff is accurate though. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiptrigger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471319</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiptrigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471319</guid>
		<description>lol. At least there is a sense of humor here. 
Free press is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol. At least there is a sense of humor here.<br />
Free press is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiptrigger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471301</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiptrigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471301</guid>
		<description>david8 - Whatever. I read it because it can be good on occasion, but I think Arrington is a wanna-get-rich lawyer from LA, not the anti-christ. I think it's a waste of time to only read stuff that one agree's with. The other articles and the concept of the blog are good - but the real stinkers that Arrington has dropped-in lately smack of ratings tricks and slimy salesmanship. I am entitled to my opinion so deal with it junior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david8 - Whatever. I read it because it can be good on occasion, but I think Arrington is a wanna-get-rich lawyer from LA, not the anti-christ. I think it&#8217;s a waste of time to only read stuff that one agree&#8217;s with. The other articles and the concept of the blog are good - but the real stinkers that Arrington has dropped-in lately smack of ratings tricks and slimy salesmanship. I am entitled to my opinion so deal with it junior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471284</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471284</guid>
		<description>Hiptrigger can't stop reading - he's actually my alternate identity, which i use occasionally to keep things interesting around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiptrigger can&#8217;t stop reading - he&#8217;s actually my alternate identity, which i use occasionally to keep things interesting around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiptrigger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471276</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiptrigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471276</guid>
		<description>Well my esteemed HoHoHumdinger, I like your logic that Mr. Softy is somehow better in their business practices if only by virtue of not claiming to not be bad. 

All kidding aside, my views regarding big corporations are far more cynical as in late-stage capitalism is a testiment as to how far greed, short-term planning, self-interest and fear of death can go. But life and its appetites crawls on...

Here are a few IMHO thoughts on Google 'destroying the Valley' (btw this most definitely *not* Google-bashing, merely my observations on the impact on business as it stands today with the Google fusion bomb blowing up under our feet.): 

1. It used to be more or less us (The Valley) against them (Redmond). Now it's us (we, the few, the proud, the 'indies') against 80% of Mountain View and on down the 101 --thinking of the planned Moffet Google/NASA matrix battery farm, oh I mean Googleplex.

2. They have sucked the valley braintrust dry of good backend engineers and anyone who can spell semantic or bayesian. (Oops I better be careful.)

3. They have distorted the local salary and stock-option picture, just as AOLscape and Yahoo! did back in the late 90's.

4. The first words out of anyone's mouth around here when you present a new idea or discuss any reasonable technological/communication/yadda innovation is "Well what if Google decided to do this?" or "Isn't this a feature of Google?" ...as if Google stands for the G-D web/internet or brainwaves of life itself. Many folks are no longer designing/building/coding for people or the web - they are coding in the Google vortex and how all things relate to it. I miss the promise of the net before there were 8000 kiloton gorillas trampling about.

5. I am tired of one entity having such big ambitions. To organize and make accessible all the world information isn't the job of one company, a corporation registered in Delaware, U.S.A. It's is the job of many smaller components - from individuals and cities to companies and international organizations. 

----
BTW Arrington still shouldn't have pulled a turd out of a crawler's cache somewhere and cried wolf. It's obvious he has an anti-Google agenda. You aren't Arrington are you hohoHummer? In any event, I gave you five points to explore .. I am sure the collective here can come up with more legitimate ones. Most listed above by others were blind bashing and some were just made up (re stock options, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well my esteemed HoHoHumdinger, I like your logic that Mr. Softy is somehow better in their business practices if only by virtue of not claiming to not be bad. </p>
<p>All kidding aside, my views regarding big corporations are far more cynical as in late-stage capitalism is a testiment as to how far greed, short-term planning, self-interest and fear of death can go. But life and its appetites crawls on&#8230;</p>
<p>Here are a few IMHO thoughts on Google &#8216;destroying the Valley&#8217; (btw this most definitely *not* Google-bashing, merely my observations on the impact on business as it stands today with the Google fusion bomb blowing up under our feet.): </p>
<p>1. It used to be more or less us (The Valley) against them (Redmond). Now it&#8217;s us (we, the few, the proud, the &#8216;indies&#8217;) against 80% of Mountain View and on down the 101 &#8211;thinking of the planned Moffet Google/NASA matrix battery farm, oh I mean Googleplex.</p>
<p>2. They have sucked the valley braintrust dry of good backend engineers and anyone who can spell semantic or bayesian. (Oops I better be careful.)</p>
<p>3. They have distorted the local salary and stock-option picture, just as AOLscape and Yahoo! did back in the late 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>4. The first words out of anyone&#8217;s mouth around here when you present a new idea or discuss any reasonable technological/communication/yadda innovation is &#8220;Well what if Google decided to do this?&#8221; or &#8220;Isn&#8217;t this a feature of Google?&#8221; &#8230;as if Google stands for the G-D web/internet or brainwaves of life itself. Many folks are no longer designing/building/coding for people or the web - they are coding in the Google vortex and how all things relate to it. I miss the promise of the net before there were 8000 kiloton gorillas trampling about.</p>
<p>5. I am tired of one entity having such big ambitions. To organize and make accessible all the world information isn&#8217;t the job of one company, a corporation registered in Delaware, U.S.A. It&#8217;s is the job of many smaller components - from individuals and cities to companies and international organizations. </p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
BTW Arrington still shouldn&#8217;t have pulled a turd out of a crawler&#8217;s cache somewhere and cried wolf. It&#8217;s obvious he has an anti-Google agenda. You aren&#8217;t Arrington are you hohoHummer? In any event, I gave you five points to explore .. I am sure the collective here can come up with more legitimate ones. Most listed above by others were blind bashing and some were just made up (re stock options, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david8</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471237</link>
		<dc:creator>david8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471237</guid>
		<description>Hiptrigger -- 

How many times are you going to repeat what is essentially the same rant over and over and over again in numerous threads? Yeah, we all know that you think that Arrington is the anti-christ and anyone who disagrees with you is a stupid suckup.

If you hate tech crunch that much, there's a simple solution -- don't read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiptrigger &#8212; </p>
<p>How many times are you going to repeat what is essentially the same rant over and over and over again in numerous threads? Yeah, we all know that you think that Arrington is the anti-christ and anyone who disagrees with you is a stupid suckup.</p>
<p>If you hate tech crunch that much, there&#8217;s a simple solution &#8212; don&#8217;t read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bronstein</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471193</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bronstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471193</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe, we feel pretty burned too! We started using Jotstpot because one of our earliest employees is/was a close friend of Ben Lutch. So we figured Jot was worth looking at and could be trusted - we in fact were paying you guys the max amount per month until the acquisition (when you stopped charging).

These days (post-acquisition) our wiki is down more than it is up, which has a very big impact on our business. We have repeatedly emailed Jotspot support to no avail. Google acquired you in order to serve smaller customers than us - so you left us out to dry. We have certainly learned *our* lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe, we feel pretty burned too! We started using Jotstpot because one of our earliest employees is/was a close friend of Ben Lutch. So we figured Jot was worth looking at and could be trusted - we in fact were paying you guys the max amount per month until the acquisition (when you stopped charging).</p>
<p>These days (post-acquisition) our wiki is down more than it is up, which has a very big impact on our business. We have repeatedly emailed Jotspot support to no avail. Google acquired you in order to serve smaller customers than us - so you left us out to dry. We have certainly learned *our* lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471105</guid>
		<description>One of the laws of physics -- right up there with action-reaction:  humans love success, and hate successful people and companies exponentially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the laws of physics &#8212; right up there with action-reaction:  humans love success, and hate successful people and companies exponentially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike aronson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471093</link>
		<dc:creator>mike aronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-471093</guid>
		<description>Yaaaawwwwn.

A large company buys a small company. And the small company's friends and supporters feel hurt.

So what?

Deal with it friends or get out of the business. 

The good news is these people don't matter. And that is as it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaaaawwwwn.</p>
<p>A large company buys a small company. And the small company&#8217;s friends and supporters feel hurt.</p>
<p>So what?</p>
<p>Deal with it friends or get out of the business. </p>
<p>The good news is these people don&#8217;t matter. And that is as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 美人她爹 &#187; 说什么什么就来</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-470791</link>
		<dc:creator>美人她爹 &#187; 说什么什么就来</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/30/anti-jotspotgoogle-post-deleted-under-pressure/#comment-470791</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch也有相关报道，糟糕的是，这个事件本身先是一个blogger抱怨自己公司的数据因为Jotspot被google买了而丢失，还抱怨online applicaion不安全，然后这个blog被作者删了。玩BBS的都知道，因为争议而被删的贴子是活的最久的贴子，这一删可是删出麻烦来了。TechCrunch这个惟恐天下不乱的家伙居然说是因为迫于压力而被删除的： [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch也有相关报道，糟糕的是，这个事件本身先是一个blogger抱怨自己公司的数据因为Jotspot被google买了而丢失，还抱怨online applicaion不安全，然后这个blog被作者删了。玩BBS的都知道，因为争议而被删的贴子是活的最久的贴子，这一删可是删出麻烦来了。TechCrunch这个惟恐天下不乱的家伙居然说是因为迫于压力而被删除的： [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.111 seconds -->
