<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:32:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-2770721</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-2770721</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. I have been looking for a great alternative for payperpost, since payperpost has a risk to lower he reputation of my bog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. I have been looking for a great alternative for payperpost, since payperpost has a risk to lower he reputation of my bog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalpointing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-2516045</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalpointing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-2516045</guid>
		<description>But i don&#039;t know why - mine wasn&#039;t even accepted at REviewme. Can you please tell me if there are any minimum requirements to get accepted at Reiewme ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But i don&#8217;t know why &#8211; mine wasn&#8217;t even accepted at REviewme. Can you please tell me if there are any minimum requirements to get accepted at Reiewme ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reviewme.com on LCDs Assistant &#124; Pageranklink</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-1493374</link>
		<dc:creator>Reviewme.com on LCDs Assistant &#124; Pageranklink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-1493374</guid>
		<description>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayPerPost Secures $7 Million In Funding - The Article Writer - Press Releases &#124; Web Content Writing &#124; Targeted Articles &#124; SEO Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-1426713</link>
		<dc:creator>PayPerPost Secures $7 Million In Funding - The Article Writer - Press Releases &#124; Web Content Writing &#124; Targeted Articles &#124; SEO Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-1426713</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington professed that PayPerPost sold the souls of bloggers. In November 2006, Arrington warmly announced the launch of ReviewMe, disclosing that this competing product (developed by TextLinkAds, an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington professed that PayPerPost sold the souls of bloggers. In November 2006, Arrington warmly announced the launch of ReviewMe, disclosing that this competing product (developed by TextLinkAds, an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: provig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-930317</link>
		<dc:creator>provig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-930317</guid>
		<description>Sedentary Lifestyle: Lack of exercise may lead to ED. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tiny.pl/chzc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;erectile dysfunction and alcohol&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sedentary Lifestyle: Lack of exercise may lead to ED. <a href="http://tiny.pl/chzc" rel="nofollow">erectile dysfunction and alcohol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy The Blogging Poet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-664505</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy The Blogging Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-664505</guid>
		<description>I tried ReviewMe.com and &lt;a href=&quot;http://bloggingpoet.squarespace.com/bloggingpoetcom/2007/1/5/reviewmecom-still-in-arrears.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;didn&#039;t get paid&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried ReviewMe.com and <a href="http://bloggingpoet.squarespace.com/bloggingpoetcom/2007/1/5/reviewmecom-still-in-arrears.html" rel="nofollow">didn&#8217;t get paid</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-536970</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-536970</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OK now how did that make you feel?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well it&#8217;s the morning after and I have to decide if I can still live with myself. 
Yesterday, of course, I dipped my toes in the (murky?) waters of paid reviews with Review: Search Engine Marketing Glossary. Today I see that my review has been ac...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OK now how did that make you feel?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s the morning after and I have to decide if I can still live with myself.<br />
Yesterday, of course, I dipped my toes in the (murky?) waters of paid reviews with Review: Search Engine Marketing Glossary. Today I see that my review has been ac&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remarkoo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-486991</link>
		<dc:creator>Remarkoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-486991</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Non Sponsored Review of ReviewMe...&lt;/strong&gt;



So ReviewMe launched last week and I must say it&#8217;s a very interesting idea.
It allows bloggers to write sponsored posts in return for money from advertisers. You can earn between $20 and $200 per post. ReviewMe calculates your worth by using ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Non Sponsored Review of ReviewMe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So ReviewMe launched last week and I must say it&#8217;s a very interesting idea.<br />
It allows bloggers to write sponsored posts in return for money from advertisers. You can earn between $20 and $200 per post. ReviewMe calculates your worth by using &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simples Assim &#187; A onda dos textos pagos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-458290</link>
		<dc:creator>Simples Assim &#187; A onda dos textos pagos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-458290</guid>
		<description>[...] Alguns sites especializados dizem que o Review Me é uma alternativa mais ética do que o Pay-per-post, um serviço similar, mas que obrigava os textos a serem positivos somente e sem nenhuma nota dizendo que o texto é patrocinado. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alguns sites especializados dizem que o Review Me é uma alternativa mais ética do que o Pay-per-post, um serviço similar, mas que obrigava os textos a serem positivos somente e sem nenhuma nota dizendo que o texto é patrocinado. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web2.0Fan.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-422699</link>
		<dc:creator>Web2.0Fan.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-422699</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;终于出了一个 ReviewMe...&lt;/strong&gt;

看看上一篇的日期是11月2日，现在已经是21日了。又是要一个月没有更新，原因是最近太忙了！废话少说，还是赶快来介绍一下昨天刚刚试用的 ReviewMe，一个我很久以前就想要的广告平台。
前...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>终于出了一个 ReviewMe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>看看上一篇的日期是11月2日，现在已经是21日了。又是要一个月没有更新，原因是最近太忙了！废话少说，还是赶快来介绍一下昨天刚刚试用的 ReviewMe，一个我很久以前就想要的广告平台。<br />
前&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 滄海一聲笑- 笑不出還可以哭 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [找粗] ReviewMe.com- Bloggers生財之道</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-413821</link>
		<dc:creator>滄海一聲笑- 笑不出還可以哭 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [找粗] ReviewMe.com- Bloggers生財之道</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-413821</guid>
		<description>[...] ReviewMe于09-11-2006開始運行 它是Text Link Ads.旗下的業務 (資料出自:TechCrunch） 隨意我們可以放心 ^________^ 只是誰是它的媽媽 我暫時還找不到相關的資料 只是在SEOBook.com看到這個的信息 We launched ReviewMe today. And reviews are coming in, including one from Tech Crunch. Yippie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReviewMe于09-11-2006開始運行 它是Text Link Ads.旗下的業務 (資料出自:TechCrunch） 隨意我們可以放心 ^________^ 只是誰是它的媽媽 我暫時還找不到相關的資料 只是在SEOBook.com看到這個的信息 We launched ReviewMe today. And reviews are coming in, including one from Tech Crunch. Yippie. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Vlietinck</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-408789</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Vlietinck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-408789</guid>
		<description>With regards to Gene&#039;s remark:

1. You&#039;d be surprised at what advertisers are willing to pay for... Dealing directly with advertisers has taught me a lot of them not using professionals web marketeers don&#039;t know what this web advertising is about, and they have all kinds of wrong assumptions about it.

2. Compare it to &#039;advertorials&#039; in the world of paper-magazines.

3. I don&#039;t believe any blogger will get rich from ReviewMe income. It&#039;s all very relative. Why would you feel under pressure if your monthly income won&#039;t run in the thousands?

4. That&#039;s a point worth mentioning, but IMMHO, it&#039;s the same as saying that small directories and SEs should be spared by Google... Perhaps they should.

-Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to Gene&#8217;s remark:</p>
<p>1. You&#8217;d be surprised at what advertisers are willing to pay for&#8230; Dealing directly with advertisers has taught me a lot of them not using professionals web marketeers don&#8217;t know what this web advertising is about, and they have all kinds of wrong assumptions about it.</p>
<p>2. Compare it to &#8216;advertorials&#8217; in the world of paper-magazines.</p>
<p>3. I don&#8217;t believe any blogger will get rich from ReviewMe income. It&#8217;s all very relative. Why would you feel under pressure if your monthly income won&#8217;t run in the thousands?</p>
<p>4. That&#8217;s a point worth mentioning, but IMMHO, it&#8217;s the same as saying that small directories and SEs should be spared by Google&#8230; Perhaps they should.</p>
<p>-Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Gelle &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-401436</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Gelle &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-401436</guid>
		<description>[...] And the runner-up ReviewMe gets noticed as well. ”While we do not endorse this business model, we do note that ReviewMe has removed the most egregious aspects of the PayPerPost business model: no disclosure requirement, and a requirement to write a positive post. ” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And the runner-up ReviewMe gets noticed as well. ”While we do not endorse this business model, we do note that ReviewMe has removed the most egregious aspects of the PayPerPost business model: no disclosure requirement, and a requirement to write a positive post. ” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Dohms &#187; ReviewMe: Ganhe dinheiro por sua opinião!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-401413</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Dohms &#187; ReviewMe: Ganhe dinheiro por sua opinião!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-401413</guid>
		<description>[...] O serviço é razoavelmente simples, você procura um tópico que deseja falar sobre (produto, site, etc..), solicita a permissão, que é aprovada pelo anunciante. Uma vez aprovado você escreve o artigo, envia o URL e pouco tempo depois recebe o pagamento. A quantia é relativa ao “destaque” de seu site, o Bruno Alves e o TechCrunch detalharam um pouco mais sobre isso. Os pagamentos vão de US$ 30 a US$ 1,000, dependendo do seu rank. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O serviço é razoavelmente simples, você procura um tópico que deseja falar sobre (produto, site, etc..), solicita a permissão, que é aprovada pelo anunciante. Uma vez aprovado você escreve o artigo, envia o URL e pouco tempo depois recebe o pagamento. A quantia é relativa ao “destaque” de seu site, o Bruno Alves e o TechCrunch detalharam um pouco mais sobre isso. Os pagamentos vão de US$ 30 a US$ 1,000, dependendo do seu rank. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReviewMe mit neuem Werbemodell &#187; Chuchichäschtli - Made in Switzerland</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-388875</link>
		<dc:creator>ReviewMe mit neuem Werbemodell &#187; Chuchichäschtli - Made in Switzerland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-388875</guid>
		<description>[...] Weitere Meinungen: Techcrunch Bloggingtom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weitere Meinungen: Techcrunch Bloggingtom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reviewme.com on LCDs Assistant at LCDs Assistant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-388461</link>
		<dc:creator>Reviewme.com on LCDs Assistant at LCDs Assistant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-388461</guid>
		<description>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reviewme.com at Enthousiasmeren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-388290</link>
		<dc:creator>Reviewme.com at Enthousiasmeren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-388290</guid>
		<description>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReviewMe Launches: A Better PayPerPost by Michael Arrington / TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mStraz SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-383592</link>
		<dc:creator>mStraz SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-383592</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Non Sponsored Review of ReviewMe...&lt;/strong&gt;

So ReviewMe launched last week and I must say it&#8217;s a very interesting idea.
It allows bloggers to write sponsored posts in return for money from advertisers. You can earn between $20 and $200 per post. ReviewMe calculates your worth by using an a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Non Sponsored Review of ReviewMe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So ReviewMe launched last week and I must say it&#8217;s a very interesting idea.<br />
It allows bloggers to write sponsored posts in return for money from advertisers. You can earn between $20 and $200 per post. ReviewMe calculates your worth by using an a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddhr.org - ReviewMe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-383568</link>
		<dc:creator>ddhr.org - ReviewMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-383568</guid>
		<description>[...] And that&#039;s cool by me.&#160; ReviewMe is the new kid on the block in the pay-per-something game.&#160; For now, it&#039;s competing with PayPerPost, the site that recently won the &quot;Leaves Worst Taste In Mouth&quot; award.&#160; As TechCrunch points out, ReviewMe has two major advantages over PayPerPost:&#160; Required disclosure and honest opinions.&#160; Every post about a ReviewMe product/website needs to be announced as a paid post.&#160; One of the biggest criticisms about PayPerPost was that posts could look like they were unbiased when they were in fact paid.&#160; This wouldn&#039;t necessarily change the content of the post, but some people didn&#039;t like being left in the dark.&#160; The other big criticism was that advertisers on PayPerPost could require that a post be positive.&#160; This essentially amounts to bribery, and it obviously left many people with a negative view of PayPerPost.&#160; The only real requirement for ReviewMe posts is that they&#039;re 200 words or more.&#160; At first that sounds like kind of a lot (I didn&#039;t write papers in college; I did math problems), but it turns out that 200 words are pretty easy to come up with when you have a brain oozing with nonsense.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And that&#8217;s cool by me.&nbsp; ReviewMe is the new kid on the block in the pay-per-something game.&nbsp; For now, it&#8217;s competing with PayPerPost, the site that recently won the &#8220;Leaves Worst Taste In Mouth&#8221; award.&nbsp; As TechCrunch points out, ReviewMe has two major advantages over PayPerPost:&nbsp; Required disclosure and honest opinions.&nbsp; Every post about a ReviewMe product/website needs to be announced as a paid post.&nbsp; One of the biggest criticisms about PayPerPost was that posts could look like they were unbiased when they were in fact paid.&nbsp; This wouldn&#8217;t necessarily change the content of the post, but some people didn&#8217;t like being left in the dark.&nbsp; The other big criticism was that advertisers on PayPerPost could require that a post be positive.&nbsp; This essentially amounts to bribery, and it obviously left many people with a negative view of PayPerPost.&nbsp; The only real requirement for ReviewMe posts is that they&#8217;re 200 words or more.&nbsp; At first that sounds like kind of a lot (I didn&#8217;t write papers in college; I did math problems), but it turns out that 200 words are pretty easy to come up with when you have a brain oozing with nonsense.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juuso - Game Producer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-382523</link>
		<dc:creator>Juuso - Game Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-382523</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip. &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/11/11/reviewmecom-opportunity-to-bloggers-earn-some-income-by-doing-reviews/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earned my $50&lt;/a&gt; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip. <a href='http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/11/11/reviewmecom-opportunity-to-bloggers-earn-some-income-by-doing-reviews/' rel="nofollow">earned my $50</a> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethics of Blogging for Paid Posts &#187; @ Ambot ah! [ technology news and reviews ]</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-381049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethics of Blogging for Paid Posts &#187; @ Ambot ah! [ technology news and reviews ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-381049</guid>
		<description>[...] The recent viral phenomenon for paid posts on blogs is just starting. In the middle of it all, ReviewMe and PayperPost, both of which presents a new revenue generating opportunity primarily focused on blogs. Let&#8217;s be honest, ReviewMe is just a re-hash of PayPerPost, only this time it followed the general sentiments of the A-Listers like TechCrunch which is to require bloggers to disclose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The recent viral phenomenon for paid posts on blogs is just starting. In the middle of it all, ReviewMe and PayperPost, both of which presents a new revenue generating opportunity primarily focused on blogs. Let&#8217;s be honest, ReviewMe is just a re-hash of PayPerPost, only this time it followed the general sentiments of the A-Listers like TechCrunch which is to require bloggers to disclose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReviewMe reviewed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-380128</link>
		<dc:creator>ReviewMe reviewed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-380128</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/'>http://www.tech...ter-payperpost/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Have What It Takes to Earn $250? &#187; Names@Work &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-378913</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Have What It Takes to Earn $250? &#187; Names@Work &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-378913</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, with a cheery ignorance that the lies, deceit, and corruption &#8220;business model&#8221; may have been tried in other &#8220;sectors&#8221;, Silicon Valley hopefuls PayPerPost and ReviewMe are gleefully touting their mechanized influence-buying machines, backed by their institutional minders Makem, Paye, and Fast. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, with a cheery ignorance that the lies, deceit, and corruption &#8220;business model&#8221; may have been tried in other &#8220;sectors&#8221;, Silicon Valley hopefuls PayPerPost and ReviewMe are gleefully touting their mechanized influence-buying machines, backed by their institutional minders Makem, Paye, and Fast. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review Me - paying bloggers &#171; Giri&#8217;s musings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-378539</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Me - paying bloggers &#171; Giri&#8217;s musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-378539</guid>
		<description>[...] Most of the blogosphere has been impressed with the service here and here. Everybody seems to catch up with the service and started reviewing Review me. A blogsearch for review me gives a lakh results already. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most of the blogosphere has been impressed with the service here and here. Everybody seems to catch up with the service and started reviewing Review me. A blogsearch for review me gives a lakh results already. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReviewMe Teething Problems &#171; John Chow dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/comment-page-2/#comment-376713</link>
		<dc:creator>ReviewMe Teething Problems &#171; John Chow dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/09/reviewme-launches-a-better-payperpost/#comment-376713</guid>
		<description>[...] ReviewMe has generated a lot of buzz since their launching. However, like many new startups, they have some teething problems that need to be worked on. In addition to the pricing and blog ownership problems, the algorithm that decides which blogs to accept and reject requires work as well. Just for fun, I submitted Tech Crunch and got this message: Sorry the blog you just submitted does not meet minimum acceptance criteria (traffic, other links to your site, etc) at this time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReviewMe has generated a lot of buzz since their launching. However, like many new startups, they have some teething problems that need to be worked on. In addition to the pricing and blog ownership problems, the algorithm that decides which blogs to accept and reject requires work as well. Just for fun, I submitted Tech Crunch and got this message: Sorry the blog you just submitted does not meet minimum acceptance criteria (traffic, other links to your site, etc) at this time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
