<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles River Ventures Goes For Angel Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: free roulette game download free roulette game</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-2274623</link>
		<dc:creator>free roulette game download free roulette game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-2274623</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;caribbean poker pagina web caribbean poker caribbean stud poker...&lt;/strong&gt;

I partie poker en ligne free nokia polyphonic ringtones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>caribbean poker pagina web caribbean poker caribbean stud poker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I partie poker en ligne free nokia polyphonic ringtones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrangeXpress&#187; Resource &#187; 现在就开始创业的五个理由</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-2050946</link>
		<dc:creator>OrangeXpress&#187; Resource &#187; 现在就开始创业的五个理由</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-2050946</guid>
		<description>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heights Media Group &#124; INTERACT &#187; Archive &#187; Understanding Advisory Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1679378</link>
		<dc:creator>Heights Media Group &#124; INTERACT &#187; Archive &#187; Understanding Advisory Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1679378</guid>
		<description>[...] a new variation of venture capital investing, is the direct result of a changing landscape among venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. This landscape has seen a flux of startups that are able to bootstrap on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new variation of venture capital investing, is the direct result of a changing landscape among venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. This landscape has seen a flux of startups that are able to bootstrap on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bay Partners Launches Facebook-Apps-Only Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1491421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bay Partners Launches Facebook-Apps-Only Fund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1491421</guid>
		<description>[...] the Charles River Ventures Quick Start program, the idea is to allow entrepreneurs to raise a small amount of capital with a minimum number [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Charles River Ventures Quick Start program, the idea is to allow entrepreneurs to raise a small amount of capital with a minimum number [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some interesting links! &#171; StartupFamily</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1371858</link>
		<dc:creator>Some interesting links! &#171; StartupFamily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1371858</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting&#160;links!  www.ycombinator.com www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market www.techstars.com www.idealab.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting&nbsp;links!  <a href="http://www.ycombinator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ycombinator.com</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006.....gel-market</a> <a href="http://www.techstars.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techstars.com</a> <a href="http://www.idealab.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.idealab.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leveraging Ideas :: The Blog of Sam Huleatt: social media, technology and startups</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1333000</link>
		<dc:creator>Leveraging Ideas :: The Blog of Sam Huleatt: social media, technology and startups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1333000</guid>
		<description>[...] to Fred’s conversation the fact that many people are saying that VCs are running out of fundable companies due to a shortage on innovative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Fred’s conversation the fact that many people are saying that VCs are running out of fundable companies due to a shortage on innovative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 现在就开始创业的五个理由 at Xifeng&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1326223</link>
		<dc:creator>现在就开始创业的五个理由 at Xifeng&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1326223</guid>
		<description>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htmlor&#8217;s blog &#187; 现在就开始创业的五个理由</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1324883</link>
		<dc:creator>htmlor&#8217;s blog &#187; 现在就开始创业的五个理由</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1324883</guid>
		<description>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 如果正考虑开始创业，你很可能会查天时观地利，以此判断会否得不偿失。（这么想的话）现在看来时机不错：VC们青睐创业公司，硬件成本越来越低，Google还刚花16.5亿美金买了家公司（htmlor注：Youtube）…… 不过，首次创业的成功或失败，并不一定取决于这些外界的社会经济因素。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechStars: Summer Camp (and cash) For Entrepreneurs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1267999</link>
		<dc:creator>TechStars: Summer Camp (and cash) For Entrepreneurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1267999</guid>
		<description>[...] mentor-driven angel investments. YCombinator and TechStars fill a definite niche, as does Charles River Ventures recent foray into small (and quick) investments as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentor-driven angel investments. YCombinator and TechStars fill a definite niche, as does Charles River Ventures recent foray into small (and quick) investments as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1122042</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1122042</guid>
		<description>Dan (34)
It isn't as complicated as you claimed.  They are only asking that they be guarrantted an invite to subsequent rounds of financing, which is only fair (imagine you investing in an idea and when the idea comes to friutation, someone else reaps the reward.) Again bear in mind that eventhou it is technially an equity/loan .. there is no personal or any other guarranttes if the company happens to go bellyup, everybody walks away with no hard feelings.

Comparing the CRV to Ycomb programme is absurd. Name 3 thriving companies that were started with $5k and even at that, they require you to give up 1 - 10% stake. CRV doesnt require  such ... meaning you'll get a fair market valuation of your comany at the loan/equity rollover.

As for the loan interest, it's capped at 25%. Who on earth will give you up to $250k in unsecured loan , with no credit (unless you are a serial entrepreneur, you have no entrepreneur credit) at such resonable terms? Some of you made it sound like the interest is akin to pay day loans 420%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan (34)<br />
It isn&#8217;t as complicated as you claimed.  They are only asking that they be guarrantted an invite to subsequent rounds of financing, which is only fair (imagine you investing in an idea and when the idea comes to friutation, someone else reaps the reward.) Again bear in mind that eventhou it is technially an equity/loan .. there is no personal or any other guarranttes if the company happens to go bellyup, everybody walks away with no hard feelings.</p>
<p>Comparing the CRV to Ycomb programme is absurd. Name 3 thriving companies that were started with $5k and even at that, they require you to give up 1 - 10% stake. CRV doesnt require  such &#8230; meaning you&#8217;ll get a fair market valuation of your comany at the loan/equity rollover.</p>
<p>As for the loan interest, it&#8217;s capped at 25%. Who on earth will give you up to $250k in unsecured loan , with no credit (unless you are a serial entrepreneur, you have no entrepreneur credit) at such resonable terms? Some of you made it sound like the interest is akin to pay day loans 420%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap airfares</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1118812</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap airfares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1118812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cheap airfares...&lt;/strong&gt;

ok...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cheap airfares&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ok&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Poker/</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1115696</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Poker/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1115696</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Poker...&lt;/strong&gt;

Play now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Poker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Play now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levitra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1054046</link>
		<dc:creator>Levitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1054046</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Levitra...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice blog!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Levitra&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice blog!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedias.mobi &#187; Y Combinator Taking Apps: Have Idea, Will Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1014635</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedias.mobi &#187; Y Combinator Taking Apps: Have Idea, Will Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-1014635</guid>
		<description>[...] Some other programs such as TechStars have adopted the model. TechStars is another well backed program based in Boulder, Colorado also offering experienced mentors and cash to aspiring startups. While not the same ground floor financing as Y Combinator or TechStars, the venerable VC firm Charles River Ventures also adopted a smaller financing program (up to $250K debt) called Quick Start. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some other programs such as TechStars have adopted the model. TechStars is another well backed program based in Boulder, Colorado also offering experienced mentors and cash to aspiring startups. While not the same ground floor financing as Y Combinator or TechStars, the venerable VC firm Charles River Ventures also adopted a smaller financing program (up to $250K debt) called Quick Start. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-802567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-802567</guid>
		<description>Fountain Partners matches the investment made by founders, friends and family, CRV, YCombinator, or other traditional or non-traditional venture capital, seed, or angel funds - usually WITHOUT TAKING EQUITY OR REQUIRING WARRANTS.  Type "Techcrunch" in the subject line and email to capital [a] fountainpartners.com  You should have at least $100,000 already in the company.  This is also a great way to get a few more months to create value while you are in between rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fountain Partners matches the investment made by founders, friends and family, CRV, YCombinator, or other traditional or non-traditional venture capital, seed, or angel funds - usually WITHOUT TAKING EQUITY OR REQUIRING WARRANTS.  Type &#8220;Techcrunch&#8221; in the subject line and email to capital [a] fountainpartners.com  You should have at least $100,000 already in the company.  This is also a great way to get a few more months to create value while you are in between rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-427504</link>
		<dc:creator>JP Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-427504</guid>
		<description>If you're looking for venture capital or angel investor funding checkt this great site called: http://www.GoBIGnetwork.com

There are daily postings for VC and AI funding wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re looking for venture capital or angel investor funding checkt this great site called: <a href="http://www.GoBIGnetwork.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GoBIGnetwork.com</a></p>
<p>There are daily postings for VC and AI funding wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wu Di&#8217;s Myth &#187; 5 Reasons to Create Your First Startup by By Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-410467</link>
		<dc:creator>Wu Di&#8217;s Myth &#187; 5 Reasons to Create Your First Startup by By Chris Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-410467</guid>
		<description>[...] If you’re thinking of creating a startup, you’re probably going to look for promising external factors like astrological signs to determine whether a gamble into entrepreneurialism is worth the trouble. And right now, the signs look good. VCs are startup friendly, hardware costs are low, and Google is buying companies for 1.65 billion dollars. The problem, however, is that first time entrepreneurs don’t necessarily succeed or fail because of outside socio-economic forces. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you’re thinking of creating a startup, you’re probably going to look for promising external factors like astrological signs to determine whether a gamble into entrepreneurialism is worth the trouble. And right now, the signs look good. VCs are startup friendly, hardware costs are low, and Google is buying companies for 1.65 billion dollars. The problem, however, is that first time entrepreneurs don’t necessarily succeed or fail because of outside socio-economic forces. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wu Di&#8217;s Myth &#187; 5 Reasons to Create Your First Startup By Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-399020</link>
		<dc:creator>Wu Di&#8217;s Myth &#187; 5 Reasons to Create Your First Startup By Chris Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-399020</guid>
		<description>[...] If you’re thinking of creating a startup, you’re probably going to look for promising external factors like astrological signs to determine whether a gamble into entrepreneurialism is worth the trouble. And right now, the signs look good. VCs are startup friendly, hardware costs are low, and Google is buying companies for 1.65 billion dollars. The problem, however, is that first time entrepreneurs don’t necessarily succeed or fail because of outside socio-economic forces. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you’re thinking of creating a startup, you’re probably going to look for promising external factors like astrological signs to determine whether a gamble into entrepreneurialism is worth the trouble. And right now, the signs look good. VCs are startup friendly, hardware costs are low, and Google is buying companies for 1.65 billion dollars. The problem, however, is that first time entrepreneurs don’t necessarily succeed or fail because of outside socio-economic forces. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Are the Y Combinator Companies?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-362761</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Are the Y Combinator Companies?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-362761</guid>
		<description>[...] Software is moving to the web and as it does, tech companies are becoming easier than ever to launch. One of the most notable changes to the tech industry of late has been the emergence of a significant number of startups that have succeeded after raising only hundreds of thousands of dollars. Joe Kraus, CEO of recently acquired JotSpot was able to bring them to market on $100,000. Reddit took even less money and were just acquired by Conde Nast. Reddit&#8217;s primary backer, Paul Graham&#8217;s fund Y Combinator, has become the poster child for making a successful startup with only tens of thousands of dollars in funding. Charles River has also scaled back the size of some of their investments as entrepreneurs are willing to take less money in exchange for more control. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software is moving to the web and as it does, tech companies are becoming easier than ever to launch. One of the most notable changes to the tech industry of late has been the emergence of a significant number of startups that have succeeded after raising only hundreds of thousands of dollars. Joe Kraus, CEO of recently acquired JotSpot was able to bring them to market on $100,000. Reddit took even less money and were just acquired by Conde Nast. Reddit&#8217;s primary backer, Paul Graham&#8217;s fund Y Combinator, has become the poster child for making a successful startup with only tens of thousands of dollars in funding. Charles River has also scaled back the size of some of their investments as entrepreneurs are willing to take less money in exchange for more control. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRV QuickStart: It&#8217;s All About The Dealflow at Brian Berliner&#8217;s Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-354841</link>
		<dc:creator>CRV QuickStart: It&#8217;s All About The Dealflow at Brian Berliner&#8217;s Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-354841</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington wrote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington wrote: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Early Stage Investing in Startups DigitalPhocus.com: &#8220;Focused on the Business of the Web&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-338695</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Early Stage Investing in Startups DigitalPhocus.com: &#8220;Focused on the Business of the Web&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-338695</guid>
		<description>[...] Interestingly, early stage companies&#8217; capital requirements are too small to appeal to Venture Capital firms who need significant returns (off of much larger base investments) to meet the return requirements of their investors. Redeye VC writes an interesting post about VCs and their significant return requirements. The post talks about Charles River Ventures&#8217;  decision to invest at the seed stage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interestingly, early stage companies&#8217; capital requirements are too small to appeal to Venture Capital firms who need significant returns (off of much larger base investments) to meet the return requirements of their investors. Redeye VC writes an interesting post about VCs and their significant return requirements. The post talks about Charles River Ventures&#8217;  decision to invest at the seed stage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 山丘突歐 &#187; [策進] 為台灣買幾張全球的Web2.0大樂透</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-336715</link>
		<dc:creator>山丘突歐 &#187; [策進] 為台灣買幾張全球的Web2.0大樂透</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-336715</guid>
		<description>[...] 美國資本雄厚，民間資金泛流，僅僅Charles River Ventures一家創投就投過18 億美金，最近這家創投又導入了創投2.0的概念的「Quick Start」專案，也搞起小創小賣，每個初期（very early stage）的創業案子只需要執行摘要、幾張投影片，也許再多個 Demo 就可能得到 10 - 50 萬美金的投資，這樣的資金已足夠讓一個全球性的服務網站萌芽、茁壯，但卻不會有賈杯杯迅速將股權稀釋的狀況，也沒有智慧資產難以鑑價的問題，讓有能力、有決心的年輕網路創業家，低風險、無後顧之憂的衝刺。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 美國資本雄厚，民間資金泛流，僅僅Charles River Ventures一家創投就投過18 億美金，最近這家創投又導入了創投2.0的概念的「Quick Start」專案，也搞起小創小賣，每個初期（very early stage）的創業案子只需要執行摘要、幾張投影片，也許再多個 Demo 就可能得到 10 - 50 萬美金的投資，這樣的資金已足夠讓一個全球性的服務網站萌芽、茁壯，但卻不會有賈杯杯迅速將股權稀釋的狀況，也沒有智慧資產難以鑑價的問題，讓有能力、有決心的年輕網路創業家，低風險、無後顧之憂的衝刺。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-336074</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-336074</guid>
		<description>Time will tell, but I expect more CRV announcements like this over the coming months.

More traditional VCs will continue to flock to this stage of investing.  This suggests that there will be some winners and losers:

Winners: 

- The bluest of "blue-chip" VCs. The Sequoias and KPCBs of the world shine brighter when the maddening crowd is rushing to chase the latest trend of VC investing. They've been there and done that time-and-again.
- Existing Angel Investors who have a track-record. When a space gets hot (i.e., angel investing), those who have been there for a while are the old wise men. Josh Kopelman, Jeff Clavier, and others will see a rise for their services even as others rush in. There will be a flight to quality. 
- Traditional VCs who are able to make the leap and really differentiate from other angel investors. Although CRV is a great firm, their success is not guaranteed. They need dealflow; their GPs needs to be seen as credible by non-nascent entrepreneurs; and they really need to be able to deliver value to their investments (beyond the simple "we love to roll up our shirtsleeves alongside our investee companies" platitudes).

Losers:

- Stuck-in-the-middle VCs: Those VCs who do a little bit of angel investing and a little bit of traditional are likely to do neither well.
- Former Great VCs who don't adapt to changing times: Remember when Softbank was king of the hill? Hot VCs who have yet to reach the echelon of Sequoia and KPCB are not assured of long-term success. They are also likely to stick-to-what-they-(think-they-)know-best. Dangerous, when the rules of the game are changing
- Later-stage/Mezzanine Investors: They just got even less relevant.

Thanks,

Eric

http://breakoutperformance.blogspot.com/2006/11/are-angels-new-vcs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell, but I expect more CRV announcements like this over the coming months.</p>
<p>More traditional VCs will continue to flock to this stage of investing.  This suggests that there will be some winners and losers:</p>
<p>Winners: </p>
<p>- The bluest of &#8220;blue-chip&#8221; VCs. The Sequoias and KPCBs of the world shine brighter when the maddening crowd is rushing to chase the latest trend of VC investing. They&#8217;ve been there and done that time-and-again.<br />
- Existing Angel Investors who have a track-record. When a space gets hot (i.e., angel investing), those who have been there for a while are the old wise men. Josh Kopelman, Jeff Clavier, and others will see a rise for their services even as others rush in. There will be a flight to quality.<br />
- Traditional VCs who are able to make the leap and really differentiate from other angel investors. Although CRV is a great firm, their success is not guaranteed. They need dealflow; their GPs needs to be seen as credible by non-nascent entrepreneurs; and they really need to be able to deliver value to their investments (beyond the simple &#8220;we love to roll up our shirtsleeves alongside our investee companies&#8221; platitudes).</p>
<p>Losers:</p>
<p>- Stuck-in-the-middle VCs: Those VCs who do a little bit of angel investing and a little bit of traditional are likely to do neither well.<br />
- Former Great VCs who don&#8217;t adapt to changing times: Remember when Softbank was king of the hill? Hot VCs who have yet to reach the echelon of Sequoia and KPCB are not assured of long-term success. They are also likely to stick-to-what-they-(think-they-)know-best. Dangerous, when the rules of the game are changing<br />
- Later-stage/Mezzanine Investors: They just got even less relevant.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Eric</p>
<p><a href="http://breakoutperformance.blogspot.com/2006/11/are-angels-new-vcs.html" rel="nofollow">http://breakoutperformance.blo.....w-vcs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer-to-Peer Angel Funding = Prosper.com for business models &#171; Give Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-333574</link>
		<dc:creator>Peer-to-Peer Angel Funding = Prosper.com for business models &#171; Give Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-333574</guid>
		<description>[...] Some very interesting concepts were raised the other day when the venture capital firm CRV announced an new business model for angel funding. Its very simple and in fact not new at all, the idea is to give small amounts of seed funding in the form of debt to bridge the gap of official series A funding. I was actually perusing this same strategy 8 months ago when searching for angel funding in NYC, unfortunately you dont get the same evaluation as you would in a tech-centric place such as the valley. We ended up sending out an RFP to a handful of people and even though they saw value in the idea and liked us, they wanted a huge equity stake. I&#8217;m a very generous person and have no problem giving a healthy ROI, but as the CEO i dont like the idea of losing control of my company because my investors have an offer on the table to sell the company for $580 MM then turn it into some lame closed garden. So I applaud more, and more people embracing this win-win business model. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some very interesting concepts were raised the other day when the venture capital firm CRV announced an new business model for angel funding. Its very simple and in fact not new at all, the idea is to give small amounts of seed funding in the form of debt to bridge the gap of official series A funding. I was actually perusing this same strategy 8 months ago when searching for angel funding in NYC, unfortunately you dont get the same evaluation as you would in a tech-centric place such as the valley. We ended up sending out an RFP to a handful of people and even though they saw value in the idea and liked us, they wanted a huge equity stake. I&#8217;m a very generous person and have no problem giving a healthy ROI, but as the CEO i dont like the idea of losing control of my company because my investors have an offer on the table to sell the company for $580 MM then turn it into some lame closed garden. So I applaud more, and more people embracing this win-win business model. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge Energies Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-333316</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge Energies Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/01/charles-river-ventures-goes-for-angel-market/#comment-333316</guid>
		<description>Is it as good as it sounds?
It seems to us that the Quick Start CRV model presents a potential conflict of interest:
It appears that CRV could benefit from foot dragging a very good new business idea in order to obtain higher equity stakes at low cost, and promote weak ideas to find a serie A investor who would pay them back their initial investment plus interest plus 25% discount.

We would like your position on this potential conflict of interest as we currently have selected innovative French start-ups that could be very good candidates for this program in order to help them succeed in penetrating the North American market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it as good as it sounds?<br />
It seems to us that the Quick Start CRV model presents a potential conflict of interest:<br />
It appears that CRV could benefit from foot dragging a very good new business idea in order to obtain higher equity stakes at low cost, and promote weak ideas to find a serie A investor who would pay them back their initial investment plus interest plus 25% discount.</p>
<p>We would like your position on this potential conflict of interest as we currently have selected innovative French start-ups that could be very good candidates for this program in order to help them succeed in penetrating the North American market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.107 seconds -->
