October 30, 2006

Monitor110 Raises $11m More for Market Monitoring

Marshall Kirkpatrick

29 comments »

Monitior110, the pre-launch web monitoring service for hedge fund traders we wrote about in September, will announce on Monday that it has closed a Series C round of financing with $11 million from new and existing investors. The company, which will begin offering its product for general subscription early next year after three years of development, has now raised a total of $20 million.

The service tracks information from now 50 million sources, analyzes it for topical relevance and delivers near real time alerts to customers. It focuses on blog, deep web and static web changes. Topical expertise evaluation is an important part of the secret sauce.

Draper Fisher Jurvetson led this round of funding and Ron Conway is the most prominent new investor. The company claims to have spent very little of its investors money so far. Longtime financial markets AI geek David J. Leinweber has also joined the Monitor110 board of advisors.

Company President Roger Ehrenberg told me yesterday that fewer than 10 clients have been using the software in a live environment for the last week. He says they have a long waiting list of customers and will increase the number to 20 hedge funds in January. Hedge funds are being targeted, he told me, because they act fast and are willing to pay a premium for tools and data. The price of the service hasn’t been announced yet, but Ehrenberg would tell me that it will be more expensive than Bloomberg. The company is targeting individual traders, has no plans to make big distribution deals and values its customer face time as a way to learn about changes that are needed quickly.

Why so much excitement about a company that seems to do something similar to other services and hasn’t even launched yet? Part of it is based just on the brilliance of RSS and all the things that can be done with it. Imagine now having 3 well funded years to build an automated RSS strategy for your information rich market vertical. Ehrenberg says that the combination of source breadth and reporting speed is what makes Monitor110 stand out.

Preventing the system from being gamed is obviously something Monitor110 has taken pains to prevent. Using more than popularity to determine authority is the first step. Blogs and social media are just one of several areas the service looks for emerging information; gaming is a frequently raised concern but the analytics in question will be no small task to toy with.

I asked Ehrenberg whether a high-end, RSS fueled market monitoring tool is ahead of its time. He said that in the hedge fund world, discussions with prospective customers indicate that though there is almost no knowledge of what RSS is in the field, a simple explanation stokes serious interest quickly. He pointed out that projects of a similar scale had been tried in the early 90’s before RSS was available and were cost prohibitive.

Will the service result in information overload and rashly made decisions because of its focus on broad, nontraditional sources? Overload can be prevented through a good UI and organization of incoming information sources but it’s up to the user to keep their head on straight when data is coming in fast. Anyone who wouldn’t pay for delivery of relevant information fast and early just because deliberation is an asset is probably making a mistake in any competitive field. The nontraditional nature of the sources is an asset not a problem for people who want to move first.

Of course this product hasn’t come to market yet and it could be an abysmal failure. I don’t think it will be, however, because the opportunity to leverage new technologies (RSS most importantly) and the energy behind this startup in particular are too big to miss completely. Some one, if not a number of people, is going to nail the new real-time research of emerging social media.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Monitor110, PayPerPost, Brightcove « Technically Speaking
  2. Hedge Funds Using RSS Monitoring | Marketing Pilgrim
  3. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » Monitor110、マーケットモニタリングのために、新たに$11M(1100万ドル)調達
  4. IR Daily » News Digest of October 31, 2006
  5. Bloggers For Hire - Using RSS to gain a competitive edge
  6. Where do you get your (breaking) news from? « Feeds 2.0

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Nick

    Your monitor110 link in the text is wrong - links to a typosquatter (monitor11.com)

  2. Notsure

    Christ………………get a designer is all i can say……..

  3. Greg

    Quick FYI: Your “Monitor110″ text link above currently points to Monitor11.com and the text has an extra “i” in it.

  4. Alaska Miller

    20 million should at least buy you a graphics designer

  5. JP Checa

    Deep search is extremely important especially for the hedge fund industry. These traders, or any traders in fact, thrive on the speed of new and relevant news. So I think the Monitor110 is a great idea, but only for now. I feel like it’s an enhanced Google News product where i’ve created my own custom news categories using search terms and read results in my RSS reader.

    I think Monitor110 is benefitting on the fact that not a lot of people know what RSS is. I believe the PEW Internet Research Group said something like 1 in 5 or 1 in 4 individuals know what RSS is. So, again, Monitor110 is good for now, but not so hot later on.

  6. Daniel Haran

    Three years before tests seems crazy. The home page’s colour scheme certainly doesn’t give the impression that they are giving good designers the front seat.

    $20 million? Just how much are these customers willing to pay for data? How big is this market?

  7. Steve E

    It’s a huge market and people are willing to pay a lot of money to have their information overload problems sorted out, especially in the realms of corporate intelligence.

    There’s been a market for this since the internet began, very quickly people got overloaded and just can’t keep up with whats being said about them/their topic of interest.

  8. TechAddress

    Looks like others have already noticed, but the link to the company is wrong. Nice article though ;-)

  9. rocketdewd

    If you like this kind of stuff, check this out: datawink.com. It’s the other side of the coin — machines doing the analysis.

  10. rocketman

    http://marketio.com for another example of a company doing RSS indexing, ticker extraction/matching, etc.

  11. Brian

    I do think there is a market for this type of service and the tools for information mining that hedge funds will need will far outstrip anything a standard feed reader or generic search engine that Google would provide can deliver.

    I agree with the readers though … their website looks like something from a 1980’s tech flick like War Games …

  12. Marshall Kirkpatrick

    Ok, that link is fixed now - my apologies.

  13. fintag

    Good grief….its a CSE and they get $20m. The people behind it are very good and well known in the industry but I don’t get it. If they are charging more than Blommberg (costs about $25k a year) then they doing pretty well.

  14. Steven

    Having experience in the field, I must say I find this interestingm however, this service does not compete with Bloomberg at all (or reuters etc for that matter). The former is valued for is pricing tools such as derivative formulas etc and quality of exchange data feeds among many other features. They are used heavily in bank and industrial environments besides just pure trading desks.

    Since I don’t know the details about this service, all I can say is if they want to target hedge traders they better offer extensive customization capability and a deep api.

    The most likley usage for such a service would be just a simple integration into existing news feeds, or as a data point (input) to a neural net system. And I would not weight it’s value very heavily either, as I do not agree that their “information dissemination cycle” is always correct, particularly in the realm of securities. Not to mention there are many other factors which are more important to monitor. I find it alarming that they use a discussion forum on the internet as an example of a source for a pre-stock move. Such information can be easily manipulated. That being said, it will be interesting to see what they put out, and it may be an interesting tool just to track industries or sectors.

  15. Andy Freeman

    > The company claims to have spent very little of its investors money so far.

    Then why are they raising more?

  16. P-Air

    While this service may be nice, it’s no panacea because the reality is that any trader that bases their model on a single signal, even where that is blogosphere buzz, is in for a ride awakening. If this company doesn’t take into account that real hedge fund traders will be depending on multiple inputs beyond those provided by Monitor110, they may price themselves out of the market. S/b interesting to watch this experiment.

  17. Oskar Syahbana

    @Andy Freeman: I totally agree with you. Why would they raise more money if they haven’t even used the previous round VC capital?

    And three years of research before throw the product to the market… are they making an operating system or some sort? Probably they’re based in Redmond?

  18. Otis Gospodnetic

    Oskar:
    No, Monitor110 is Redmond, it’s in NYC.
    Yes, it may sound weird that they are raising more money when they still have a stash of it, but there are good reasons for such actions, too. I strongly suggest you check out who’s behind Monitor110. Jeff Stewart (the CEO) knows what he’s doing, just do a bit of research on his background.

  19. Mathew

    they must be prop. trading all of the excess vc money!

    demonstration of concept, haha!

  20. dave

    not sure how they’ll distinguish themselves from higher priced alternatives, including capitaliq (though a different bent toward transactions) and bloomberg (with a deep history)…many have tried and failed with this information gathering approach, including the cia’s own attempts to automate the collection of open source intelligence (aka ‘osint’) and so i’m not quite sure how this firm will be doing it any better…unless they have solved the knowledge mining problem such that they are able to automate recommendations and pre-process for ready-made-analysis-kits, then they’re going to be shit out of luck within about two years as the free services catch up and the same hedge funds pursue a more simple rollyo/google style approach to private source mining…

  21. Debra

    just checkin things out

  22. Dave Leinweber

    “Longtime financial markets AI geek David J. Leinweber has also joined the Monitor110 board of advisors.”

    Mother will be so proud.

    David J. Leinweber

  23. RB

    I don’t under stand the screenshot. Besides they do need a designer.. What are these N B1 B2 B3 G? Looks interesting but have no clue what it is? Any ideas?