<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:55:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suman Kayastha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-2834914</link>
		<dc:creator>Suman Kayastha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-2834914</guid>
		<description>i got so much fun &amp; good knowledge. Wishing that i will get other also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got so much fun &amp; good knowledge. Wishing that i will get other also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Alberty's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-482289</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Alberty's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-482289</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Diet Coke and Mentos - First Sponsored Google Video...&lt;/strong&gt;

Vous connaissez tous ces fameuses vidÃ©os dans lesquelles on peut voir des grands garÃ§ons s&#8217;amuser Ã  faire exploser ou gicler du Coca Light en plaÃ§ant des Mentos dans une bouteille remplie. RÃ©action &#8220;explosive&#8221; assurÃ©e...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Diet Coke and Mentos &#8211; First Sponsored Google Video&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Vous connaissez tous ces fameuses vidÃ©os dans lesquelles on peut voir des grands garÃ§ons s&#8217;amuser Ã  faire exploser ou gicler du Coca Light en plaÃ§ant des Mentos dans une bouteille remplie. RÃ©action &#8220;explosive&#8221; assurÃ©e&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Alberty's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-482288</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Alberty's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-482288</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Diet Coke and Mentos - First Sponsored Google Video...&lt;/strong&gt;

Vous connaissez tous ces fameuses vidÃ©os dans lesquelles on peut voir des grands garÃ§ons s&#8217;amuser Ã  faire exploser ou gicler du Coca Light en plaÃ§ant des Mentos dans une bouteille remplie. RÃ©action &#8220;explosive&#8221; assurÃ©e...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Diet Coke and Mentos &#8211; First Sponsored Google Video&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Vous connaissez tous ces fameuses vidÃ©os dans lesquelles on peut voir des grands garÃ§ons s&#8217;amuser Ã  faire exploser ou gicler du Coca Light en plaÃ§ant des Mentos dans une bouteille remplie. RÃ©action &#8220;explosive&#8221; assurÃ©e&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H Nalty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-360928</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H Nalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-360928</guid>
		<description>My stuff has created more than a million views on Google. While I&#039;m happy about the exposure, I&#039;m bummed that Google isn&#039;t commercializing it for me much less itself. No ads around it. Common! 

Drop the 1000 hours. What does that achieve? Google is cutting out the bulk of amateur videographers and repurposing OLD media. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stuff has created more than a million views on Google. While I&#8217;m happy about the exposure, I&#8217;m bummed that Google isn&#8217;t commercializing it for me much less itself. No ads around it. Common! </p>
<p>Drop the 1000 hours. What does that achieve? Google is cutting out the bulk of amateur videographers and repurposing OLD media. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Checkout, Google Goals, 2CH.net, Multichannel Buyers, Abandoned Carts, Godin, Spock, Eepybird II, Real Time Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-356528</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Checkout, Google Goals, 2CH.net, Multichannel Buyers, Abandoned Carts, Godin, Spock, Eepybird II, Real Time Analytics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-356528</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Sponsored Video  Marshall Kirkpatrick of TechCrunch analyzes the difference between the first and the second Diet Coke and Mentos video: corporate sponsorship.  Web media grows up: follow the money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Sponsored Video  Marshall Kirkpatrick of TechCrunch analyzes the difference between the first and the second Diet Coke and Mentos video: corporate sponsorship.  Web media grows up: follow the money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirpod</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-328086</link>
		<dc:creator>mirpod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-328086</guid>
		<description>A free BLOGTv at :
http://www.mirpod.com/blog.php?id_blog=1&amp;id_article=2484&amp;lang=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A free BLOGTv at :<br />
<a href="http://www.mirpod.com/blog.php?id_blog=1&amp;id_article=2484&amp;lang=en" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.mirpod.com/blog.php?id_blog=1&amp;id_article=2484&amp;lang=en'>http://www.mirp...484&amp;lang=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split » KOKYUNAGE NEWS » Not the usual mix.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-325231</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split » KOKYUNAGE NEWS » Not the usual mix.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-325231</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Google’s first “Sponsored Video” had it’s debut. Titled The Domino Effect, it’s Diet Coke and Mentos part II from the guys in white lab coats - EepyBird. It’s sponsored, believe it or not, by Coca Cola and Mentos. The original video the pair made was much more entertaining and brought them a reported $35,000 via the Revver revenue sharing system.&#8221;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story       Related Articles: If Drugs Were Legal (video)BBC documentary about what would happen to the world if drugs were legalized.read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story...Magic SandMagic sand is a special type of hydrophobic sand.Meaning that it avoids water.This video demonstrates it&#039;s properties.read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story...Xogen - Tap Water as Fuel? (w/ video)Xogen claims to have developed a process to split water and deliver hydrogen on demand to a burner tip, combustion...Trends of Google&#8217;s Disruptive Behavior: Some Food For ThoughtThe internet is abuzz. Google is being disruptive! Google is changing the way business is done! Microsoft, eBay, and...Google Opens Block-Long Office in N.Y.It&#039;s so big, you won&#039;t even need Google Maps to find it. Internet search engine Google Inc. has a new... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Google’s first “Sponsored Video” had it’s debut. Titled The Domino Effect, it’s Diet Coke and Mentos part II from the guys in white lab coats &#8211; EepyBird. It’s sponsored, believe it or not, by Coca Cola and Mentos. The original video the pair made was much more entertaining and brought them a reported $35,000 via the Revver revenue sharing system.&#8221;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story       Related Articles: If Drugs Were Legal (video)BBC documentary about what would happen to the world if drugs were legalized.read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story&#8230;Magic SandMagic sand is a special type of hydrophobic sand.Meaning that it avoids water.This video demonstrates it&#8217;s properties.read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story&#8230;Xogen &#8211; Tap Water as Fuel? (w/ video)Xogen claims to have developed a process to split water and deliver hydrogen on demand to a burner tip, combustion&#8230;Trends of Google&#8217;s Disruptive Behavior: Some Food For ThoughtThe internet is abuzz. Google is being disruptive! Google is changing the way business is done! Microsoft, eBay, and&#8230;Google Opens Block-Long Office in N.Y.It&#8217;s so big, you won&#8217;t even need Google Maps to find it. Internet search engine Google Inc. has a new&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2006-11-01 &#187; Whatever&#8217;s Interesting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-325043</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2006-11-01 &#187; Whatever&#8217;s Interesting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-325043</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split Everybody&#8217;s been saying that this had to happen - Google would have to find a way not only to monetize the content for themselves, but also for the content producers. Has it begun? (tags: google blogging video web2.0 revenue) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split Everybody&#8217;s been saying that this had to happen &#8211; Google would have to find a way not only to monetize the content for themselves, but also for the content producers. Has it begun? (tags: google blogging video web2.0 revenue) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaggs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-322399</link>
		<dc:creator>jaggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-322399</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin, pitch us a viral. Go on! :-) Loved that one. 

BTW this is definitely just Google testing waters. Nothing to see here, wait till version 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin, pitch us a viral. Go on! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Loved that one. </p>
<p>BTW this is definitely just Google testing waters. Nothing to see here, wait till version 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the Difference Between Google Video and YouTube? &#171; Will Video for Food</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-322199</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s the Difference Between Google Video and YouTube? &#171; Will Video for Food</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-322199</guid>
		<description>[...] What it Could Have Been: The one-stop shop for all videos (just as it is for content and images). A great search tool for any video on any site. The king of linking video content to relevant ads. A way for small creators to distribute content and get paid a portion of the ad revenue. Turns out, however, TechCrunch is reporting Google Video will hoard ad revenue unless you&#8217;re the media elite.  I&#8217;m really disappointed about that&#8230; those of us with less than 1,000 hours of video content will have to look elsewhere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What it Could Have Been: The one-stop shop for all videos (just as it is for content and images). A great search tool for any video on any site. The king of linking video content to relevant ads. A way for small creators to distribute content and get paid a portion of the ad revenue. Turns out, however, TechCrunch is reporting Google Video will hoard ad revenue unless you&#8217;re the media elite.  I&#8217;m really disappointed about that&#8230; those of us with less than 1,000 hours of video content will have to look elsewhere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H Nalty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-322138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H Nalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-322138</guid>
		<description>Poor Google. Trying to be a Yahoo when the market is going in another direction. At least they have both ends of the spectrum covered. Google Video featuring fat media guys with cigars. YouTube staring radical teens with joints. 

What about the rest of us? Revver, Metacafe, Brightcove. Remember those three words. And remember you heard &#039;em from Nalts at willvideoforfood.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Google. Trying to be a Yahoo when the market is going in another direction. At least they have both ends of the spectrum covered. Google Video featuring fat media guys with cigars. YouTube staring radical teens with joints. </p>
<p>What about the rest of us? Revver, Metacafe, Brightcove. Remember those three words. And remember you heard &#8216;em from Nalts at willvideoforfood.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Manoff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-322123</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Manoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-322123</guid>
		<description>Our company has already been doing things like this for months.  We provide sites with an easy to use code for a video player or video page that delivers quality video content, not user generated and advertisements.  We share the commercial revenue with the site partners.  While many of these companies talk about doing this JamboVideoNetwork.com is actually doing it.

This service provides the content partners extended reach for their footage and provides web publishers video content and advertising that they could never do by themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company has already been doing things like this for months.  We provide sites with an easy to use code for a video player or video page that delivers quality video content, not user generated and advertisements.  We share the commercial revenue with the site partners.  While many of these companies talk about doing this JamboVideoNetwork.com is actually doing it.</p>
<p>This service provides the content partners extended reach for their footage and provides web publishers video content and advertising that they could never do by themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321892</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Video Goes High Brow with Revenue Split</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321892</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;Google&#8217;s first &#8220;Sponsored Video&#8221; had it&#8217;s debut. Titled The Domino Effect, it&#8217;s Diet Coke and Mentos part II from the guys in white lab coats - EepyBird. It&#8217;s sponsored, believe it or not, by Coca Cola and Mentos. The original video the pair made was much more entertaining and brought them a reported $35,000 via the Revver revenue sharing system.&quot;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story  Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;Google&rsquo;s first &ldquo;Sponsored Video&rdquo; had it&rsquo;s debut. Titled The Domino Effect, it&rsquo;s Diet Coke and Mentos part II from the guys in white lab coats &#8211; EepyBird. It&rsquo;s sponsored, believe it or not, by Coca Cola and Mentos. The original video the pair made was much more entertaining and brought them a reported $35,000 via the Revver revenue sharing system.&quot;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story  Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NCH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321536</link>
		<dc:creator>NCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321536</guid>
		<description>role not roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>role not roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hashim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321487</link>
		<dc:creator>Hashim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321487</guid>
		<description>I posted a video on Google back in February ago, with the intention of charging for the download, a capability Google allows you to check during the upload process.

Weeks later my video was not approved. I contacted Google Video, and they replied that the hold up was due to me choosing to charge for download, a feature they only allow their prmium partners to use. 

I wish they would have told me that before I chose their service as the place to distribute my video.

I also hope they open that aspect of their service up soon to us long tail producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a video on Google back in February ago, with the intention of charging for the download, a capability Google allows you to check during the upload process.</p>
<p>Weeks later my video was not approved. I contacted Google Video, and they replied that the hold up was due to me choosing to charge for download, a feature they only allow their prmium partners to use. </p>
<p>I wish they would have told me that before I chose their service as the place to distribute my video.</p>
<p>I also hope they open that aspect of their service up soon to us long tail producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zatz Not Funny. . .&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Interesting News Dave Hasn&#8217;t Covered</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321426</link>
		<dc:creator>Zatz Not Funny. . .&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Interesting News Dave Hasn&#8217;t Covered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321426</guid>
		<description>[...] Google monetizes video sharing: TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google monetizes video sharing: TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tor I. Pettersen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor I. Pettersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321386</guid>
		<description>To begin with the AdWords program was only available for sites with more than 10 million visitors per month. 
This probably isn&#039;t Google cutting off their &quot;long tail&quot;, it&#039;s starting it off with a small number of customers to refine the tech before allowing the masses in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To begin with the AdWords program was only available for sites with more than 10 million visitors per month.<br />
This probably isn&#8217;t Google cutting off their &#8220;long tail&#8221;, it&#8217;s starting it off with a small number of customers to refine the tech before allowing the masses in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoTechie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-321263</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoTechie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-321263</guid>
		<description>Web videos are not as safe as we think. Hackers are actively infecting Web videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web videos are not as safe as we think. Hackers are actively infecting Web videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV 2.0 &#8212; slouching towards Bethlehem &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-320894</link>
		<dc:creator>TV 2.0 &#8212; slouching towards Bethlehem &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-320894</guid>
		<description>[...] with del.icio.us &#160; &#124; &#160; Email this entry  &#160; &#124; &#160; TrackBack URI &#160; &#124; &#160; Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; &#124; &#160; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with del.icio.us &nbsp; | &nbsp; Email this entry  &nbsp; | &nbsp; TrackBack URI &nbsp; | &nbsp; Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yohay Elam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-320707</link>
		<dc:creator>Yohay Elam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-320707</guid>
		<description>Metacafe&#039;s approach is straightforward and understandable: You are viewed = you get paid.
The others use revenue sharing which is a more complex way of calculating your income....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metacafe&#8217;s approach is straightforward and understandable: You are viewed = you get paid.<br />
The others use revenue sharing which is a more complex way of calculating your income&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidEzra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-319808</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidEzra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-319808</guid>
		<description>There has been ample &quot;talk&quot; about how the internet is &quot;disrupting&quot; the traditional business of the &quot;big boy&quot; content holders - Networks, Viacom, etc.  However, it seems as if there might be some aditional &quot;seeds of disruption&quot; about to germinate that should cause some other &quot;established folk&quot; to take notice (not that anything drastic is going to occur over the next 6 months, but it seems that a whole industry could be forced to change as a result of market dynamics over the next 5 to 10 years.)

I&#039;m speaking of the actors and the producers of the content itself!

I realize that the &quot;gulf&quot; between the quality of what the networks produce compared with the quality of what amateurs produce is quite wide, however, there also exists a wide &quot;gap&quot; in the cost of the two vehicles (millions of dollars per hour vs. ~thousands / or less per hour?)  But the salient point worth noting is that both mediums are competing for the same eyeballs, and the &quot;low budget&quot; films are winning the battle of increasing market share.  

Which leads to this question ... as the trend towards better and better quality films being produced by individuals who have a financial motivation / incentive to do so, how much will this current &quot;gaping gulf&quot; be bridged before it starts shaking up the engrained ways that the &quot;Hollywood establishment&quot; has been doing business as usual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been ample &#8220;talk&#8221; about how the internet is &#8220;disrupting&#8221; the traditional business of the &#8220;big boy&#8221; content holders &#8211; Networks, Viacom, etc.  However, it seems as if there might be some aditional &#8220;seeds of disruption&#8221; about to germinate that should cause some other &#8220;established folk&#8221; to take notice (not that anything drastic is going to occur over the next 6 months, but it seems that a whole industry could be forced to change as a result of market dynamics over the next 5 to 10 years.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m speaking of the actors and the producers of the content itself!</p>
<p>I realize that the &#8220;gulf&#8221; between the quality of what the networks produce compared with the quality of what amateurs produce is quite wide, however, there also exists a wide &#8220;gap&#8221; in the cost of the two vehicles (millions of dollars per hour vs. ~thousands / or less per hour?)  But the salient point worth noting is that both mediums are competing for the same eyeballs, and the &#8220;low budget&#8221; films are winning the battle of increasing market share.  </p>
<p>Which leads to this question &#8230; as the trend towards better and better quality films being produced by individuals who have a financial motivation / incentive to do so, how much will this current &#8220;gaping gulf&#8221; be bridged before it starts shaking up the engrained ways that the &#8220;Hollywood establishment&#8221; has been doing business as usual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Google Video、収益分配で上流指向へ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-319765</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Google Video、収益分配で上流指向へ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-319765</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  Google Video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  Google Video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Lopez-Valcarcel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-319744</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Lopez-Valcarcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-319744</guid>
		<description>Very interesting news. 
Sounds like Google more of a distribution role rather than aggregator with this new service. It will be interesting to see whether Google can leverage its strong brand with advertisers to gain traction in this space against more promising yet less visible startups like Brightcove.

Still, beyond the top quality videos, I believe the future of online distribution for the long tail of video content is in P2P, as I discussed in: http://www.digitalmediareview.com/archives/308</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting news.<br />
Sounds like Google more of a distribution role rather than aggregator with this new service. It will be interesting to see whether Google can leverage its strong brand with advertisers to gain traction in this space against more promising yet less visible startups like Brightcove.</p>
<p>Still, beyond the top quality videos, I believe the future of online distribution for the long tail of video content is in P2P, as I discussed in: <a href="http://www.digitalmediareview.com/archives/308" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.digitalmediareview.com/archives/308'>http://www.digi...om/archives/308</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-319596</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-319596</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an article explaining that Google doing something like this makes everyone pay attention, if anything (plus, where does YouTube fit in here?):

http://www.computers.net/2006/10/get_paid_for_yo.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an article explaining that Google doing something like this makes everyone pay attention, if anything (plus, where does YouTube fit in here?):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computers.net/2006/10/get_paid_for_yo.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.computers.net/2006/10/get_paid_for_yo.html'>http://www.comp...aid_for_yo.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/comment-page-1/#comment-319480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/30/google-video-goes-high-brow-with-revenue-split/#comment-319480</guid>
		<description>At some point the advertisers will smarten up and stop wasting their money on google ads that don&#039;t bring any returns. For now, they are content on letting a portion of their ad money go to waste on google, as long as overall, they get enough return out of it, but eventually no company wastes money indefinitely and they will demand their ads actually produce results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point the advertisers will smarten up and stop wasting their money on google ads that don&#8217;t bring any returns. For now, they are content on letting a portion of their ad money go to waste on google, as long as overall, they get enough return out of it, but eventually no company wastes money indefinitely and they will demand their ads actually produce results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
