October 27, 2006

VSocial Pitches White Label Video Solutions

Marshall Kirkpatrick

12 comments »

If you had stopped by video sharing site VSocial before today you may not have thought much of the service, its sparse UI made it look like just one more also-ran. This week the site relaunched and is making a serious play to monetize customized white label video players. With $1.5 million in funding from Ron Conway and Consor Capital, VSocial is aiming for a mid market price point on short form video.

It may well be able to monetize on the growing demand for video networking sites, but I don’t know how happy to be about that. Early showcase examples of the company’s products don’t look terribly stable, well designed or appealing to me. Perhaps with recent funding the offerings will be improved but the company has been around since 2002. The service looks to me like it was just waiting for something like GooTube to yield a mass of companies feeling left behind and wanting a quick and dirty video networking component.

That’s just my judgment, though. You can click through to the product showcase examples below and decide for yourself.

The company offers three different products. The first is called VConnect MyBrand. This level of service allows publishers to add their logo to the player, watermark over the video and “call to action” link back to their own site. The MyBrand player costs $75 per month for business use. VSocial’s advertising partner can run preroll, post roll or text ads with a 50/50 revenue split between VSocial and the video publisher. Here’s VSocial’s showcase customer for this product, amateurgolf.com. The player looks good.

The second product is called VConnect ProPublisher. The company calls this level of service a turnkey solution for video enabled microsites. This service costs $500 per month plus a 30% ad revenue cut. The showcase example of this that VSocial has to offer is a Chevy page on gas consumption reduction. None of the videos ever loaded when I went to the site, it’s on a VSocial domain and if it’s a turnkey microsite some one designed it very poorly.

The top tier of service is called VConnect for Enterprise Communities. It’s a preconstructed social networking service with video at the center of the strategy. Every part of site functionality at Latino video network Voytv.com is provided by VSocial. There are quite a few features and no shortage of ads. The service costs between $5 and $20 thousand per month plus 15 to 20% of ad revenue. This might be worthwhile for companies seeking an easy video/social networking solution but you’d have to give it a long, hard look before deciding this this is solid software.

I think there is a clear demand for products like these. I also think that there are other people who are doing it better. Check out KickApps (our coverage) and watch here for coverage of a better looking video network solution in the very near future. When copyrighted video detection technology becomes commoditized and is a standard component of these kinds of white label video networks - then we’ll know they have really arrived.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Inspirational Technology » Blog Archive » VSocial raises 1.5m
  2. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » VSocial、ホワイトラベルビデオソリューションを投入

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Kevin Burton

    I always really liked vSocial and felt they were the underdog player here.

    I found vSocial to be a LOT more addictive than youtube. In my book though MetaCafe currently holds the ‘addiction’ crown…

    From what I could tell the were competing head on with youtube and had *around* the same user base install before youtube really grew like wild fire. I don’t have any real traffic numbers because the alexa numbers are insane. (wish I had hitwise data).

    I think one big contributor to youtube was the SNL Chronicles of Narnia skit which threw it over the top and made it harder for competitors to catch up… first mover advantage all over again.

  2. Innovation Zen

    In my opinion vSocial is doing a good work with business model innovations. Like the MyBrand player and other features where they might be able to generate revenues offering a valued service for content producers.

    Then again, success in the online video arena will probably require more than that.

  3. Mike

    I think the best offering in this market segment is from a relative newcomer called Fliqz. Here’s a link to the widget download:

    ( http://www.widgetbox.com/search?q=fliqz )

    I’ve tried using this widget on my blog, it works well. I was impressed. And it’s Free! I’m not sure how VSocial will survive with competing offers like this… it will completely undercut their market share. I mean honestly, why pay $75/month when you can get the same thing for $0/month?

  4. John C

    “With $1.5 million in funding from Ron Conway and Consor Capital, VSocial is aiming for a mid market price point on short form video.”

    I’d give anything to here just what these companies are spending this money on. I just visited that website, saw nothing new, and I will certainly never go back. Why? Because it’s nothing new, and I just don’t care.

    But seriously. Could somebody please explain to me how $1.5 million is going to improve anything?

  5. Rich

    Fliqz has BEEN doing this, go to this website for Travelblog.com. I can use their video uploader right from this site The video page testifies to how much of a success they have already become.

    http://www.travelblog.org/Vide.....ideos.html

    I just saw Mikes comment above. Why does this, “VSocial” site charge? Fliqz does it for free! Sounds too me like VSocial should reconsider their stradegy!

  6. Startups.in/India

    I believe Brightcove is also offering some thing very similar.

  7. Adam

    White Label video portals are not really that new. We’ve been doing it for about two years now and have over 2,000 web sites using our service. That said we welcome the competition. I’ve always thought of VSocial as a leader in this space with a shrewd management team. I find their move very validating for providers like us who are providing a “start your own YouTube” type service. Good Luck guys!

    -Adam Bruce
    Vidiac.com

  8. lemon obrien

    you know guys….i’m just sick of the social sites….its like yahoo groups with web2.0 buzz…whatever that is.

  9. Alexander Mouldovan

    Maven Networks is a key player in this space - they have customers like Sony, Weather.com and Disney.

    http://maven.net/customers/

    We’re partnering to deliver the social media piece.

  10. ArenaFan

    Have you seen what Arena Football was able to do using KickApps’ solution? Looks awesome! Go to http://www.arenafootball.com and click the MyAfl videos of the week widget…