<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office Roundtable v. Polycom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:24:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: videoconferencing equipments</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-2555849</link>
		<dc:creator>videoconferencing equipments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-2555849</guid>
		<description>This is the greatest post I have come across so far.I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog .I love your blog by the way, I am gonna have to add you to my list of watched blogs .Thank you for this very useful information. stored it.Thanks again and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the greatest post I have come across so far.I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog .I love your blog by the way, I am gonna have to add you to my list of watched blogs .Thank you for this very useful information. stored it.Thanks again and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karib Corner-Blog Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Office Roundtable v. Polycom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-1502673</link>
		<dc:creator>Karib Corner-Blog Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Office Roundtable v. Polycom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-1502673</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Roundtable v. Polycom October 23rd, 2006    Microsoft Office Roundtable v. PolycomMicrosoft is releasing a new hardware device, called Microsoft Office Roundtable, in mid 2007. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Roundtable v. Polycom October 23rd, 2006    Microsoft Office Roundtable v. PolycomMicrosoft is releasing a new hardware device, called Microsoft Office Roundtable, in mid 2007. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Recap2.0: les autres billets de la semaine de TechCrunch.com (21/28 oct. 06)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-309679</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Recap2.0: les autres billets de la semaine de TechCrunch.com (21/28 oct. 06)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-309679</guid>
		<description>[...] Vidéoconférence : Microsoft Office Roundtable contre Polycom. Lire le billet ici [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vidéoconférence : Microsoft Office Roundtable contre Polycom. Lire le billet ici [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailywireless.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco Telepresence</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-309596</link>
		<dc:creator>dailywireless.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco Telepresence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-309596</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft&#8217;s Office RoundTable is about 100 times cheaper. It provide a view of remote participants seated around a circular table and will cost around $3000 when it&#8217;s available in mid 2007. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft&#8217;s Office RoundTable is about 100 times cheaper. It provide a view of remote participants seated around a circular table and will cost around $3000 when it&#8217;s available in mid 2007. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embracing Chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-303558</link>
		<dc:creator>Embracing Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-303558</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google vs. Microsoft: MS Retreats to Hardware...&lt;/strong&gt;

A couple of recent product announcements out of Redmond have me thinking about the current big struggle in the software industry: GOOG vs MSFT. Frankly, GOOG is eating MSFT&#039;s lunch on the consumer software front. But MSFT still dominates in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google vs. Microsoft: MS Retreats to Hardware&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A couple of recent product announcements out of Redmond have me thinking about the current big struggle in the software industry: GOOG vs MSFT. Frankly, GOOG is eating MSFT&#8217;s lunch on the consumer software front. But MSFT still dominates in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-300174</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-300174</guid>
		<description>Guys, you have to think out of the VideoCon box here. 

I was at a presentation yesterday on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadstuff.com/archives/37-My-2nd-Life-on-Web-3.D.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2nd Life&lt;/a&gt; where an IBM guy said they were doing virtual Videocons on 2nd Life, and an amazing result was that the avatars were hanging around for water cooler conversations afterwards, which you don&#039;t get in a Videocon

Oh, and Frank....I was messing about with Citrix 10 years ago and ASP&#039;s 5 years ago. Fat, cheap broadband changes a *lot* of accepted corporate norms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, you have to think out of the VideoCon box here. </p>
<p>I was at a presentation yesterday on <a href="http://www.broadstuff.com/archives/37-My-2nd-Life-on-Web-3.D.html" rel="nofollow">2nd Life</a> where an IBM guy said they were doing virtual Videocons on 2nd Life, and an amazing result was that the avatars were hanging around for water cooler conversations afterwards, which you don&#8217;t get in a Videocon</p>
<p>Oh, and Frank&#8230;.I was messing about with Citrix 10 years ago and ASP&#8217;s 5 years ago. Fat, cheap broadband changes a *lot* of accepted corporate norms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Cefalu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-294055</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Cefalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-294055</guid>
		<description>km4 That is the dumbest comment I&#039;ve heard. You never been in a corporate office have you? Corporate Office Meetings YOUR ALREADY POSING and SHOWING! No one is there in shorts and picking their asses. Damn man. Go troll some other product. Your comments have no base. Join alanp on Skype.  

@alanp 14, there is reason for specialized products as they have a footing  and a real need. Cheap free services will not do. You evidently don&#039;t know the advantages of windows enterprise server, and a office interlinked with citrix.  Maybe we should also start getting payed 20,000 max pay as developers in  India do. This is silly Alan. Because you cannot see yourself using this product doesnt make it absolete. Instead think who may use this. Is there a market for this? Yes, absolutely!. I can name 30 products off the top of my head by IBM that are higher cost than this and are bought quite regularly.

Fact of the matter is that these comments are made out of ignorance with no basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>km4 That is the dumbest comment I&#8217;ve heard. You never been in a corporate office have you? Corporate Office Meetings YOUR ALREADY POSING and SHOWING! No one is there in shorts and picking their asses. Damn man. Go troll some other product. Your comments have no base. Join alanp on Skype.  </p>
<p>@alanp 14, there is reason for specialized products as they have a footing  and a real need. Cheap free services will not do. You evidently don&#8217;t know the advantages of windows enterprise server, and a office interlinked with citrix.  Maybe we should also start getting payed 20,000 max pay as developers in  India do. This is silly Alan. Because you cannot see yourself using this product doesnt make it absolete. Instead think who may use this. Is there a market for this? Yes, absolutely!. I can name 30 products off the top of my head by IBM that are higher cost than this and are bought quite regularly.</p>
<p>Fact of the matter is that these comments are made out of ignorance with no basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-293200</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-293200</guid>
		<description>@eas

...I was being tongue in cheek above, but with a serious message. Its all on the post in my blog (link in the post above) but in essence the 80/20 of webcon is fairly mundane small team meeting stuff - so why not do Web conf as a Web service using a &quot;free ride&quot; on existing gear rather than invest in a lot of specialised stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eas</p>
<p>&#8230;I was being tongue in cheek above, but with a serious message. Its all on the post in my blog (link in the post above) but in essence the 80/20 of webcon is fairly mundane small team meeting stuff &#8211; so why not do Web conf as a Web service using a &#8220;free ride&#8221; on existing gear rather than invest in a lot of specialised stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-292900</link>
		<dc:creator>eas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-292900</guid>
		<description>km4, people can&#039;t always be in the same room, and a phone call doesn&#039;t always do the job, especially if its a conference call where most of the participants are in a room together, but one or two people are remote.   Giving the remote participants a better way to keep track of who is saying what, and to whom, is likely to increace the value of remote conferencing.   

Perhaps there will be more grandstanding, but I kind of doubt it, especially if the remote participants can see that everyone in the room is shaking their heads in disgust while the monologue unwinds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>km4, people can&#8217;t always be in the same room, and a phone call doesn&#8217;t always do the job, especially if its a conference call where most of the participants are in a room together, but one or two people are remote.   Giving the remote participants a better way to keep track of who is saying what, and to whom, is likely to increace the value of remote conferencing.   </p>
<p>Perhaps there will be more grandstanding, but I kind of doubt it, especially if the remote participants can see that everyone in the room is shaking their heads in disgust while the monologue unwinds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km4</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-292279</link>
		<dc:creator>km4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-292279</guid>
		<description>correction: Now with “360-degree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction: Now with “360-degree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km4</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-292274</link>
		<dc:creator>km4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-292274</guid>
		<description>First the REAL value of videoconferencing is questionable sorta like having meetings without a real purpose or agenda..

How with “360-degree, panoramic video of side-by-side images of everyone who taking part in the conference,” there&#039;s more cause for &#039;posing and showing&#039; with less REAL work getting done.

Finally the best meetings are usually 1 on 1 or very few people in attendance. 

Do you really need Microsoft Office Roundtable for this ?

No !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the REAL value of videoconferencing is questionable sorta like having meetings without a real purpose or agenda..</p>
<p>How with “360-degree, panoramic video of side-by-side images of everyone who taking part in the conference,” there&#8217;s more cause for &#8216;posing and showing&#8217; with less REAL work getting done.</p>
<p>Finally the best meetings are usually 1 on 1 or very few people in attendance. </p>
<p>Do you really need Microsoft Office Roundtable for this ?</p>
<p>No !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-292006</link>
		<dc:creator>eas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-292006</guid>
		<description>I helped champion the first round of internal funding to get ringcam out of research and on track to become a commercial product, what, 4 years ago.  I&#039;ll be interested to see what the shipping product is like.  Somehow, I suspect all my favorite features will have been cut.

AlanP, a $30 webcam + &quot;some smart mashup work,&quot; really?  I kinda doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I helped champion the first round of internal funding to get ringcam out of research and on track to become a commercial product, what, 4 years ago.  I&#8217;ll be interested to see what the shipping product is like.  Somehow, I suspect all my favorite features will have been cut.</p>
<p>AlanP, a $30 webcam + &#8220;some smart mashup work,&#8221; really?  I kinda doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-291551</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-291551</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...mid 2007 for $3000 eh?

Alternatively, Webcam $30 + a bit of smart mashup work and a webservice.....VideoSkype for Biz anyone?

You read it &lt;a href=&quot;http://broadstuff.com/archives/35-VideoSkype.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; first.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;mid 2007 for $3000 eh?</p>
<p>Alternatively, Webcam $30 + a bit of smart mashup work and a webservice&#8230;..VideoSkype for Biz anyone?</p>
<p>You read it <a href="http://broadstuff.com/archives/35-VideoSkype.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> first.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 「Microsoft Office Roundtable」 vs Polycom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290966</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 「Microsoft Office Roundtable」 vs Polycom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290966</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  Microsoft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  Microsoft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotta Wonder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290838</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotta Wonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290838</guid>
		<description>Where have you guys been?  First saw Roundtable on this post way back in June.  

See the demo of the camera here:  http://www.humanproductivitylab.com/archive_blogs/2006/06/27/microsoft_announces_roundtable.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where have you guys been?  First saw Roundtable on this post way back in June.  </p>
<p>See the demo of the camera here:  <a href="http://www.humanproductivitylab.com/archive_blogs/2006/06/27/microsoft_announces_roundtable.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.humanproductivitylab.com/archive_blogs/2006/06/27/microsoft_announces_roundtable.php'>http://www.huma..._roundtable.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290626</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290626</guid>
		<description>Polycom has a strong resale deal with Cisco, so I don&#039;t see much of a threat.  Most likely, Polycom has something in the works too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polycom has a strong resale deal with Cisco, so I don&#8217;t see much of a threat.  Most likely, Polycom has something in the works too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines WEB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290442</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290442</guid>
		<description>__________________________________________________


As this technology becomes more Hi tech, it will revolutionize instant global business communication - (but bad news for the airline and hotel industry :-( ) 

Later on , it will become the latest plaything of young geeks, .....then, an innovative Web 2.0 firm will attempt to develop an online MySpace killer.

Then in about a decade-  ultimately - it will become 3D. :-)

The challange that microsoft is working on that will differentiate this from other technologies is the attempt to relate non-verbal communication, and the reflective vs. non-reflective sound and of course integration with Microsoft softwares.

But be absolutely  certain that Google will introduce a service as software version in about one year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>__________________________________________________</p>
<p>As this technology becomes more Hi tech, it will revolutionize instant global business communication &#8211; (but bad news for the airline and hotel industry <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  ) </p>
<p>Later on , it will become the latest plaything of young geeks, &#8230;..then, an innovative Web 2.0 firm will attempt to develop an online MySpace killer.</p>
<p>Then in about a decade-  ultimately &#8211; it will become 3D. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The challange that microsoft is working on that will differentiate this from other technologies is the attempt to relate non-verbal communication, and the reflective vs. non-reflective sound and of course integration with Microsoft softwares.</p>
<p>But be absolutely  certain that Google will introduce a service as software version in about one year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fear uncertainty doubt generation engine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Office Roundtable and Polycom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290441</link>
		<dc:creator>fear uncertainty doubt generation engine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Office Roundtable and Polycom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290441</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gerbyshak</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290329</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gerbyshak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290329</guid>
		<description>Awesome tool. This is the first I&#039;ve seen of it. I think this would be a great tool for virtual coaches too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome tool. This is the first I&#8217;ve seen of it. I think this would be a great tool for virtual coaches too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290259</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290259</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s another company called Be Here that&#039;s doing something similar with its product TotalView.  TotalView launched at DEMOfall last month and purports to be cheaper than Microsoft&#039;s solution.  You can see Rafe Needlman&#039;s introduction at DEMO at: 
http://news.com.com/1606-2_3-6121527.htm?tag=ne.video.6120357</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another company called Be Here that&#8217;s doing something similar with its product TotalView.  TotalView launched at DEMOfall last month and purports to be cheaper than Microsoft&#8217;s solution.  You can see Rafe Needlman&#8217;s introduction at DEMO at:<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/1606-2_3-6121527.htm?tag=ne.video.6120357" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://news.com.com/1606-2_3-6121527.htm?tag=ne.video.6120357'>http://news.com...e.video.6120357</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Zafra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290235</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Zafra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290235</guid>
		<description>This stuff integrates alot of their currently existing technologies. I cant imagine what the administration overhead will be with all of this integration. Very cool stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff integrates alot of their currently existing technologies. I cant imagine what the administration overhead will be with all of this integration. Very cool stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne lambright</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290100</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne lambright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290100</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is totaly cool.  If they need beta testers put me on the list :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is totaly cool.  If they need beta testers put me on the list <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolnalu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/comment-page-1/#comment-290099</link>
		<dc:creator>coolnalu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-office-roundtable-v-polycom/#comment-290099</guid>
		<description>Ah...I sit in the corner on purpose, why do you pull me to the front?

How would it be displayed on the other side though? They need 360 degree surrounding screen too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;I sit in the corner on purpose, why do you pull me to the front?</p>
<p>How would it be displayed on the other side though? They need 360 degree surrounding screen too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
