<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Announces Support for Open ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Live Sex Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-1544390</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Sex Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-1544390</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Live Sex Entertainment ...&lt;/strong&gt;

Cool site. And a lot of usefull info....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Live Sex Entertainment &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Cool site. And a lot of usefull info&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jilles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-771049</link>
		<dc:creator>Jilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-771049</guid>
		<description>Technorati doesn't really get it: I need to sign up with them to be able to use my existing openid?! WTF! The whole point of openid is to never, ever, ever need to sign up for anything again! As long as you can't sign in with an openid account to technorati they are not supporting it really.

Clearly, I won't sign up with them. The minute they properly support openid, I'll happily use mine on their site as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati doesn&#8217;t really get it: I need to sign up with them to be able to use my existing openid?! WTF! The whole point of openid is to never, ever, ever need to sign up for anything again! As long as you can&#8217;t sign in with an openid account to technorati they are not supporting it really.</p>
<p>Clearly, I won&#8217;t sign up with them. The minute they properly support openid, I&#8217;ll happily use mine on their site as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellame</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-768607</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-768607</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bistrovtop.9999mb.com/buy-phentermine.html " rel="nofollow"&gt;buy phentermine&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bistrovtop.9999mb.com/buy-phentermine.html " rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/bistrovtop.9999mb.com');">buy phentermine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trish stratus topless</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-551957</link>
		<dc:creator>trish stratus topless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-551957</guid>
		<description>trish stratus topless

http://myblog.es/trish-stratus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trish stratus topless</p>
<p><a href="http://myblog.es/trish-stratus" rel="nofollow">http://myblog.es/trish-stratus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tera Patrick Anal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-530296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tera Patrick Anal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-530296</guid>
		<description>Tera Patrick Anal

http://myblog.es/tera-patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tera Patrick Anal</p>
<p><a href="http://myblog.es/tera-patrick" rel="nofollow">http://myblog.es/tera-patrick</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenID in the news at protocol7</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-289751</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenID in the news at protocol7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-289751</guid>
		<description>[...] Some exciting&#160;news on OpenID adoption the last couple of days (for me anyways). First of, Technorati is now supporting OpenID for claiming your blog with more stuff coming soon. The Techcrunch article about Technorati also mentions that the big players are participating in discussions on OpenID. I think it would make perfect sense for someone like Google or Yahoo do like Verisign and start providing OpenID identies to their already existing users. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some exciting&nbsp;news on OpenID adoption the last couple of days (for me anyways). First of, Technorati is now supporting OpenID for claiming your blog with more stuff coming soon. The Techcrunch article about Technorati also mentions that the big players are participating in discussions on OpenID. I think it would make perfect sense for someone like Google or Yahoo do like Verisign and start providing OpenID identies to their already existing users. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-283187</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-283187</guid>
		<description>It's quite frustrating having so many identity solutions, but we decided to try Yahoo! BBauth because of the huge user base that Yahoo has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite frustrating having so many identity solutions, but we decided to try Yahoo! BBauth because of the huge user base that Yahoo has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282833</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282833</guid>
		<description>David:
I think Dick Hardt sums it up really well in his video available here.
http://www.identity20.com/ or http://www.sxip.com

Mike Arrington: 
Check out Sxip's Score product to combat Wordpress spam.

Rob Ellis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:<br />
I think Dick Hardt sums it up really well in his video available here.<br />
<a href="http://www.identity20.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.identity20.com/</a> or <a href="http://www.sxip.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sxip.com</a></p>
<p>Mike Arrington:<br />
Check out Sxip&#8217;s Score product to combat Wordpress spam.</p>
<p>Rob Ellis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282661</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282661</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit confused as to why this is needed???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit confused as to why this is needed???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitendra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282418</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea...I hope this leads to bigger adoption of the opedID. Kudos to technorati for this step to support the user centered identity movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea&#8230;I hope this leads to bigger adoption of the opedID. Kudos to technorati for this step to support the user centered identity movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuneyt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282235</link>
		<dc:creator>cuneyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282235</guid>
		<description>Ahh, this problem domain again.  I definintely support OpenID, but I would picture, as Adam Fisk pointed out, that OpenID not grow beyond a low level protocol. I envision Google, Yahoo, et al. providing value add services on top of the OpenID standard, that would enable engineers at startups to avoid repetitive tasks such as user registration, authentication and profile management. This is more than just Yahoo's SSO, we're talking about custom, extensible profiles and group management necessary to create your own applications. And in return, providing these services will reduce development times and costs associated with aquiring and integrating the startup into the existing corporate codebase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, this problem domain again.  I definintely support OpenID, but I would picture, as Adam Fisk pointed out, that OpenID not grow beyond a low level protocol. I envision Google, Yahoo, et al. providing value add services on top of the OpenID standard, that would enable engineers at startups to avoid repetitive tasks such as user registration, authentication and profile management. This is more than just Yahoo&#8217;s SSO, we&#8217;re talking about custom, extensible profiles and group management necessary to create your own applications. And in return, providing these services will reduce development times and costs associated with aquiring and integrating the startup into the existing corporate codebase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Balfour</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282170</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Balfour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282170</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is suppose to be launching new CardPass service with Vista that will attempt the universal login problem again.  I think that an open source platform will fair better then a company who is trying to capitalize on universal login.  Either way this concept requires universal adoption by the largest internet players (Google, Yahoo, etc.) in order to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is suppose to be launching new CardPass service with Vista that will attempt the universal login problem again.  I think that an open source platform will fair better then a company who is trying to capitalize on universal login.  Either way this concept requires universal adoption by the largest internet players (Google, Yahoo, etc.) in order to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282099</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282099</guid>
		<description>hmm ... kinda cool i guess that way i can have one id for everything...but this might cause other problems for search engines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm &#8230; kinda cool i guess that way i can have one id for everything&#8230;but this might cause other problems for search engines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fisk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282052</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-282052</guid>
		<description>I'm a big supporter of the Open ID movement.  The details of the protocol aren't easily understandable on the first read, but this is largely an issue of improving the documentation.  For me, improved documentation and tutorials are the single most important piece of accelerating Open ID adoption.

There's clearly a lot of confusion about Open ID at the moment.  The key is this:  one ID you can use at all supporting sites where you control who keeps track of your ID.  The rest is just protocol details -- those are the confusing part.

Oh, and take it easy on the "leverage" comment.  What's the point?  If you don't have anything insightful to say about the ideas, please don't resort to pompous and *trendy* discussion of what the acceptable buzz-verbs of the day are.  You lose credibility by even bringing it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big supporter of the Open ID movement.  The details of the protocol aren&#8217;t easily understandable on the first read, but this is largely an issue of improving the documentation.  For me, improved documentation and tutorials are the single most important piece of accelerating Open ID adoption.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s clearly a lot of confusion about Open ID at the moment.  The key is this:  one ID you can use at all supporting sites where you control who keeps track of your ID.  The rest is just protocol details &#8212; those are the confusing part.</p>
<p>Oh, and take it easy on the &#8220;leverage&#8221; comment.  What&#8217;s the point?  If you don&#8217;t have anything insightful to say about the ideas, please don&#8217;t resort to pompous and *trendy* discussion of what the acceptable buzz-verbs of the day are.  You lose credibility by even bringing it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281967</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281967</guid>
		<description>The implementation or use of OpenID just confuses me.  I have still not worked out how it actually works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The implementation or use of OpenID just confuses me.  I have still not worked out how it actually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281686</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281686</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.neohide.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;OpenID&lt;/a&gt;? That's good. In that case, users do not have to have multiple IDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neohide.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.neohide.com');">OpenID</a>? That&#8217;s good. In that case, users do not have to have multiple IDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati lets you claim your blog with OpenID at The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281496</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati lets you claim your blog with OpenID at The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281496</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more at the Technorati blog, and over at TechCrunch where I first came across this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at the Technorati blog, and over at TechCrunch where I first came across this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281328</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281328</guid>
		<description>There are multiple sites where you can store your identity (see wikipedia article, section "OpenID URL registrars"). This is another advantage of this protocol, i.e. there is noone that 'owns' it, unlike what happens in Passport. I am personally much more confident in this protocol exactly for this reason.

As more and more web based services come online, a simpler way of signing up/logging in with a single profile is absolutely a must. Today you login to your Windows/Linux desktop only once, and then use all sorts of applications from multiple vendors. If "web 2.0" wants to replace or mimick the desktop, it must provide the same simplicity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are multiple sites where you can store your identity (see wikipedia article, section &#8220;OpenID URL registrars&#8221;). This is another advantage of this protocol, i.e. there is noone that &#8216;owns&#8217; it, unlike what happens in Passport. I am personally much more confident in this protocol exactly for this reason.</p>
<p>As more and more web based services come online, a simpler way of signing up/logging in with a single profile is absolutely a must. Today you login to your Windows/Linux desktop only once, and then use all sorts of applications from multiple vendors. If &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; wants to replace or mimick the desktop, it must provide the same simplicity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281324</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281324</guid>
		<description>This is good news but when are the other big players going to adopt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news but when are the other big players going to adopt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startups.in/India</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281291</link>
		<dc:creator>Startups.in/India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281291</guid>
		<description>Boris, you might want to check out
http://getopenid.com/
http://openidtag.com/action/signup/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boris, you might want to check out<br />
<a href="http://getopenid.com/" rel="nofollow">http://getopenid.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://openidtag.com/action/signup/" rel="nofollow">http://openidtag.com/action/signup/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281283</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281283</guid>
		<description>Is there a standard OpenID website where everybody goes to get their own OpenID or doesn't it work like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a standard OpenID website where everybody goes to get their own OpenID or doesn&#8217;t it work like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startups.in/India</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281282</link>
		<dc:creator>Startups.in/India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281282</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ian. But what did you mean by "...using 'my' page." Probably, I should just RTFM. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian. But what did you mean by &#8220;&#8230;using &#8216;my&#8217; page.&#8221; Probably, I should just RTFM. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati Announces Support for Open ID &#124; j4s0n Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281183</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati Announces Support for Open ID &#124; j4s0n Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281183</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog search engine Technorati announced tonight that bloggers will now be able to claim ownership of their blogs with Open ID credentials and that more work in support of Open ID is on the way. Open ID is a secure means of identification that offers cross-site single log-in, user control of our own data and potentially a whole lot more.read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog search engine Technorati announced tonight that bloggers will now be able to claim ownership of their blogs with Open ID credentials and that more work in support of Open ID is on the way. Open ID is a secure means of identification that offers cross-site single log-in, user control of our own data and potentially a whole lot more.read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281181</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281181</guid>
		<description>Startups.in/India  - Given how OpenID works, choosing an identity provider shouldn't really be a concern. Yes, you can have multiple identities. However, OpenID binds your identity to a page that bears the identity provider specifics;  when you authenticate with it, you're using *your* page.

Justin - Technorati's goal is to experiment with simply lowering the barrier for user identification. We feel that OpenID's system of using a URL to identify a person is very powerful. Is it too early to embrace distributed identity? Perhaps, but we're betting that the risks of moving with the evolution of OpenID are lower than the risks of not trying at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Startups.in/India  - Given how OpenID works, choosing an identity provider shouldn&#8217;t really be a concern. Yes, you can have multiple identities. However, OpenID binds your identity to a page that bears the identity provider specifics;  when you authenticate with it, you&#8217;re using *your* page.</p>
<p>Justin - Technorati&#8217;s goal is to experiment with simply lowering the barrier for user identification. We feel that OpenID&#8217;s system of using a URL to identify a person is very powerful. Is it too early to embrace distributed identity? Perhaps, but we&#8217;re betting that the risks of moving with the evolution of OpenID are lower than the risks of not trying at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Technorati、Open IDのサポートを発表</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281180</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Technorati、Open IDのサポートを発表</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/#comment-281180</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  Technorati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  Technorati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.094 seconds -->
