<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phanfare Says Rich Internet Applications Are Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 40 Terabytes More Data For Amazon S3</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-1496857</link>
		<dc:creator>40 Terabytes More Data For Amazon S3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-1496857</guid>
		<description>[...] Phanfare, which stores a lot of user generated media, announced today that they are in the process of moving [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phanfare, which stores a lot of user generated media, announced today that they are in the process of moving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Gopal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-364062</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Gopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-364062</guid>
		<description>I agree with Trevor,

Sorry, Marshall, but this is NOT a review. The "desktop client works well" wouldn't earn more than a B- to a student in my class, you certainly can do better than publishing one-sided reviews not even mentioning Flickr, Fotki,  Pbase, Smugmug, Webshots and others to compare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Trevor,</p>
<p>Sorry, Marshall, but this is NOT a review. The &#8220;desktop client works well&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t earn more than a B- to a student in my class, you certainly can do better than publishing one-sided reviews not even mentioning Flickr, Fotki,  Pbase, Smugmug, Webshots and others to compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Phanfare、リッチ・インターネット・アプリケーションこそがベストなサービス</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270801</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Phanfare、リッチ・インターネット・アプリケーションこそがベストなサービス</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270801</guid>
		<description>[...] ［原文へ］  Phanfare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ［原文へ］  Phanfare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270778</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270778</guid>
		<description>Trevor, the company didn't frame its release this way - I did.  This particular photo sharing and storage app works fine, like I said - the desktop client works quite well in fact.  What I find interesting is just what I wrote about, the fact that this - like a growing number of things - works best on the web and on the desktop together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor, the company didn&#8217;t frame its release this way - I did.  This particular photo sharing and storage app works fine, like I said - the desktop client works quite well in fact.  What I find interesting is just what I wrote about, the fact that this - like a growing number of things - works best on the web and on the desktop together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270670</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270670</guid>
		<description>Do a real review Marshall! This reads as a barely digested version of whatever pitch 'myphanfare' sent you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a real review Marshall! This reads as a barely digested version of whatever pitch &#8216;myphanfare&#8217; sent you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Derricott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270603</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Derricott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270603</guid>
		<description>My company has been working on a client's software project for over a year now and it's interesting to see the evolution of the project over time. It started out as a desktop app that made use of a lot of web services hosted on a central server but the app is now fully web-based. The main driving force for the change was to ease deployment and maintence for the customers. The other factor was the realization by our client that his customers didn't need some of the intensive desktop processing (image manipulation) that he'd previously thought. Definitely seems to be a blurry line between the desktop and the web these days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has been working on a client&#8217;s software project for over a year now and it&#8217;s interesting to see the evolution of the project over time. It started out as a desktop app that made use of a lot of web services hosted on a central server but the app is now fully web-based. The main driving force for the change was to ease deployment and maintence for the customers. The other factor was the realization by our client that his customers didn&#8217;t need some of the intensive desktop processing (image manipulation) that he&#8217;d previously thought. Definitely seems to be a blurry line between the desktop and the web these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank, myphanfare, 7 Minutes with Rex Dixon aftershow notes &#171; Technically Speaking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270468</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank, myphanfare, 7 Minutes with Rex Dixon aftershow notes &#171; Technically Speaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 01:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270468</guid>
		<description>[...] Phanfare is a new photo, video storage service. How many of these are out there anyways? Read the TechCrunch article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phanfare is a new photo, video storage service. How many of these are out there anyways? Read the TechCrunch article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startups.in/India</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270432</link>
		<dc:creator>Startups.in/India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/16/phanfare-says-rich-internet-applications-are-best/#comment-270432</guid>
		<description>For a moment thought they are same as the http://fanfaregroup.com/ . :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a moment thought they are same as the <a href="http://fanfaregroup.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fanfaregroup.com/</a> . <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.071 seconds -->
