<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Presents Code Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:43:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sneakers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2954941</link>
		<dc:creator>Sneakers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2954941</guid>
		<description>A good tool ,Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good tool ,Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2923792</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2923792</guid>
		<description>Joinme to find a better Tool  :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joinme to find a better Tool  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2923789</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2923789</guid>
		<description>Is there any better place to find the code tool ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any better place to find the code tool ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Sneakers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2804435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Sneakers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2804435</guid>
		<description>Thanks Very Much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Very Much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cntradeus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2794996</link>
		<dc:creator>cntradeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2794996</guid>
		<description>Good Tools , i realy like it .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Tools , i realy like it .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordans</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2752312</link>
		<dc:creator>jordans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2752312</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a good tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Now Displaying Code Search Results &#124; Alex McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2410956</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Now Displaying Code Search Results &#124; Alex McFarlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2410956</guid>
		<description>[...] has integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Code Search &#124; blog ex machina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2407948</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Code Search &#124; blog ex machina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2407948</guid>
		<description>[...] this has been present for months, in fact, it started the year 2006. So what? I just learned it today. I don&#8217;t surf the Net that much because I used to work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this has been present for months, in fact, it started the year 2006. So what? I just learned it today. I don&#8217;t surf the Net that much because I used to work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Now Displaying Code Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2407818</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Now Displaying Code Search Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2407818</guid>
		<description>[...] has integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Now Displaying Code Search Results</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-2407815</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Now Displaying Code Search Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-2407815</guid>
		<description>[...] have integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have integrated results from Code Search as snippets in the main search results page. Code Search was launched by Google in October of 2005 as a seperate vertical search property. As the name suggests, Code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Transcription</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-1179204</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Transcription</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-1179204</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Medical Transcription...&lt;/strong&gt;

Fast Medical Help!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Medical Transcription&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Fast Medical Help!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-1027638</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-1027638</guid>
		<description>Have you heard of http://merobase.com? Another cool code search engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard of <a href="http://merobase.com?" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://merobase.com?'>http://merobase.com?</a> Another cool code search engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OLIVE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AllTheCode Launches New Code Search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-894053</link>
		<dc:creator>OLIVE &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AllTheCode Launches New Code Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-894053</guid>
		<description>[...] AllTheCode have today launched a new code search engine which has joined a group of existing solutions including site such as Krugle, Koders and Google Code Search, no less. We previously wrote about the state of code search in a post about the then new Google Code Search, and we pointed out that in our own tests that none of the sites seemed to return adequate results. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AllTheCode have today launched a new code search engine which has joined a group of existing solutions including site such as Krugle, Koders and Google Code Search, no less. We previously wrote about the state of code search in a post about the then new Google Code Search, and we pointed out that in our own tests that none of the sites seemed to return adequate results. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Pandas &#187; Archive &#187; Google Code Search Vs Krugle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-572504</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Pandas &#187; Archive &#187; Google Code Search Vs Krugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-572504</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch about Google Code Search… I did a comparison between Google Code Search and Krugle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch about Google Code Search… I did a comparison between Google Code Search and Krugle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Startup du jour: Krugle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-2/#comment-457468</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Startup du jour: Krugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-457468</guid>
		<description>[...] There have been some relatively cursory reviews of Krugle vs Google Code vs Koders, but these miss the point that raw search is not all that Krugle serves up. For instance, when I searched for &#8220;MD5&#8243; as the above reviewer did, I also looked at the &#8216;tech pages&#8217; tab and the &#8216;projects&#8217; tab. Together with the code tab there was far more useful information than when I did the same on Google Code, which had just a bunch of header file with the text md5 in them, and at www.koders.com, where I did get some project results on the side, but when I dug deeper I found the UI far less conducive to workflow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There have been some relatively cursory reviews of Krugle vs Google Code vs Koders, but these miss the point that raw search is not all that Krugle serves up. For instance, when I searched for &#8220;MD5&#8243; as the above reviewer did, I also looked at the &#8216;tech pages&#8217; tab and the &#8216;projects&#8217; tab. Together with the code tab there was far more useful information than when I did the same on Google Code, which had just a bunch of header file with the text md5 in them, and at <a href="http://www.koders.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.koders.com'>http://www.koders.com</a>, where I did get some project results on the side, but when I dug deeper I found the UI far less conducive to workflow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suresh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-388885</link>
		<dc:creator>suresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-388885</guid>
		<description>search the code for finite automata implementation in ruby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>search the code for finite automata implementation in ruby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krugle Blog &#187; Semantic Code Search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-298804</link>
		<dc:creator>Krugle Blog &#187; Semantic Code Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-298804</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, Nik Cubrilovic at TechCrunch blogged about his test of Google vs. Krugle and Koders. He was hoping to find an implementation of the MD5 hash algorithm in C. His summary? One problem here is that the search engines don’t actually know you are looking for a simple implementation of md5, they are just string-matching against their indexes so you get some very poor results (such as functions that call an MD5 library). Across the 3 search engines, I could not find a good, pure MD5 implementation – just a lot of header files and functions that had the string ‘md5’ within them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, Nik Cubrilovic at TechCrunch blogged about his test of Google vs. Krugle and Koders. He was hoping to find an implementation of the MD5 hash algorithm in C. His summary? One problem here is that the search engines don’t actually know you are looking for a simple implementation of md5, they are just string-matching against their indexes so you get some very poor results (such as functions that call an MD5 library). Across the 3 search engines, I could not find a good, pure MD5 implementation – just a lot of header files and functions that had the string ‘md5’ within them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-281448</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-281448</guid>
		<description>@cbmeeks
Try to find something like 

public class Stack {
  public void push(int i) {}
  public int pop() {}
}

with normal Google. Google&#039;s codesearch seems to make it possible with regex. It&#039;s not possible with Krugle and Koders? Merobase does search this directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cbmeeks<br />
Try to find something like </p>
<p>public class Stack {<br />
  public void push(int i) {}<br />
  public int pop() {}<br />
}</p>
<p>with normal Google. Google&#8217;s codesearch seems to make it possible with regex. It&#8217;s not possible with Krugle and Koders? Merobase does search this directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbmeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-278775</link>
		<dc:creator>cbmeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-278775</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see what the benefit is to code search.  What does it provide that normal Google doesn&#039;t?

cbmeeks
http://www.codershangout.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see what the benefit is to code search.  What does it provide that normal Google doesn&#8217;t?</p>
<p>cbmeeks<br />
<a href="http://www.codershangout.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.codershangout.com'>http://www.codershangout.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-266893</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-266893</guid>
		<description>Have you heard of http://merobase.com? Another cool code search engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard of <a href="http://merobase.com?" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://merobase.com?'>http://merobase.com?</a> Another cool code search engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kankan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-252466</link>
		<dc:creator>kankan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-252466</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s really a good tool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s really a good tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techrageo.us &#187; Google Code Search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-251052</link>
		<dc:creator>techrageo.us &#187; Google Code Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-251052</guid>
		<description>[...] Seen here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Seen here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aibek Esengulov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-249136</link>
		<dc:creator>Aibek Esengulov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 06:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-249136</guid>
		<description>I agree with Craig Ogg, it seems that this engine produces more productive results when you rather specify querries same to regular expressions as you would in an actual program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Craig Ogg, it seems that this engine produces more productive results when you rather specify querries same to regular expressions as you would in an actual program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Ogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-248956</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Ogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 03:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-248956</guid>
		<description>Given that it is a search engine intended for coders it is actually pretty easy to find what you are looking for using the regexp syntax (and correcting your search term to use the correct way to specify programming language):

^int\s+md5 lang:c file:.c$

This will return only .c files (no header files) and does a decent job of returning only function calls (though it picks up some variable declarations).  The problem you were having is a familiar problem to C programs trying to find where a function is defined rather than its declaration or calls to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that it is a search engine intended for coders it is actually pretty easy to find what you are looking for using the regexp syntax (and correcting your search term to use the correct way to specify programming language):</p>
<p>^int\s+md5 lang:c file:.c$</p>
<p>This will return only .c files (no header files) and does a decent job of returning only function calls (though it picks up some variable declarations).  The problem you were having is a familiar problem to C programs trying to find where a function is defined rather than its declaration or calls to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond Caffeine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangers of Google Code Search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/comment-page-1/#comment-247954</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond Caffeine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangers of Google Code Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/05/google-presents-code-search/#comment-247954</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of days Google announced it&#8217;s new Code Search. Soon after that announcement people were talking about the new release, and they still are, but not in a good way. While Google Code Search provides a great avenue for programmers to search, dangers were immediately seen in the search results. At this point - those results are far too revealing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of days Google announced it&#8217;s new Code Search. Soon after that announcement people were talking about the new release, and they still are, but not in a good way. While Google Code Search provides a great avenue for programmers to search, dangers were immediately seen in the search results. At this point &#8211; those results are far too revealing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
