When photo slide show sharing service FilmLoop launched one year ago, Michael Arrington said it was going to be a winner. One year later the company will launch a new version this month that lets users add text, picture-in-picture and graphic “tattoos”. Filmloop began as a desktop application only, but last month added the ability to embed image slide shows in web pages and and launch a full page view in any browser with a click. The fact that the company faces competition from Slide, RockYou, BubbleShare and probably others could be a sign that this is a thriving market for slide show sharing. With the release of FilmLoop 2.0 impending, it could be a good time to look at some good news and some bad news about the company.
First, a slide show to demonstrate my personal use of the product.
The Good News
- Filmloop has powerful backing, it’s received more that $7 million in funding from investors like CommVentures and Guy Kawasaki’s Garage.com.
- The fact that multiple users are able to add photos to a shared slide show is an important differentiator.
- It’s easy to link each photo to an action when clicked, so the service is loved by many eBay sellers for example.
- The company reports that 42 million photos have been uploaded to its servers by more than 1 million registered users.
- It’s a very good thing that a desktop client is no longer required for viewing the slide shows.
- The company has distribution partnerships with NASCAR and Photobucket - you couldn’t ask for better partners than that.
- There’s a healthy list of global brand advertisers.
- The Windows desktop slide show builder has basic features that are relatively easy to work with.
- Sliding pictures are intuitively pleasing.
Consider the above before you roll your eyes at the thought of a photo slide show service getting big VC bucks. If YouTube is the poster child for a growing “clip culture,” that culture plus the ubiquity of camera phones and online self publishing all combine to make a slide show service a relatively serious media infrastructure play. Hard as that might have been to believe just a few short years ago.
The Bad News
The desktop client for Version 2.0 caused me a fair amount of pain to use. I wasn’t able to resize or change the color of the text on my captions or delete frames from a saved slide show and it took me some time to figure out how to edit a project I’d already saved. There are little things that bothered me, like that the slide show builder didn’t remember my prefered layout each time I left the display page to make changes to the contents. Hopefully by the time it launches the navigation and functionality can be improved, but the preview I saw of Scrapblog at DEMO was much more powerful and usable, if not as simple. They are different products but I feel like Scrapblog is a more appealing way to tweak and share photos.
It’s not clear why there’s a desktop presence at all, other than to push photos to the desktops of family and customers (for branding use). The company said when it launched that it would offer a Mac version in 2005 and that hasn’t happened.
There’s a catch 22 at work when the new version seeks to enable both embedding into web pages and the addition of relatively small graphic details. As you can see from my example above, the small items added to the basic photos are frustratingly unclear at a certain size. Click on that slide show for a full screen view and they look much better, but I think FilmLoop may be flirting with one of the basic boundaries of the medium. In order to be useful a widget has to be small, but it’s a real challenge to integrate a full frame photo and any number of small elements in such a small space. After working with it for awhile I feel like this is less of a problem than I did at first, but I do want to keep a limit on the space I give any widget on a website.
I think this is a strong company even though the market is crowded with photo slide show services. There’s more good news here than bad by a long shot. Many of the changes in Version 2.0 are much needed, but I hope that the graphics and text adding features come out of the gate at launch stronger than they are today.









“could be a sign that this is a thriving market for slide show sharing.”
Or could be a sign that this is an oversaturated market for slide show sharing.
“The company has distribution partnerships with NASCAR and Photobucket -you couldn’t ask for better partners than that. There’s a healthy list of global brand advertisers.”
They’re only good partners and advertisers if they generate notable revenues. I don’t see what value FilmLoop really brings to the table over competing services. I would not be surprised if some of these deals generated little to no revenue. They look good on paper, but I just don’t see anybody being willing to spend a significant amount of money for a slide show service.
“I think this is a strong company even though the market is crowded with photo slide show services.”
How can one determine that a company is “strong” when you don’t know its revenues, when it is likely not profitable, when it is reliant on VC money and when it is competing in a highly-saturated market where its technology is commoditized and can easily be replicated?
I, too, question the statement that Filmloop is strong. In fact, I think FilmLoop is probably dead. The looplets won’t load, there is zero response from customer support, and almost all of the loops on their own website return an error message. If they’re not dead, they’re circling the bowl…
I can’t comment on if they are strong or not… but I think that they have some possibility.
First - I’ve found FilmLoop farily easy to use. I’ve played with the other services listed and found them less intuitive for me. Just looking at the RockYou site makes me want to leave and not come back.
Second - I don’t think that they have really marketed to the right people… or sites. They have the services to allow a “insert your niche” company to display on their site both a headline and a picture that could draw audiences into the content. This would mean that they have to skip the “see it big” view and enable linking directly to the content… but that can be done.
Third - I think that they are sitting on the edge of a revenue sharing model in which they can enable sites to specify the type of ads that they want to have displayed and then share the ad dollars.
Finally - I don’t think that “personal use” is the driver for FilmLoop. It’s just way to easy to email pix or to use one of the “billion” other offerings for photo sharing. But having a user base that was using it for personal use enables them to tweak the offering and improve it for commercial applications.
I can come up with a dozen or so ways to utilize this service… but that will have to wait ’till I write it up at Marlin Creek.
Funny stuff on the slideshow..
An entire company just to scroll photos across your screen and get $7M in investor funding. It’s starting to look a lot like the 2000 days just before the dotcom crash.
Mac client is out since January’06 or so - just try going to download page from the Mac browser - http://www.filmloop.com/download/
See also
http://www.filmloop.com/help/using-mac
–igor
Just an update: FilmLoop beta is available for everyone now … at http://www.filmloop.com. Thanks!
FilmLoop is interesting. Flickr is sort of Unix where as FilmLoop is for everyone else. I really enjoy Guy’s books, Art of the Start, but I have not really figured out where this fits into all his own advice. Interesting. You can read a summary of the high level stuff at http://www.businessbookreview.com — just seems odd to me????